State officials announce massive update to 'cherished' state park: 'I look forward to families experiencing this'
The Enchanted Rock State Natural Area will be getting bigger. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) has invested $43 million to acquire over 3,000 acres of land adjacent to the state park in Llano County. The property will double the amount of land for public use at Enchanted Rock, according to a TPWD news release.
The expansion offers new recreational opportunities and will preserve the region's unique landscape and ecosystem.
Enchanted Rock is known for its massive pink granite dome rising 425 feet above the surrounding terrain. The newly purchased land, previously used for private hunting, includes a distinctive rock formation that could provide new lookout points of the iconic dome. The addition will enrich the visitor experience and ensure the conservation of the area.
Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty?
Definitely
Only in some areas
No way
I'm not sure
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
The expansion is part of a larger initiative funded by the Centennial Parks Conservation Fund — $1 billion in funding established by Texas voters in 2023. The fund aims to develop and expand state parks, meeting the demand of the growing number of visitors as well as ensuring natural spaces are preserved.
"Enchanted Rock is cherished by Texans across the state, and we are thrilled to add a property of this size and scope to this beloved park," said Jeff Hildebrand, chairman of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission. "I look forward to families experiencing this new addition to Enchanted Rock SNA and creating lasting memories for generations to come."
The TPWD will gather public input to develop a plan for the property, per the release. For the community, being able to go and experience a park of this nature is proven to be beneficial for one's health.
According to the National Park Service, a 30-minute visit to a park can improve heart health, reduce inflammation, and boost your immune system — all of which can reduce risks of cancer and disease. Further, just five minutes of walking in nature can lower cortisol levels and reduce anxiety and depression.
Preserving national and state parks is also important for protecting natural resources and wildlife. There are a myriad of environmental benefits, including protecting habitats for rare and endangered plants and animals, protecting clean air and water, and combating climate change.
Looks like Enchanted Rock will only get more enchanting for locals and visitors alike.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Texas paramedics to get tuition exemptions already provided to firefighters, police thanks to passed bill
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Paramedics could soon be exempt from tuition and laboratory fees while taking certain courses at public colleges and universities, thanks to a bill that recently passed in the Texas Legislature. House Bill 1105, authored by Rep. Sheryl Cole, D-Austin, applies to paramedics employed by a political subdivision of Texas. Many of Texas' paramedics are also firefighters, who already have access to fee exemptions under Texas law. Law enforcement officers also have access to exemptions. However, an author-sponsor statement of intent for HB 1105 states that as many as 6,000 paramedics in Texas are not employed by a fire department. 'In Texas, most paramedics working for a political subdivision are also employed as firefighters,' the statement reads. 'Since firefighters are eligible … most paramedics have likewise benefited from these courses and the tuition exemption.' When implemented, the law will direct the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to restrict how many remote students get exemptions to 20% of enrolled students. Austin EMS Association (AEMSA) President James Monks provided the only testimony in support of the bill during an April 15 hearing, according to legislative records. AEMSA organizes Austin-Travis County EMS workers. 'I think it was an oversight. EMS is not quite at the top of everybody's radar,' said Monks to KXAN on Thursday. 'We got left out of the loop when [fee exemption] legislation initially passed, and I just tried to convince them that the initial intent of this legislation was to include paramedics … third service just kind of got left out.' Representatives from the city of Austin, city of Houston, Texas AFL-CIO, Texas State Association of Fire and Emergency Districts, Texas Fire Chiefs Association, Conference of Urban Counties, and County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas registered in support of the bill but did not testify. No one testified against or registered opposition with the Senate's Higher Education committee. Texas AFL-CIO: Texas Legislature passes bill protecting utility workers from assaults, harassment during disasters Some AEMSA members have already indicated they will seek more training because of the bill, Monks said. He also said that the law would help ATCEMS retain staff. 'I definitely see it as step in the right direction,' Monks said. 'It's offering a further incentive for people who have their paramedic license or certification, so that they can go ahead and pursue higher education.' Bill sponsor Sen. Sarah Eckhardt, D-Austin, provided a statement to KXAN, in which she said she was proud to help pass the bill. 'Nearly 9% of Texas paramedics are employed by a standalone EMS department but are excluded from participating in the tuition exemption program offered to their counterparts who work jointly with police and fire,' Eckhardt said. 'This bill is about ensuring parity and opening vital pathways for more Texans to get to work helping their communities, especially those struggling with the greatest need for personnel.' Monks also told KXAN that he was grateful for Cole and Eckhardt, and said that their staff were 'fantastic.' Unless vetoed, HB 1105 takes effect in September. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Texas Secures $382K Grant To Boost Beach Water Quality Monitoring
Texas Land Commissioner Dawn Buckingham announced Wednesday that her agency has secured $382,000 in federal funding to monitor bacterial levels at Texas beaches. The EPA grant will support the state's Texas Beach Watch program through the 2025 swimming season. The funding comes as millions of Texans prepare for summer beach trips along the Gulf Coast. Rising concerns about water quality have made bacterial monitoring increasingly critical for public health officials. 'The GLO is proud to monitor the water quality up and down our beautiful Texas coast for the well-being of beachgoers, our shoreline communities, and the marine life across various beach habitats,' said Buckingham. 'As someone who lived on the coast for over a decade, I want to thank President Trump's EPA for the issuance of this grant that will assist the Texas Beach Watch program in keeping Texans informed as they visit our beaches this summer.' The program tests specifically for Enterococcus bacteria, which naturally occurs in warm-blooded animals. While normal in coastal ecosystems, elevated levels can signal potential health risks. Heavy rainfall and stormwater runoff often drive bacterial spikes. When levels exceed safety thresholds, the GLO issues water quality advisories to warn swimmers. Still, the actual risk remains relatively low. Last year, only 797 of 8,237 samples triggered advisories—roughly 9% of all tests conducted. The GLO does not close beaches during advisories. That decision rests with local authorities who weigh multiple factors beyond bacterial counts. The grant stems from the federal BEACH Act, which mandates coastal water quality monitoring nationwide. EPA officials framed the funding as part of their 'Powering the Great American Comeback' initiative. That said, bacterial monitoring represents just one piece of coastal management. The GLO simultaneously oversees beach nourishment projects and hurricane recovery efforts across the Texas coast. Buckingham, who became Texas's first female Land Commissioner in 2022, has prioritized coastal issues. Her agency recently completed what officials describe as the state's largest beach nourishment project. The Texas Beach Watch program encourages visitors to help maintain water quality. Officials specifically request proper pet waste disposal and trash management at beach sites.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Doritos and Mountain Dew could carry a new ‘not recommended for human consumption' warning under landmark Texas bill
Texas Governor Greg Abbott will decide whether to enact a bill requiring food manufacturers to add warning labels to products if they contain ingredients like dyes that have been banned or restricted by other countries. Major food conglomerates have opposed the bill, arguing it would add greater uncertainty for consumers in a time of economic unpredictability. A Texas bill on the brink of becoming law would crack down on major food manufacturers, requiring them to label products with warnings about ingredients 'not recommended for human consumption,' under the standards of countries other than the U.S. Senate Bill 25 would require U.S. food manufacturers to, beginning in 2027, clearly mark products sold in Texas with warning labels that the foods contain certain ingredients like bleached flour and synthetic food dyes that other countries have prohibited or required warnings for. The legislation would impact major food manufacturers like General Mills, whose brands Pillsbury Toaster Strudel contain bleached flour, as well as PepsiCo, the conglomerate behind Doritos and Mountain Dew, which contain dyes. The bill also outlines requirements for physical education and nutrition education in schools. The legislation reached the desk of Texas Governor Greg Abbott on Sunday. Supported by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the bill's enactment would notch a victory for Kennedy's 'Make America Healthy Again' (MAHA) movement. The HHS secretary, as part of his MAHA efforts, has advocated for the banning of dyes, additives, and seed oils, arguing the ingredients increase the risk of cancer, hyperactivity in children, inflammatory bowel diseases, and allergic reactions. The bipartisan bill's enactment would also mark a departure from Texas's history of being a deep red state with a light touch with regulations. Texas is the second-largest state in the U.S. by population, with more than 31 million residents in 2024. A spokesperson for Abbott did not respond to Fortune's request for comment, but press secretary Andrew Mahaleris said in a statement to Bloomberg that, 'Governor Abbott will continue to work with the legislature to ensure Texans have access to healthy foods to care for themselves and their families and will thoughtfully review any legislation they send to his desk.' The HHS did not respond to Fortune's request for comment. In response to the bill, dozens of food manufacturers and distributors wrote a letter on May 19 to the Texas legislature asking it to remove the section of the legislation regarding warning labels. 'As currently written, the food labeling provision in this bill casts an incredibly wide net—triggering warning labels on everyday grocery items based on assertions that foreign governments have banned such items, rather than on standards established by Texas regulators or by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,' the letter said. The companies argued in the letter that Texas is outpacing national food labeling standards, and the enactment of the bill would 'destabilize local and regional economies' and limit access to foods in times of economic uncertainty. According to John Hewitt, senior vice president of state affairs at Consumer Brands Association, which represents several major U.S. food manufacturers, the food industry is committed to tools that increase ingredient transparency, but urged Abbott to veto the bill. 'The ingredients used in the U.S. food supply are safe and have been rigorously studied following an objective science and risk-based evaluation process,' Hewitt told Fortune in a statement. 'The labeling requirements of SB 25 mandate inaccurate warning language, create legal risks for brands and drive consumer confusion and higher costs.' Consumer Brands Association did not respond to Fortune's inquiry about what component of the warning language was inaccurate. In the past following the enactment of food labeling legislation, food manufacturers have had to make sweeping changes to packaging to abide by the laws, according to Jura Liaukonyte, professor of marketing and applied economics at Cornell University's SC Johnson College of Business. Her research includes analyzing the ramifications of the passage of a Vermont law regarding labels for genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Following the law's enactment, several large food companies changed their labeling at the national level, finding it inefficient to only update labels for products in one state. A national law around GMO labels passed about 30 days later, essentially rewarding the companies' strategy. Christina Roberto, director of the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Food and Nutrition Policy, told Fortune that in other cases, food manufacturers resist the legislation by taking legal action. 'The industry tends to not want to do something different, not want to do something that's going to incur costs,' Roberto said. 'And certainly this kind of legislation—where it's trying to warn consumers about the harms of aspects of the product—it's very unlikely that any manufacturer would be on board.' Liaukonyte noted another potential layer of uncertainty for food manufacturers is the bill's invocation of foreign food standards on U.S. products. Liaukonyte said the labeling mandate would highlight the disparities between food safety standards in the U.S. versus other parts of the world. 'There is a very different principle of how food and cosmetics safety is regulated in [the European Union] and in the U.S.,' she said. The EU uses the precautionary principle for food and cosmetics safety that requires rigorous testing, essentially that products are automatically deemed risky until proven safe. Meanwhile, the U.S. generally has a looser framework around safety. Companies can include additives to a product without explicit approval from the Food and Drug Administration, for example, if those additives are 'generally recognized as safe' (GRAS), meaning qualified experts deem the product safe based on past research and use. Kennedy has advocated for greater scrutiny of the GRAS framework. New York is considering a law that would require the disclosure of evidence for products that are GRAS. Republican support for increased labeling of ingredients largely marks a departure of a decades-old trend of opposing food regulation. Liaukonyte speculated Kennedy's MAHA efforts have championed a naturalist movement that equates health decisions with individual rights. 'There is a little bit of reframing health as a conservative value,' she said. 'Reframing the labeling initiative: It's an issue of parental rights, personal responsibility, and it's sort of like making your own decisions conditional on being informed.' While Kennedy's claims around vaccines causing autism have been proven false and his recent 'MAHA report' misinterpreted and omitted citations, public health experts agree tighter regulation of labels, particularly to align with more stringent European standards, is good news for public health. For Roberto, her qualm with the legislation in question isn't that it isn't supported by scientific research or oversteps boundaries with food companies, but that it doesn't go far enough in setting standards to protect public health. She would like to see legislation advocating for warnings about salt, sugar, and saturated fats in certain foods, as well as taxing or banning them from schools. 'It actually is an exciting time,' Roberto said. 'But I think a lot of these policies could go further to support children's health by coupling it with other types of policies that we know work.' This story was originally featured on
