GSK 'well positioned' for potential tariffs after beating forecasts
Drugmaker GSK has today reaffirmed its outlook for 2025 and said it was "well positioned" to mitigate any hit from potential sector-specific tariffs, after first quarter results beat expectations.
Companies globally are scrambling to adapt to levies proposed by US President Donald Trump in his trade war, and Trump's plans for a "major" tariff on pharmaceutical imports could threaten an interwoven global supply chain, and raise US drug costs by $51 billion annually, a report found.
GSK said it had identified options within its supply chain and productivity initiatives to mitigate any hit from possible pharmaceutical tariffs, but did not give further details.
GSK CEO Emma Walmsley has been focusing on expanding newer products, including within the company's infectious diseases portfolio, to offset declining sales from its top-selling drugs and vaccines as demand slows and competition increases.
She is also preparing GSK for looming patent expirations for its HIV treatments.
"The momentum in the company's portfolio, together with the strength of our portfolio and proven ability to drive operating leverage, underpin our confidence in guidance for the year and our longer-term outlooks," Walmsley said in a statement.
GSK reported first-quarter turnover of £7.52 billion and core profit of 44.9 pence per share, narrowly ahead of analysts' average expectation of £7.42 billion and 40.9 pence per share, respectively, according to a company-compiled consensus.
However, sales at its vaccine unit were down 6% to £2.1 billion, with its newer RSV vaccine Arexvy bringing in just £0.1 billion, down 57%.
GSK initially had projected Arexvy to be a blockbuster product, estimating peak annual sales of £3 billion, but sales have missed market expectations for the past several quarters.
In February, GSK lifted its long-term sales target to over £40 billion by 2031, but uncertainties around pharmaceutical import tariffs and the Trump administration's policies on vaccines and HIV prevention loom large on drugmakers in the near term.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
6 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump says he is going to double tariffs on foreign steel from 25% to 50%
President Donald Trump said that he is doubling the tariff rate on steel to 50%, a dramatic increase that could further push up prices for a metal used to make housing, cars and other goods. Mr Trump spoke at US Steel's Mon Valley Works–Irvin Plant in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, to discuss investments by Japan's Nippon Steel. The price of steel products has increased roughly 16% since Mr Trump became president, according to the government's producer price index. Mr Trump said US Steel will stay an American company under a deal for Japan-based Nippon to invest in the steelmaker. Few details about the deal have been made public. President Donald Trump talks to workers as he tours US Steel (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson) 'We're here today to celebrate a blockbuster agreement that will ensure this storied American company stays an American company,' Mr Trump said as he opened an event at one of US Steel's warehouses near Pittsburgh. 'You're going to stay an American company, you know that, right?' Mr Trump said doubling the tariffs on imported steel 'will even further secure the steel industry in the US'. But such a dramatic increase could push prices even higher. Employees, Trump supporters, local officials and others filled one of the massive warehouses on the grounds of the Irvin finishing plant to hear Mr Trump. Giant American flags hung from the ceiling and a sign read, 'The Golden Age'. Steelworkers in orange hard hats and work clothes milled about, and part of the warehouse's cement floor was packed with huge rolled coils of shiny steel sheet produced at the plant and used for appliances, doors and other applications. Though Mr Trump initially vowed to block the Japanese steelmaker's bid to buy Pittsburgh-based US Steel, he changed course and announced an agreement last week for what he described as 'partial ownership' by Nippon. It is not clear, though, if the deal his administration helped broker has been finalised or how ownership would be structured. Mr Trump stressed the deal would maintain American control of the company, which is seen as both a political symbol and an important matter for the country's supply chain, industries like car manufacturing and national security. Mr Trump, who has been eager to strike deals and announce new investments in the US since retaking the White House, is also trying to satisfy voters, including blue-collar workers, who elected him as he called to protect US manufacturing. US Steel has not publicly communicated any details of a revamped deal to investors. Nippon Steel issued a statement approving of the proposed 'partnership' but also has not disclosed terms of the arrangement.
The Journal
7 hours ago
- The Journal
Trump claims China has 'totally violated' tariff de-escalation deal with the US
US PRESIDENT DONALD Trump has accused China of violating a tariff de-escalation deal, while saying he expects to eventually speak with Chinese leader Xi Jinping. His comments came hours after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that trade talks with Beijing were 'a bit stalled' in an interview with broadcaster Fox News. Earlier this month, the world's two biggest economies agreed to temporarily lower staggeringly high tariffs they had imposed on each other, in a pause to last 90 days. But today, Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform: 'China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' without providing further details. He told reporters this afternoon: 'I'm sure that I'll speak to President Xi, and hopefully we'll work that out.' Trump's deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller told reporters that with China failing to fulfill its obligations, 'that opens up all manner of action for the United States to ensure future compliance.' US stock markets closed mixed, after fluctuating in the day on jitters that Trump could return to a more confrontational stance on China. Market jitters On Wall Street, the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed higher, while the S&P 500 index was flat, and the tech-focused Nasdaq Composite fell 0.3%. 'If it weren't for the trade war, the market would be feeling pretty good,' said Tom Cahill of Ventura Wealth Management. Advertisement 'Inflation is definitely moving in the right direction,' he added, referencing the Federal Reserve's favored inflation gauge, which cooled more than expected last month, according to fresh data published today. In Europe, London and Germany's major indices ended higher, while France's CAC40 closed lower, following declines in Asian markets earlier in the day. 'If President Trump does slap tariffs back on Chinese imports to the US… we may see demand for US assets, and the dollar, severely impaired by a chaotic and undiplomatic approach to trade policy,' said Kathleen Brooks, research director at XTB. Earlier, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CNBC: 'The Chinese are slow-rolling their compliance, which is completely unacceptable.' While Greer did not go into specifics, he noted reports that Beijing continues to 'slow down and choke off things like critical minerals and rare earth magnets,' adding that the US trade deficit with China is still 'enormous.' Greer said that Washington was not seeing major shifts in Beijing's behavior. Forthcoming deals? Washington is also in 'intensive talks' with other trading partners, Greer told CNBC, saying he has meetings next week with counterparts from Malaysia, Vietnam and the European Union. The meetings come as he heads to Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) talks in Europe. 'The negotiations are on track, and we do hope to have some deals in the next couple of weeks,' Greer said. Washington and Tokyo are making progress towards a deal, Kyodo News reported, citing Japan's tariffs envoy Ryosei Akazawa. Akazawa, who met with Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick in Washington, expects another round of talks before mid-June. But Trump's tariff plans are facing legal challenges. Related Reads White House complains of 'judicial coup' after US court blocks Trump's sweeping import tariffs 'Wait and see': Taoiseach says Trump's extension on tariff threat could stifle economic growth Trump says 50% tariffs on EU delayed until 9 July after 'very nice call' with von der Leyen On Wednesday, the New York-based Court of International Trade ruled that the tariffs were unconstitutional, and that Trump did not have the authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose them. The White House bit back at the decision, calling it 'blatantly wrong' while accusing the court of attempting to 'usurp' Trump's authority. However, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Thursday temporarily reinstated Trump's sweeping measures, requesting instead that both sides issue written arguments on the matter before a final ruling is made by next month. Greer said it was important to get through the legal process so partners have a 'better understanding of the landing zone.' Since Trump returned to the presidency, he has slapped sweeping tariffs on most US trading partners, with especially high rates on Chinese imports. New tit-for-tat levies on both sides reached three digits before the de-escalation this month, where Washington agreed to temporarily reduce additional tariffs on Chinese imports from 145% to 30%. China, meanwhile, lowered its added duties from 125% to 10%. The US level is higher as it includes a 20% that Trump imposed on Chinese goods over the country's alleged role in the illicit drug trade – an accusation that Beijing has pushed back against. The high US-China tariffs, while still in place, forced many businesses to pause shipments as they waited for both governments to strike a deal. With reporting from © AFP 2025 Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Elon Musk's departure: a myth punctured
Future historians of the United States will no doubt be fascinated by the 130-day period in which the richest man in the world was permitted to take a chainsaw to the institutions and agencies of the federal government. Much remains to be discovered about what really transpired under the auspices of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (Doge),but there is good reason to believe that most of it was calamitous.. We do have a sense of whether or not Musk succeeded in his stated aim of cutting $2 trillion from the federal budget. He later described that figure as a 'best-case outcome,' suggesting that achieving $1 trillion in cuts would be a more realistic and still significant goal. By April 2025, the department claimed to have saved approximately $160 billion, a figure that was met with scepticism and scrutiny regarding its accuracy and the methods used to calculate it. In fact, many agencies actually incurred new costs due to the chaos left in Doge's wake, from severance payouts to emergency re-hires and legal if the figure of $160 billion were to be believed, it is dwarfed by the trillions of dollars of additional debt contained in Donald Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful bill', if it is approved by Congress. Despite their protestations, it is clear that deficit reduction and elimination of waste were not the true purposes of Musk or Trump. This was a massive exercise in vindictiveness and vandalism against the very idea of public service. It was therefore both highly ideological and intensely narcissistic. Musk arrived in Washington promising to apply Silicon Valley principles to the sprawling machinery of American government. What unfolded was something altogether cruder. Mass layoffs were announced via social media before the agencies affected were informed. But far worse was the damage inflicted on international aid and humanitarian relief programmes. USAID, once a cornerstone of American soft power, was left scrambling to maintain basic operations in famine human toll was stark: disrupted refugee resettlements, delayed disaster responses and stalled global vaccination campaigns. READ MORE Musk, predictably, blamed 'deep state resistance' and entrenched bureaucracy for his failures. But his refusal to engage with the reality of public service reveals the deeper flaw in his approach. Government is not a start-up. Its success is not measured in quarterly earnings or viral acclaim. Musk's brief, brash time at Doge offers a lesson in the costs of mistaking disruption for leadership. Efficiency, when pursued without empathy or accountability, becomes little more than cruelty in spreadsheet form. The damage may yet be repaired, but the myth of the benevolent tech disruptor has surely, at last, been punctured.
