&w=3840&q=100)
Tariff truce prompts Chinese auto-parts makers to rethink US investment
Chinese auto-parts manufacturers are reconsidering their plans to establish production facilities in the United States, following a recent move by the Donald Trump-led US administration to temporarily reduce tariffs on Chinese goods.
The decision, which lowers the combined US tariffs on most Chinese imports to 30 per cent from 145 per cent for 90 days, has given exporters some breathing space but left longer-term strategies in limbo, the South China Morning Post reported on Wednesday.
Industry insiders noted that while lower duties make Chinese products more competitive in the short term, the possibility of a tariff hike after the truce expires has cast doubt over new deals and investment plans.
Trade experts and automotive industry officials said the volatile tariff environment is complicating efforts by Chinese suppliers to pursue global expansion. Many companies have paused or slowed feasibility studies on overseas production bases due to fluctuating costs and unclear long-term pricing strategies.
Analysts at S&P Global in a recent report also observed heightened sensitivity to tariff fluctuations among Chinese auto-parts firms, noting that the unpredictability of US trade policy is making offshore investment decisions particularly challenging.
Suppliers consider investment in US-based facilities
At Auto Shanghai, which concluded on May 2, multiple suppliers acknowledged that they were considering US-based facilities to shield themselves from future tariff spikes. Smart cockpit maker Autolink, backed by EV firm Nio, is one such example, having planned a Detroit factory since early 2025. Meanwhile, Fuyao Glass confirmed a US$400 million investment to expand its manufacturing footprint in Illinois, complementing its existing Ohio operations.
Other manufacturers, including a state-backed producer of EV connectors from Henan province, are also weighing American ventures alongside operations in Vietnam and Germany.
Despite the uncertainty, some suppliers still believe that their US clients will continue to favour Chinese-made components, such as batteries, tyres, and optical systems, if the revised tariff levels remain in place beyond the temporary reprieve.
US-China trade talks and 90-day pause
The latest agreement emerged from negotiations in Geneva aimed at defusing tensions between the world's two largest economies, which had set off a trade war soon after President Trump took office. Trump had announced tariff measures on all of the US' trading partners, with hefty duties specifically imposed on China. In response, China introduced retaliatory tariffs and trade measures, leading to a series of tit-for-tat actions between the two nations.
China exported nearly 100 billion yuan ($13.9 billion) worth of automotive components to the US in 2024, ranging from electric vehicle (EV) batteries to lidar sensors and control systems, customs data show. While not all Chinese parts manufacturers were subjected to the highest 145 per cent rate imposed last month, many still faced duties averaging 70 per cent, according to data from the International Intelligent Vehicle Engineering Association. Nevertheless, the 90-day window has introduced a high level of unpredictability. ALSO READ:
Consultants in the automotive sector caution that firms should remain flexible in the current climate. Those with operations in other regions, such as Mexico, Thailand, or Europe, may already be better positioned to manage the ongoing volatility in global trade conditions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
23 minutes ago
- Hans India
Israel's strikes set back Iran's nuclear program, but fail to dismantle it completely
Israel's recent wave of airstrikes inflicted significant damage on Iran's nuclear infrastructure but failed to fully dismantle the program, according to global nuclear experts. This outcome leaves both Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the U.S. administration facing a critical decision on how to proceed. Preliminary reports from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) indicate that while Israel targeted surface-level structures at the Natanz nuclear facility, the heavily fortified underground halls—where uranium enrichment occurs—remain intact. Natanz is central to Iran's nuclear ambitions, and the inability to penetrate its core enrichment areas suggests the operation, while serious, was incomplete. Strikes on other key sites, including Isfahan and Fordow, will also factor heavily into Israel's strategic calculus. The Isfahan facility is Iran's only uranium conversion site—an essential part of the nuclear fuel cycle. Disabling it could temporarily freeze Iran's capacity to enrich additional uranium, though experts note the country still holds considerable stockpiles of enriched material. 'If you interrupt that piece of the flow-sheet, the fuel cycle doesn't work anymore,' said Robert Kelley, a former IAEA weapons inspector. 'The front end of their program dies.' The air campaign reportedly killed nine senior nuclear scientists, which could severely set back Iran's technical capabilities. Still, the bigger challenge may be what happens next. Analysts warn that further escalation could push Iran to deepen its nuclear activities underground, cut off access to international inspectors, and abandon remaining diplomatic efforts. In retaliation, Iran launched hundreds of ballistic missiles and drones toward Israeli cities, signaling that tensions could sharply intensify. UN officials, including IAEA chief Rafael Grossi, have expressed concern that the strikes could limit future monitoring of Iran's nuclear program. The potential for Iran to divert enriched uranium to undisclosed locations, or exit the Non-Proliferation Treaty altogether, has heightened global anxiety. 'Iran's 400 kilograms of highly-enriched uranium could be easily concealed in a few cylinders,' Kelley added, warning that any move toward weaponization would be difficult to detect without full inspection access. Fordow, another critical enrichment site buried deep within a mountain, remains virtually untouched. Experts say only the U.S. military has the capability to destroy such a fortified facility with bunker-busting munitions. 'Israel cannot destroy Fordow without U.S. support,' said Kelsey Davenport of the Arms Control Association. This raises a difficult question for the Trump administration. While President Trump has repeatedly voiced preference for diplomacy over military intervention, pressure is mounting for the U.S. to act if Iran's program shows signs of recovery. The Center for Strategic and International Studies noted, 'While the administration may not want to launch strikes, allowing Iran to rebuild its nuclear infrastructure may be seen as a greater risk.' Even Israeli leadership concedes that airstrikes alone are not a permanent solution. 'It is impossible to destroy the nuclear program with force alone,' said Israel's National Security Adviser Tzachi Hanegbi. 'The goal is to make the Iranians understand that they will have to stop the nuclear program.' With diplomatic negotiations on uncertain footing and regional tensions rising, the path forward for both Israel and the United States remains fraught with complexity and risk.
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Flying suitcases packed with Hard Drives to China, taking hundreds of servers on rent and ...: How Chinese AI companies dodge US chip ban
(AI image) In a bid to bypass stringent U.S. restrictions on advanced AI chips, Chinese companies are resorting to innovative workarounds, including processing data abroad. According to a recent Wall Street Journal report, in early March, four Chinese engineers traveled from Beijing to Malaysia, each carrying a suitcase with 15 hard drives containing 80 terabytes of data for training an AI model. At a Malaysian data center, the engineers utilized approximately 300 servers equipped with Nvidia's advanced chips to develop the AI model, which they later brought back to China. Smuggling AI hardware Since 2022, the U.S. has tightened export controls on high-end AI chips to China, citing national security concerns. According to WSJ report, these restrictions have limited Chinese firms' access to cutting-edge American technology, prompting them to explore alternatives. Some have substituted domestic chips for American ones, while others have smuggled AI hardware through third countries. However, increased U.S. pressure has made smuggling more challenging, pushing Chinese companies to process data outside China in regions like Southeast Asia and the Middle East. 'This was something we were consistently concerned about,' said Thea Kendler, former head of export controls at the Commerce Department under the Biden administration, referring to Chinese firms' remote access to U.S. AI chips, told WSJ. The process involves layers of intermediaries, obscuring whether U.S. regulations are being violated. The Biden administration proposed country-specific caps on American chip purchases to curb such activities, but the Trump administration scrapped these in May, citing unnecessary regulatory burdens on U.S. companies like Nvidia. Instead, it issued guidance urging firms to prevent their chips from being used to train Chinese AI models. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo How and why China uses countries in Southeast Asia as base In Malaysia, the Chinese company's operation required meticulous planning. Engineers reportedly spent over eight weeks optimizing data sets in China, as transferring large data volumes online could take months. Last July, the company worked through a Singaporean subsidiary but later registered a Malaysian entity to avoid scrutiny after Nvidia and its vendors intensified end-user audits. To evade suspicion at Malaysian customs, the engineers distributed hard drives across four suitcases, a shift from bundling them into one the previous year. They returned to China with several hundred gigabytes of model parameters guiding the AI system's output. Southeast Asia is reported to be emerging as a hub for such activities, with data centers rapidly expanding. Jones Lang LaSalle estimates nearly 2,000 megawatts of data-center capacity in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia -- matching Europe's largest markets. Malaysia's AI chip imports from Taiwan surged to $3.4 billion in March and April, exceeding its 2024 total. Meanwhile, the Middle East is also becoming a destination for Chinese AI developers, with Nvidia recently announcing significant chip sales to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE. These maneuvers highlight the challenges of enforcing U.S. export controls as Chinese companies exploit global data centers to access American technology. While Southeast Asian authorities, like Singapore's, are cracking down on transshipments, the region's booming infrastructure continues to attract both Western and Chinese clients, testing the limits of regulatory oversight. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Swedish pension fund AP7 blacklists Tesla, says union rights violations in U.S. crossed the ethical line
Sweden's pension fund, AP7, which stands for Sjunde AP-fonden or Seventh AP Fund, has blacklisted and fully divested from US electric vehicle giant Tesla because of the EV maker's alleged violations of union rights in the United States, as per Reuters. Tesla Blacklisted Over Union Rights Violations The pension fund wrote in a statement to Reuters, "AP7 has decided to blacklist Tesla due to verified violations of labor rights in the United States," as quoted in the report. AP7 also highlighted that, "Despite several years of dialogue with Tesla, including shareholder proposals in collaboration with other investors, the company has not taken sufficient measures to address the issues," quoted Reuters. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Don't Miss The Top Packaging Trends Of 2024, Enhnace Your Brand With The Latest Insights Packaging Machines | Search Ads Search Now Undo Swedish Pension Fund AP7 Sold Off $1.36 Billion Stake in Tesla The pension fund's spokesperson revealed that the fund's stake in Tesla was worth about $1.36 billion when it was sold in late May, Reuters reported. During the time of the sell-off, AP7's stake in Tesla represented about 1% of the AP7 Equity Fund, according to the report. Tesla: The Only Non-Unionized US Carmaker According to the EV maker had employed about 70,000 workers in the United States at the end of 2024 and is the only American automaker whose workers are currently not represented by a union. Live Events Tesla's Ongoing Labor Disputes in Sweden Many unionisation efforts have consistently failed until now, like those by the United Auto Workers, the United Steelworkers, Workers United, and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, reported. Tesla has also been in a conflict with IF Metall, a Swedish trade union, after the IF Metall workers' union initiated a strike, accusing the EV maker of refusing to join a collective wage agreement, as per Brussels Times. The company's CEO, Elon Musk, has repeatedly dismissed calls for unionisation within his global workforce, according to Brussels Times. FAQs Why did AP7 divest from Tesla? Because Tesla was found to have violated labor rights in the US, and after years of engagement, AP7 felt the company failed to make any changes. How much was AP7's stake in Tesla worth? Roughly $1.36 billion when it was sold in late May 2025.
