The Daily T: Why has Trump changed his mind on Russia?
The President has announced that the US will resume the supply of weapons, via Nato, and also threatened 100pc tariffs on Russia if a deal isn't done. He also later told the BBC that he was 'disappointed' in Putin.
Camilla and Tim speak to former economic advisor to Donald Trump, Carla Sands, who blames 'weak and flabby militaries throughout Europe' and a 'feckless' Joe Biden for the current situation in Ukraine, and believes Trump will get a deal despite Putin not being an 'honest broker'.
Elsewhere, Camilla and Tim speak to Conservative MP James Cleverly, who was making a speech in Central London about countering the rise of Reform, and ask him if he's on manoeuvres for a leadership run.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump says Indonesia to pay 19% tariffs, buy 50 Boeing jets under trade deal
US President Donald Trump says he has struck a trade pact with Indonesia resulting in significant purchase commitments from the south-east Asian country, after negotiations to avoid steeper tariffs. Indonesian goods entering the United States would face a 19% tariff, Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform. This is significantly below the 32% level the president earlier threatened. 'As part of the Agreement, Indonesia has committed to purchasing $15 Billion Dollars in US Energy, $4.5 Billion Dollars in American Agricultural Products, and 50 Boeing Jets, many of them 777's,' Trump wrote. Boeing shares closed down 0.2% after the announcement. 'They are going to pay 19% and we are going to pay nothing … we will have full access into Indonesia, and we have a couple of those deals that are going to be announced,' Trump said outside the Oval Office earlier. Indonesia's total trade with the US – totalling just under $40bn in 2024 – does not rank in the top 15, but it has been growing. US exports to Indonesia rose 3.7% last year, while imports from there were up 4.8%, leaving the US with a goods trade deficit of nearly $18bn. The Trump administration has been under pressure to wrap up trade pacts after promising a flurry of deals recently, as countries sought talks with Washington to avoid the US president's tariff plans. But Trump has so far only unveiled other deals with Britain and Vietnam, alongside an agreement to temporarily lower tit-for-tat levies with China. Last week, Trump renewed his threat of a 32% levy on Indonesian goods, saying in a letter to the country's leadership that this would take effect 1 August. It remains unclear when the lower tariff level announced on Tuesday will take effect for Indonesia. The period over which its various purchases will take place was also not specified. Trump said on social media that under the deal, which was finalised after he spoke with Indonesian president Prabowo Subianto, goods that have been transshipped to avoid higher duties would face steeper levies. He separately told reporters that other deals were in the works, including with India, while talks with the European Union are continuing. Indonesia's former vice minister for foreign affairs, Dino Patti Djalal, told a Foreign Policy event Tuesday that government insiders had indicated they were happy with the new deal. Trump in April imposed a 10% tariff on almost all trading partners, while announcing plans to eventually hike this level for dozens of economies, including the EU and Indonesia. But days before the steeper duties, customised to each economy, were due to take effect, he pushed the deadline back from 9 July to 1 August. This marked his second postponement of the elevated levies. Instead, since early last week, Trump has been sending letters to partners, setting out the tariff levels they would face come August. So far, he has sent more than 20 such letters including to the EU, Japan, South Korea and Malaysia. Trump has unveiled blanket tariffs on trading partners in part to address what his administration deems as unfair practices that hurt US businesses. Agence France-Presse and Reuters contributed to this report
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on the children of Gaza: when 17,000 die, it's more than a mistake
On Sunday, an Israeli strike killed six Palestinian children – and four adults – as they queued for water in a refugee camp. The deaths of children may be the most terrible part of any war. It is not only the suffering of the innocent and powerless, and the unimaginable pain of surviving parents – as dreadful as those are – but the knowledge of lives ended when they had barely begun, of futures that should have stretched long into the distance severed in an instant. As shocking as Sunday's deaths were, they are commonplace in Gaza: a classroom-worth of children have been killed each day since the war began. What marked them out was that so many deaths happened at once and publicly; and that Israel's military felt obliged to acknowledge its responsibility – though without any great contrition. It claimed that a 'technical error with the munition' caused it to miss its intended target and added that it 'regrets any harm to uninvolved civilians'. What does this bloodless, bureaucratic language have to do with the bloody deaths of six already traumatised children? These deaths were not a mistake. They were a tragedy – like those of the 10 children killed days before, as they queued outside a clinic. The Israeli military said, again, that it regretted any harm to civilians. And yet the bodies of children pile up. Children killed as they sheltered in former schools; children killed as they fled Israeli forces; children killed as they slept at home. Gaza's ministry of health says that more than 17,000 of the 58,000 Palestinians killed are children. Israel says that it seeks to minimise harm to civilians. The death toll belies that and Israeli intelligence sources told reporters last year that at times they were permitted to kill up to 20 civilians to take out even junior militants – with the preference being to attack targets when they were at home, because it was easier. Those six thirsty children should not have needed to queue for water due to what the UN calls a human-made drought. Human Rights Watch believes that thousands of Palestinians have died due to Israel's deliberate pattern of actions to deprive them of water, which it alleges amounts to the crime against humanity of extermination as well as acts of genocide. Those 10 hungry children should not have required nutritional supplements, but Israel continues to choke off aid and civilians are starving. Unrwa says that a tenth of the children screened in their clinics are malnourished. Tens of thousands of children have been seriously injured; many are amputees. As of February last year, around 17,000 had been identified as unaccompanied or separated from their families. The very young are among those least able to cope with hunger and disease. How many will survive this conflict? How many will be able to remain in Gaza? How many will be able to live anything like a normal life one day? How many will see only vengeance or despair ahead of them? Meanwhile, Israeli parents call for the hostage release and ceasefire deal that must end this conflict, and which Benjamin Netanyahu has resisted. Allies, including the EU and Britain, remain complicit in this war. They should ask themselves what they would do if their children faced for even one day what those in Gaza have endured for month after month. The children of Gaza have the same rights as children anywhere – to water, to food, to shelter, to education, to play, to hope, to joy. To life. Yet on Sunday, Israel killed Abdullah Yasser Ahmed, Badr al-Din Qarman, Siraj Khaled Ibrahim, Ibrahim Ashraf Abu Urayban, Karam Ashraf al-Ghussein and Lana Ashraf al-Ghussein. They were children. They were loved. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Europeans open to buying US arms for Ukraine under Trump plan but need details
BRUSSELS, July 15 (Reuters) - Several European countries said on Tuesday they were willing to buy U.S. arms for Ukraine under a scheme announced by U.S. President Donald Trump, although arrangements still needed to be worked out. Trump said on Monday that Washington will supply Patriot air defence systems, missiles and other weaponry to Ukraine for its war against Russia's invasion and that the arms would be paid for by other NATO countries. But much remains undisclosed, including the amounts and precise types of weapons to be provided, how quickly they would be supplied and how they would be paid for. U.S. officials have suggested that European countries will be willing to give up some of their own stocks of weapons for Ukraine and then buy replacements from the United States. But some of the countries involved say they still don't even know what is being asked of them. Such a move would get weapons to Ukraine more quickly but would leave donor countries' defences more exposed until new systems are ready. "We are ready to participate. Of course we can't do it on our own, we need others to partner up – but we have a readiness,' Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen told reporters in Brussels on Tuesday ahead of a meeting of European Union ministers. Speaking alongside Trump at the White House on Monday, NATO chief Mark Rutte said that Germany, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Canada want to be part of the new initiative. Many of those countries have been among the biggest military aid donors to Ukraine, either overall or per capita. Asked whether Denmark could give U.S. arms from its own stocks as part of the scheme, Rasmussen said: 'We don't have these kind of systems – the Patriot systems – so if we should lean in, and we are absolutely ready to do so, it will be (with) money and we have to work out the details.' European ministers said they would now need to examine how new purchases of U.S. weapons could be paid for. In many cases, that seems likely to involve countries teaming up to buy U.S. weapons systems. "Now we need to see how together we can go in and finance, among other things, Patriots, which they plan to send to Ukraine," Sweden's Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard told Swedish radio. In Brussels, Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp said his country is looking into the plan 'with a positive inclination'. Asked about the scheme, Norwegian Defence Minister Tore Sandvik told Reuters that Oslo was 'in close dialogue with Ukraine' on military aid and 'air defence remains a high priority for Ukraine and for the Norwegian military support'. 'Norway has contributed to significant amounts of air defence for Ukraine, including co-financing the donation of a Patriot system and missiles,' he said. The Finnish Defence Ministry said Helsinki 'will continue to provide material support to Ukraine'. "The details of the U.S. initiative ... are not yet known and we are interested to hear more about them before we can take more concrete lines on this issue,' it said.
