Texas Republicans pitch new House map to net them up to five more seats
Currently, Texas has 38 congressional districts, represented by 25 Republicans and 12 Democrats — with one vacancy, in the deep-blue 21st District, to be filled in a special election this November following the death of Rep. Sylvester Turner in March.
According to election analyst Dave Wasserman, the new map would have 30 Republican-favoring districts and eight Democrat-favoring districts, if adopted.
Advertisement
The proposed boundary changes, unveiled by GOP State Rep. Todd Hunter, mainly affect districts in South Texas, the cities of Austin and Dallas, and parts of Houston — putting the seats of Democratic Reps. Lizzie Fletcher, Henry Cuellar, Sylvia Garcia, Julie Johnson and Vicente Gonzalez at risk.
The new lines could also put incumbent Austin-area Reps. Greg Casar (D-Texas) and Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) on a collision course with one another in 2026, while combining Houston Rep. Al Green's 9th District with the vacant 18th District.
Most of the big pickup opportunities for Republicans would be in Hispanic-majority districts, including the ones held by Cuellar and Gonzalez in South Texas.
Advertisement
President Trump won Texas' 40 electoral votes in 2024 with 56% of the vote, but the new map could see Republicans holding 79% of the state's House seats.
4 Texas Republicans are hoping to pick up as many as five seats from the proposed reconfigured congressional districts.
Texas Legislative Council
4 The Texas state legislature is slated to consider the new maps during its special session.
AP
Traditionally, new congressional maps are drawn after each edition of the census, with the latest round of redistricting for most states wrapping up in 2022. However, with Trump's fervent support, Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott has called a special session to redraw the congressional lines earlier than usual.
Advertisement
The Texas effort has spurred Democratic governors like Kathy Hochul in New York and Gavin Newsom in California to explore redrawing their state maps to boost the blue team and negate Republican gains.
'Donald Trump asks for 5 seats and Greg Abbott automatically bends the knee. The 2026 election is being rigged. California won't sit back and watch this happen,' Newsom declared Wednesday on X.
4 California Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to take action to further gerrymander his state's seats in response.
AP
Advertisement
However, many of the most populous Democratic states either have independent redistricting commissions or have already been gerrymandered so heavily that there are few additional safe districts they can carve out of the line-drawing process.
To become law, the proposed Texas congressional map needs to clear the state House and survive the all-but-certain legal challenges from Democrats.
Texas Democratic lawmakers have toyed with ways to prevent passage of the new map, including by fleeing the state to ensure that the legislature lacks a quorum.
4 President Trump has strongly encouraged Texas Republicans to redraw the state's congressional map.
AP
The new Texas map is slated to get a committee hearing on Friday.
The legislature's special session is scheduled to run through Aug. 19.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
a few seconds ago
- Fox News
China deploys submarine to port in Russia for the first time
Fox News chief national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin has the latest on tensions in the region as President Trump's deadline for peace draws near on 'Special Report.'
NBC News
a few seconds ago
- NBC News
White House searches for a new BLS chief with 'credibility' and 'experience'
WASHINGTON — White House officials began the week scrambling to find a permanent replacement after President Donald Trump fired Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer on Friday, following a weaker-than-expected July jobs report and drastic downward revisions of employment for the prior two months. Steve Bannon, a senior White House adviser in Trump's first term who is influential with the MAGA wing of the GOP, is pushing hard for E.J. Antoni, the chief economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation. Antoni, a contributor to the Project 2025 policy rubric, has been a longtime skeptic of BLS data. On Bannon's podcast last week, Antoni called for McEntarfer to be fired shortly before Trump pulled the trigger. In an interview with NBC News Monday afternoon, Antoni said he had not been contacted by anyone in the White House about the job. West Wing officials were "still running traps" on candidates for the Senate-confirmed position Monday, one White House aide said. The White House did not return a request for comment on whether Antoni is under consideration. Trump said Sunday that he plans to announce a pick in the next three or four days. 'It's going to have to be somebody that has tremendous credibility and experience,' said a senior White House official who noted that Trump would likely listen to the thoughts of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett and Stephen Miran, the chair of the National Economic Council. Hiring such a person could potentially be a challenge for Trump. In ousting McEntarfer, he baselessly claimed that jobs numbers are subject to political manipulation — "RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad," he said — raising the specter that a new commissioner would not release numbers that made Trump look bad. "I find it so hard to believe that your average person hears Trump fired someone because he claimed that they manipulated data and whoever he's replaced them with is going to produce trustworthy data," Kathryn Anne Edwards, an independent economic consultant and host of a podcast called The Optimist, said. Trump's decision was widely condemned, including by William Beach, who served as McEntarfer's predecessor in Trump's first term. He said her firing " sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau." In his interview with NBC News, Antoni said new leadership could help increase faith in the agency and its numbers. But he suggested that won't happen overnight. "We're going to need to rebuild trust, which happens over time, and it happens with consistency. So again, I'm not even sure anybody is going to get a fair shake no matter who gets appointed to this role," he said. 'Whoever is in that role is going to need to make the changes necessary to make the numbers more accurate, and then over time, we will again have faith in the data. That is ultimately what it's about. It's about having faith in the data.' Over the weekend and into Monday, Trump's allies moved away from the narrative that McEntarfer, a political appointee of President Joe Biden, altered figures to suit a partisan agenda and toward a framing that held her responsible for revisions to earlier data. BLS has traditionally updated its monthly jobs figures based primarily on employment surveys that come in late. Together, the revisions for May and June amounted to more than 250,000 fewer jobs than originally reported. "For Trump to say she's fixing the numbers and so on, I think there's no evidence of that. It might be true, but there's no real evidence of that,' said Stephen Moore, a former Trump campaign adviser on economic issues. "The main thing is, whoever Trump chooses, if they're coming out with these wild estimates that are completely off base then people would lose faith in the numbers, but I think that's already happening." The senior White House official said that it's hard for the government and the private sector to make decisions if employment numbers don't reflect current reality — and pinned that problem on McEntarfer and BLS as one of reluctance to modernize. "The goal here is to provide data that the markets, the policy makers, can rely on and people know how it's being produced," the official said. "I think what we know factually is that there's no transparency in how these numbers are produced and why they're so bad and you know that there's been a resistance, too, From BLS to really explore that." BLS publishes the methods it uses to calculate employment data, including complex formulas, on its website, and the standards have not changed since Trump was elected. "It's purely transparent," Edwards said. "You can go and download every single survey that was sent in. ... The idea that the numbers aren't transparent, bald-faced lie; the idea that the numbers could be manipulated by a single commissioner, bald-faced lie; the idea that there is the capacity for manipulation, bald-faced lie."
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
The Origins of the Political Power Grab in Texas
The cutthroat political maneuvering in Texas seemed to begin quietly in June, when President Trump's political team urged Republican leaders in the state to squeeze more G.O.P. seats out of the state's already-lopsided congressional map. A person close to Trump, my colleagues J. David Goodman and Shane Goldmacher wrote at the time, wanted them to be 'ruthless.' Barely two months later, Texas Republicans have used a special session called by Gov. Greg Abbott to advance a plan they hope will help their party pick up five seats in the narrowly divided House — and dozens of Democratic legislators have fled the state to try to stop it from becoming law. It's a gambit that could shape the outcome of next year's midterm elections, and turn the nation's redistricting battles into an all-out war. Trump is getting the bare-knuckle tactics — and most likely the five more favorable districts — that he wanted. The groundwork for this moment, however, was laid well before June. Today, I'll explain how we got here, and why Democrats looking to fight fire with fire may have their hands tied. Gerrymandering is nothing new. The term itself goes back to 1812, when Gov. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, one of the signatories of the Declaration of Independence, signed a bill that created Boston-area State Senate districts so contorted, one was said to look like a salamander. Partisan map-drawing reduced competitiveness, turning more and more races into blowouts for one party or the other. By 2024, just 8 percent of congressional races were decided by fewer than five percentage points, according to an analysis by my colleagues this year. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
