logo
Lessons from an olive oil sommelier

Lessons from an olive oil sommelier

Times16-07-2025
We've all heard of a sommelier, right? The highly trained nose responsible for selecting, pairing and serving wines in restaurants — all based on a deep knowledge of grape varieties, regions, vintages and tasting techniques. However, there's a new breed of sommelier in town, and this time they're not sipping on hearty malbec or assessing the mouthfeel of a chardonnay. Instead, they are all about the olive — olive oil that is.
It's hard to know just how many olive oil sommeliers there are in the UK, but Sarah Vachon is one of them. Through her company Citizens of Soil, Vachon is on a mission to get us to rethink how we use the golden liquid. Founded in 2021 by Vachon and her husband, Michael, Citizens of Soil provides olive oil subscriptions (starting from £15 per month) through its Olive Oil Club — with oils responsibly sourced from across the Mediterranean. It has also grown into an olive oil brand stocked by Selfridges, Fortnum & Mason and Waitrose, among others, and used in some of London's top restaurants (although many Michelin-starred chefs apparently prefer to work with oil from mild olive oil varieties so as not to affect the flavour of their cooking).
The temperature is suitably Mediterranean when I meet Vachon in the City of London office that Citizens of Soil calls home, for a crash course in all things olive oil. She lives and breathes the fruit — even wearing a discreet pendant engraved with an olive branch. It all started on a holiday to visit friends in rural Greece. There the couple fell in love with the complex flavours of the olive oil they encountered, and started to bring some of the oil back as gifts for their friends in the UK and US. Investigating just why this oil tasted better than the bottles on the supermarket shelves, the couple discovered an industry dominated by anonymised production. Citizens of Soil counters that by putting producers — and, principally, female producers — at the heart of the product. The farmers' names are included on each bottle, they are paid above the market rate and are encouraged to use regenerative farming practices. All this has led to Citizens of the Soil being rated a B-Corp (a company that meets high standards of social and environmental performance, accountability and transparency).
The holiday also kick-started Vachon's journey to becoming a fully fledged olive oil expert. She started by gaining experience on the ground. 'I had been doing harvest and gone to mills and had already started doing work days with producers,' she explains over some cups of olive oil. 'I'd reach out to international olive oil judges and pay them to do a workshop just so I could learn.' Vachon formalised her training in tasting, assessing and sourcing the finest oils in the world through a year-long course at one of the principal training grounds for the olive oil sommelier, ESAO (the Escuela Superior del Aceite de Oliva) located in Valencia, Spain. This training allows her to guide and educate others in broadening their olive oil palates. Be prepared to learn the difference between the bold, peppery finish of a Tuscan batch and the green, grassy balance of lesser-known regions like Croatia and South Africa.
There are over 1,000 varieties of olives, from the Tsounati of Greece to the Mission of California, each with its own nuances. 'They can each have different nutritional benefits and flavours and things that they can do,' Vachon explains. 'But also you can take those varieties and you can transplant them to different hillsides of the same area and they'll taste different. It's the same concept we have in wine, this element of terroir.' It turns out that anywhere that's good for growing grapes is also good for growing olives — with South America the next frontier.
The first stage in getting to grips with these nuances is honing your senses. 'Smelling everything really trains you,' Vachon explains as we start the tasting process, 'because if you don't know what something smells like, you can't identify it.' Olive oil tasting uses special cups shaped like mini wine tumblers. These cups are made from dark coloured glass so the colour of the oil is obscured and cannot subconsciously affect the tasting. Blue and red are popular, but Citizens of Soil's next venture, the Olive Oil Clubhouse, uses black. Planted in the heart of Notting Hill from 17th to 28th July, the pop-up Clubhouse will immerse visitors in all things EVOO as the UK's first-ever olive oil bar. There will be olive oil tastings (complete with little black tasting cups), talks from nutritionists, soft serve vanilla ice cream or chocolate sorbet courtesy of cult ice cream brand Happy Endings topped with olive oil, and even complimentary golden-hour cocktails. All this plus a well-stocked olive oil shop.
'Colour is no indicator of quality in extra virgin olive oil,' Vachon says. The shape of the cup is also significant. Much like with wine tasting, this allows the oil to breathe. The tasting begins with us warming the oil with our body heat by cupping the glass with our hands — one on top and one on the bottom — and rotating the glass back and forth. 'This allows the compounds to activate to kick off the flavour and the aromas,' Vachon notes. Although a little heat is a good thing, too much heat is a no-no. 'If someone doesn't package it right or if they keep it in a clear bottle, or keep it near their stove … keeping it near a stove where it's getting heat all the time, even in a dark glass bottle, can ruin an amazing oil.' This is because too much heat accelerates the oxidation process, breaking down the oil's beneficial antioxidant compounds.
Then, we smell. 'The wonderful thing about polyphenols, which are the antioxidant compounds that everyone's talking about, is that you can smell them and you can taste them,' Vachon explains. 'So what I tell people is, look for the smell of life. You need to smell plants.'
We start our tasting session with one of Citizens of Soil's more delicate, Greek oils. It smells crisp and fresh, with herbaceous notes and, to Vachon's expert nose, red apples. 'There's all sorts of things you might smell, but it's the smell of life that you're looking for, because if that's gone away, that means that oil could have a defect or it's no longer fresh.'
Next comes the actual tasting. Again, it's similar to wine tasting. Take a sip — no more than a teaspoon — and aerate the oil in your mouth, allowing it to coat the palate. Do this by sticking your tongue on the roof of your mouth and sucking in air as you splash the oil around your mouth. What you're looking for is an astringent feeling on the palate — maybe a bitterness, maybe a slight sharpness.
The second oil we taste is an intense Spanish oil harvested in November 2024 by Marina Segura Gómez and her father, Manuel (who have been producing olive oil for Citizens of Soil since 2023), available in small batches from their groves in Andalusia. Alongside more tomatoey notes, it's distinctly sharper on the palate than the Greek oil.
One of the markers of a quality olive oil is the acidity level. 'That has to be under 0.8 per cent,' Vachon says. 'We've never brought in anything over 0.4 per cent. Before I even work with a producer, I look at their labs, even from the previous years, because that lets me know the shape that the fruit was in before it went to the mill. How quickly did they get it in there? How clean was the mill? Was the fruit damaged?' In the case of Marina's oil, the acidity is always under 0.2 per cent. That's partly down to the productions methods used — she has a mobile mill, which means the oil can be produced as soon as the olives are harvested.
The third aspect of the olive oil tasting is a pepperiness — 'it could be like a little tingle,' Vachon says. 'Sometimes it's a sharper pepper that'll actually make you cough.'
That's quite apparent in the third oil we taste, a limited-edition Cerasuola olive oil from Syracuse in Italy. 'This year is a little bit punchier just because the climate was so stressful,' Vachon says, 'and when the olives get stressed, much like grapes, they put out more antioxidants and more of these polyphenols.' This in turn means a more peppery taste.
While we mainly associate olive oil with drizzling on salads or frying food — both valid uses — there are also some more inventive approaches. The Spanish oil we taste pairs really well with acidic fruits like mango, or pineapple. Meanwhile, many of the female olive oil producers that Citizens of Soil work with enjoy olive oil on yoghurt with seeds and honey for breakfast — or even blended into matcha.
Citizens of Soil has made a conscious effort to prioritise female-led production and support a new generation of farmers, actively working to partner with farms that are at least 50 per cent female-run. This includes producers Juan Olivares, an agronomist, and Carolina Domínguez, who works with endangered species, in Spain — two friends who have combined their olive groves. Younger women entering the field represent not only essential new labour in an often ageing field but also a cultural and environmental shift in how farming communities are shaped.
This summer, Londoners can experience Sarah's expertise and Citizens of the Soil's products first hand at the Olive Oil Clubhouse, where they can sip on tomatinis served with pan con tomate drizzled in liquid gold, explore pairing olive oil with peaches, and eat on EVOO-infused pastries (the dates of events and offerings vary, check the website for full details and timings). Although this is only temporary, Vachon hopes that it might be the first step on the way to a more permanent iteration — perhaps featuring everything from visiting producers to wellness and skincare.
Find the Olive Oil Clubhouse at 2 Blenheim Crescent, London W11, July 17-28
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What is fair pay for a CEO? Modern bosses need to think long-term
What is fair pay for a CEO? Modern bosses need to think long-term

Times

time44 minutes ago

  • Times

What is fair pay for a CEO? Modern bosses need to think long-term

What is fair pay? This week, Eamonn O'Hare, the boss of a little-known telecoms company, Zegona, listed on the London Stock Exchange, was paid £1.8 million; on top of that he was paid £129 million in shares — the highest ever sum awarded to the chief executive of a UK-listed company. Meanwhile, resident doctors have been on strike demanding an increase to their salaries, which now average £54,300, arguing their pay has failed to keep pace with inflation since 2008. You get 2,375 doctors for every O'Hare. To compare the pay packet of a telecoms chief executive with a doctor may seem strange. But 30 years ago this exact same contrast was being drawn after Sir Iain Vallance, the then boss of BT, was hauled in front of a parliamentary select committee. BT had been privatised for a decade and in that time the pay of the chief executive had increased in real terms by 970 per cent, with Vallance paid a total of £1.24 million, compared with £36,000 for the best paid junior doctors. Back then you got 34 doctors for every Vallance. He pointed out that he worked a 70-hour week, adding he 'would quite like a job as a junior doctor. It might be relaxing'. As you might imagine, the junior doctors of the time were about as amused by his comment as today's are when you point out their strikes are damaging the reputation of medics. Vallance's gaffe is retold with glee by Michael Aldous and John D Turner in their enjoyable recent book, The CEO — The Rise and Fall of Britain's Captain of Industry. The two are business historians, both at Queen's University Belfast, and their book is partly a rollicking tale of Britain's most famous bosses from the end of the Victorian era to 2020, including some who are now forgotten. I had never heard of Sir John Ellerman, who, when he died in 1933, had a probate valued at £36.7 million — the largest estate ever declared in Britain, three times bigger than the Guinness fortune. His vast riches came from shipping, before he expanded into mines, brewing, newspapers and London property. I also learnt that Alfred Lyttelton — the first man to be capped by England at both cricket and football — chaired the Law Union Insurance Company until his untimely death in 1913 from a stomach abscess which he developed after being struck by a cricket ball. The more famous figures — Lord Leverhulme, Ralph 'five times a night' Halpern, Fred 'the Shred' Goodwin of RBS infamy, and Cedric 'the Pig' Brown of British Gas also get a run out as the book tells the tumultuous history of Britain's strange relationship with its business leaders. Do we admire them for creating wealth, jobs and contributing to our tax base? Or do we revile them for being mostly 'concerned with making money', as Jim Slater famously declared, a class of executives responsible for the widening disparity between the 0.1 per cent and the rest? What makes Aldous and Turner's study more than just a series of pen portraits is their analysis, drawing on a database of 1,387 bosses at 475 of our largest companies. There has been a long-standing assumption that Britain became the sick man of Europe after the Second World War because, in Harold Wilson's 1963 reprimand, even though the MCC had abolished the snobbish distinction between amateurs and professionals in cricket, 'in science and industry we are content to remain a nation of gentlemen in a world of players'. Too many ill-qualified toffs were running Britain's top companies. One of the interesting conclusions of Aldous and Turner, however, is that Wilson was resoundingly wrong. Yes, in the first two decades of the 20th century, four in ten bosses were peers of the realm, but this had fallen to 5 per cent by the 1960s and you were far more likely in the UK to make it to the top as son of a bricklayer or postman than in the United States. Also, in the first two decades when aristos were in charge, their study 'shows no discernible difference in profitability and stock market valuation between companies led by gentlemen or players'. In more recent years, despite Britain catching up with America in sending bosses to business school, modern chief executives have failed to boost the productivity or the prosperity of the country. They argue, in fact, that the modern professional chief executive — 43 per cent of whom lose their job by being sacked or ousted after a takeover — is now too short-termist. Like football managers, they know they won't last long in the job so push for as high a salary as possible. O'Hare at Zegona was paid such a huge sum because the shares of his company leapt fourfold between 2021 and 2024. Zegona shareholders have done very well; no wonder they were happy to vote for his large pay packet. However, part of the company's impressive performance was down to slashing 28 per cent of the workforce. Aldous and Turner argue that the Edwardian aristos, and founders of family companies, were surprisingly good managers because they had long-term 'skin in the game'. The welfare of staff mattered to them. Crucially, many had a 'purpose' — that modish term. Lord Leverhulme, a Congregationalist, made such a success of Sunlight Soap because, in part, he genuinely believed in the importance of cleanliness. To pin the robustness of early 1900s companies on the noblesse oblige of the bosses, as Aldous and Turner suggest, seems a touch romantic. But they believe corporate Britain needs to recapture that spirit by chief executive pay being tied not just to the interests of shareholders but wider society too. That's ambitious at best, a legal quagmire at worst — but it is true more bosses need to act as longer-term stewards if they want a role in revitalising Britain's economy. There are only so many doctors they are worth.

What is the car finance scandal - and what could today's ruling mean for motorists?
What is the car finance scandal - and what could today's ruling mean for motorists?

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

What is the car finance scandal - and what could today's ruling mean for motorists?

The UK's Supreme Court is set to deliver a landmark ruling today that could have billion-pound consequences for banks and impact millions of motorists. The essential question that the country's top court has been asked to answer is this: should customers be fully informed about the commission dealers earn on their purchase? However, the Supreme Court is only considering one of two cases running in parallel regarding the mis-selling of car finance. Here is everything you need to know about both cases, and how the ruling this afternoon may (or may not) affect any future compensation scheme. What is the Supreme Court considering? The Supreme Court case concerns complaints related to the non-disclosure of commission. This applies to 99% of car finance cases. When you buy a car on finance, you are effectively loaned the money, which you pay off in monthly instalments. These loans carry interest, organised by the brokers (the people who sell you the finance plan). These brokers earn money in the form of a commission (which is a percentage of the interest payments). Last year, the Court of Appeal ruled in favour of three motorists who were not informed that the car dealerships they agreed finance deals with were also being paid 25% commission, which was then added to their bills. The ruling said it was unlawful for the car dealers to receive a commission from lenders without obtaining the customer's informed consent to the payment. However, British lender Close Brothers and South Africa's FirstRand appealed the decision, landing it in the Supreme Court. What does the second case involve? The second case is being driven by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and involves discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs). Under these arrangements, brokers and dealers increased the amount of interest they earned without telling buyers and received more commission for it. This is said to have incentivised sellers to maximise interest rates. The FCA banned this practice in 2021. However, a high number of consumers have complained they were overcharged before the ban came into force. The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) said in May that they were dealing with 20,000 complaints. In January 2024, the FCA announced a review into whether motor finance customers had been overcharged because of past use of DCAs. It is using its powers to review historical motor finance commission arrangements across multiple firms - all of whom deny acting inappropriately. The FCA also said it is looking into a "consumer redress scheme" that means firms would need to offer appropriate compensation to customers affected by the issue. An estimated 40% of car finance deals are likely to be eligible for compensation over motor finance deals taken out between 2007 and 2021, when the DCAs were banned. To find out how you can tell if you've been mis-sold car finance, read the following explainer from our reporter Megan Harwood-Baynes. How does the ruling affect potential compensation? In short, the Supreme Court ruling could impact the scale and reach that a compensation scheme is likely to have. The FCA said in March that it will consider the court's decision and if it concludes motor finance customers have lost out from widespread failings by firms, it is "likely [to] consult on an industry-wide redress scheme". This would mean affected individuals wouldn't need to complain, but they would be paid out an amount dictated by the FCA. However, no matter what the court decides, the FCA could go ahead with a redress scheme. The regulator said it will confirm if it is proposing a scheme within six weeks of the Supreme Court's decision. What impact could this have on lenders? Analysts at HSBC said last year the controversy could be estimated to cost up to £44bn. Alongside Close Brothers, firms that could be affected include Barclays, Santander and the UK's largest motor finance provider Lloyds Banking Group - which organises loans through its Black Horse finance arm. Lloyds has already set aside £1.2bn to be used for potential compensation. The potential impact on the lending market and the wider economy could be so great that Chancellor Rachel Reeves is considering intervening to overrule the Supreme Court, according to The Guardian. Treasury officials have been looking at the potential of passing new legislation alongside the Department for Business and Trade that could slash the potential compensation bill. The Treasury said in response to the claim that it does not "comment on speculation" but hopes to see a "balanced judgment".

Full details of Heathrow's plans for a third runway revealed
Full details of Heathrow's plans for a third runway revealed

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Full details of Heathrow's plans for a third runway revealed

Heathrow Airport has said it can build a third runway for £21bn within the next decade. Europe's busiest travel hub has submitted its plans to the government - with opponents raising concerns about carbon emissions, noise pollution and environmental impacts. The west London airport wants permission to create a 3,500m (11,400ft) runway, but insists it is open to considering a shorter one instead. 5:31 In January, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced that the government supports a "badly needed" expansion to connect the UK to the world and open up new growth opportunities. But London mayor Sir Sadiq Khan is still against a new runway because of "the severe impact" it will have on the capital's residents. Under Heathrow's proposal, the runway would be constructed to the northwest of its existing location - allowing for an additional 276,000 flights per year. The airport also wants to create new terminal capacity for 150 million annual passengers - up from 84 million - with plans involving a new terminal complex named T5XW and T5XN. Terminal 2 would be extended, while Terminal 3 and the old Terminal 1 would be demolished. The runway would be privately funded, with the total plan costing about £49bn, but some airlines have expressed concern that the airport will hike its passenger charges to pay for the project. EasyJet chief executive Kenton Jarvis said an expansion would "represent a unique opportunity for easyJet to operate from the airport at scale for the first time and bring with it lower fares for consumers". Thomas Woldbye, the airport's chief executive, said in a statement that "it has never been more important or urgent to expand Heathrow". "We are effectively operating at capacity to the detriment of trade and connectivity," he added. "With a green light from government and the correct policy support underpinned by a fit-for-purpose, regulatory model, we are ready to mobilise and start investing this year in our supply chain across the country. "We are uniquely placed to do this for the country. It is time to clear the way for take-off." The M25 motorway would need to be moved into a tunnel under the new runway under the airport's proposal. London mayor still opposed Sir Sadiq says City Hall will "carefully scrutinise" the proposals, adding: "I'll be keeping all options on the table in how we respond." Tony Bosworth, climate campaigner at Friends of the Earth, also said that if Sir Keir Starmer wants to be "seen as a climate leader", then backing Heathrow expansion is "the wrong move". Earlier this year, Longford resident Christian Hughes told Sky News that his village and others nearby would be "decimated" if an expansion were to go ahead. 2:33 It comes after hotel tycoon Surinder Arora published a rival Heathrow expansion plan, which involves a shorter runway to avoid the need to divert the M25 motorway. The billionaire's Arora Group said a 2,800m (9,200ft) runway would result in "reduced risk" and avoid "spiralling cost". Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander will consider all plans over the summer so that a review of the Airports National Policy Statement can begin later this year. It also comes after Sky News reported on a Heathrow Airport-funded group sending leaflets supporting a third runway to thousands of homes across west London. The group, called Back Heathrow, sent leaflets to people living near the airport, claiming expansion could be the route to a "greener" airport and suggesting it would mean only the "cleanest and quietest aircraft" fly there. 3:21 Opponents of the airport's expansion said the information provided by the group is "incredibly misleading".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store