Russia Warned of Spiking Risk of Run on the Banks
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Economic turbulence in Russia has raised the chances that depositors will hurry to withdraw their money from banks, it has been reported.
Russia's Center for Macroeconomic Analysis and Short-Term Forecasting (CMASF), which is linked to Russia's authorities, has said there has been an increased possibility of "depositor flight" or a run on the banks.
The prediction comes amid economic uncertainty amplified by a record-high key interest rate of 21 percent imposed by the Russia's Central Bank (CBR) to curb inflation fueled by high spending on the military amid Vladimir Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Newsweek has contacted CMASF for comment.
A woman walks past an office of Rosselkhozbank in the Moscow International Business Centre on October 3, 2023.
A woman walks past an office of Rosselkhozbank in the Moscow International Business Centre on October 3, 2023.
ALEXANDER NEMENOV//Getty Images
Why It Matters
The CBR last week kept its key interest rate unchanged at 21 percent for a fourth straight meeting, to cool rising inflation driven by Moscow's invasion of Ukraine.
The central bank said it would keep borrowing costs high for a long time to return inflation to its target of 4 percent from its current level of 10.3 percent.
It also warned U.S. tariffs on imports from the rest of the world could push inflation higher, by reducing demand for Russian oil and weakening the Russian currency, the ruble.
Within this context, the CMASF forecast noted "geoeconomic instability" could cause a "panic reaction" among depositors akin to other "shocks" such as at the start of the war in a sign of the turbulence faced by Russia's sanctions-hit economy.
What to Know
In its April report, CMASF said that the probability of systemic liquidity risks or "depositor flight" has increased sharply based on its early warning system which draws on economic indicators.
The system establishes that a risk below 0.3 means there is a low probability, while between 0.3 and 0.5, there is an average probability of depositor flight. This risk has increased from 0.27 in February, to 0.6 in April.
The current level has only been reached four times, the most recent in March 2022, after the start of Vladimir Putin's full-scale invasion, when Russians withdrew foreign currency worth $9.8 billion, according to Reuters, as Western sanctions spooked consumers.
The CMASF said the situation is aggravated by the growing likelihood of an economic downturn due to the ultra-tight monetary policy of the central bank, the key rate of which is accused of stifling lending and investment.
It warned of a vicious circle, in which panic among depositors may stimulate banks to further tighten lending to accumulate liquidity to protect against new runs on the banks. In January the CMASF warned of a huge rise in corporate bankruptcies due to the interest rate.
What People Are Saying
Russia's Center for Macroeconomic Analysis and Short-Term Forecasting (CMASF): "the probability of systemic liquidity risks ("depositor flight") occurring has increased sharply...(due to) increasing geoeconomic instability which could cause panic among depositors.
"A similar reaction to external instability took place during shocks in 2014, 2018, 2020, 2022."
What Happens Next
Russia's economy could face extra pressure with the plunging cost of oil, its lucrative export, which has forced the government to readjust its budget.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
11 minutes ago
- Politico
What Trump Doesn't Understand About Putin
Russian leader Vladimir Putin looks increasingly cornered. The Ukrainians just staged a stunning drone attack on strategic bombers in far-flung Russian air bases. Putin's battered troops are struggling to gain significant territory in Ukraine, and the frontline has barely shifted in two years. His economy is a mixed bag, with inflation slowing growth and other danger signs flashing. President Donald Trump, who has long admired Putin's brash leadership style, is now questioning the Russian leader's sanity and urging him to 'STOP!' his attacks on Ukraine. And U.S. lawmakers are mulling a heavy new sanctions and tariffs package aimed at Moscow — the type one senator describes as 'bone-crushing.' Given all these challenges, why won't Putin abandon his goal of conquering Ukraine? I have been asking former U.S. officials versions of this question in recent days. Finally, I realized it's the wrong question — and the wrong way to think about this whole war. Putin will never abandon his ambition of conquering Ukraine, and convincing him to do so shouldn't be the aim of Ukraine's global supporters. Instead, the goal should be to make it impossible for Putin to fulfill that ambition. In simpler terms: You can't make Putin walk away from Ukraine; you have to put Ukraine out of his reach. Trump and some of his top aides do not seem to understand this about Putin. They've sent mixed signals about their views of Russia's strongman, with Trump acting as if the carrots of economic deals and Truth Social posts can sway him. With new sanctions on the table, many Russia watchers hope Trump will seize the moment to show Putin that even if he can't control his ambitions, he can make it too painful for Putin to achieve them. But those same analysts warned that new sanctions alone won't make Putin back down. Neither will continued military aid to Ukraine, nor tough-talking posts on social media. Showing Putin that he absolutely cannot subsume Ukraine will require all these tactics and more. It will also require patience. 'That's why you do these missions, like Ukraine taking out some of their strategic bombers. That hurts. It's expensive,' said Andrea Kendall-Taylor, a former U.S. intelligence official. 'Can we impose enough costs that he eventually says, 'I cannot do this indefinitely?'' I'm not the first person to posit that Putin will never change his belief that Ukraine belongs to Russia. Putin's own writings make clear that he's convinced Kyiv must be under Russia's thumb if Moscow wants to achieve new heights on the global stage. Former Secretary of State Antony Blinken suggested Putin's view is 'theological.' One analyst has argued that the West's best strategy on the war may require waiting until Putin dies. A White House official, in response to a request for comment from the administration, told me Trump 'has always been tough on Putin.' The official, whom was granted anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomatic issues, added: 'This president's foreign policy is unique in that he can be tough on our adversaries, but he is simultaneously able to look anyone in the eye to try to deliver peace.' But many of Trump's words and actions indicate that he has limited appreciation for how hard-core Putin is about pursuing Ukraine. During the campaign, Trump declared numerous times that he could end the war in his first 24 hours back in office — a claim that he now says was in jest but which nonetheless cast Putin as easy to persuade. In the months since, the president has seemed bewildered that Putin isn't easing up on Ukraine. Trump recently said, with a tone of surprise, that the Russian leader has gone 'absolutely CRAZY.' Trump also seems frustrated with Putin's lack of seriousness in ceasefire talks. The tough talk from Trump is striking given his past efforts to win Putin over. But his methods are not always consistent. Trump came across as passive in a social media post Wednesday after speaking to Putin, saying the Russian made it clear he'd have to retaliate against the Ukraine drone strikes. 'It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace,' Trump wrote, not saying if he'd urged Putin to avoid escalation. Comments and moves by others in the administration also suggest a lack of clarity about the Kremlin boss, who first invaded Ukraine more than a decade ago. Vice President JD Vance's dismissal of Ukrainian concerns that Putin will not uphold a peace deal — most famously in that awkward Oval Office meeting in February with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy — indicates that he doesn't fully grasp the depth of Putin's desires. It also likely boosted Russian confidence that its efforts to drive wedges between Washington and its allies, including Ukraine and the European Union, are working. Secretary of State Marco Rubio's assertion that the United States may simply walk away from trying to resolve the crisis didn't exactly help Kyiv, either. It suggests the U.S. lacks patience and that the Russians should forge ahead in seeking a decisive edge in the war. And if there's one thing Putin believes he has on his side, it's time. What exactly is Putin's breaking point, or the point at which he'll give up on taking over Ukraine? 'This kind of stuff — it's very hard to quantify. It's the psychology of one man,' Eddie Fishman, a former State Department official who dealt with Russia sanctions, told me. Some of these Russia specialists said Putin is likely aware of the concept of 'TACO Trump' — the 'Trump Always Chickens Out' notion that's swept Wall Street and other realms. Trump's policy inconsistency and his frequent backtracking, such as on tariffs, may suggest to Putin that the U.S. president will try to drive a hard bargain but ultimately cave, giving Moscow wiggle room. The sanctions bill is a test of sorts for Trump and whether he truly understands Putin's mindset. It has garnered support from the majority of U.S. senators and includes harsh provisions aimed at choking off Russia's last major source of income: its energy exports. The legislation would impose 500 percent tariffs on countries that continue buying Russian oil, gas, uranium and other materials. It's questionable whether the 500 percent figure will survive talks between the White House and Capitol Hill. The tariffs would land on major U.S. trading partners in Europe, China and India and wreak havoc on the global economy. Still, whatever version of the bill survives could deal a major blow to Russia. If Trump signs the bill, the Kremlin should worry because it will mean he's not afraid to escalate things with Moscow. But if he signs the bill and then delays, waives or otherwise doesn't enforce the sanctions and tariffs involved, Putin will believe Trump is backing down yet again and that he can take advantage of the American leader's capriciousness. If Trump also fails to take other meaningful steps to help Ukraine, especially on the military aid front, it could further boost Putin's confidence that he and his troops can ultimately overpower Kyiv. Of course, the Kremlin chief could still agree to peace talks — he already has, in a way, though he tends to send powerless underlings to the sessions in his place. Those motions seem to be about buying time with Trump, a self-styled dealmaking expert who is eager for a compromise. Even if Putin agrees to a sustained ceasefire or other type of pause in the fighting, Russia analysts I spoke to believe he'll use the downtime to regroup and eventually make another move against Kyiv. One Trump tactic unlikely to work on Putin is promising him economic deals, should he come to terms with Ukraine. To be fair, Putin himself has raised this prospect in a bid to get sanctions relief from Trump, who largely sees the world through a business lens. The reality is that the Russian economy has been transformed since the February 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine. It is now heavily fueled by the war itself. There are signs that this cannot go on forever, but it has continued longer than many Western officials and analysts predicted. Putin is also likely aware that even if Trump were to lift all U.S. sanctions on Russia, American businesses are unlikely to jump into the Russian market anytime soon. There are too many risks, including the possibility that a future U.S. president could reimpose the sanctions. Besides, European sanctions are likely to remain in place. 'Given sanctions and export controls that need to be lifted, not to mention the reputational risk and the operating environment in Russia, it's hard to see that Western companies would be rushing to go back to that market,' Randi Levinas, a former chief operating officer of the now-dissolved U.S.-Russia Business Council, told me. Putin is in a corner. But while everyone is watching him, he's still got his eye on Ukraine — all of Ukraine.
Business Insider
30 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Ukraine can make way more weapons than the country can buy. Industry figures say there's a simple fix to unlocking its potential.
Ukraine's industry is growing rapidly amid Russia's invasion, and Ukraine is relying less on allies. But the industry says it has far more capacity that's unused as Ukraine can't spend that much. Industry leaders say there's a simple way that Ukraine's potential can be reached. Ukraine's defense industry says it is prepared to produce much more weaponry than it is currently making. The problem is that the Ukrainian government can't afford the multi-billion-dollar price tag for production. But it says there's a straightforward solution. Ukraine's defense industry has boomed since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, with manufacturers ranging from huge outfits to small companies based in people's garages. These companies are crucial, especially at times when Western support is uncertain. The host of defense companies that have sprung up over the last three years of war has allowed Ukraine to innovate quickly and make weaponry that is well suited to the country's specific fight, and their insights into the demands of modern war have many Western companies keen to collaborate and learn from them. Ukrainian Minister of Strategic Industries Herman Smetanin shared earlier this year that "the capabilities of the Ukrainian defense industry have grown 35 times over the three years of the invasion," up from $1 billion in 2022 to $35 billion now. Industry bodies, each representing around 100 Ukrainian defense companies, told Business Insider that the country's industry is ready to make far more weaponry if someone can fund it, and said it would be a win-win for allies. Ukraine can make much more with more funding Serhiy Goncharov, the CEO of the National Association of Ukrainian Defense Industries, which represents around 100 Ukrainian companies, told BI that Ukrainian producers' capacity is more than three times as large as their purchasing power from current budgets. He said Ukrainian defense companies get contracts worth around $11.5 billion, but they have the capacity to make as much as $45 billion in weapons. "We are ready to increase our production. We have the capacity to increase our production," Goncharov said. But for now, "we still work in the limit of the budget of Ukraine." Government officials have shared similar observations. For instance, Oleksandr Kamyshin, then Ukraine's minister of strategic industries, said in April 2024 that Ukraine's defense production capacity was three times as much as its defense budget. Ihor Fedirko, the CEO of the Ukrainian Council of Defence Industry, a body that represents more than 100 companies, told BI "there are huge spare manufacturing capacities." Ukraine's defense companies typically rely on money from the government buying their goods for the military. Units also buy some weaponry and items themselves, but that practice doesn't add up to the same scale or offer businesses the same confidence. Ukraine's government only has so much money, particularly during wartime. A way to fix the problem Ukrainian industry figures outlined a simple solution, one that is already underway on a smaller scale. It's a new way of supporting Ukraine that was launched by Denmark last year. The model, nicknamed the "Danish model," buys weapons for Ukraine directly from Ukrainian developers instead of purchasing them from European or US companies or taking them from other countries' stockpiles. Goncharov described actions similar to the Danish model as the "simplest" way partner nations can help Ukraine's industry and the one that gives the "fastest result on the battlefield." He said this approach allows Ukraine to increase its production by giving manufacturers financial assurances and confidence. Multiple countries have joined this model, and some others, like Germany, say they are working on their own version of it. The Danish model ensures weapons reach Ukrainian soldiers faster and typically for less money. It also means the weaponry Ukrainian forces need most is prioritized. Goncharov said it helps Ukrainians get "exactly what they need on the battlefield." Through this approach, even if a partner country has limited stockpiles or a limited defense production capacity, it can still "purchase the artillery for Ukraine from Ukraine." Around $550 million worth of weapons procurements were finalized last year and boosted the production of key weapons like the Bohdana self-propelled howitzer. Goncharov said Ukraine's industry has a list of weapons it is ready to increase the production of if it gets money through this type of model. That list includes artillery and armored vehicles. Fedirko said the Danish model is "the largest hope for the private sector." Other options include using frozen Russian assets and joint manufacturing opportunities with foreign companies. The Danish model isn't the only option Goncharov said he has discussed the Danish model and other options for producing more Ukrainian weaponry with members of the European Commission. Another model he proposed is financing production in Ukraine that depends on a substantial amount of European components. He said many Ukrainian companies import some components from elsewhere in Europe, like some metals and vehicle chassis. He described this as "more complex" and more medium-term than the Danish model, but it's one solution that also benefits European industry, which is ramping up. Europe is watching the war in Ukraine closely, with many countries massively boosting their defense spending and warning that Russia could attack elsewhere on the continent. Countries are hesitant to drain their stockpiles, and new defense orders are creating backlogs in industry, limiting its capacity to produce weapons for others. Many European countries are studying Ukraine's defense industry and its speed, but it's a work in progress. Goncharov said many of Ukraine's international partners are not expanding their defense production fast enough, so Ukraine's industry "has no other options only to grow, to cover our demand." He said working with Ukraine is advantageous for other countries attempting to improve their defenses. They can learn from Ukrainian companies with the advantage of being in direct contact with soldiers and units, allowing them to stay up to date with what is needed against Russia and test their products. "We unfortunately face this situation when we have war on our territory, and it's not our choice, but it is what it is."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Editorial: Ukraine hits back hard — Drone strikes show Russia's got plenty to lose
Helmets off to the Ukrainians for giving the Russian aggressors a humiliating black eye and the loss of $7 billion in military hardware using 117 relatively cheap drones. Yes, war is hell and that pain should be felt by the instigators of war (like Vladimir Putin) and not just the victims (like Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy). What the Ukrainians did was smuggle the drones into Russian territory to strike at some 40 Russian bombers, about a third of that nation's strategic cruise missile carriers. This is no Pearl Harbor sneak attack or some manner of terrorism. A state of war has existed since Russia's February 2022 invasion because of Putin's imperialist designs. This strike, as far east as Siberia and as far north as the Arctic, was only a surprise insofar as Ukrainian security forces cleverly organized it in a way that the Russians could not effectively counter. Unlike a terrorist attack, Ukrainian forces did not kill any civilians in this operation; in fact, so far there are no reports even of Russian service members dying in the drone bombings. It was surgically designed to affect exclusively Russian military hardware, hardware of the sort that Russia has been using to mount its own strikes on Ukraine, far less scrupulously aware of civilian casualties. On Sunday, Russia used its own drones to attack Ukrainian territory in retaliation, including the city of Zaporizhzhia, reportedly killing and injuring dozens of civilians. Some might claim that this is a misguided move just ahead of another round of peace talks that began in Istanbul, potentially derailing the conversations before they got underway. Yet, Ukraine says that this operation was in the works for about a year and a half, and it can't well let supposed peace talks — talks to which Putin himself seems only ambivalently committed — block what it must do to safeguard its territorial integrity and people. Every wrecked Russian war plane is one that can't go on bombing runs over Ukrainian cities. In any case, this helps strengthen Ukraine's position going into the conversations. Zelenskyy and his generals have once more demonstrated that, in the face of the Kremlin's significant raw military advantage, they are capable of utilizing strategy, technology, creativity and general willpower to even the scales far more than Putin had ever expected when he launched the war, thinking he'd be appointing a governor in Kyiv within a week. The Russian tyrant has now cost his country hundreds of thousands of lives and huge portions of its military capability. Perhaps this will be on Russian negotiators' minds as they meet their Ukrainian counterparts this week. Who knows what else Russia might lose fighting this grinding war of attrition, imperiling its economy, its population and its own defensive capabilities. We understand that what Putin wants most of all is to be able to say that he won, that he is returning Russia to some imagined former glory. Yet what he risks is ending up with a Russia that is far more isolated and far weaker than it was when he started. Even longtime admirer President Donald Trump, who once spoke approvingly of the despot's incursion into his smaller neighbor, has come around to the idea that Putin must be reined in. It's time for Putin to end this war, not with Ukraine's subjugation but with its territory kept out of Putin's hands. _____
