New study makes exciting revelation about health advantages of certain diets: 'Substantial nutritional ... benefits'
A new study published in Nature reveals that adopting a plant-rich or vegan diet offers serious benefits for both personal health and the environment.
Researchers in Iceland compared the health and environmental impacts of vegan and omnivorous diets. They found that individuals following a plant-based diet not only met more nutritional recommendations, but also decreased their carbon footprint as a result of avoiding meat-production-related pollution.
However, both groups showed room for improvement in fully meeting dietary recommendations.
While plant-rich diets have long been associated with health benefits, few studies have directly compared vegan diets to omnivorous ones, until now.
The research team analyzed dietary data from 651 omnivores and 68 vegans in Iceland, discovering that the vegan group's diet produced 50% less planet-warming pollution, had nine times higher fiber compliance, and consumed less saturated fat than the meat and dairy consumers.
"Our results also indicate that in our omnivore population a shift towards a more plant-rich diet without eliminating all foods of animal origin could lead to substantial nutritional and environmental benefits," the study concluded.
Another recent study from Harvard Health Publishing involving identical twins found that those on a vegan diet had significantly lower LDL cholesterol and insulin levels, and lost about four pounds — all in just eight weeks.
Even if you're not interested in going vegan, these findings suggest that transitioning to a plant-forward diet can have meaningful effects on both short- and long-term health.
In addition to personal wellness, the environmental impact is substantial. Meat and dairy production are leading contributors to planet-warming emissions, excessive water use, and land degradation globally.
According to the Environmental Protection Agency, agriculture is the top source of methane and nitrous oxide pollution in the U.S., largely stemming from livestock and factory farming. Reducing reliance on animal products, even just a few days a week, can help shrink your environmental impact and support a healthier food system.
Why do you eat plant-based foods?
The health benefits
It's cheaper
It's good for the planet
I prefer the taste
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
One Reddit user shared their takeaways from the data: "None of this is surprising, but it's interesting to see studied. I wonder if the gap between vegans and omnivores in [the U.S.] is even bigger due to our factory farm processes."
"Only 5% of omnivores are eating enough fiber?? Yikes," another user added. "No wonder colorectal cancers are on the rise."
Another commenter noted how interesting it was that vegans were closer to meeting macronutrient requirements: "I suspect this is because it's a very conscious dietary choice and is more often actually planned," they said. "Fiber and fats almost take care of themselves."
Join our free newsletter for easy tips to save more and waste less, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
These moths use stars to navigate, just like humans
If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. We've long known that some animals depend on the Sun to navigate the world. However, new research may have uncovered the first insect we know of that does the same using the stars and night sky. The stars have long been a navigational tool for humans. For instance, think of the North Star. However, we've never discovered any insects that use them the same way we do. At least not before the bogong moth. According to new research published this year, these moths actually rely on the stars the same way that humans do. Each spring, these moths travel more than 600 miles using the stars as their guide. The journey is an important one for the moths, which rely on the cool climate of the Australian Alps to keep them safe from the obtrusive summer heat. Today's Top Deals Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 The thing about bogong moths is that these insects have never traveled to the mountains before they make their yearly migration. This isn't a path that they take every year of their lives. Many of these insects only live a matter of days or weeks. So, there had to be some way for them to get where they were meant to be. The only answer researchers could reach was stellar navigation. As I noted above, this form of navigation has been a mainstay in human travels for centuries. It's one of the primary ways that sailors used to navigate the high seas, and without any kind of land to mark the horizon, being able to tell which way you were traveling just from looking up was extremely important. And in the Australian outback, where the bogong moths live, one of the most prominent landmarks is the Milky Way. So, it makes sense that these insects might rely on such a prominent figure in the sky to get them around the world. But a theory can only go so far. To truly test it, researchers had to capture some of the insects and put them through some tests. To test that they actually rely on the stars and not Earth's magnetic field, the researchers did everything they could to negate the force of Earth's magnetic field. This allowed them to see that bogong moths do indeed rely on the stars in the night sky to see where they're going. The researchers hope that by learning more about how these insects get around, it could help with conservation efforts in the future. For now, knowing that some animals and insects rely on the stars can help us look deeper into the animal kingdom for others that do the same. It can also help us better understand how light pollution, which continues to get worse, might affect these creatures. More Top Deals Amazon gift card deals, offers & coupons 2025: Get $2,000+ free See the
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
See the lifelike face of a Stone Age hunter-gatherer woman, revealed thanks to ancient DNA
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Researchers and artists have created a striking facial reconstruction of a Stone Age woman who lived roughly 10,500 years ago in what is now Belgium. The detailed depiction of the prehistoric hunter-gatherer, known as the "Margaux woman," is based on various scientific data, including the remains of her skeleton and ancient DNA, according to a statement from Ghent University in Belgium. The reconstruction — which was produced by the university's interdisciplinary Regional Outlook on Ancient Migration (ROAM) project, in collaboration with Dutch artists and twin brothers Adrie and Alfons Kennis — reveals an intriguing set of features. ROAM research has indicated that the hunter-gatherer likely had blue or light eyes and a surprising "medium-toned" skin complexion, project leader Isabelle De Groote, a professor in the Department of Archaeology at Ghent University, told Live Science in an email. This skin tone appears to be slightly lighter than that of most other Western European individuals from the Mesolithic period (or Middle Stone Age) that scientists have studied so far. Related: 45 amazing facial reconstructions, from Stone Age shamans to King Tut Comparing her to other individuals who lived in roughly the same time period, such as the iconic Cheddar Man from England, reveals this "subtle but important" difference that highlights the variation already present in post-ice age Western Europe, De Groote said. "The skin pigmentation of the Margaux woman points to greater complexity of skin pigmentation within these populations and that it was more heterogenous than previously thought." Cheddar Man belonged to the same Western European hunter-gatherer population as the Margaux woman, according to the statement. Previous research has suggested that he also had blue eyes, although his skin complexion is thought to have been slightly darker. Other members of this hunter-gatherer population shared a similar combination of dark skin and pale eyes. The remains of the female hunter-gatherer first came to light in 1988 during an excavation of the Margaux cave near Dinant, in Belgium's Meuse Valley region. At the time, the genetic analysis techniques that informed the new reconstruction were not research team first scanned the woman's skull and created a 3D-printed reproduction, De Groote said. The Kennis brothers then used this printed version to model the muscle and skin of the head. They did this using anatomical standards for the region while taking into account the age of the woman. Based on features of her skull, the researchers estimated that she would have been between 35 and 60 years old when she died. RELATED STORIES —Neanderthal woman's face brought to life in stunning reconstruction —Most ancient Europeans had dark skin, eyes and hair up until 3,000 years ago, new research finds —Stunning reconstruction reveals warrior and his weapons from 4,000-year-old burial in Siberia The team deduced her potential eye color and skin complexion using ancient DNA extracted from parts of her skull. They also considered the effect of suntanning to re-create her skin color, given that she likely lived a mobile, outdoor lifestyle. Although facial reconstructions such as these can provide a fascinating window into the distant past, some elements are open to interpretation. "Actual skin tone and eye colour is difficult to discern," De Groote said. "There is no exact answer in ancient DNA."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Playing God are Building Human DNA From the Ground Up
Biological science has made such astonishing leaps in the last few decades, such as precise gene editing, that scientists are now tackling the next logical — yet inherently controversial — step: fabricating human DNA from the ground up. Details are a bit vague, but a team of scientists in the United Kingdom have embarked on a new project to construct what they describe in a statement as the "first synthetic human chromosome." The scientists hope that the five-year Synthetic Human Genome project will result in better understanding of the essential building blocks that make human life possible and find clues to cure diseases and debilitating genetic conditions — so it's not like they are trying to make life from nothing like God, a well-used plot line in lots of science fiction movies. "The ability to synthesize large genomes, including genomes for human cells, may transform our understanding of genome biology and profoundly alter the horizons of biotechnology and medicine," said Jason Chin, a biology professor at Oxford University and one of the project leads. The medical non-profit, Wellcome Trust, is kicking in an initial $13.7 million for the project, which builds on the successfully completed project to map the entire human genome, which Wellcome also funded, according to the BBC. Making synthetic genomes isn't an entirely novel endeavor. Back in 2010, scientists managed to make from scratch the whole genome of a simple bacterium, and then plugged its genetic material inside an empty cell of another bacterium, making something entirely new that they cleverly dubbed Synthia. Scientists have also synthesized viral and yeast cells in other research. But a human genome is an entirely different proposition. For one thing, it involves a vastly more complex organism than some bacteria. And two, ethical concerns abound. Any whiff of messing around with human DNA has the stink of designer babies and eugenics. Because of these concerns, the project has a social research component. "Over the next five years, the team will undertake a transdisciplinary and transcultural investigation into the socio-ethical, economic, and policy implications of synthesising human genomes," the statement on the research reads. That sentence does feel a bit vague — so we'll be closely watching this project to see how it plays out in more concrete terms. At the end of the five years, the project leaders hope they'll have a finished human chromosome. That will be a huge step for biological progress — but there will no doubt be many ethical questions to unpack. Starting with: what's the meaning of life, if we can make it ourselves? More on DNA: You Can Now Buy a Sample of Ozzy Osbourne's DNA in Twelve Easy Payments
