Lawyers: Department of Justice says Boeing won't be criminally liable in 737 Max crashes
Lawyers: Department of Justice says Boeing won't be criminally liable in 737 Max crashes
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Chinese airlines rejecting new Boeing jets over tariffs
Boeing has confirmed that its Chinese customers are refusing to take delivery of new jets as tariffs raise prices. Chief executive Kelly Ortberg said 'many' airlines in China now won't accept deliveries. Two 737 MAX jets which had been ferried to the country returned to the U.S.
More than six years after the crashes of two 737 Max jets that killed 346 people, lawyers for the families who lost loved ones said the U.S. Department of Justice informed them it apparently intends to drop all criminal charges against the airliner.
The lawyers said they learned of the DOJ's proposed intent to "back down from any criminal prosecution" and dismiss the case against Boeing during an online meeting May 16. Instead of pleading guilty, Boeing would receive a non-prosecution agreement.
The apparent agreement would halt a scheduled June 23 trial date for Boeing. The airliner faced charges it misled U.S. regulators about a crucial flight control system on the 737 MAX, its biggest-selling jet. The deal would need a judge's approval.
Paul Cassell, an attorney for the victims' families and a University of Utah law professor, said in a statement that the Justice Department "conveyed their preconceived idea that Boeing should be allowed to escape any real consequences for its deadly lies."
Cassell added that family members expressed outrage at the DOJ's proposed non-prosecution deal and urged the department to reject it. Cassell asked the DOJ if he could submit additional written arguments against this proposal, explaining the families' position by May 23. The DOJ responded that it would get back to the families.
"We hope that this bizarre plan will be rejected by the leadership of the Department," Cassell said. "If not – and if the Department moves to dismiss the case – we will strenuously object before Judge O'Connor."
The Justice Department and Boeing did not immediately respond to USA TODAY seeking comment.
The apparent decision comes as the families have pushed the Justice Department to hold Boeing accountable for the deaths. The airline manufacturer has paid billions in settlements resulting from Lion Air Flight 610, which killed 189 people in 2018, and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302, which killed 157 people in 2019. The crashes were caused by faulty flight control software issues just minutes after takeoff.
But Boeing has largely avoided criminal prosecution. Boeing reached a deal with the Justice Department regarding its criminal investigation in January 2021 and was placed on corporate probation.
However, federal prosecutors claimed Boeing violated the deal in 2024. The Justice Department said in a court filing that Boeing failed to "design, implement, and enforce a compliance and ethics program to prevent and detect violations of the U.S. fraud laws throughout its operations."
The government was weighing whether to pursue prosecution of Boeing, as lawyers representing families of the victims who died in the crash had hoped to see further action.
Victims' families and lawyers appalled by apparent DOJ decision against Boeing
The latest DOJ proposal with Boeing has left the victims' families frustrated and angry, their lawyers said. Sanjiv Singh, a lawyer representing the families of 16 victims in Lion Air Flight 610, said he is appalled by the decision.
"We view the current tentative NPA effectively as a 'slap on the wrist' dismissal equivalent, and as such, I find it appalling and morally repugnant that this is even a consideration," Singh said. "I am also appalled by the DOJ's professed fear of losing at trial against Boeing. In what Alice in Wonderland world does Boeing win at trial, given the facts we know."
Fatal flights: What we know about Boeing MAX 8 crashes in Ethiopia and Indonesia
Chris Moore of Canada whose 24-year-old daughter Danielle, was killed in the Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302, said in a statement, the case isn't about money.
"You have no humanity," Moore said. "It's about justice."
Cassell, a former federal judge who is representing the crash victims' families for free, said dismissing the case would "dishonor the memories of 346 victims, (whom) Boeing killed through its callous lies."
"We hope that Judge will use his recognized (authority) under federal law to reject (a) proposal like this that are clearly contrary to the public interest,' Cassell said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China expresses deep concern about Israel's attacks on Iran, urges de-escalation
BEIJING (Reuters) -China was deeply concerned about the Israeli attacks on Iran and urged de-escalation for regional peace and stability, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson said on Friday. "China opposes any infringement upon Iran's sovereignty, security and territorial integrity, and opposes any escalation of tensions and expansion of conflicts. A sudden rise in regional tensions is not in the interests of any party," Spokesperson Lin Jian told a regular press briefing. Lin also said China was ready to play a constructive role in easing the situation. Israel launched large-scale strikes against Iran on Friday, saying it was the start of a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran from building an atomic weapon. Iran promised a harsh response with Israel saying it was working to intercept about 100 drones launched towards its territory. Beijing and Tehran share friendly ties, supported by China's search for energy security through Iran's oil shipments and a wider strategy of increasing influence across the Middle East to rival the United States. Earlier on Friday, the Chinese embassies in Israel and Iran issued advisories to citizens warning of the "complex and severe" security situation in the two countries. The embassy in Tel Aviv also warned those in Israel to prepare for possible missile, rocket and drone attacks.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
The only trade certainty is uncertainty
The latest U.S. trade deal with China may let the economy take a brief breather, but it's far from being able to relax. Why it matters: Months of real-time uncertainty are being replaced with longer-term uncertainty, with trade policy living on three-to-six-month cycles that make business planning a nightmare. The big picture: Tariffs are still in place, prices are still (at least anecdotally) rising, and deal deadlines with dozens of countries still loom over the summer. Stocks may have priced in the TACO ("Trump Always Chickens Out") trade, but that doesn't help companies planning their operations. So-called hard economic data — inflation, jobs — remains strong. But the anecdotes, the real-world commentary from businesses, are getting more negative by the month. "We have members now that the tariff alone will cause them to go bankrupt. The margins are so tight on their product that they can't pass the price on, and they get caught," Ross Perot Jr., the new chairman of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, told Axios this week. Indexes that measure trade policy uncertainty are almost literally off the charts, and surging again after a brief respite last month. Catch up quick: The U.S. and China agreed to a trade deal in Geneva in mid-May, which both sides almost immediately ignored. This week's London deal is supposed to cement actually implementing the May agreement, including faster Chinese approvals of rare earths exports and relaxed U.S. export controls on software and jet parts. Yes, but: The London deal was barely 12 hours old when the Wall Street Journal reported the Chinese would only approve the rare earths export licenses for six months at a time. For the makers of the hundreds of products with components that require rare earths, six months of certainty is an improvement — but also the start of an expensive race to stockpile parts before it all turns over again. Zoom in: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent moved the goalposts even further Wednesday, when he told a House panel it was " highly likely" the current pause on reciprocal tariffs would be extended for countries in talks. Hours later, President Trump told reporters he could extend the deadline if he wanted, but didn't think it was necessary, because the U.S. was getting ready to send out " take it or leave it" offers instead. What looked like a firm, universal July 8 deadline for dozens of countries now becomes a fungible, case-by-case affair. The intrigue: There's also the ongoing question of whether those tariffs are even legal or not. A federal court said no in late May, but an appellate court has stayed that ruling until at least the end of July. Administration officials say they have a Plan B if the courts ultimately strike down the current regime, raising the prospect of the global economy having to start over in the fall with a whole new program. By the numbers: The lingering uncertainty isn't really showing up in stocks, which remain near all-time highs, but the stress is unmistakable elsewhere. The U.S. Dollar Index, a basket of the dollar against other major currencies, has moved relentlessly lower even as stocks rallied. It remains the strongest example yet of the " sell America" trade that began in earnest in April, as investors seek safer havens elsewhere. "The US dollar remains a key barometer of trade sentiment, and its failure to extend higher in the wake of the so-called deal with China was telling. Now, it's under increased selling pressure once more, with the dollar index looking poised to hit a fresh 3-year low," Convera's lead currency and macro strategist George Vessey wrote Thursday morning. The bottom line: It's impossible to plan ahead with confidence in an economy like this.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows Where Hegseth Wants US Military on China's Doorstep
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. U.S. defense chief Pete Hegseth on Wednesday stressed the role of regional partners in the Pentagon's bid to counter an increasingly assertive China. "The Indo-Pacific is our priority theater, and China is our pacing threat,' he said while making the case for the defense budget requested by the Trump administration for the next fiscal year. Those words echoed his May 31 remarks at the Shangri-La Dialogue defense summit in Singapore, where he hailed examples of U.S. and allied military cooperation—including those illustrated on the Newsweek map below. Why It Matters China's rapid military buildup and competing territorial claims have strained ties with several neighbors, including U.S.-allied Philippines and Japan, both of which share defense treaties with Washington that could potentially draw American forces into a conflict. Chinese threats and increasing military activities around Taiwan, the island democracy Beijing claims as its territory, have further raised concerns. The tensions have driven some of China's neighbors to deepen military cooperation with the United States and one another. Newsweek contacted the Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C., for comment by email, but did not receive a response before publication time. What To Know In Singapore, Hegseth praised President Donald Trump's "America First" foreign policy while blaming former President Joe Biden for the U.S.-Mexico border crisis to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Yet, he added, "America First certainly does not mean America alone." Taking aim at what he called China's "destabilizing actions," Hegseth said the U.S. should be prepared for war, although deterring Chinese military aggression by raising its costs was preferable. "We're doing this here in the Indo-Pacific in three distinct ways: first, by improving our forward force posture. Second, by helping allies and partners strengthen their defense capabilities. And third, by rebuilding defense industrial bases," he told attendees. These efforts include deploying to the first island chain assets such as the U.S. Marine Corps' NMESIS high-precision anti-ship missile system to the Luzon Strait—a maritime choke point frequented by Chinese warships. A U.S. Army Mid-Range Capability, or Typhon missile system fires a Standard Missile-6 at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, on November 8, 2024. A U.S. Army Mid-Range Capability, or Typhon missile system fires a Standard Missile-6 at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, on November 8, 2024. The platform was delivered to the Philippines' far-northern Batanes province about 120 miles south of Taiwan. The deployment "enhanced our interoperability and improved our readiness on cutting-edge platforms, where we need them and when we need them," Hegseth said. The NMESIS missile system adds to the growing U.S. firepower in the Southeast Asian country. Last year, the U.S. deployed a U.S. Army Mid-Range Capability, also known as the Typhon missile launcher, to the Philippines ahead of joint military drills last spring. Philippine officials initially suggested the system would be removed after the drills, but later indicated it could remain indefinitely, irking officials in Beijing over the system's ability to reach China's eastern seaboard with weapons like as the Standard Missile-6 and the Tomahawk cruise missile. A second Typhon system will be deployed to AUKUS partner Australia this summer, where the U.S. Army plans to conduct its first-ever live-fire test of the system on foreign soil, Hegseth said. This year, Washington and Canberra also reached an agreement for Australia to produce 155-millimeter artillery rounds and assemble guided multiple-launch rocket systems, boosting Australia's potential as a force multiplier in the event of a conflict. Washington's efforts to deepen cooperation with Japan, a key Pacific security treaty ally, are also advancing, with upgrades to the joint headquarters of the U.S. Forces Japan. The move will increase deterrence and mark "progress the alliance has made toward improving interoperability and strengthening Japan's capabilities," Hegseth said. The changes, which began in April, will integrate U.S. land, air, sea, space and cyber forces under a single headquarters. There are currently over 50,000 active-duty American military personnel in Japan—the most stationed in any foreign country. The U.S. is also ramping up cooperation with India, one of the four Quad nations and a country that continues to experience friction with China along its disputed border regions in the Himalayas. The Pentagon is working with the South Asian country—an increasingly capable arms manufacturer—to "co-produce equipment needed to deter aggression, and this includes negotiating an agreement to bring our industrial bases ever closer," Hegseth said. Following February talks in Washington between Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the two leaders announced an "Autonomous Systems Industry Alliance" that will see the two countries co-develop and co-produce sea drones and counter-drone systems. What People Are Saying: Da Wei, director of the Center for International Security and Strategy at Beijing's Tsinghua University, told Newsweek:"What I want to stress is we are on the path to better relations with regional countries—so we don't need the U.S. to teach us." "I think Secretary Hegseth is kind of trying to [come] between China and regional countries. I don't think this will be successful." What's Next The House Appropriations Committee advanced the Pentagon's request for a base defense budget of $892.6 billion, lower than the $1 trillion figure previously pledged by Trump. That, along with a $150 billion reconciliation package providing additional funds for priority programs such as shipbuilding and munitions, is expected to pass in the overall congressional vote.
