Hawaiʻi Is Failing Special Education Students. Federal Cuts Could Make It Worse
This article was originally published in Honolulu Civil Beat.
Mai Hall expected that her oldest child would automatically receive special education services for her autism, dyslexia and ADHD when she enrolled in a Kaimukī elementary school 10 years ago. But the school said Hall's daughter didn't need any additional support, insisting that she earned good grades and got along with her friends.
It was only after Hall received training from a federally funded parent information center that she was able to successfully advocate for her daughter — and later, her son — to get the support services they needed.
Parents of students with disabilities have long struggled to ensure their kids have the resources and support they need in public schools in Hawaiʻi, which ranks among the worst states in the nation when it comes to academic outcomes for special education students.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
Today, Hall's daughter is attending college and her son is receiving the accommodations he needs to feel supported and happy at school. But Hall and other families are worried that potential cuts to federal funding and efforts to shutter the U.S. Department of Education will result in fewer services and learning opportunities for special education students.
'We really don't need to worry about our children's education any more than we already are,' Hall said.
Education advocates and families say federal funding and regulation have played a key role in strengthening protections for special education students in Hawaiʻi, but it's unclear what oversight will look like moving forward. President Donald Trump cut the U.S. DOE's staff by nearly half last month, resulting in the closure of seven civil rights offices dedicated to processing student discrimination claims, including those related to disabilities.
A recent executive order from the administration also aims to dismantle the U.S. DOE, and the administration has proposed shifting special education programs to the Department of Health and Human Services. But the health department doesn't have the staff or expertise to hold states accountable for following federal special education laws, said Meghan Burke, a professor at Vanderbilt University.
A reduction in federal oversight may make it harder for Hawaiʻi families to receive support and resources for their children, said attorney Keith Peck, who leads the Advocacy Project providing legal representation to families seeking special education services.
Federal funding is currently tied to Hawaiʻi's compliance with special education laws, Peck said, but he's worried the new administration may provide states with more flexibility and less accountability on how the money can be spent.
'If the funding is no longer linked to allowing the parents to assert their rights and dispute against the Department of Education, if the (Hawaiʻi) DOE no longer has to comply with those protections, then nobody will have any protections,' Peck said.
Hawaiʻi's education department enrolls over 18,000 special education students and receives $50 million from the federal government each year to educate those children. To access the money, Hawaiʻi must submit annual data reports and comply with federal laws requiring schools provide special education students with necessary services, from physical therapy to one-on-one aids.
Teachers, families and educational specialists work together to determine the specific services students with disabilities should receive in schools.
But Hawaiʻi has fallen short of meeting federal benchmarks for the quality of special education services for the last decade, according to annual evaluations from the U.S. DOE.
Hawaiʻi's special education students rank among the lowest in the nation in reading and math proficiency and learn in traditional classroom settings at lower rates than their peers on the mainland.
Researchers and families say including students with disabilities in general education classrooms provides them with important opportunities to interact with their peers and raise their academic achievement.
Leah Yim said she's lost count of the hundreds of meetings she's attended over the years to advocate for her two children with special needs.
Yim's 6-year-old daughter currently receives speech therapy for her autism spectrum disorder, while her 15-year-old son has a nurse and aid accompanying him in class. He also receives services like physical and occupational therapy as part of his treatment after having a stroke in utero.
Yim said she hasn't heard of any changes to her children's services so far, but worries that federal funding cuts could reduce the number of educators and specialists in schools, which already face a shortage of special education teachers.
'My worry would just be the amount of caseloads that they're carrying, and then how that would affect their quality of services one-on-one with our child,' said Yim, whose family also filed a lawsuit against the state education department in 2023 accusing a teacher at Kaiser High School of sexually abusing their son.
While the U.S. DOE plays a key role in protecting the rights of special education students, the agency has limited enforcement powers.
In the most extreme cases, the U.S. DOE can take away special education funding if states aren't complying with federal law, said Nathan Stevenson, an associate professor at Kent State University. In most cases, he said, the federal government steps in with grants or training to support states in areas where they're struggling.
In Hawaiʻi, the federal government has provided a variety of aid, such as training sessions teaching staff how to resolve disputes with parents over special education services and collaborations with national centers to expand access to preschool for students with disabilities, said department spokesperson Krislyn Yano. The department declined an interview for this story.
The U.S. DOE also has a regulatory branch, the Office of Civil Rights, dedicated to processing complaints from students who file claims of discrimination based on gender, race, age or disability against their schools. As of January 2025, Hawaiʻi had 32 pending cases in both public schools and universities, 17 of which had to do with students' disabilities.
JD Hsin, an assistant professor at the University of Alabama, said recent staffing cuts to OCR and the closure of seven regional offices will make it much harder for the remaining employees to handle families' complaints and ensure states are providing special education students with the services they need. As of January 2025, OCR had over 12,000 pending cases that could take years to close and required in-depth investigations involving families, schools and federal attorneys.
Now, with fewer staff on board, Hsin said, he's worried that many cases will be left unresolved, leaving families with no answers about the support their children should receive in school.
'Those are kids' lives,' Hsin said. 'These are just kids who want an education.'
At the Hawaiʻi Disability Rights Center, Executive Director Louis Erteschik said he's most concerned about what accountability will remain if the U.S. DOE is dismantled and special education is moved to the Department of Health and Human Services. Already, he said, many students with disabilities aren't receiving the education they deserve under law.
In 2019, Erteschik filed a complaint with the Office of Civil Rights arguing that students with disabilities weren't receiving adequate services because they were suspended at three times the rate of the rest of their peers.
While Trump has proposed shifting special education oversight from the U.S. DOE to the Department of Health and Human Services, the move would require an act of Congress, said Jennifer Coco, interim executive director at The Center for Learner Equity. But there are ongoing worries that the federal government could reduce funding for students with disabilities, she said, adding that the U.S. DOE is already underfunding special education in schools and has consistently fallen short of its promise of covering 40% of the costs of providing services.
Currently, the funding Hawaiʻi receives from the U.S. DOE makes up roughly 10% of what the state spends on special education.
U.S. Rep. Jill Tokuda said the state would have to fill in the funding gaps if the federal government reduces its support for special education. But, she said, the uncertainty around the future of federal funding makes it hard for state lawmakers to plan on how they'll meet special education students' needs.
'I have great fears that we will go backwards in terms of actually providing the appropriate and adequate education to our special needs students,' Tokuda said.
Federal funding for Hawaiʻi schools should remain roughly the same from this year to next year, according to a presentation Superintendent Keith Hayashi is slated to give to the Board of Education on Thursday.
Peck at the Advocacy Project said he's most concerned that the federal government won't enforce the mandates that have historically accompanied its special education funding to states. With the administration's efforts to dismantle the U.S. DOE, the federal government will lack the staff and expertise needed to oversee states' compliance with special education law, he said.
Hawaiʻi has a state equivalent of the federal special education law that also requires schools to meet the needs of students with disabilities, providing families with an extra layer of protection if the federal government stops enforcing its laws. But the state still needs an external source of enforcement to keep schools accountable, Peck said.
It's unlikely the Hawaiʻi education department will take on the added responsibility of strengthening oversight over its schools, Erteschik said, adding that states don't have the same familiarity with special education law and requirements compared to the federal level.
'The state can't oversee itself by definition,' he said.
This story was originally posted on Honolulu Civil Beat.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Supporters of dog tether law not ready to give up
PLATTSBURGH — A woman who began campaigning in 2024 for a countywide dog tether law isn't ready to give up anytime soon despite being denied a public hearing by the Clinton County Legislature for the second time in eight months. Five out of 10 legislators voted no at Wednesday's meeting to ensure the public hearing resolution for the law did not pass. It needed six affirmative votes to pass. 'We have had hundreds turn out and support the Dog Tether Law. Unfortunately, we don't feel heard, and now we have been banned from speaking in any regular session legislature meeting, as well as we have been denied a public hearing for the second time,' Jennifer Jewett said in a statement Friday. Jewett, of Champlain started campaigning for the dog legislation in February 2024. Since then, she has been to dozens of meetings to ask the legislature to pass a county-wide dog tethering law. Jewett was hoping for the county to pass legislation that would mirror Essex County's existing tether law, which has been in place since 2016. She made some progress last fall after spending months crafting legislation she thought legislators would feel comfortable with, but they voted down allowing it to go to a public hearing. The process played out the same at Wednesday's meeting as it did last fall and a couple dozen supporters of the tether law, led by Jewett, once again saw their efforts for a law be thwarted. 'This just isn't right. We have no voice, and this is an issue that's important to a lot of people,' Jewett said. 'We were told to show that we have support. As soon as we did, we were then silenced. The public support we have gained was used against us to deny us a public hearing. We have an overwhelming amount of support. That's undeniable. Instead of the legislators doing something to fix the problem, their main goal is to silence the public, so we'll go away. 'This Tether Law fight has turned into a fight for our First Amendment rights. Why have public meetings if the public is not allowed to address the legislature? I see this happening again in the future to some other group with an important issue they need resolved. It's only a matter of time.' Legislators Francis Peryea, R-Area 2, Altona; Mark Henry, R-Area 3, Chazy; Robbie Timmons, R-Area 7, Peru; Kevin Randall, R-Area 5, Schuyler Falls; and Dave Bezio, D-Area 4, town of Plattsburgh; all voted down the resolution. Legislators Calvin Castine, R-Area 1, Champlain; Bobby Hall, D-Area 10, city of Plattsburgh; Patty Waldron, D-Area 6, Saranac; Paul Lamoy, D-Area 8, city, town of Plattsburgh; and Josh Kretser, D-Area 9, city of Plattsburgh; voted for it. 'I am very shocked and surprised,' Hall said during the vote as the 'no' tallies came in. 'To tell people that they can't come here and speak, that's wrong, guys. I'm very disappointed,' Hall said. Those against the law, which would have included banning 24/7 tethering of dogs outside, all shared a similar consensus that they have heard everything they needed about it. A public hearing on it would be redundant, Randall said. 'I believe there should be a public hearing only after we have a consensus that we are moving forward with this as a law,' he said. 'We have listened and listened and listened. We know that there are many people that take time out of their day to come here and to preach to have this law in place. Unfortunately, we do have a small portion of the population that doesn't do the right thing, and that's why you're all here — I get it — but when we're passing a law for 80,000 people in the county, we want to make sure that we get it right.' Waldron couldn't understand why half of her colleagues were against it. 'This is truly just allowing the public to be heard. As was said earlier, we have never denied a public hearing in Clinton County's history, so I'm not sure what the sticking point is, but the public deserves to be heard,' Waldron said. 'And then if people want to cast their votes one way or the other, if we have a hearing, then that's fine, but I see no reason why we should deny the public to be heard.' Kendra Babbie Durant, who has a service dog named Lola and spoke at the meeting ahead of the vote, shared how Lola was mistreated by her previous owner, including being tethered outside for long periods of time and then getting shot when Lola no longer 'had any value.' 'She wears her scars as a testament to what happens when they look away too long,' Durant said. 'She shouldn't have those scars. No dogs should, no dog should live their life how she did. Let me reiterate, Lola had been abused before she was shot. She'd been tethered outside 24/7, on an 8-foot chain, surviving in a circle. 'It doesn't stop somebody from owning a dog, having a working dog, having a regular dog, having a dog for protection,' she continued.' It doesn't stop someone from hooking their dog up when necessary. It regulates harmful conditions and bans suffering. It protects dogs from being forgotten hour after hour, chained to the ground, waiting for food, water, shelter or a kind word.' While Jewett and other supporters have not been successful in convincing the county to pass a law, several townships have, including the town of Plattsburgh last month. It's unclear where the fight for a county-wide law goes from here, but Jewett said they're not giving up.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Minnesota Title IX investigation escalates after Champlin Park softball championship
The Brief The U.S. Department of Education is escalating its Title IX investigation into Minnesota after the Champlin Park girls softball team won a state championship with a transgender pitcher. Law professor David Schultz says Minnesota and the Trump Administration have very different interpretations of Title IX when it comes to transgender athletes. Attorney General Keith Ellison is suing the Trump Administration, challenging the executive order that MINNEAPOLIS (FOX 9) - The U.S. Department of Education is raising the stakes in its Title IX investigations against the State of Minnesota. What we know The federal government announced an investigation into Minnesota earlier this year. A few weeks ago, they launched a second investigation into the Minnesota Department of Education and the Minnesota State High School League for allowing transgender athletes to play in women's sports. Thursday, officials announced they were accelerating the investigation. Why you should care This, after the Champlin Park girls softball team garnered national attention. The Rebels just won the Class 4A state championship, led by a star pitcher who is transgender. The U.S. Department of Education and Department of Justice announced Thursday they were elevating their investigations into the Minnesota Department of Education. Federal officials say it's because Champlin Park won the state softball title with a male athlete. "If we start to look at the state of interpretation of Title IX, it's not completely clear," said David Schultz with the Mitchell Hamline School of Law. Dig deeper Schultz says Title IX, which prohibits sex-based discrimination and education, is being interpreted very differently by the Trump Administration and the State of Minnesota when it comes to transgender athletes. "It comes down to the federal courts, including possibly the Supreme Court, to render the final interpretation of what Title IX actually requires or what it means," Schultz said. The Minnesota State High School League and Department of Education's position is that Minnesota human rights laws ban discrimination based on gender identity, and that it does not conflict with Title IX. The Trump Administration believes Title IX protects women athletes, and transgender athletes violate that protection. "They're going to have to eventually show that the interpretation of the word sex isn't broad enough to include transgender, and if transgender athletes participate in high school or college sports, their participation actually hurts women, and therefore violates Title IX," Schultz said. What's next So where does this go from here? It's now an expedited investigation, with a resolution expected soon. Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison has an ongoing lawsuit against the Trump Administration, challenging President Trump's executive order banning transgender athletes in women's sports and threatening to pull federal funding to states. The federal government's response is due by June 26.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Nevada Legislature Approves State's First Open Enrollment System
An education reform package recently passed in the Nevada Legislature will launch the state's first open enrollment system for public school students. The legislation is a compromise between dueling education bills, one sponsored by Democratic state Sen. Nicole Cannizzaro and the other supported by Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo. It passed unanimously in the Senate on June 1 and with a 38-4 Assembly vote June 2. Lombardo said in a June 3 statement that the Legislature 'passed historic education choice and accountability, so that every Nevada student can graduate career or college ready.' The bill was sent to his desk June 6. Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter More than 40 states allow interdistrict open enrollment, according to the nonprofit Education Commission of the States. Nevada's new system will let students transfer to schools outside their residential zone if there's room in their grade. It will also provide transportation subsidies for students trying to leave low-performing schools. Many states don't require transportation to be provided for open enrollment students, as it is for residents, according to Education Next. In New Hampshire, for example, lawmakers recently passed an open enrollment bill that places responsibility for transportation on parents. Families can drive their child to a bus stop on an existing route if they are attending a school outside their attendance zone, according to the bill. Related Multiple times a year, districts will be required to publish open enrollment data online, including school vacancy numbers and the total number of students who transferred in and out of their attendance zones. Nevada school boards will have to create a method, such as a lottery, to determine which open enrollment students are accepted into a grade that reaches capacity. Schools that deny a student's application will have to explain why. The bill prohibits districts from considering factors like disability, English learner status, athletic ability and residential address when evaluating applications. Schools will be required to create a priority lottery for students who have low academic scores. Related Students can be denied if they were expelled or suspended for 10 or more days during the previous school year. Parents can appeal a rejection to the district superintendent. The Nevada Department of Education will have to provide transportation for students who want to transfer from a low-performing school but have no way to get there. According to the bill, the department will award grant funds 'to the extent money is available' to local organizations that provide transportation. The bill will also create a statewide accountability system for districts and charter schools. The department could intervene in persistently low-performing districts by replacing leadership or assuming state control. 'We implemented open zoning so our children can attend the school that best fits their educational needs, and we provided resources to allow those children trapped in underperforming schools transportation to attend the school of their choice — regardless of their zip code,' Lombardo said in his statement. 'Simply put, we have instituted more educational accountability measures than during any legislative session in the history of Nevada.' Related