Italy grounds migrant rescue charity plane for first time under new rules
The National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC) confirmed on Friday that the Sea-Watch group's Seabird 1 plane had been placed under administrative detention.
It said it acted after being informed by the Italian coastguard that the Seabird 1's pilot had failed to notify relevant authorities about an emergency situation at sea.
Sea-Watch called the aircraft's detention "a new escalation in the Italian government's fight against civilian human rights observation in the Mediterranean".
Italy has temporarily halted dozens of charity rescue vessels, and last year passed a decree allowing similar measures against charity-operated aircraft.
The tighter regulations for rescue vessels and planes, which are used to spot boats in distress, were brought in under Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who in the past accused charities of cooperating with traffickers to bring in more migrants.
The government said the crackdown was necessary to ensure better coordination with authorities and avoid abuses. Charities say the measures seriously limit their capacity to operate, putting migrants' lives at risk.
Sea-Watch said it was considering legal options against the grounding of its plane and had deployed another monitoring aircraft to continue its work.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Convicted Indian asylum seekers will be deported while human rights appeals heard
Foreign criminals from India and 14 other countries will be deported before their human rights appeals have been heard after the Government announced an expansion to its 'deport now, appeal later' scheme. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, said foreign criminals had been 'exploiting' the immigration system by 'remaining in the UK for months or even years while their appeals drag on'. She has expanded a scheme that allows the UK to deport offenders who have had a human rights claim against their removal rejected, with any appeals heard from abroad over a video link. It comes as the Government struggles to tackle the small boats crisis. A further 435 migrants who arrived in small boats were brought to shore on Saturday – the highest total since the 'one-in, one-out' deal with France was announced. The total number arriving in boats this year has hit 25,000, with that figure reached more quickly than in any previous year. The rules currently apply to foreign offenders from eight countries, but ministers are adding another 15 countries to the list, including India, Bulgaria and Australia. The other countries now in the scheme are Angola, Botswana, Brunei, Canada, Guyana, Indonesia, Kenya, Latvia, Lebanon, Malaysia, Uganda and Zambia. The scheme is designed to prevent lengthy human rights appeals that can prevent offenders from being deported because of court backlogs and delays. Labour has ramped up its policy on deportations after criticism from the Conservatives and Reform UK that too many jail cell places were taken up by foreign criminals. On Sunday the Home Office announced it would change the law to allow foreign offenders to be immediately deported on conviction to reduce the number of migrants in British jails. Ms Cooper said: 'Those who commit crimes in our country cannot be allowed to manipulate the system, which is why we are restoring control and sending a clear message that our laws must be respected and will be enforced.' The Home Office said the expansion of 'deport now, appeal later' would help 'scale-up' the UK's ability to remove foreign criminals. However, a Home Office spokesman could not give a figure for the number of deportations that would happen under the new rules because decisions would be made on a 'case-by-case basis'. Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, said the move would save £54,000 a year per prison place. Since Labour came to power last year, almost 5,200 foreign offenders have been deported – a 14 per cent increase on the previous 12 months. Although officials have said increasing deportations will help ease pressure on overcrowded prisons, figures from the Ministry of Justice from the end of June suggest there are currently just 772 prisoners from the 15 new countries covered by 'deport now, appeal later'. Of the new countries, only Indians are in the top nationalities among current prisoners. There are no offenders from Botswana or Brunei currently behind bars. The 'deport now, appeal later' scheme for human rights claims was introduced in 2014 but was ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court three years later, in cases where deportation would prevent an offender from giving live evidence in their appeal. The court noted that giving evidence over a video link could be sufficient, provided it was financially and logistically possible, in effect limiting the policy to countries where video appeal facilities were realistically available. The UK currently has arrangements for video appeals with eight countries, including Tanzania, Belize, Finland and Estonia. David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, said: 'We are leading diplomatic efforts to increase the number of countries where foreign criminals can be swiftly returned, and if they want to appeal, they can do so safely from their home country. 'Under this scheme, we're investing in international partnerships that uphold our security and make our streets safer.'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Jimmy Kimmel floats move to Europe to 'escape Trump' as liberal late night hosts face harsh rebuke
has revealed he has obtained Italian citizenship as a backup plan to escape Donald Trump 's presidency, after Trump said he was next to be canceled. The 57-year-old late night host made the revelation while appearing on the Sarah Silverman Podcast earlier this week. He said: 'I did get Italian citizenship, I do have that. What's going on is as bad as you thought it was gonna be. 'It's so much worse, it's just unbelievable - I feel like it's probably even worse than he would like it to be.' The news from Kimmel comes after Trump said on Wednesday that he and his fellow late-night host Jimmy Fallon were next to be canceled. The commander-in-chief was asked about rumors that Howard Stern is to part way with Sirius XM, before giving his two cents on both Jimmy Fallon and Kimmel. Inside the Oval Office, he said: 'Fallon has no talent. Kimmel has no talent. They're next. They're going to be going, I hear they're going to be going.' During the same podcast appearance, Kimmel also slammed what he called the 'loud' left for woke cancel culture. The news from Kimmel comes after Trump said on Wednesday that Kimmel and his fellow late-night host Jimmy Fallon were next to be canceled The comedian added: ''It's not the party. It's not the majority. It's the loud voices that scare people from saying what they believe and make you think twice about a joke. 'You know, a lot of their points are valid, but a lot of them are also just repulsive, in that they repel people. 'They go like, "Oh, you're no fun. I don't want to be around you." And I think if you had to boil it down to one thing, that's kind of what it is.' Kimmel and Silverman discussed how Trump supporters who expressed their regret for casting their vote for the president have faced backlash from the left online. Silverman noted the hate that famed podcaster Joe Rogan received after criticizing the president's second term. 'Now you see like these clips of Rogan saying, "Why is he doing this? He shouldn't be deporting people," and people go, "Fuck you, you support him, whatever." 'I don't buy into that. I don't believe the "f*** you, you supported him",' Kimmel added. 'If you wanna change your mind, that's so hard to do. If you want to admit you were wrong, that's hard and so rare to do, you are welcome,' he said. His remarks comes after he found an unlikely ally in Fox News host Greg Gutfeld who lauded him with glowing praise for not being afraid of the left's cancel culture. Gutfeld, who appeared on Fallon's show Thursday night, joked that the pairing was 'the biggest crossover since the Harlem Globetrotters visited "The Golden Girls."' The Fox host dubbed Fallon 'a great, genuine guy who wants to make people laugh instead of putting them to bed angrier than 'The View at a salad bar.' But it was his praise of Fallon's late-night show that grabbed everyone's attention, as he applauded Fallon's ability to break from the typical liberal late-night mold. 'Unlike the other guys, Jimmy doesn't reside in a liberal echo chamber,' Gutfeld said. The industry has been left grappling with uncertainty after Colbert announced last month that his show was being brought to an end next year. CBS said the move to axe Colbert was due to low viewership and a decline in profits, but critics believe the network crumbled under pressure from President Trump. Paramount, which owns CBS, decided to settle for $16 million on a suit over deceptive editing of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris filed by Trump. Colbert then used the term 'big fat bribe' to describe the settlement.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on attacking the ECHR: the real target is judicial independence and the rule of law
Most British citizens have little contact with human rights law, which is as it should be in a mature democracy. Widespread anxiety about basic freedoms is a feature of more repressive regimes. Many people will only have heard of the European convention on human rights (ECHR) in the context of the last Conservative government's failed attempts to dispatch asylum seekers to Rwanda, or in a handful of incidents where convicted criminals or terrorist suspects have avoided deportation to jurisdictions where they might face inhumane treatment. Such cases are amplified by politicians who are hostile to the whole apparatus of human rights law. The Strasbourg court that adjudicates on breaches of the ECHR is denounced as an enemy of British sovereignty. Those attacks will continue for as long as asylum, and small-boats traffic on the Channel in particular, are salient political issues – for the foreseeable future, in other words. Labour's new 'one-in, one-out' scheme for returning seaborne refugees is more robust in legal and humanitarian terms than the failed Tory method. France is a safe country. That won't stop critics accusing the government of failing to control the border and citing international human rights conventions as the main impediment to the restoration of law and order. Nigel Farage has said he would 'get rid of the ECHR' as a day-one priority should Reform UK ever form a government. Kemi Badenoch is drifting to the same position, albeit with circumspection. The Conservative leader acknowledges that peremptory rupture is not straightforward, especially for Northern Ireland since European convention rights are woven into the Good Friday agreement. Mrs Badenoch has commissioned a report to consider how an ECHR exit might be achieved but expressed her personal view that Britain 'will likely need to leave' because human rights are wielded as a 'sword … to attack democratic decisions and common sense.' The core argument, for both Mrs Badenoch and Mr Farage, is that voters want politicians to expel undesirable elements from society but the popular will is being thwarted by unelected judges. Human rights, in this conception, are a loophole through which criminals and foreign interlopers evade justice. Ideas codified after the second world war as foundational principles of a new democratic settlement for Europe are recast as attacks on the law-abiding majority. This rhetorical subterfuge gets a purchase on public discourse through channels previously opened by Brexit. The ECHR is not an EU institution, but the fact of it being European in name stirs suspicion that it is an alien imposition. Dispensing with human rights obligations would be a necessary step for any government seeking to emulate Donald Trump's programme of detaining and deporting migrants without regard for due process. It is not far-fetched to envisage a Reform government recreating that model, given Mr Farage's record of admiration for Mr Trump. ECHR rulings are not infallible. A 71-year-old institution can reasonably be scrutinised with a view to reform. But that is not what its noisiest UK antagonists have in mind. They target the convention not because it is a big part of public life, but because it is a minor one and poorly understood. It is a soft target in a longer campaign to undermine judicial independence, discredit liberal principle and, ultimately, degrade the rule of law to the benefit of unaccountable executive power.
