logo
Man jailed for role in Bristol's summer riots 'doesn't regret' attending protest

Man jailed for role in Bristol's summer riots 'doesn't regret' attending protest

ITV News19-05-2025

A man who was jailed for his part in the protests last summer has said he 'fundamentally regretted having altercations' but did not regret attending the demonstration.
Dan Lock, 32, from Kingswood, South Gloucestershire, pleaded guilty to violent disorder after attending a demonstration in Bristol on 3 August.
He was sentenced to two years in prison for his role in a 'violent situation' that unfolded outside a hotel housing asylum seekers in the city.
Now, having served six months of his sentence, Mr Lock has spoken to ITV News West Country about his decision to attend a planned 'Stop the Boats' protest in August last year.
Asked if he had regrets over what had happened, Dan said: 'I fundamentally regret having altercations with people, I should have dealt with it in a better way but I don't regret going down there, no.
'I firmly believe if you feel like you need to voice your opinion and you're worried about something then in this day and age there's nothing wrong with speaking out about it.'
The demonstration was one of more than 30 across the country that broke out following the murders of Alice da Silva Aguiar, Bebe King and Elsie Dot Stancombe in Southport.
Mr Lock is one of 48 to have been sentenced for his role in the Bristol unrest which began in Castle Park on 3 August 2024 before moving across Bristol Bridge, with a group ending up outside the Mercure Hotel.
Prior to the protest, the self-employed electrician had been of previously good character and a court heard had never been inside a police station before.
Reflecting on what happened that day he said: 'I went down there just to see what was going on really. It was a peaceful protest as far as I was aware.
'As time went on things started to get a bit more aggressive from both sides. Missiles were getting thrown, bottles of urine - from both sides.'
Asked why he went, he said: 'I do firmly believe in Stop the Boats. I firmly believe in that. I feel like we are being overran.
'The country hasn't got much funding as it is and we're spending a lot of money on housing illegal immigrants at the minute.
'Money that could be spent on many other things - transport, my grandparents have just had their winter fuel cut, they've had their winter fuel payments taken away from them and we're housing illegal immigrants - spending billions and billions on it, I just don't see the logic in it at all.'
Many asylum seekers are currently being housed in temporary accommodation, such as hotels.
People are not illegal immigrants unless they have had an asylum claim refused and they remain in the country regardless.
Mr Lock said he had hit a member of the 'anti-protest' after they had spat at him and allegedly called him a Nazi.
Sentencing him at Bristol Crown Court for the altercation, Judge Michael Cullum said: 'You assisted and led in what became a violent situation, quite clearly you were intent in leading from the front row.
'That was entirely out of character, I don't know what it was about that situation that led you to behave to those people in a way that's very different to how you have previously acted to other people.'
Mr Lock said during and following the protests people automatically assumed that he was racist, a far right supporter or a member of the English Defence League.
Reflecting on his arrest he said: 'I was spat at. That's what initially started it, someone spat at me and called me a Nazi.
'Because I'm white and I'm bald, do I fit the agenda of someone who is being a Nazi and a racist?'
He added: 'There were some people that were down there to specifically cause trouble, there's no doubt about that.
'But, you can't brandish everyone - just because people are walking around with an England flag - you can't brandish them all racists and far right.'
Mr Lock said he regretted how the protest had panned out as it had had a 'major' impact on his life.
'I never thought I'd go to prison. Ever. I've never been involved in that sort of life,' he said.
'In later life I've always wanted to move to Australia, settle down in Australia - that's off the cards now because of what I've done.
'It's had a major impact on my life - I've been branded a racist, which I'm not.
'I've been branded far right, EDL, my girlfriend received threats, minor threats, but threats because of what happened.'
He said that people should not feel sorry for him and that he did not feel sorry for himself but that he was now working on rebuilding his life.
He said: 'It's a daunting period for me, it's a period that I'm not going to forget for a long, long, long time.
'Since I've come out life is just kind of back to normal. I'm keeping my head down and just trying to rebuild on the time that I've lost and the finances I've lost from being away.
Asked if he sees violence erupting again, he responded: 'No, no, not with the sentences and the way that people like myself were treated, no.
'I think people would be ridiculous to do something like that. I for one lost six months of my life. I wouldn't go down there again.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The BBC's Israel problem
The BBC's Israel problem

Spectator

time3 hours ago

  • Spectator

The BBC's Israel problem

Intrepidly, the BBC dared recently to visit Dover, Delaware – source, it implied, of starvation in Gaza. I listened carefully as its State Department correspondent, Tom Bateman, hunted down the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in the state which, he explained, is 'a corporate haven for those who like privacy'. Brave Tom did not find much, but that only proved to him that 'The main ingredients of this aid are its politics'. The foundation's chairman says he is a Christian Zionist which, for the BBC, is almost as bad as saying you are a neo-Nazi. The portentousness aside, it is reasonable to ask tricky questions of the American/Israeli organisation which claims it can solve aid in Gaza. The BBC's problem is that it would never, ever apply its investigative zeal to the cartel currently responsible for the aid that seems not to get through. When has it ever doorstepped the UNWRA operatives who moonlight for Hamas? When has it ever challenged the political 'ingredients' of UN agencies as they heap abuse on Israel and stay respectfully silent about Hamas? When has it complained that Hamas does not answer its calls? Perhaps Hamas does answer, welcoming the BBC's trusting approach. The Office of Rail and Road has noticed that our railway system comes down too hard on the innocent. Yes. The weekend before last, about to return from Newcastle, I found I had lost my ticket. I went to the ticket office, bearing my complete receipt, which even included my seat reservation. The man was pleasant, but said there was no way I could have a free new ticket or even an eventual refund. So I had to pay £133 (nearly £50 more than I had already paid) to travel. Approaching the train, I noticed that the barrier was open. Boarding, I found the computer seat reservations had all gone down. Alighting at King's Cross, I realised that no guard had checked my ticket on the journey and that the barriers were open and unmanned. So if I had 'cheated', I would have been unmolested but because I had owned up, I was out of pocket. Obviously this all started with my carelessness, but why can rail companies treat one as guilty until proven innocent though English law says the opposite? I spoke twice in Oxford last week to highly intelligent, mainly undergraduate audiences. The atmosphere reminded me of 1980s secret meetings of dissidents behind the Iron Curtain arranged by British intellectuals, such as Roger Scruton, who were smuggled in. One encountered young people who feared discovery but showed a touching belief in the life of the mind as they thirsted for freedom in the desert of enforced conformity. For the sake of their careers, I shall not reveal who my audiences were. From one attendee, I learnt that in Mods, the first half of the Oxford four-year Classics degree, one no longer studies Virgil or Homer. Instead, the only compulsory texts are Terence and Plautus. This is like reading theology without studying the Old or New Testaments (which, come to think of it, is probably now commonplace). Are there any subjects, outside the liberal arts, in which each generation is encouraged to know less than the previous one? Are there physics degrees which drop quantum theory, or maths ones without calculus? We have contrived a culture in which universities grow, yet knowledge shrinks. As a graduate of Cambridge, I am depressed by my university's decision to open up the Chancellorship to all of us. We always felt smug about Oxford's beauty contest between superannuated politicians. Ours was uncontested. Now we have to endure a dingier version of the Oxford rhodomontade. The Chancellor of Cambridge should not strike attitudes or take sides, as a vote compels. He or she should be unspeakably grand/rich/disinterested. For many years, the late Duke of Edinburgh held the post, faction-free, because he was married to the then Queen, had a mind of his own and had never been to a university. After Prince Philip, our Chancellor was Lord Sainsbury of Turville, a blamelessly benevolent prince of commerce. Now there are ten candidates, all with 'statements' staking their claims. Gina Miller, the eurofanatic, wishes to 'affirm Cambridge's commitment to modernity and equality'. Sandi Toksvig, the television personality, says she speaks up for 'equity, inclusion, rewilding, sustainability and tackling online bias'. We don't want someone who speaks up. Why can't we have the present Duke of Edinburgh, alumnus of Jesus College, who gives diligent public service and will therefore remain silent? There are a great many stories about ransomware and the damage it causes. Presumably these attacks happen mainly because the businesses attacked pay the ransom. One never reads about this, or how criminals get away with the money. If a business pays, is it acting legally? If a public limited company pays a ransom, could shareholders sue? If, on the contrary, it is argued that paying the ransom is good for shareholders, could they sue a company that refused to pay? Friends tell me – and I believe them – that Chloe Dalton's new book Raising Hare is excellent. It does not automatically follow that she is right to call for a new law to impose a close season on hare-culling. The patchy shortage of hares (in some places, the fields are teeming with them) is not attributable to shooting but to habitat loss, vermin and European Brown Hare Syndrome. Besides, as is so often the case when people itch to legislate, there is a relevant law already. Under the Hares Preservation Act 1892, it is an offence to sell, or expose for sale, any hare or leveret between the months of March and July inclusive. Hares may only be sold if shot between 1 August and the last day of February. There is therefore no commercial incentive to orphan a hare in the breeding season.

Some French Tesla drivers file lawsuit over harm allegedly caused by Musk's behaviour
Some French Tesla drivers file lawsuit over harm allegedly caused by Musk's behaviour

Reuters

time15 hours ago

  • Reuters

Some French Tesla drivers file lawsuit over harm allegedly caused by Musk's behaviour

PARIS, June 11 (Reuters) - A small group of Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab owners in France is suing the carmaker run by Elon Musk, alleging its vehicles have become "far-right totems" that are harming their reputation, the law firm representing the group said on Wednesday. The group is seeking to terminate their lease contracts and recover legal costs at the Paris Commercial Court, citing the "direct and concrete" harm caused by Musk's public behaviour after he rallied in support of Donald Trump's presidential bid and Germany's far-right AfD party. The group has launched the action against a backdrop of plummeting Tesla sales in core European markets including France, Britain, Germany and Italy, in some cases in protest at Musk's political activities and as customers favour Chinese electric vehicles because of their competitive prices. "Tesla vehicles have become powerful political symbols and are now perceived as true far-right 'totems,' much to the dismay of those who purchased them solely as innovative and eco-friendly vehicles", the plaintiffs' lawyers Patrick Klugman and Ivan Terel at law firm GKA said in a statement. Tesla Europe did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment. GKA said about 10 Tesla leaseholders had joined the lawsuit. Musk helped bankroll Trump's presidential campaign and spearheaded Trump's efforts to cut federal jobs and slash what the administration perceived as wasteful public spending. Musk's involvement in the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) saw him become a political lightning rod, fueling protests and vandalism at Tesla showrooms in the United States and Europe. The GKA statement referred to a hand gesture by the billionaire during Trump's inauguration celebrations that drew online comparisons to a Nazi salute as an example of his harmful behaviour. Musk dismissed the criticism of the gesture as a "tired" attack. Musk said on Wednesday he regretted some of the remarks he made on social media platform X, which he owns, during an acrimonious and very public falling out with Trump last week.

R Kelly's lawyers accuse prison officials of ‘soliciting inmate to kill him'
R Kelly's lawyers accuse prison officials of ‘soliciting inmate to kill him'

Metro

timea day ago

  • Metro

R Kelly's lawyers accuse prison officials of ‘soliciting inmate to kill him'

R Kelly's lawyers are fighting to get him released from jail after claiming his life is in danger. The American singer and producer, real name Robert Sylvester Kelly, was once credited as 'the King of R&B', releasing 18 albums and having over 75 million albums and singles, as well as working on albums by Michael Jackson, Britney Spears, Whitney Houston, Mariah Carey, Justin Bieber and Mary J. Blige. He won Grammy, Billboard and American Music Awards, but his career abruptly ended in 2019 following his arrest and subsequent sentencing for racketeering and sex trafficking charges involving the sexual abuse of minors. Kelly, 58, is currently serving a 31-year combined sentence at a prison in North Carolina. However, his legal team have now filed an emergency motion calling from his immediate release from federal custody to home detention. In a filing made on Tuesday, reviewed by Variety, his attorney Beau B. Brindley claims that the team had 'explicit evidence that officials solicited an inmate to murder him while in custody'. His counsel provided a sworn declaration from Mikeal Glenn Stine, a terminally ill inmate, who said that officials 'offered him freedom in his final days in exchange for Kelly's murder'. Stine, a member of the neo-Nazi prison gang Aryan Brotherhood, claimed that he was told Kelly and his attorneys were planning to expose damaging information, as with the filing alleging that officials violated attorney-client privilege by intercepting personal correspondence. He also stated that officials told him he would be charged with Kelly's murder, but that evidence would be mishandled and there would be no conviction. After arriving at Kelly's unit in March, Stine said he was prepared to kill the rapper but changed his mind and ended up telling the rapper that 'Bureau of Prisons officials directed him to carry out his murder'. Kelly's lawyers have claimed that last month they were told a second member of the Aryan Brotherhood who was told by officials to kill both Kelly and Stine. They have said Kelly is in danger remaining in custody with other members of the Brotherhood. 'The threat to Mr. Kelly's life continues each day that no action is taken,' they wrote in the filing. 'More A.B. members are accumulating at his facility. More than one has already been approached about carrying out his murder. 'One of them will surely do what Mr. Stine has not, thereby burying the truth about what happened in this case along with Robert Kelly.' More Trending In 2023 Kelly was sentenced to 20 years in prison for child sex crimes in Chicago while already serving a 30-year prison sentence over sex trafficking and racketeering charges in New York. The judge ruled he could serve 19 years at the same time, meaning the child sex crimes only added one year to his existing sentence. His convictions included three counts of coercing minors into sexual activity and three of producing sex tapes involving a minor. Metro has contacted the U.S. Attorney's Office for comment. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Taylor Swift fans convinced she's secretly married Travis Kelce MORE: It's been 20 years since Brad Pitt 'left' Jennifer Aniston for Angelina Jolie – have we learned anything? MORE: Beyoncé giving away free concert tickets to London shows after 'poor sales'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store