
SA's police serve ANC insiders, not the people: Here's how it happened
After South Africa's first democratic elections in 1994, there was significant optimism about police reform in the country.
Impressive steps were taken to bring the South African Police Service (Saps) under civilian control and to create a service responsive to calls for assistance from the public.
During the apartheid period, South Africa's police worked to preserve the political order and pursue political opponents.
It did not focus on dealing with crime. This is why the achievements of the 1990s are so important.
For the first time, black South Africans could call upon officers to respond to personal emergencies. This period also saw a drop in crime levels.
However, this promising early transformation was interrupted. The appointment of Jackie Selebi as national police commissioner in 2000 heralded a new era.
Selebi was an African National Congress (ANC) insider. The ANC originated as a liberation movement and has governed the country since 1994.
Selebi had served as the head of the ANC's Youth League in the 1980s, when it was banned.
In 1987 he was appointed to the organisation's national executive committee, its highest decision-making organ.
His appointment as police commissioner was the start of significant change in the purpose of policing.
It marked the end of the focus on civilian control of the police force and prosecuting authorities.
As an ANC insider, Selebi led efforts to establish party control over the police.
ALSO READ: Madlanga inquiry: Mkhwanazi first to be consulted
This politicisation gained momentum over the next two decades.
In the early years it was exemplified by the suspension of the head of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), Advocate Vusi Pikoli, by then president Thabo Mbeki, amid corruption allegations against Selebi himself.
Other telling developments ensued. The Scorpions were disbanded in 2009 by acting president Kgalema Motlanthe.
The unit's job was to pursue high-profile cases against senior ANC politicians (among others).
The police became increasingly entangled in the ANC's internal political conflicts.
At the same time the office of the national police commissioner experienced high turnover due to intense political manoeuvring.
Between 2009 and 2022, there were seven national commissioners.
Recent developments have once again brought the intermingling of police work and power battles in the ANC to the fore.
In early July 2025, Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, the commissioner of police in the province of KwaZulu-Natal, made some startling claims.
He called a press conference and, wearing camouflage uniform, he implicated the minister of police, Senzo Mchunu, together with the deputy national commissioner for crime detection, in a scheme to close down investigations into political assassinations in the province.
President Cyril Ramaphosa rushed back from a meeting of the Brics countries in Brazil to attend to the matter.
He announced that the police minister had been placed on leave with immediate effect. He also announced a judicial inquiry into the allegations.
I have conducted research into South Africa's security apparatus over the last decade.
Based on this work, and new research forthcoming in the Journal of Southern African Studies done with Jelena Vidojevic, co-founder of the New South Institute, it is clear that elite contestation in the ANC is intensifying.
In other words, the ability of internal party structures to manage gatekeeping is declining. Many of the people involved are indifferent or even hostile to South Africa's democratic and constitutional order.
As the ability of some political elites to access state resources through the party declines, some are linked with organised criminal networks.
Organised crime has been on the edges of South African politics. It now risks taking a more central role.
In this environment, the police service will often be the thin (blue) line between multiparty contestation according to constitutional rules and the criminalisation of politics in South Africa.
The shift
Large organisational changes within the police vividly illustrate this shift away from its core function.
The Visible Policing programme was meant to meant to deter crime through patrols, checkpoints and roadblocks.
But, instead, there was a steady decline in resource allocation. Employee numbers dropped between 2015 and 2021.
Detective services and crime intelligence also experienced such declines.
Conversely, employee numbers in the Protection and Security Services programme, responsible for providing bodyguards to politicians, increased sharply between 2014 and 2016.
Evidence heard by the commission of inquiry into state capture suggested that some officers and budgets in the service were even used to supply President Jacob Zuma and other politicians with what amounted to a private militia.
READ MORE: Police investigate allegations of Basotho military-style training camps in South Africa
This reorientation of resources coincided with a rise in crime across the country, a decline in arrests by 24.5%, and a drop in the police's efficacy in solving crimes.
Furthermore, a politicised police leadership effectively stopped policing various categories of crime.
This was particularly true of offences like fraud, corruption, and certain types of theft, and particularly when politically connected persons were involved.
The state capture commission heard extensive evidence about the failure of the police to pursue politically sensitive investigations.
Investigations into senior officials were frequently frustrated or impeded, and cases at state-owned enterprises were abandoned.
This shows how police resources were actively redirected as weapons of elite competition, pursuing political enemies and protecting allies within the ruling party.
Mkhwanazi's claims, if substantiated, suggest that this political policing remains entrenched.
What now?
Ramaphosa has announced the appointment of Firoz Cachalia as the acting minister of police.
Cachalia, a well regarded legal academic, served as ANC minister for community safety.
Between 2019 and 2022 he was part of the ANC's national executive committee.
His appointment raises serious questions.
If the core problem with the police is that it has become embroiled in ANC internal politics, having an ANC insider head the ministry of police (even if only on an acting basis) threatens only to compound the problem.
Moreover, South Africans have already witnessed a long and expensive judicial inquiry into state capture.
And despite extensive evidence of police failure to pursue politically sensitive investigations, nothing concrete has come of it.
READ MORE: Ramaphosa says Madlanga commission mustn't take more than one year
How likely is it that this new initiative will be any different, especially if those investigating it and presiding over key institutions are themselves ANC insiders?
To depoliticise the police service and redirect its attention and activities towards crime and emergencies, a crucial first step is to reconsider the appointment processes for the national police commissioner and other top managers.
Under the current system the president has sole discretion. This bakes party-political considerations into the decision-making process.
Without structural changes, genuine democratic policing will remain an elusive ideal.
In 2024/25 the murder rate in South Africa stood at 42 per 100,000, among the highest in the world and close to levels not seen since the early 2000s.
At the very least, the minister of police must not be an ANC insider. Democratic renewal in South Africa requires bringing the police firmly under parliamentary control.
This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
18 minutes ago
- The Citizen
When voters choose chaos over change
False hope and food handouts mask deep corruption and looming collapse — yet voters continue to fall for the same lies. Some readers have accused me of sounding like a broken record for discussing the ongoing corruption in our government. Exposing evil and issuing warnings is not acting like a broken record. It is a notice of pending disaster. If voters are not made aware of the many looming disasters facing South Africa, then silence equates to complicity in the chaos that is bound to follow. If we are unable or unwilling to speak truth to power, we are part of the problem and not part of the solution. If we are challenged and demonised for speaking out, then so be it. As our country enters ever darker days, our voters must be educated on what to expect. Much of what has been warned about in past columns has happened. The reality is that we, the voters, allowed it to happen. ALSO READ: SA teeters under corrupt leadership and collapsing diplomacy And when it happened, we complained but did nothing to rectify it. The government of President Cyril Ramaphosa ignores its voters at its own peril. It has even claimed it is willing to sacrifice them if need be. This is government by tyranny, not democracy. Buying off voters before elections is an old trick the political parties have used. False promises, creating expectations and offering fried chicken and T-shirts for votes while lying will not solve our problems. It would be a great disaster if South Africa's chicken farms were ever to be struck by an unknown virus. This disgraceful exploitation of the poor, needy and unemployed must be stopped. We cannot allow liars in suits to continue destroying the country and its people. The process of the government of national unity's majority party buying voters with food is nothing but disgraceful exploitation of the poor, needy and unemployed. The poverty and deprivation suffered by voters is the result of the greed and corruption of our so-called leaders. The hollowed out fiscus hasn't got money for much, but there will probably be money for fried chicken when it is time to vote. If this industry collapses, so, too, will the government. ALSO READ: Mr President, it's time for you to leave It also begs the question: what happened to the billions of rands South Africa was given to combat the Covid virus? What benefits did the nation get from this funding? And which political leaders benefited from this money? Maybe there will be another investigation that leads nowhere. But when a government appoints itself to investigate its own alleged corruption and report back to it, one must assume nothing will come from such investigations. For a revolutionary movement to claim that it single-handedly overthrew the apartheid government is a lie. There were many other people and organisations that played large roles in bringing about an end to apartheid. These people and organisations are neglected and sidelined for a lie. ALSO READ: ANC's cheap distraction- 30 years later People who vote for a party that has a record of failure and corruption merely allow the rot to rise to the top. South Africa is standing on the edge of economic and financial collapse. With that will come political collapse and mass chaos. Those who voted for this must not complain as they have the government they voted for. This government that is sleepwalking the country into economic disaster and is unable to negotiate trade tariffs that impact greatly on our few remaining industries. This is the result of what was voted for. When psychiatric patients freeze to death as a result of hospital mismanagement, we are expected to accept that as 'normal'. When it is hinted grieving families must 'look on the bright side' by a minister, it indicates how little respect leaders have for their citizens. ALSO READ: Leaders stumble from one crisis to another This disgrace becomes more obvious when nurses are expected to treat patients by torchlight. Our once beautiful inner cities have become filth strewn, pothole riddled cesspools, overrun by illegal foreigners. Alongside the corruption and failures of our government, the illegals have added to the degradation of our infrastructure, law and order and general development of South Africa. When our political leaders become millionaires overnight, should they not share their brilliant financial acumen with us? Surely that will bring about an end to the grinding poverty we are facing. The claim by the government of Ramaphosa that they are willing to sacrifice South Africa's citizens for their ideals and ideology is increasingly obvious. And they have indeed sacrificed us. The government ought to be very afraid of its people, and how they vote. Until voters realise what they are voting for, we will be governed by looters in suits who strive for chaos and who dress like us, sing like us, and talk like us. We must expect more poverty and disaster. ALSO READ: When following the 'science' becomes a path to collapse

IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Political pressure mounts for banking sector regulation in South Africa
SA's big banks' trade policies in the spotlight Image: IOL HEATED calls for a body to regulate the practices of the country's banking sector, especially from political circles, have emerged once again. They are dismayed with the wanton power that banks currently possess, which included cherry-picking which clients' accounts could be shut without justification. Parties such as the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and Umkhonto WeSizwe Party (MKP) were very vocal about the establishment a formal adjudication body to oversee banks. Donald Trump's tough stance on US banks has got South Africans thinking Image: Lee Ronganger Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The conversation resurfaced yet again after US President Donald Trump's plans to have their nation's banks powers reviewed for what he called 'politicising or unlawful banking practices'. However, unlike the US, the South African Constitution does not give President Cyril Ramaphosa such leverage to regulate the powers of the country's banks, due process must be followed. Earlier this year, the South African banks came under strong criticism at a Parliamentary standing committee on finance meeting. The meeting focused on issues pertaining to competition, the provision of credit for productive activities, and transformation. The South African Reserve Bank (SARB), along with its Prudential Authority Institute, the Banking Association South Africa (BASA), Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA), Standard Bank, FNB, Absa, Investec, Nedbank, and Capitec were in attendance. In the latter part of 2023, there were reports that banks were charging clients rates based on the colour of their skin. That revelation caused people to ask pertinent questions about the regulation of banks. The move by Trump's got people asking similar questions as well as why doesn't Ramaphosa implement similar policies as his US counterpart. Labour expert Michael Bagraim responded that the country's Constitution doesn't allow for Ramaphosa to exercise absolute authority and interfere with the banking sector. 'There is no possibility that our president can do something similar to what the Trump presidency has done. We are governed by a much more inclusive constitutional democracy and our laws would not allow such horrific powers to be given to an individual. "The American system gives despotic power to the American presidency,' Bagraim explained. His sentiments were echoed by Professor Siphamandla Zondi, who said the constitutional and political system does not give the president such executive power to punish such wrongdoings. 'In our case, the president should be reporting these matters of debanking and banks' misdemeanors to the regulators and the reserve bank. "The fact these issues continue in our banking sector means those tasked with supervisory and oversight roles are weak and ineffective,' said Zondi. Previously the MK Party had expressed its concerns about banking issues through its member of parliament, Sanele Mwali. Mwali raised concerns that the banks were displaying and "perpetuating unfairness and neo-apartheid systems of racist practices post-1994". He accused banks of exercising double standards when dealing with clients. "We have seen that there were companies covered in controversy in the financial sector, for instance Tongaat, Steinhoff, and Glencor, but they still have accounts with the major banks. "But Sekunjalo and others have already faced their day in court and they've already experienced closure of their accounts. Mwali said such actions by the country's major banks was a concern and he supported the notion that there discrimination within the financial sector still existed. DAILY NEWS


Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Tebogo Malaka ‘sting' – here's why Daily Maverick did it and what's next
The action of the Independent Development Trust's CEO and her spokesperson is an assault on the fourth estate, a vital pillar of a functioning democracy, and on freedom of expression. It's been more than three years since the State Capture commission wrapped up its work. Precious little has been done in the way of prosecuting those responsible for pillaging this country's coffers. So woeful is this lethargy that even former Chief Justice Raymond Zondo recently lambasted President Cyril Ramaphosa 's government, a highly unusual step for someone in Zondo's position. Failing to act on past State Capture crimes is one thing. Sadly, though, it is starting to dawn on South Africans that our ongoing corruption crisis is as grievous as it had been when the Zuma-Gupta syndicate ruled the roost. Whistle-blowers and forensic investigators are being gunned down. Shady contractors with no real business bona fides still clinch huge government contracts. Our President, for some reason, keeps cash in his couches. The deputy president and his family sit on vast assets that they can't quite explain. Two of Ramaphosa's 'post-capture' ministers have been caught in huge graft scandals. One of them resigned from the Cabinet, but still ended up as a Member of Parliament. The other was simply reshuffled to a new portfolio. Recent allegations regarding our police service read like a horror story. Entire pockets of the police, along with the organisation's political custodians, may very well be in the clutches of criminals. It is in this unsettling milieu that Daily Maverick decided to investigate the Independent Development Trust (IDT), a lesser-known yet important state body that spends billions of rands on social infrastructure projects. Our investigation into the IDT's R836-million oxygen plants debacle led us ever deeper into the IDT and its CEO's affairs. Somewhere along this research journey, we must have triggered a very sensitive nerve. The IDT's spokesperson got in touch with our journalist. He said he had 'very sensitive' business to discuss. A first meeting ensued, one in which promises of tenders and cash payments dominated the conversation. The spokesperson, Phasha Makgolane, wanted to set up another meeting to seal the deal. Makgolane's boss, Tebogo Malaka, would avail herself for this second gathering, the spokesperson promised. This left Daily Maverick with a crucial decision to make: spurn whatever advances Makgolane had made up to that point, or string them along with the hope of documenting a most compelling instance of alleged bribery. We went for the latter option. It was a tack that was always guaranteed to spark some debate, even if it achieved its goal of exposing high-level malfeasance. Journalistic 'stings' aren't exactly unheard of, but they're certainly unusual. They involve deceit and covert tactics, plus a level of planning and resources that nowadays aren't readily available to newsrooms. But we strongly believe it was more than justified. In a normal world, it would not fall to journalists to conduct sting operations, complete with hidden cameras and surveillance. But these are not normal times. In normal times, action would be swift off the back of the evidence presented. In normal times, the systems which should hold power to account would react. An arrest warrant issued. But, these are not normal times. The action of the IDT's CEO and her spokesperson is an assault on the fourth estate, a vital pillar of a functioning democracy, and on freedom of expression. Corruption, particularly within state entities such as the IDT, diverts public funds, undermines service delivery and erodes trust in governance. Journalists are not merely reporters; they are conduits of information essential for citizens to hold their leaders accountable. But these are not normal times. To accept a bribe, or to simply walk away from such an offer without exposing it, would be a betrayal of this fundamental responsibility. It would also be a betrayal if we stopped there. Good journalism plays the role of a watchdog – shining a light on abuse of power, corruption and injustice – not enforcing the law. But in these abnormal times, it falls to us to act in self defence and hold the line. To risk our lives to expose the truth. In another time, when the other three pillars of a democracy are functioning at strength, our job would be done. But history has shown that exposure is not enough. So while we strive against becoming political actors or activists, we cannot maintain a passive role when journalism is the target of bad actors intent on snuffing out our torches. To safeguard our independence, freedom of expression and to fight against this tendency to bribe journalists, Daily Maverick will be taking legal steps in the form of criminal charges against our would-be bribers. Anything less is a dereliction of our duty. DM Jillian Green is the Editor-in-Chief of Daily Maverick and Pieter-Louis Myburgh Daily Maverick's senior investigative journalist.