US envoy meets Netanyahu to revive Gaza truce talks
Listen to article
US special envoy Steve Witkoff met Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday in a bid to salvage Gaza truce talks and tackle a humanitarian crisis in the enclave, where a global hunger monitor has warned that famine is unfolding.
Shortly after Witkoff's arrival, President Donald Trump posted on his Truth Social network:
"The fastest way to end the Humanitarian Crises in Gaza is for Hamas to SURRENDER AND RELEASE THE HOSTAGES!!"
The US State Department also announced sanctions on officials of the Palestinian Authority and the Palestine Liberation Organization, saying the groups were undermining peace efforts. It was Washington's latest apparent diplomatic shift backing Israel against the Palestinians and diverging from its European allies.
The PA and PLO, rivals of the Hamas fighters that control Gaza, are internationally accepted as the representatives of the Palestinian people and administrators of a Palestinian state that France, Britain and Canada have said in recent days they could soon recognise as independent.
A spokesperson for the Palestinian Authority did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The full impact of the US move was not immediately clear: the State Department said targeted individuals would be barred from travelling to the United States but did not identify those targeted.
Read More: US hits Palestinian Authority officials with visa ban over statehood recognition
Witkoff arrived in Israel with Netanyahu's government facing mounting international pressure over the widespread destruction of Gaza and constraints on aid in the territory.
Following the meeting, a senior Israeli official said an understanding between Israel and the US was emerging that there was a need to move from a plan to release some of the hostages to a plan to release all the hostages, disarm Hamas, and demilitarize the Gaza Strip.
The official did not provide details on what that plan would be but added Israel and the United States will work to increase humanitarian aid, while continuing the fighting in Gaza.
Witkoff will travel to Gaza on Friday to inspect food aid delivery as he works on a final plan to speed deliveries to the enclave, the White House said.
"The special envoy and the ambassador will brief the president immediately after their visit to approve a final plan for food and aid distribution into the region," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters.
Indirect ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas in Doha ended in deadlock last week with the sides trading blame for the impasse and gaps lingering over issues including the extent of an Israeli military withdrawal.
On Thursday, two senior Israeli cabinet ministers, Defence Minister Israel Katz and Justice Minister Yariv Levin, voiced support for annexing the West Bank, Israeli-occupied territory where the Palestinians hope to build their state.
"At this very moment, there is a moment of opportunity that must not be missed," they wrote.
alestinians say annexation would foreclose the prospect of a two-state solution and terminate any peace process.
Israel on Wednesday sent a response to Hamas' latest amendments to a US proposal that would see a 60-day ceasefire and the release of some hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners, a source familiar with the details said. There was no immediate comment from Hamas.
Gaza medical officials said at least 23 people were reported killed by Israeli fire across the enclave, including 12 people among crowds who had gathered to receive aid around the Netzarim corridor, an area held by Israeli troops in central Gaza.
The Israeli military said its troops had fired warning shots to disperse crowds and had not identified any casualties.
Since the war began, the Gaza health ministry has recorded 156 deaths from starvation and malnutrition, most of them in recent weeks, including at least 90 children.
Confronted by rising international outrage over images of starving children, Israel said on Sunday it would halt military operations for 10 hours a day in parts of Gaza and designate secure routes for convoys delivering food and medicine.
Calls on Hamas to disarm
The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said on Wednesday the United Nations and its partners had been able to bring more food into Gaza in the first two days of pauses, but the volume was "still far from enough."
Residents face peril from Israeli forces and Palestinian looters when trying to reach supplies.
Also Read: UAE begins Gaza water pipeline project
"I have tried several times to grab a sack of flour. The only time I managed to do so, someone with a knife froze me in the street and took it away, threatening to stab me," one man from Deir Al-Balah told Reuters, asking not to be identified.
With the number of Palestinians killed in almost two years of war passing 60,000 this week, pressure has been mounting in Gaza on Hamas to reach a ceasefire deal with Israel. Hamas is still holding 50 hostages in Gaza, of whom around 20 are believed to be alive.
Mothers of hostages led a protest outside Netanyahu's office, calling on the government to end the war. Netanyahu, whose ruling coalition includes two far-right parties that want to conquer Gaza and re-establish Jewish settlements there, has said he will not end the war until Hamas no longer rules the enclave and lays down its arms. Hamas has rejected calls to disarm.
Qatar and Egypt, who are mediating the ceasefire efforts, backed a declaration on Tuesday by France and Saudi Arabia which outlined steps for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The declaration says Hamas "must end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority". Israel has ruled out the PA gaining control of Gaza.
Hamas-led factions said on Thursday in a statement that Palestinian resistance will not stop until "the occupation" ends and an independent, fully sovereign state with Jerusalem as its capital is established.
Israel has denounced declarations by France, Britain and Canada since last week that they may recognise a Palestinian state, which Israel says amounts to rewarding Hamas for its October 7, 2023, assault on Israeli territory. That attack, in which fighters killed 1,200 people and took 251 hostages back to Gaza, precipitated the war.
German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul, embarking on a visit to Israel, said negotiations for a two-state solution must begin, while for Germany the recognition of a Palestinian state would come at the end of that process.
In Jerusalem, Wadephul told reporters that Israel was in danger of becoming isolated and he was trying to prevent that.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
APC calls for abolishing SIFC, 26th Amendment, creating new 'Charter of Democracy'
Opposition leaders attend the day two of the All Parties Conference in Islamabad on Aug 1, 2025. Photo: X/YousafzaiHusain Listen to article Opposition leaders urged all political parties to come together to establish constitutional norms for inter-party relations, calling for a new democratic framework, systemic reforms, and an end to political victimisation and institutional overreach. An All Parties Conference (APC), organised by Tehreek Tahafuz Ayin-e-Pakistan (TTAP), was hosted at former senator Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar's residence in Islamabad on Mahmood Khan Achakzai's invitation. The conference brought together leaders of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), Pashtunkhwa Milli Awami Party (PkMAP), former senators, legal experts, and civil society groups. Issuing a wide-ranging manifesto, the APC demanded the dissolution of the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC) and the 26th Amendment, immediate release of political detainees, lifting of media restrictions, and the referral of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the International Criminal Court (ICC). Read More: Opposition demands end to 'engineered politics' Reading out the joint declaration, Khokhar condemned 'escalating authoritarian practices' and demanded immediate release of Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi, with expedited hearings in the Islamabad High Court and Supreme Court. He described the sentencing of dozens of PTI activists and opposition lawmakers a day earlier as a 'black day' in democratic history, asserting 'the hybrid regime wants the complete elimination of opposition in the country.' Delegates also called for the creation of a new 'Charter of Democracy' reaffirming the supremacy of the 1973 Constitution, rule of law, judicial independence, and the establishment of an impartial and autonomous Election Commission. A declaration warned: 'As a result of successive assaults by the hybrid regime, the Constitution of Pakistan—including the fundamental rights in Articles 8 to 18—and the parliamentary democratic system have been rendered meaningless.' Also Read: FO slams India's 'Operation Mahadev' as 'entirely fabricated' The conference further demanded abolition of SIFC, calling it unconstitutional and in violation of the 18th Amendment. 'SIFC is contrary to the spirit of the 18th Amendment and the Constitution. We demand its dissolution and cancellation of plans to transfer millions of acres of land—acquired in the name of corporate farming—to Green Initiative Company.' Criticising civil–military interference, the APC accused federal and defence institutions of undermining civilian agencies, eroding public trust in law enforcement and the justice system. It demanded immediate reforms and restoration of confidence in the judiciary. Addressing judicial independence, the resolution declared: 'Following the 26th Constitutional Amendment, judicial independence has been reduced to a slogan and is effectively nonexistent in Pakistan. Kangaroo courts are now serving establishment interests; regular courts serve select individuals, while the chief justice has become a symbolic figurehead.' To reverse this, the conference called for full repeal of the amendment, ending all interference, and establishing an impartial system for judicial appointments. 'To restore the sanctity of the judiciary… the complete repeal of the 26th Constitutional Amendment is necessary,' it said. Also Read: Imran's sons await visa approval, says Aleema Khan On provincial autonomy, the APC demanded that mineral resources in Balochistan, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, and Gilgit‑Baltistan remain under local control, declaring any legislation or contracts made without provincial consent as null and void. The declaration also demanded release of missing persons in Balochistan and K‑P via court appearances, immediate dissolution of illegal private militias alleged to have establishment backing, and release of political prisoners. It insisted on the constitutional right to fair trials. It further called for removal of restrictions on pilgrims (Zaireen) from Balochistan heading to Iran and Iraq, terming bans a violation of religious and human rights, and demanded greater local involvement in managing border areas adjacent to Iran and Afghanistan. Also Read: Five cops martyred as Katcha bandits attack check post in Rahim Yar Khan Promoting transitional justice, the APC proposed a Truth and Reconciliation Commission modelled on South Africa, stating: 'Every institution or individual who, from the founding of Pakistan until today, has played any role against democracy, the rights of the people, or the Constitution must voluntarily appear before this commission and confess to their crimes and errors.' The resolution emphasised promoting democratic culture and inter‑party consultation to curb political victimisation. Voicing concern over Pakistan's socio‑economic situation, the APC highlighted that around 45 per cent of Pakistanis live below the poverty line, salaried purchasing power has declined by 58 per cent, overall unemployment stands at 22 per cent and youth unemployment exceeds 30 per cent. Finally, the opposition urged the K‑P government to comply with the Peshawar High Court's verdict striking down the FATA‑TOF regulation and to withdraw its appeal in the Supreme Court.
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Exceptionalism versus state credibility
Listen to article The literally en mass convictions (related to the May 9, 2023 protests) on account of terrorism and the resultant disqualifications of several PTI stalwarts including Omar Ayub, Shibli Faraz, Senator Ejaz Chaudhry, MNA Muhammad Ahmad Chattha and Punjab Assembly opposition leader Ahmad Khan Bhachar by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) exemplify a new brand of exceptionalism. Exceptionalism is a term often associated with the policies of the United States and its European allies in defending their interests, regardless of logic or morality. However, Pakistan has also been experiencing exceptionalism of a different kind in recent years. The ongoing terrorism in Balochistan and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa provinces, the state's narrative against violence and the disqualification of PTI MPs suggest exceptional approaches. Are these routine occurrences or consequences of Pakistan's exceptionalism in recent years? Ayub, Faraz, Chaudhry, Chattha and Bhachar were sentenced to 10 years in prison each under anti-terrorism charges related to the May 9 protests and riots. Their convictions were not surprising. Similarly, an opposition MP in the Punjab Assembly, Rana Shahbaz Ahmad, recently questioned the institution of multiple cases against him under the Anti-Terrorism Act. While holding the Holy Quran, he asked other MPs if he looked like a terrorist. This context fits the term exceptionalism, which denotes selective application of laws, subversion of regulations for expedience and socio-political discrimination in favour of certain groups. This approach distorts governance, stunts the rule of law and raises questions about the conduct of state institutions, which often claim to uphold the rule of law and justice for all but engage in actions that contradict their exhortations to the public. Exceptionalism undermines the state's integrity and authority by discrediting narratives against non-state actors. While certain segments face state-sponsored wrath and attacks on rights, the official advocacy for justice, equality and expectation of loyalty to the state loses credibility. Rhetoric on the rule of law becomes meaningless when protectors of state lands ally with lawbreakers and land grabbers. Citizens doubt the rule of law when state institutions turn a blind eye to political, non-political or religious groups intruding on public spaces, occupying green areas and disregarding laws. When religio-political groups are seen as tools for power politics, the state loses credibility. Can the rule of law thrive without action against anti-state elements? If the status quo persists and short-sighted policies continue, threats from within will also persist. State institutions use parties and individuals as socio-political crutches, disregarding the fact that most hosts (mosque/madrassas) and their guests (often militants/insurgents of different shades) are actually ideological partners. Many mosques and madrassas run by factions of mainstream parties serve as conduits and shelters for proxy terrorists but state institutions can't dare check them out. Such duplicity and inaction — a kind of exceptionalism vis a vis certain groups — also drain investors' confidence and casts doubt on the intent against terrorist groups. Even China's strategic patience in economic engagement can wear thin if Pakistani leaders continued the path of ambiguity as far as order and justice is concerned. Certainty of punishment is the primary reason for lower crime rates in countries like China, Iran, Central Asian Republics and Middle Eastern countries. Quick institutional responses and certainty of punishment deter such crimes. Until state institutions showcase exemplary case settlement through efficient policing, quick prosecution and a justice-focused judiciary, law-breaking will increase without fear of punishment. Until the state demonstrates indiscriminate justice to all law-breakers, crime will thrive, damaging the integrity of the rule of law narratives. Narrative is abstract, but its outcomes - indiscriminate due process of justice — are not. When people see the state's top brass indulge in expedient actions that run contrary to the notion of rule of law, they stop trusting the state. Compassion, favouritism and expedience subvert law and weaken public belief in it. Common people will believe only when justice is served to victims, and violators are punished. A people-centric rights-based advocacy campaign should accompany strict punishment. Indiscriminate commitment to and execution of the rule of law facilitates state narratives on rights and justice. Exceptionalism undermines state narratives against subversive groups or non-state actors. The civil and military leadership may peddle the anti-terrorism notions or scream day and night about their commitment to the rule of law, yet not many would accord any credence as long as people at large view that rhetoric being at variance with actions on ground. The most current example of exceptionalism's bitter outcomes is the genocide of the Palestinians at the hands of Israelis who are willfully starving tens of thousands of besieged, helpless Gazans, including women and children. Few people across the globe trust the sympathetic statements that ring out of major capitals because people at large view them as Israel-abettors. Similarly, exceptionalism is accruing huge credibility costs to the Pakistani society too. The sooner this approach ends the better it may be for the integrity and credibility of the state institutions. The latest round of convictions will only further erode the state credibility and deepen the wedge between the people and the state.
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Trump's tariffs: What has changed and who is affected
WASHINGTON: A range of new tariffs due to take effect in one week were announced Thursday on most US trading partners, with separate sector specific duties – on copper – also being implemented. President Donald Trump unveiled an array of import levies that ranged as high as 41 percent on Syria and included a hike on Canadian imports from the current 25 percent to 35 percent. AFP takes a look at the most recent developments: India engaged in further trade talks with US, Indian government source says Canada Trump said Thursday the United States would raise tariffs on certain Canadian goods from 25 percent to 35 percent. He had warned of trade consequences for Canada after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced plans to recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. 'Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them.' Unlike the new levies hitting dozens of other economies, there is no delay and these begin Friday, according to a White House fact sheet. Products covered by the 2020 United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement – which covers a wide swath of items – will be exempt from the tariff rate. Malaysian pharmaceuticals, semiconductors exempt from US tariffs, minister says Mexico Trump said Thursday he would delay imposing higher tariffs on Mexican imports, pushing back their rollout by 90 days. The decision came after he spoke with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. The US leader had originally threatened to raise tariffs on Mexican products from 25 percent to 30 percent come August 1, citing a lack of progress in flows of illicit fentanyl. Goods entering the United States under the existing North American trade deal were spared. South Korea Just days before the tariff deadline, Washington and Seoul reached a deal to avert a 25 percent duty on South Korean goods, bringing the level down to 15 percent instead. In making the announcement Wednesday, Trump said the country also committed to $350 billion in investments and to purchase $100 billion worth of liquefied natural gas (LNG) or other energy resources. The 15 percent rate matches levels determined from US accords with Japan and the European Union. Tariffs on automobiles will also stay at 15 percent, Seoul said. Bangladesh secures 20% US tariff for garments, exporters relieved Brazil Trump's measures against Brazil are openly political, overriding long-standing trade ties. He announced 50 percent tariffs on Brazilian goods, although delaying their imposition from August 1 to August 6 and exempting products like orange juice and civil aircraft. The tariffs marked Trump's follow-through on threats to use American economic power to punish Brazil – and Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes – for what he has called a 'witch hunt' against his far-right ally and former president Jair Bolsonaro. US cuts Pakistan tariff to 19% from 29% after trade deal India Trump on Wednesday said Indian goods would face a 25 percent US tariff starting August 1, slightly below an earlier threatened level. The country would also face an unspecified 'penalty' over New Delhi's purchases of Russian weapons and energy, Trump said on social media. 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care,' Trump added in a separate post. European Union EU exports to the United States are set to face tariffs of 15 percent on most products after both sides struck a deal to avoid a higher 30 percent level. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said some agricultural products would be exempt under the agreement struck Sunday, though she did not specify which. But France's President Emmanuel Macron pledged to be 'firm' in follow-up talks. 'It's not the end of it,' Macron told ministers during a cabinet meeting.
