
Joseph Nye, pioneer of ‘soft power' and adviser to US presidents, dies as Trump era challenges legacy
WASHINGTON, May 8 — Joseph Nye, a versatile and influential political scientist and US policymaker who coined the term 'soft power,' a concept of nations gaining dominance through attractiveness now scoffed at by President Donald Trump, has died, Harvard University announced yesterday. He was 88.
Nye, who died Tuesday, first joined Harvard's faculty in 1964 and served as dean of the Harvard Kennedy School as well as in positions under presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton.
The author of 14 books and more than 200 journal articles, the neo-liberal thinker studied topics as varied as arms control and pan-Africanism but became best known for developing the term 'soft power' in the late 1980s.
As opposed to hard power, such as weapons and economic sanctions, soft power includes values and culture that can win over others.
'Soft power — getting others to want the outcomes that you want — co-opts people rather than coerces them,' Nye wrote in a 2004 book on the topic.
Among other examples, he pointed to growing US influence in Latin America when Franklin Roosevelt instituted a 'good neighbor policy' and, conversely, how the Soviet Union lost Eastern Europe through brutality even as Moscow's hard power grew.
Trump, since returning to office in January, has sharply reduced US soft power, including through dismantling foreign assistance and cracking down on international students, and has sought to ramp up military spending.
In responses to AFP in February about how he saw Trump's second term, Nye wrote: 'Trump does not really understand power. He only thinks in terms of coercion and payment.'
'He mistakes short-term results for long-term effects. Hard coercive power (such as a threat of tariffs) may work in the short term while creating incentives for others to reduce their reliance on the US in the longer term,' he wrote to AFP by email.
'Our success over the past eight decades has also been based on attractiveness.'
But he said that US soft power had seen cycles in the past, pointing to the unpopularity of the United States during the Vietnam War.
'We will probably recover somewhat after Trump, but he has damaged trust in the US,' he wrote.
Nuclear thinker
Nye acknowledged the limitations of soft power alone. In his book, he wrote: 'Excellent wines and cheese do not guarantee attraction to France, nor does the popularity of Pokemon games assure that Japan will get the policy outcomes it wishes.'
Nye was considered a possible national security adviser if John Kerry won the White House in 2004. He was also particularly active on Japan, where former president Barack Obama considered appointing him ambassador.
Always attentive to soft power, Nye took to the opinion pages of The New York Times in 2010 to criticise some in the Obama administration for seeking to play 'hardball' with a new, inexperienced Japanese government over base relocation, calling for a 'more patient and strategic approach' to the longtime US ally.
Much of Nye's time in government was focused on nuclear policy. He argued that the risk of nuclear weapons could have deterred major powers from entering World War I — but that the spread of nuclear weapons since the end of the Cold War posed new dangers.
'He was proudest of having contributed both intellectually... and practically (in the Carter and Clinton administrations) to preventing nuclear war,' fellow Harvard scholar Graham Allison said in a statement. — AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Free Malaysia Today
22 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
California asks court to block US troop deployment in LA
Local officials insisted the sporadic clashes in Los Angeles were isolated and maintained they remained in control despite the troop deployment. (AP pic) LOS ANGELES : California on Tuesday asked a court for a restraining order to prevent US troops being deployed on the streets of Los Angeles, after President Donald Trump sent in Marines and the National Guard. 'Sending trained warfighters onto the streets is unprecedented and threatens the very core of our democracy,' Governor Gavin Newsom said. 'Donald Trump is behaving like a tyrant, not a president. We ask the court to immediately block these unlawful actions.' The move came five days after immigration raids around Los Angeles ignited demonstrations – mostly peaceful, but with sporadic clashes between protesters and law enforcement. The violence – including the burning of several cars on Sunday – has been eye-catching but isolated, and local officials have insisted they remain in control. But Trump and his administration have argued otherwise and taken the extraordinary step of deploying thousands of National Guard troops and even active duty Marines – over Newsom's protests. The president and his Pentagon chief, Pete Hegseth, have 'have sought to bring military personnel and a 'warrior culture' to the streets of cities and towns where Americans work, go to school, and raise their families,' according to the court filing, seen by AFP. 'To put it bluntly, there is no invasion or rebellion in Los Angeles; there is civil unrest that is no different from episodes that regularly occur in communities throughout the country, and that is capable of being contained by state and local authorities working together,' it said. 'And nothing is stopping the president from enforcing the laws through use of ordinary, civilian mechanisms available to federal officers.'


The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, US Appeals court decides
U.S. President Donald Trump holds a chart as he delivers remarks on tariffs in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 2, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the appeals play out. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 12 U.S. states. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their assets. Trump is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit. The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed. - Reuters


Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Bessent emerges as possible contender to succeed Fed's Powell
US treasury secretary Scott Bessent leads Donald Trump's global trade overhaul and plays a key role in tax and regulatory changes. (AP pic) WASHINGTON : US treasury secretary Scott Bessent has emerged as a possible candidate to succeed Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell, Bloomberg News reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter, a report immediately denied by the White House. Bessent joins a small list of Fed chair candidates that has included Kevin Warsh, a former Fed official whom Trump previously interviewed for Treasury secretary, Bloomberg added. A White House official dismissed the Bloomberg report as false. Trump said on Friday he would name a successor to Powell very soon. Bloomberg, citing two unidentified people familiar with the matter, reported that formal interviews for the job have not begun. Bessent is leading Trump's sweeping global trade overhaul and has a hand in pushing for changes to taxes and regulation.