CSL to lay off up to 15% of workforce and spin off flu vaccine arm; shares tumble
It is also targeting annualised savings of up to $550 million over the next three years and plans to book a one-off pre-tax charge of up to $770 million in the current financial year.
"The transformational initiatives we are announcing today will further reshape and simplify the business, provide a platform to renew CSL's focus on our core strengths," CEO Paul McKenzie said in a statement.
The strategic overhaul was announced in tandem with earnings, with CSL reporting a 14% rise in underlying profit for the year ended June to $3.3 billion on a constant currency basis, driven by a strong performance from its blood plasma business, CSL Behring.
It aims to spin off the flu vaccine unit, CSL Seqirus, into a separately listed entity in Australia by next June, as lower U.S. immunisation rates and potential U.S. tariffs on pharmaceuticals cloud the division's outlook.
Craig Sidney, a senior investment advisor at Shaw and Partners, said the spin-off "could actually unlock some value and that may well be positive".
But CSL, which employs some 29,900 people, saw its stock tumble to its lowest in five weeks, making it the worst performer in the ASX200 benchmark index (.AXJO), opens new tab, which traded 0.6% lower.
"Cutting back staff is normally a positive thing, but I suspect that it will have an impact on earnings growth and that's what the market seems to be focused on at the moment," Sidney said.
CSL also said it will resume its share buyback program, starting with A$750 million ($486 million) this financial year.
CSL Behring's fiscal 2025 revenue grew 6% to $11.16 billion, with demand for its core plasma therapies expected to remain robust in 2026.
That underpinned CSL's forecast of underlying annual earnings of between $3.45 billion and $3.55 billion on a constant currency basis, though the midpoint of the range fell short of the Visible Alpha consensus of $3.56 billion.
CSL, founded more than a century ago as a government laboratory, declared a final dividend of $1.62 per share, up from $1.45 per share declared a year ago.
($1 = 1.5415 Australian dollars)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Mining giant BHP's profits slump to five-year low - but record output cheers investors
Mining giant BHP posted its weakest annual underlying profit in five years on Tuesday after oversupply concerns and slowing Chinese demand weighed on iron ore prices. Prices for iron ore, the FTSE 100-listed miner's top-earning commodity, have been relatively volatile this year, with futures trading at $112 per tonne in October 2024 compared with around $101/t at time of writing. Futures have been under pressure from additional supply from Australia, Brazil and South Africa, as well as weaker Chinese steel consumption, which has kept prices well below the $140/t seen in January 2024 and Covid-era highs touching $220/t. BHP, the world's largest listed miner, reported an underlying attributable profit of $10.16billion for the year ended 30 June, missing forecasts of $10.22billion and down from $13.66billion last year. It marked the group's lowest profit since 2020. BHP announced a final dividend of $0.60 per share, down from $0.74 a year earlier and taking the total annual payout to $1.10 - the miner's weakest dividend since 2017. But BHP shares rose on Tuesday morning as boss Mike Henry cheered 'record production' and a 'strong performance' despite a 'backdrop of global disruption'. The group met full-year production guidance across all assets, setting new records in copper and iron ore output. Henry said BHP would 'continue to invest in growth', earmarking $11billion in capital and exploration to be spent over each of the next two years He added: 'The global economic outlook is mixed. Growth is expected to ease to 3 per cent or slightly below in the near-term amid shifting trade policies, yet demand for commodities remains strong, particularly in China and India. 'We remain confident in the long-term fundamentals of steelmaking materials, copper and fertilisers, which are critical to global growth, urbanisation and the energy transition. 'Backed by a diversified portfolio of large, long-life assets, disciplined low-cost operations and a strong balance sheet, BHP is well-positioned to deliver enduring value through the cycle.' BHP shares were up 1.9 per cent to 2,024p in early trading in London, where the group has its secondary listing. Shares in BHP's primary market of Australia also rose. Adam Vettese, market analyst for eToro, said: 'BHP offers resilience and defensive attributes that appeal to long term investors, even as near-term profits are hit by commodity weakness. 'Investors will need to accept some short-term pain for the longer-term opportunity, but BHP's scale, asset quality and strategy underpin a compelling investment case as the energy transition accelerates.' Matt Britzman, senior equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, added: 'What sets BHP apart is its enviable cost base.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Perth's water supply at ‘high risk' from Alcoa bauxite mining, expert study finds
Alcoa's plan to vastly expand its strip mining of forest near Perth's dams poses a high risk to the water supply for the city's 2.3 million people, according to global engineering consultancy GHD. The US aluminium producer commissioned the detailed analysis as part of its bid for approval to mine an additional 67 square kilometres of jarrah forest for bauxite – the source material for aluminium. GHD identified 22 pathways for Alcoa's mining to contaminate dams inland of Perth and concluded that all but one of them presented a high risk. The triple threats to the water supply are contamination of the dams by pathogens from sewage, hydrocarbons from oil spills (both from Alcoa's mining) or simply excessive soil washing into the dam, which makes the water unclear, rendering water treatment plants ineffective. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Extensive reporting has documented how Alcoa's wholesale clearing of the forest and tardy rehabilitation after mining have increased the open area at risk of significant runoff, while its preventative drainage works have a history of frequent failures. The GHD study of Alcoa's expansion reinforces concerns of the state-owned Water Corporation, which regards contamination of its reservoirs from Alcoa's current mining as certain. The utility faces a bill of $3.25bn if it has to upgrade water treatment plants for all dams where Alcoa is now mining. If the crucial Serpentine Pipehead dam is contaminated, more than 100,000 households could be consuming contaminated water within six hours. Within weeks, Perth and Western Australia's south west could face water restrictions. The WA Forest Alliance director, Jess Boyce, said the study showed there should be an immediate ban on mining in reservoir protection zones, which extend two kilometres around dams, and a complete phase-out of mining in water catchments over the next few years. 'This move would not only protect critical drinking water supplies for WA but also strong forest habitat for threatened plants and animals, including black cockatoos and quokkas, all of which are suffering in a changing climate,' she said. Even without mining, the highly biodiverse northern jarrah forest ecosystem is at risk of collapse from hotter and drier conditions with more fires, according to a 2022 assessment by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Boyce called for a transition package for affected communities. The WA government has a $547m transition package under way at the coalmining town of Collie, where it will shut two coal-fired power stations by 2029. Alcoa depends on WA, where it employs about 4,000 people. It extracts three-quarters of its global bauxite production from the jarrah forest that is then processed into alumina – the feedstock for aluminium smelters – at refineries at Pinjarra and Wagerup. For six decades, the $12bn company has mined the jarrah forest shielded from regular environmental oversight by a legislated agreement with the state. However, it is now facing unprecedented scrutiny on two fronts. The northwards march of its mining has reached the edge of Serpentine Dam that supplies almost a fifth of Perth's water, and alarmed government authorities. Now it wants access to the forest on the other side of the dam. WA's independent Environmental Protection Authority will assess both Alcoa's current mining and its proposed expansion after public comments on its plans close on Thursday. GHD's damning finding appeared on page 103 of one of 68 documents appended to 23 main reports Alcoa submitted to the EPA. As well as concerns about the water supply, Alcoa is having to defend its record of not completing rehabilitation fn a single hectare of the 280 square kilometres of forest it has cleared since 1963. In late 2023, the WA Labor government stepped in to allow Alcoa to keep mining while the WA EPA assessed its current operations. It did so despite warnings from Water Corporation and its Department of Water and Environmental Regulation, which wrote that Alcoa's plan 'lacks the clarity and coherence necessary' and rejected it 'in its entirety'. GHD followed a guideline from WA's environment regulator to assess the risk to the water supply from Alcoa's mining. It identified seven pathways for pathogens to enter the water supply, each with catastrophic consequences, defined as a major impact on a large population, but these would be rare, occurring only in exceptional circumstances. An Alcoa spokesman said the guideline recommended consequence levels of 'catastrophic' for pathogens, and 'major' for hydrocarbons and turbidity. 'Under the risk framework, this level of consequence is deemed to have a minimum risk level of 'high', regardless of the likelihood,' he said. Alcoa planned numerous measures to reduce the risks from its expansion, including avoiding mining within 2km of reservoirs and improving drainage works to stop runoff into the dams. GHD concluded these measures reduced the likelihood of 20 of the risks to 'rare' and one to 'unlikely.' 'Alcoa intends to continue its more than 60-year history of operating without negative impact to Perth's drinking water supply,' he said. The EPA is likely to release its advice to the WA environment minister, Matthew Swinbourn, in 2026, who will then decide the conditions placed on Alcoa's mining based on social and economic factors as well as environmental protection.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Four-day work week? Six weeks of holidays? Australians have a choice about how to bank productivity gains
One of the ideas that has captured many peoples' attention amid the flurry of proposals ahead of the economic roundtable is the Australian Council of Trade Unions' vision of a four-day working week. The peak union body argued that working less could actually be productivity enhancing, although the studies behind those claims aren't too rigorous. While many Australians would certainly welcome a three-day weekend, Jim Chalmers has made it clear that working towards a national four-day working week is not on the government's agenda, while reaffirming Labor's commitment to flexible work. Employer groups have been scathing, and it's not likely to be a big discussion point on day two of the three-day roundtable. Clearly not on board with the treasurer's 'open hearts and open minds' approach to this week's talkfest, the Australian Industry Group's chief executive, Innes Willox, called the four-day working week idea 'another populist, anti-productivity thought bubble'. Willox calculated that at the current dismal rate of productivity growth it would take 26 years to get to the point where we could drop a day's work without going backwards economically. But as the ACTU secretary, Sally McManus, explained to the Conversation's Michelle Grattan: the labour movement doesn't expect a revolution in the working week to happen overnight. 'To be clear, we weren't asking for a change to the workplace laws for the government to do something,' McManus said. 'We were raising this in the context of a discussion both around productivity and around AI as an important part of the distribution of the benefits of productivity growth or, for that matter, productivity growth out of less jobs, out of AI.' The longer arc of Australian history has been towards shorter working weeks and longer holidays. But that progress stopped a few decades back, settling on the current set-up of a 38-hour full-time job, two-day weekend and four weeks' paid leave. But there has been progress in other ways (assuming 'progress' is working less – many believe hard work is an end in and of itself). For example, since the turn of the century, the share of full-time employed Australians who say they work longer than 50 hours weekly has gone from 25% to 15%. Meanwhile, part-time work has flourished, fed in particular by a surge in women entering the jobs market. (Which means households overall are probably working harder.) Since the turn of the century, the female employment to working-age population ratio has climbed from 50% to over 60%, according to data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. (The equivalent workforce participation rate for men is just under 68% and hasn't moved much over 25 years.) Of course, the working from home phenomenon that emerged with Covid has been a revolution for many, particularly working families. Thankfully, employers are on board and hybrid work looks set to stay. But to many Australians juggling work and other commitments, time still feels like the greatest luxury. In which case, why shouldn't the reward for lifting productivity growth be fewer working hours for the same pay? Some fascinating research earlier this year by Rusha Das, an economist at the Productivity Commission, showed we would have a three-day working week today if we had collectively decided in 1980 to spend all the productivity gains of the following decades on leisure time instead of higher incomes. Das calculated that Australians used only a quarter of the productivity 'dividend' from the past 40-plus years to work less, while we banked the remaining three-quarters as higher income. 'We have largely traded it for higher incomes, and more and better stuff,' she said. One of the great things about a more efficient and dynamic economy is that it can give us more choices about what we want to do – how much more we want to buy, how much more we want to work and how much more we want to devote to family, hobbies or helping others. This may be getting ahead of ourselves – we have to raise our economic speed limit before we decide how much faster we want to drive. But we'd be mad to limit our thinking to the notion higher productivity is all about generating more income. The ACTU's four-day work week proposal is a good reminder of that.
