logo
We fact check the claim no-one uses Glasgow's cycle lanes.

We fact check the claim no-one uses Glasgow's cycle lanes.

Glasgow Times29-06-2025
Segregated bike lanes have been under construction in Glasgow for a number of years.
Some are complete, others are underway and more are being extended.
Much of the new Avenues Project to redesign the city centre streets involves segregated cycle lanes in line with the Connectivity Commission recommendation to prioritise space in a hierarchy of walking, wheeling and cycling above private car use.
READ NEXT: Are refugees given priority for social housing in Glasgow?
Not everyone in the city, however, is in four of this approach.
The aim is to provide a safe space for cycling to encourage more people who say they want to but are put off by the risks of cycling on roads with cars and lorries.
Many of the comments and criticism of the lanes is based on the observation that 'no-one ever uses the cycle lanes'.
(Image: newsquest)
The Glasgow Times decided to fact-check these claims and ask the question: Does anyone use the cycle lanes?
Cycling Scotland has a data map of cycle counters at various points across the city.
We can see how many people use the bike lanes.
We look at points on the main routes, the South City Way, West City Way and other strategic points like bridge crossings and the Sauchiehall Street lane, the first to be completed.
The data gives the average daily and weekly number of cyclists who pass at each location.
READ NEXT:Get You in Town: New campaign to promote Glasgow city centre as a destination
Some still have a low number passing through, while others are high.
Sauchiehall Street cycle lane posted an average weekly cycle count of 6552.
On Thursday June26 at 4.24pm, the counter showed 472 had passed by eastbound and 128,421 for the year so far.
Westbound it 286 for the day and 101,925 for the year.
(Image: newsquest)
On a short walk from one end to the other, we counted 18 cycles in under five minutes. Half were delivery drivers.
The South City Way from Queens Park into the city centre is heralded as one of the success stories.
Its average weekly bike count at Victoria Road/Calder Street was the highest at 13,573.
At the city centre end of the route at Victoria Bridge showed 10,199 a week.
Others were also in the thousands, including Garscube Road at Possil Road, with 6398 a week, and at the Cowcaddens end, 4886.
Glasgow Green, which links cycle lanes at Bridgeton and Clyde Street, counted 8820 a week.
Others had lower numbers but were obviously being used, just not as much.
The East City Way travels along London Road.
At the junction with Fielding Street the counter picker up 2114 a week on average. Further east at Springfield Road it was 1715.
St Andrews Drive in the southside had 1106 and Kelvin Way, while not a cycle lane but is closed to traffic, had 1596.
Some are low, in the hundreds.
READ NEXT: Bus boss tells MSP to 'get on his bike and leave transport to the adults'
READ NEXT: Patrick Harvie MSP calls for publicly owned bus firm in Glasgow
Archerhill Road, in Knightswood, posted an average 224 bikes a week.
The Abert Bridge over the River Clyde in the City Centre, one of the many available crossings, showed 994 a week, and the George V Bridge had 693 bikes.
The expectation is that once the networks are complete and less of a journey has to be done on road, more people will use the routes.
There are many more cycle lanes than the ones above and more are being created, particularly in the city centre with the avenues project in Argyle Street and the area around George Square.
Other data points towards cycling increasing in the city.
Glasgow, like many other cities, has an on-street bike hire scheme and it has seen an increase in usage, particularly in the last year and a half.
The scheme began in 2014 and in the first four years recorded just under half a million hires.
By Spring 2022, the number of journeys had gone above 1.5 million.
The scheme said almost one million trips have been made in the last 20 months alone and in August last year, rentals for both standard bikes and e-bikes were averaging almost 2000 per day.
Barriers to cycling remain, including weather, transporting goods and possessions and safety.
Cycling Scotland Attitudes and Behaviours Towards Cycling in Scotland 2022 survey found 56% agreed that the roads near where they live are too busy to cycle safely.
Around half (48%) agreed they have never considered cycling to get around, and only a third (33%) agreed they would consider cycling for some of the journeys they make.
The top four barriers to cycling remain unchanged over time: - Poor weather (78%) - Not practical for carrying things (75%) - Not feeling safe on roads (68%) - Insufficient cycle lanes / traffic free options (57%).
While barriers to cycling remain, and some cycle lanes are clearly being used more than others, the statistics, as well as the evidence of own eyes, show Glasgow's cycle lanes are being used.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

William and his family will live in Forest Lodge even when he is King, reveals REBECCA ENGLISH. So what will become of Buckingham Palace?
William and his family will live in Forest Lodge even when he is King, reveals REBECCA ENGLISH. So what will become of Buckingham Palace?

Daily Mail​

timea day ago

  • Daily Mail​

William and his family will live in Forest Lodge even when he is King, reveals REBECCA ENGLISH. So what will become of Buckingham Palace?

Almost exactly 85 years ago, German bombs struck Buckingham Palace. As the Queen Mother stood among the rubble and debris, she memorably remarked that she could finally 'look the East End in the face'. It became a point of national pride that she and her husband, King George VI, refused to leave their London residence during the Second World War. Yet, almost nine decades on from those devastating raids, the landmark faces an even more uncertain future – as a palace without a king. With the news that the Prince and Princess of Wales plan to move to a new 'forever home' – Forest Lodge in Windsor Great Park – the spotlight is being shone on the Royal Family 's huge portfolio of properties, and the ever-dwindling number of tenants to occupy them. The Daily Mail has been told that it is William's 'intention' to remain in their new Grade II-listed property even after he accedes to the throne. 'This is for the long term and it's their intention to stay in Forest Lodge once he becomes king,' a source said. Understandably this has prompted serious questions in royal circles about the long-term viability of both Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle, as well as other private royal estates such as Sandringham in Norfolk and Balmoral in the Scottish Highlands, which the prince is eventually set to inherit. Locals say the eight-bedroom Forest Lodge is a definite 'step up' from the family's current four-bedroom home, Adelaide Cottage, where they have lived since 2022 (after deciding to leave London and move to Berkshire while their children were still young). Once described as a 'very substantial house in one of the loveliest parts of the country', the Georgian mansion dates back to the 1770s. The three-storey home boasts elaborate plaster cornices and ceiling decoration, exquisite marble fireplaces and a half-barrel-vaulted ceiling. It also has six bathrooms, a long gallery and a tennis court, which will doubtless suit the sporty Princess of Wales. Since the lodge was acquired by the Crown in 1829, a number of equerries, private secretaries and other royal staff have lived there. It underwent a £1.5 million refurbishment in 2001 so that it could be rented out commercially. Although well beyond the means of most families, Forest Lodge is certainly not grand – particularly when it comes to an heir to the throne. William's decision to live there shows his determination to adopt a more 'relatable' way of living, in comparison with Prince Andrew's vast 30-room Royal Lodge just a short drive away in the Great Park, or Prince Edward's Bagshot Park, which is said to boast between 50 and 120 rooms. The Waleses will pay a market rent for Forest Lodge, which is never publicly disclosed for commercial reasons. (The freehold is owned by the Crown Estate which also owns the freehold to Prince Andrew's home.) Plans have already been approved by the local council for a limited amount of internal and external renovations, which William and Catherine are funding themselves. Building works have already begun, with the family hoping to move in by the end of the year. Sources close to the couple stress their initial decision to up-sticks from their apartment at Kensington Palace to Adelaide Cottage in 2022 was 'designed to test a new location and see if it worked for them as a family' – and it very much has. Currently, all three children attend Lambrook School, a short drive away in Bracknell, and are said to be 'thriving' in the new environment. William and Catherine remain determined to be as hands-on as possible with their children while continuing to work as senior members of the Royal Family. Living in Windsor, insiders say, offers them the opportunity to do just that. 'They want to continue to do the school run, even if they are king and queen,' adds a source. Friends also say the move to Forest Lodge will allow the family to start a new chapter after a 'challenging' few years which have seen both the Princess of Wales and King Charles diagnosed with cancer. While Catherine is now in remission, a source says of the move: 'It's a fresh start for them after three really tough years. 'They are looking forward to creating many happy memories in their new home and leaving some of the unhappier ones behind.' There will be no live-in staff, butlers or valets for the Waleses at Forest Lodge – an illustration of just how fiercely they guard their privacy. The same applies currently at Adelaide Cottage. However, there are 'five or six' two- and three-bedroom cottages – currently occupied by estate staff – just a few hundred yards away from the Waleses' new home. Locals understand these will be occupied by the family's security detail, housekeeper and nanny after they move in. Extra security will also be needed as Forest Lodge is outside Windsor Castle's 'ring of steel'. One local tells me: 'The lodge is on a private road, close to a little village with a shop, a post office and a tea shop, which is mainly used by staff. 'It's about as isolated as you can get there, so you can see the attraction for them. 'It's situated in a huge private chunk of Windsor Great Park and the children can go out cycling for miles and not come anywhere near any of the local residents. 'There's a nearby fishing lake that's open only to staff, but that's it. It's also a lot closer – probably a 15-minute drive – to their current school.' The only concern for locals, I am told, is what will happen to their Christmas tree shop each year. 'It's run by the royal estate and is hugely popular,' says one local source. 'Thousands of people from the area come to buy home-grown Windsor trees each year over a glass of mulled wine. 'But it means people will be driving past their front door all day over the festive season and people think it will have to be moved. Generally, though, I think most are excited to see their new neighbours.' Interestingly, it seems the couple will continue to work out of Kensington Palace where their Royal Foundation and Catherine's Centre for Early Childhood are based, along with their household staff and press office. They will also retain their existing 20-room residence, Apartment 1A, at Kensington Palace, and Anmer Hall, their Norfolk retreat. However there are likely to be growing questions over the viability of their London base – not least because the Kensington apartment was refurbished in 2014 at a cost of £4.5 million to the public purse and is now used barely a handful of times a year. Might the Waleses be persuaded to use a suite of rooms in Buckingham Palace instead, allowing the Kensington apartment to be rented out commercially? It might make sense, say some. As for Windsor Castle, which was once earmarked for William and Catherine by the late Queen, the prospect of a full or even part-time royal resident after Charles also looks unlikely. But that is less concerning to many than the future of Buckingham Palace, the sovereign's official London residence, not least because £369 million of public funds is currently being invested in a top-to-toe refurbishment – including a complete redecoration of the late Queen's suite of rooms. At present, no members of the Royal Family reside at the Palace due to this mammoth ten-year re-servicing programme, which is required to bring the crumbling royal residence up to scratch. There is no doubt the works were overdue and badly needed. The Palace's pre-war electrics were verging on dangerous for such an historic building. But, without a king in situ – or even in proximity – will people really feel this is justified? One of the biggest attractions of Buckingham Palace, whether you are visiting it as a head of state, one of the 50,000 guests who attend garden parties, receptions and functions held there each year or even just as a paying punter in the summer months, is that it is the living, breathing heart of the institution. Will it have the same attraction as the nation's most-gilded museum when there is no monarch in residence? Palace aides have always carefully insisted that Charles 'intends' to take up residence in 'Monarchy HQ', as Buckingham Palace is dubbed. However, others think that is unlikely now he and the Queen are well established in the more private and homely surrounds of neighbouring Clarence House. It's worth noting that the building works are not due to be concluded until 2027, when King Charles will be 78 and William 45. A well-placed source tells me that William will be taking an even more 'pragmatic' approach to Buckingham Palace in the future, stressing that Forest Lodge will be his family's only 'long-term' home. To all intents and purposes, then, he will be the first monarch since medieval times not to live in a castle or a palace. Like his father, William is keen to open Buckingham Palace to a greater number of tourists each year than at present. This would generate funds for its future upkeep while lessening pressure on the public purse. The Prince of Wales also wants to see the amount of official entertaining that goes on at the Palace expanded, possibly even using it for government and charitable events. While Sandringham and Balmoral are very much private royal estates with no public funding, it seems that they, too, could undergo a subtle change of status, and be opened to visitors on more days than in the past. All of these are clearly sensible ideas. And yet concerns remain – particularly when it comes to Buckingham Palace. Those I have spoken to are choosing their words carefully, knowing how important it has been to William to ensure that family – rightly – comes first. As one insider says: 'The late Queen said she had to be seen to be believed. I just hope that the Prince of Wales can find the right balance between raising his family away from the public glare at Windsor with the presence required of him as a future, and eventual, head of state.'

Submarine exam resits ‘put Britain's nuclear deterrent credibility at risk'
Submarine exam resits ‘put Britain's nuclear deterrent credibility at risk'

Telegraph

time3 days ago

  • Telegraph

Submarine exam resits ‘put Britain's nuclear deterrent credibility at risk'

Britain's nuclear deterrent risks a 'potentially catastrophic' loss of credibility because submarine captains are being allowed to resit their command exams. The Royal Navy's Perisher course, which tests whether officers are made of the right stuff to take charge of a nuclear submarine, is revered by navies around the world because students only have one chance to pass its gruelling final test. Yet the Navy has now admitted that students are being allowed to retake Perisher's final sea phase. Former submariners expressed concern to The Telegraph about the change in policy, warning that the watering down of the course risked jeopardising the credibility of those in charge of Britain's nuclear deterrent. There is growing public concern over the state of the Navy, with unprecedented numbers of ships and submarines unable to put to sea through a combination of mechanical defects and crew shortages. Rob Forsyth, a former Teacher, or chief instructor, of Perisher in the 1970s explained that the course's famous pass-or-leave ethos had bred the best of submarine captains among Western navies. 'The commanding officer is akin to God and must not be thought to have a weakness,' said Mr Forsyth. 'My view then, and still is, that there were some who could, some who never could and a very few who could but lacked the confidence at first to know this and needed a push to show them they could be safe and competent COs [commanding officers]. 'Some of these got there fine, always viewed as my success stories, but some remained marginal and had to be failed. To give them a second go would have been to weaken the whole concept of Perisher and undermine the relationship of trust between crew and captain who would know that he was a 'round again' qualifier.' His sentiments were echoed by another former Teacher from the early 2010s, Ryan Ramsey, who said: 'I have two issues with reruns. First, if you've already seen the sea phase, you know the scenarios. That short-term familiarity can hide the true weaknesses the course is designed to expose. 'Second, this isn't a driving test. Passing Perisher means you're trusted to take a nuclear submarine and its crew into harm's way. If you fail, fail again, then pass, you may carry a credibility problem into command, and credibility is everything when the stakes are military, political and potentially catastrophic.' Student evades four 'enemy' warships' During Perisher, would-be captains are put in charge of a submarine under the watchful eye of a qualified Teacher. Students are put through a gruelling four-phase course lasting up to five months. The final phase of Perisher is a practical exam with the student evading up to four 'enemy' warships trying to hunt down and sink the trainee's boat. A naval insider said that if Perisher staff feel a student needs more experience, he can be sent back to sea and retake the course again later in his career. 'This normally only happens during Phases 1-3. It would be exceptional to happen on Phase Four but is not excluded,' said the insider. It is not known whether any current submarine commanders have passed after resitting Phase 4. A Royal Navy spokesman said that 'unsuccessful candidates on the Submarine Command Course have been able to reapply since 2013' and said 'the high standards required to pass have not changed'. 'Candidates who are initially unsuccessful may go on to be reselected, but only once they have demonstrated their potential while gaining additional experience in the fleet,' the spokesman said. Mr Ramsey said: 'In 2013, I became the first Perisher Teacher to take a rerun student – someone removed from the Submarine Command Course before the sea phase,' he said. 'I didn't ask why at the time; I wanted my assessment to be entirely objective. He was the lead student in the simulator phase, but when we went to sea, I failed him. Later, I learnt my predecessor had removed him for the exact same reason. We agreed as an organisation not to try that again.' When asked if his statement claiming that students have been able to resit the Perisher course since 2013 was accurate, the Navy spokesman said he had nothing to add.

Fruit purees to add class to homemade summer cocktails
Fruit purees to add class to homemade summer cocktails

The Guardian

time5 days ago

  • The Guardian

Fruit purees to add class to homemade summer cocktails

There are many reasons I've never had a bar cart. For one thing, there's something sublimely Abigail's Party about having an area solely dedicated to drinking. Plus a bar cart says: 'I have my life together! Friends regularly visit my house and enjoy doing so!' (Both things I'm unable to verify.) The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more. My new home, however, comes complete with a drinks trolley, yet I'm scared to touch it. Why? Mainly because I just don't think I'm capable of producing something I'll actually like. Besides chucking some cold gin in a coupe and dropping in a poorly cut toenail of lemon, my mixologist skills begin and end at lumping a few liquids in a jug and calling it a 'lazy girl cocktail' – although 'cocktail' feels a rather grandiose term for creating what is, essentially, a domestic version of a Wetherspoon's pitcher. The drinks I want to make – a clover club, a porn star martini, a bellini, say – are out of my reach because I'm incapable of making a convincing fruit puree. I lose most of it to the walls of the blender, knacker my wrist grinding it with a pestle, add too much sugar or bankrupt myself by overbuying expensive fruit. So I asked Mez Austin, bar manager at Morchella in central London, for advice on how to make a foolproof puree from summer fruits. From just a single 150g punnet of berries, Mez says you can make enough for a small summer party of eight to 10 people. Simply introduce your chosen fruit and sugar to heat. How much sugar? Ah, that depends. 'That will be determined by the fruit involved,' Mez says. 'Pear puree, for example, will require a fair bit more sugar than strawberry or raspberry puree. It also depends on how ripe the fruit is – if you've bought it from a supermarket, I'd say maybe two tablespoons. Sugar also prolongs the preservation time of a puree.' Leave the fruit and sugar on a low temperature, with a lid on, for five minutes, take off the heat, then blend once it's cooled a little. 'Blending is the tricky part,' Mez explains ('No kidding!' I think). 'Over-blending can kill the effervescence of a puree, so blend just until smooth, then stop immediately.' And there you have it: your very own DIY puree. You can now shake/mix/pipette it into myriad cocktails, but the easiest way to drink it is in a bellini. Mez has his own summer rendition, using pét-nat instead of prosecco for a chic twist. 'Pét-nats often offer a broader range of flavour: a really dry, sharp one works brilliantly with a summer fruit puree such as redcurrant or raspberry, while a slightly funky and sour pét-nat works well with pear puree in an autumn bellini.' Now there's something to look forward to. Boiron Raspberry Fruit Puree £10.52 (1 litre) Henley Bridge, 0%. Mez's preferred shop-bought puree. Keeps for eight days after opening. Bristol Syrup Co Strawberry Puree £7.39 (600ml) Nisbets, 0%. Tart, sweet strawberry puree. Try it in a Tom Collins or French 75. Roc Ambulle Pét-Nat £16.90 Les Caves de Pyrene, 9.5%. Bold and deeply coloured, with ripe cherry and raspberry notes. Lost in a Field Frolic Pét-Nat 2023 £29.99 Grape Britannia, 9.5%. A sharp, aromatic blend of six heritage grape varieties from a project that seeks to protect them.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store