&w=3840&q=100)
India-Pak clash spikes Asia Cup 2025 ad rates up to ₹16 lakh per 10 seconds
New Delhi
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Hyderabad gears up for Swadeshi, eco-friendly Ganesh Chaturthi with 1.4 lakh pandals
Hyderabad: The city is gearing up for a grand Ganesh Chaturthi, with over 1.4 lakh pandals set to come up this year. The Bhagyanagar Ganesh Utsav Samithi, now in its 46th year, has announced 'swadeshi' as the central theme of the celebrations. "Nearly Rs 1 lakh crore is spent annually on Ganesh Utsavs across the country. All the puja-related products should come from Goshalas and local manufacturers instead of imports," said R Shashidhar, general secretary of the Samithi and Vishwa Hindu Parishad national spokesperson. "Festivals like this must promote swadeshi and the spirit of Make in India." Along with swadeshi, the Samithi has added a patriotic dimension by dedicating this year's festivities to the 150th birth anniversary of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel. The celebrations will also highlight 'desh bhakti' and 'daiva bhakti', with a special focus on Operation Sindoor. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad | Gold Rates Today in Hyderabad | Silver Rates Today in Hyderabad Eco-friendly measures are being promoted, with more idols being made of clay each year. "We are trying to make city celebrations as green as possible," Shashidhar said. Immersion day is scheduled for Sept 6. Shashidhar explained, "There are 66 immersion points across the city. We are urging pandal organisers to finish immersions by late evening. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Rates Undo The main procession will begin at 11 am, reach the Sri Bhagya Laxmi temple by noon, MJ Market by 2 pm, and move towards Hussainsagar via Abids, Basheerbagh, and Liberty." The Khairatabad Ganesh, as always, will be immersed earlier in the day, by noon at NTR Ghat. This year's Khairatabad Ganesh Utsav Samithi, in its 71st year, will feature a 69-foot clay idol named Viswa Shanti Mahashakthi Ganesha. Flanked by Vasavi Kanyaka Parameswari Devi, Gaja Lakshmi, and Puri Jagannadh, the idol is being crafted over 90 days by 220 artisans, including 80 clay workers and 40 welders. Convenor Sandeep Raj said the organisers are committed to balancing grandeur with eco-friendly practices. "Earlier we used Plaster of Paris for the finish, but this year we switched to clay sourced from Gujarat. Nearly 1,000 bags of clay weighing 35 kg each have been brought in, along with 20 tonnes of iron for scaffolding and natural materials like paddy husk powder and water colours." Started in 1954, the Khairatabad Utsav has grown into one of Hyderabad's most iconic celebrations, drawing lakhs of devotees each year. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Trump's Tariff Threat Tests India-US Relations
Published : Aug 16, 2025 19:25 IST - 6 MINS READ There is a distinct souring of sentiment in the narrative across India's 24-hour news channels. A news anchor opens her piece with a sarcastic diatribe on how, if only Trump were president of the USA in the past, so much could have been avoided through history; the First World War, the Second World War, all of it. The screen behind her displays an image of the US president with the text 'Earth is spinning better, thank Trump!'. The title of this video op-ed piece is 'Why Trump Should Never Win the Nobel Peace Prize'. It is a marked departure from the rapturous reception a second Trump term got only nine months back. A statement released then by India's External Affairs Ministry described how the two leaders had reaffirmed their commitment to a mutually beneficial and trusted partnership and agreed to remain in touch and meet soon. Social media and news coverage were awash with praise both for this sweeping victory and the warm and cordial relations between Mr Trump and Mr Modi. President Trump's decision and threat to now impose a 50 per cent tariff by the end of August because of India's purchase of Russian oil has escalated a stand-off over trade and led to a spiral of news flow; the US will regret treating India this way, warns one piece; US-India relations are at their worst, bemoans another. The social media clarion has sounded—it is time to ditch American products and companies like McDonald's, Coca-Cola, Amazon; although how exactly that will be done remains unclear. All this unfolding while a fresh deadline to this hefty tariff clocks down. So much has changed in nine months. India has for now been steely in its response; but both choices present hard outcomes. Global commodity data shows India imported about 1.8 million barrels per day of Russian crude in the first half of the year, which is about 37 per cent of its total imports. Since 2023, India has been the biggest market for Russian crude, and between the two largest buyers of Russian crude, India and China, it is India that is clearly more dependent. According to data and analytics company Kpler, India imported 89 million tonnes (seaborne crude) last year, which was more than China's import. Switching crude oil varieties and buyers is neither going to be easy nor practical for India's refineries, aside from the fact that it also threatens to ratchet up prices. Also Read | America's melting ice cube and other tariff fairy tales On the flip side, the collateral damage of a 50 per cent tariff slap will be large. There are a number of export-oriented industries that are already feeling jittery; textiles, for one, the gems and jewellery sector, another, where the US makes up 30 per cent of its exports. Many export-oriented industries are in fact also labour-intensive industries, and a hit to their fortunes will have a massive knock-on effect on jobs. The list of vulnerable companies includes the big gun, Reliance Industries, which signed a 10-year contract to buy nearly 5,00,000 barrels a day of crude from Russia's state-owned Rosneft, making it the biggest-ever energy agreement between the two nations. Reliance has been exporting its refined products to both Europe and North America. A breakdown in ties with Western countries will mean significant changes in its business and perhaps its profitability in the months to come. India's domestic advantage with a large consumer market has been pointed to, but whichever way you cut it, a tariff hike of this quantum will see economic damage and dented investor sentiment for the country. There are counter-arguments to the possibility of a grim reset in Indo-US ties. One, that this will be yet another flip-flop by the US President, where a resolution of some sort will be cobbled together before the end of August, which is the deadline set by him. Two, that the two countries are now intertwined across too human and financial capital strands; Indian tech firms have long been present in America's industry through its services and its engineers. Money now flows both ways through venture capital and significant equity market exposure. Ripping all that apart will take more than tariff sabre-rattling. All or some of this may prove to be true. But there are also two clear questions here that need to be reckoned with. India was used to being the 'pick me' candidate when it came to China, where there was tactical and strategic advantage in building strong relations with India to offset China's growing strength in the region. Many nations, the US included, are having a rethink about that approach. China is no longer taboo, and India is no longer the counterfoil to China's regional dominance. Worse yet is the distinct turn in relations between the US and India's other neighbour, Pakistan. What started with a rather embarrassing display of cornering credit, President Trump claimed he was the one to put a stop to an imminent war between India and Pakistan—a claim that has been consistently repeated while speaking on the subject. While Indian diplomatic channels frantically tried to belie that take, Pakistan not only concurred with the US President's statement, it went on to nominate Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. Relations between the US and Pakistan have been on the upswing since then, ranging from private lunches with Pakistan's top military brass and talks about potentially boosting trade and commercial ties. It has left the Indian government with egg on its face and a disgruntled domestic mood. India and Pakistan, to America's mind are now firmly re-hyphenated. Also Read | Modi's foreign policy in shreds as non-alignment becomes multi-alignment How did it all turn sour so quickly when the singular narrative so far has been Prime Minister Modi's outstanding personal equation with Trump—from walking out hand in hand to address a rally in Houston, Texas a few years ago, to what is now being termed the lowest point in Indo-US ties in many decades; the 'great friendship' has not yielded any joy on economic ties. Perhaps the first lesson then is when policies—foreign, national, or economic—are built around personalities rather than nations, egos tend to get in the way. Especially when there is a domestic fan base that has been cheering the 'strongman' approach to cater to. There is also a view that this could be the moment India dives into structural reforms. In other words, this will be the catalyst for the great reset. As we wait on that outcome to emerge, it gives rise to the second question: Was that not the plan with the 'Make in India' campaign launched a decade ago? What has gone so sorely wrong ten years into its launch, where is the performance audit on the promised nation-building initiatives, the manufacturing thrust, more jobs for more people? This present round of tariff threats and ultimatums could go in any direction. Frankly, it does not even matter. The economic ground is shifting beneath the feet of both leaders. Time to see who has feet of clay. Mitali Mukherjee is the Director of the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. She is a political economy journalist with more than two decades of experience in TV, print and digital journalism. Mitali has co-founded two start-ups that focussed on civil society and financial literacy and her key areas of interest are gender and climate change.
India Today
5 hours ago
- India Today
BCCI introduces injury replacement rule in domestic cricket, will ICC follow suit?
The BCCI (Board of Control for Cricket in India) has brought in a revolutionary change in its playing conditions for domestic cricket, introducing a provision for 'serious injury replacements' in multi-day tournaments for the upcoming season. There have been widespread discussions about the need for a law to allow replacements for players who face serious injuries during a match in the aftermath of the recently concluded five-match Test series between India and the fourth Test of the series, India wicketkeeper batter Rishabh Pant fractured his toe and couldn't participate any further in the game. On the other hand, England all-rounder Chris Woakes injured his shoulder while fielding during the fifth Test and was ruled out of the match. While the ICC is yet to work on any such provision for international cricket, the BCCI has introduced a new set to laws to bring about a revolutionary per the rule, any player who sustains an injury due to an external blow within the playing area and cannot participate further in the match, can be allowed a like-for-like replacement by the match referee. "If a player sustains a serious injury during the course of the relevant match, a Serious Injury Replacement may be permitted in the following circumstances. The serious injury must have been sustained during play and within the playing area described in clause 1.2.5.2. The injury must have occurred due to an external blow and result in fracture/deep cut/ dislocation etc,' stated the newly-introduced rule communicated to the state associations."The injury should render player unavailable for remainder of the match. Identify the requested Serious Injury Replacement, who shall be a like-for-like replacement for the player who has sustained the serious injury,' the rule rule will be applied in multi-day matches of senior and junior domestic tournaments and is set to make its debut in Duleep Trophy from August 28 and Under-19 CK Nayudu Trophy. Recently, both India and England camps were asked about the need for injury replacements in cricket during the Test series. While India head coach Gautam Gambhir supported the idea, England captain Ben Stokes shrugged it off as unnecessary, stating that the law could be new injury replacement rules:1.2.8.1: If a player sustains a serious injury during the course of the relevant match, a Serious Injury Replacement may be permitted in the following circumstances:1.2.8.1.1: The serious injury must have been sustained during play and within the playing area described in clause 1.2.5.2 injury must have occurred due to an external blow and result in a fracture / deep cut/dislocation, etc. The injury should render the player unavailable for the remainder of the match.1.2.8.1.2: On-field umpires shall be the final authority to decide on the extent of serious injury and allowance of Serious Injury Replacement. They may consult the BCCI Match Referee and/or the doctor available on the The Team Manager shall submit a Serious Injury Replacement Request to the BCCI Match Referee on a standard form, which shall:1.2.8.1.3.1: Identify the player who has sustained the serious injury.1.2.8.1.3.2: Specify the incident in which the serious injury was sustained, including the time at which it occurred.1.2.8.1.3.3: Confirm that the player has sustained a serious injury and will not be able to participate further in the match due to the injury; and1.2.8.1.3.4: Identify the requested Serious Injury Replacement, who shall be a like-for-like replacement for the player who has sustained the serious injury.1.2.8.1.3.5 In all circumstances, a serious injury replacement player shall be from nominated substitutes at the time of toss (For Col C K Nayudu Trophy, from the time of nomination of players).Only in the case where the wicket-keeper is seriously injured and needs a replacement, then the Match Referee may allow a wicket-keeper from a player outside the nominated substitutes if there is no wicket-keeper in the nominated substitutes.1.2.8.2: The Serious Injury Replacement Request must be submitted to the BCCI Match Referee as soon as possible after the incident specified in clause 1.2.8.1.3.2 if a Serious Injury Replacement is to be The BCCI Match Referee should ordinarily approve a Serious Injury Replacement Request if the replacement is a like-for-like player whose inclusion will not excessively advantage his team for the remainder of the match.1.2.8.4: In assessing whether the nominated Serious Injury Replacement should be considered a like-for-like player, the BCCI Match Referee should consider the likely role that the seriously injured player would have played during the remainder of the match, and the normal role that would be performed by the nominated Serious Injury Replacement.1.2.8.5: If the BCCI Match Referee believes that the inclusion of the nominated Serious Injury Replacement, when performing their normal role, would excessively advantage their team, the BCCI Match Referee may impose such conditions upon the identity and involvement of the Serious Injury Replacement as he/she sees fit, in line with the overriding objective of facilitating a like-for-like replacement for the seriously injured clarity, a Serious Injury replacement will inherit all warnings, penalty time and suspensions that were imposed on the replaced The BCCI Match Referee may, in reviewing a Serious Injury Replacement Request made in accordance with clause 1.2.8.1.3, request any such further information as may be required in order to make the determination required under clauses 1.2.8.4 and 1.2.8.5.1.2.8.7: The decision of the BCCI Match Referee in relation to any Serious Injury Replacement Request shall be final and neither team shall have any right of appeal.1.2.8.8: Once the Serious Injury Replacement has been approved by the BCCI Match Referee, the replaced player shall take no further part in the match.1.2.8.9: Both the Serious Injury Replacement and the replaced player shall be considered to have played in the match for records and statistical purposes.- Ends
