logo
How Trump's Rollbacks Keep Lead and PFAS in Water for Black Communities

How Trump's Rollbacks Keep Lead and PFAS in Water for Black Communities

Yahoo19-02-2025
Less than a year ago, the Biden administration's Environmental Protection Agency unveiled the first national plan to remove lead pipes and limit the levels of harmful chemicals in drinking water — and they chose to do so in front of Black North Carolinians.
For decades, residents in the Tar Heel State have been concerned by the prevalence of lead water pipes and a drinking water supply that is contaminated by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, also known as PFAS or 'forever chemicals.' And researchers have shown that Black residents of the state who rely on well water are typically exposed to higher levels of chemicals and lower quality drinking water than communities connected to a municipal water supply.
When the EPA's plan was announced last year, Belinda Joyner, a former schoolteacher in North Carolina, told Capital B she was ecstatic about cleaning up the state and nation's drinking water. 'It's finally here, and we love it,' she said, 'even if it is all overdue and something that should have happened years ago.'
But now, that sense of progress is on the chopping block before it could even truly take hold.
Within weeks of taking office, the Trump administration paused the plans to replace lead pipes and tighten rules on limiting toxic chemicals in drinking water.
If the plans are completely abandoned, millions of people will remain at risk of exposure to contaminants that have long been linked to developmental delays in children and heightened risks of chronic diseases for adults.
The reversals come as the Trump administration dismantles a range of governmental agencies that had been designed to regulate big business and protect Americans. The Biden administration's efforts were particularly relevant for Black Americans because studies have shown that they are typically exposed to higher levels of lead and other toxic chemicals in their water than other demographic groups.
Read More: Trump's Fossil Fuel Agenda Puts Black Communities at Risk
The changes that the new administration is implementing, coupled with its removal of other supports for economically disadvantaged communities, threaten to widen the gap in access to safe drinking water.
The rapid elimination of these initiatives feels like 'if you put a gallon of milk in the fridge and it spoils overnight,' said Nayyirah Shariff, a community activist who has helped secure funding for the replacement of lead water pipes in Flint, Michigan, for a decade.
Republican lawmakers in Congress have already introduced a new rule to permanently repeal the plan to replace the nation's lead pipes.
There are still other avenues available to improve water plants and replace water lines, but advocates say that they are not optimistic that those efforts will lead to significant improvements for the Black communities that need them most. In the first month of the Trump administration, roughly 15% of EPA workers were warned they were at risk of immediate termination. In addition, EPA workers focused on reducing environmental harms to poor and minority communities were put on leave.
'With environmental justice effectively dead at the federal level and the attention to our community gone,' the struggle for clean drinking water in Black neighborhoods is a 'fight for our dignity and place in this country,' said Shariff.
That fight is about more than just physical ailments. Research has shown that unsafe drinking water in communities correlates with higher rates of gun violence, lower property values, neighborhood disinvestment, joblessness, and under-funded schools.
Officials at both the EPA and Department of Justice declined to comment on the rule pauses.
Here are the answers to some commonly asked questions about public water systems and what the administration's changes might mean for you:
Public Drinking Water Systems:Public drinking water systems in the U.S. start by drawing water from natural sources like rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers and then purify it at water treatment plants that are regulated by the EPA. The water then gets transferred through an extensive network of pipes. (About 10% of these pipes are made of lead.)
These systems are typically managed by local or municipal governments and funded through taxes or fees. However, due to historical and systemic inequities, many Black American communities have experienced underinvestment in water infrastructure, leading to both economic and health disparities.
Read More:
Record Investment Merely Scratches the Surface of Fixing Black America's Water Crisis
The Water Crisis Is Disrupting Black Americans' Lives
Private (Rural) Drinking Water Systems:Private or rural drinking water systems are often individual wells or small community-managed systems, where homeowners or local groups take on the responsibility for maintaining water quality and infrastructure. Because these systems are not as tightly regulated or financially supported as those run by large public utilities, they face challenges with consistent water quality testing, upkeep, and access to modern treatment technologies. This situation is particularly acute in rural areas where Black Americans reside because of geographic isolation and economic policies that make it difficult for these homeowners to afford water wells and regular water quality testing.
Read More: Alabama Discriminated Against Black Residents, Feds Confirm
It is important for the federal government to collaborate with state and local governments because funding, infrastructure, and oversight responsibilities are often decentralized and siloed, said LaTricea Adams, a former member of the White House Environmental Justice Advisory Council. Without adequate funding, local and state governments could not manage distribution systems, oversee local infrastructure, or conduct water quality testing.
Federal programs passed under Biden like the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law's $50 billion investment in water systems provided investments for replacing lead pipes and upgrading water treatment facilities, while the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund helps states finance long-term improvements. However, states must properly allocate these funds and enforce regulations. Last year, an analysis by Capital B found that money allocated through the revolving fund was more likely to benefit non-Black communities. Essentially, to ensure Black neighborhoods have clean drinking water, there needs to be strong regulations that are backed by dedicated funding sources and strict oversight, Adams explained. Historically, this has not happened, as seen in Flint, Michigan, and Jackson, Mississippi.
Read More: Jackson's Water Is Still Brown. The EPA Says That's Not Discrimination.
Lead contamination in drinking water happens due to the nation's aging lead service lines that often corrode, allowing lead to seep into the water. Historical policies like redlining and discriminatory urban planning has left Black neighborhoods with outdated infrastructure and a higher risk of exposure to lead. Furthermore, while the Safe Drinking Water Act set standards for lead levels, its uneven enforcement and lack of targeted remediation in marginalized communities have perpetuated these inequities. (In 2020, the first Trump administration attempted to limit elements of the Clean Water Act and this year, the administration has signaled an attempt to weaken current lead restrictions.)
There are roughly 9 million lead water service lines in operation across the nation, and they're virtually everywhere, making it difficult for cities to locate and replace these pipes without federal funding.
Read More: Flint's Water Crisis, 10 Years Later
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a group of manmade chemicals used in everyday products like nonstick cookware, waterproof fabrics, and firefighting foams for their durability and water-resistant properties. They're often called 'forever chemicals' because they do not break down or disappear, remaining in our environment forever.
They've found their way into our drinking water through industrial discharges, runoff from military bases where firefighting foams were used, and leaching from landfills and wastewater. Exposure to PFAS has been linked to a range of serious health issues — including immune system disruptions, thyroid problems, certain cancers, and reproductive and developmental effects—and Black American communities often face higher exposure due to long-standing environmental injustices that place them near contaminated sites and industrial operations.
Since PFAS does not break down easily, it requires more advanced — and often pricey — technologies to effectively get them out, something that is difficult to do without federal support.
Read More: Black and Hispanic Communities More Likely to Have Drinking Water with PFAS
You can check if your community has elevated levels of PFAS in drinking water using this map. Here, you can check if your city is a hotspot for lead contamination and service lines. (Neither of these databases are exhaustive, so it is recommended that you reach out to your local city council member or city public works department for more information.)
Below you'll find a collection of steps recommended by advocates and former government officials that you can take to ensure your water is meeting the standards it should.
The activists and officials emphasized the need for a multipronged approach that combines learning from history, adapting leadership to the current challenges, and maintaining the push for strong regulations and oversight alongside infrastructure improvements.
Reach out to your local city council members with a set of questions:
Has your area conducted extensive mapping of where lead service lines are located?
Is there funding for lead testing at individual properties?
How old is our water treatment facility? (More than half of the country has outdated facilities.)
Ask for access to water quality reports
Advocate for continued investment in water infrastructure, especially in your area's rural communities.
Collaborate with local groups to discuss water quality concerns, share information, and develop collective strategies for improvement.
Participate in public comment periods and attend hearings to influence water quality regulations and policies.
If possible, purchase a water filtration system for your kitchen and bathroom sinks.
Study the strategies and tactics used by Civil Rights Era activists to address environmental issues and learn from their experiences.
Expanding the work around water access in addition to drinking water. Focus on protecting wetlands and other natural water filtration systems, as they are crucial for water quality.
Ultimately, 'we do not have time to allow our water issues to continue; this is literally life or death,' Adams explained. 'We can
The post How Trump's Rollbacks Keep Lead and PFAS in Water for Black Communities appeared first on Capital B News.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump moves to use the levers of presidential power to help his party in the 2026 midterms
Trump moves to use the levers of presidential power to help his party in the 2026 midterms

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump moves to use the levers of presidential power to help his party in the 2026 midterms

President Donald Trump has made clear in recent weeks that he's willing to use the vast powers of his office to prevent his party from losing control of Congress in next year's midterm elections. Some of the steps Trump has taken to intervene in the election are typical, but controversial, political maneuvers taken to his trademark extremes. That includes pushing Republican lawmakers in Texas and other conservative-controlled states to redraw their legislative maps to expand the number of U.S. House seats favorable to the GOP. Others involve the direct use of official presidential power in ways that have no modern precedent, such as ordering his Department of Justice to investigate the main liberal fundraising entity, ActBlue. The department also is demanding the detailed voter files from each state in an apparent attempt to look for ineligible voters on a vast scale. And on Monday, Trump posted a falsehood-filled rant on social media pledging to lead a 'movement' to outlaw voting machines and mail balloting, the latter of which has become a mainstay of Democratic voting since Trump pushed Republicans to avoid it in 2020 — before flipping on the issue ahead of last year's presidential election. The individual actions add up to an unprecedented attempt by a sitting president to interfere in a critical election before it's even held, moves that have raised alarms among those concerned about the future of U.S. democracy. 'Those are actions that you don't see in healthy democracies,' said Ian Bassin, executive director of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan organization that has sued the Trump administration. 'Those are actions you see in authoritarian states.' Trump has already tried to overturn an election Bassin noted that presidents routinely stump for their party in midterm elections and try to bolster incumbents by steering projects and support to their districts. But he said Trump's history is part of what's driving alarm about the midterms. He referenced Trump's attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, which ended with a violent assault on the Capitol by his supporters. 'The one thing we know for certain from experience in 2020 is that this is a person who will use every measure and try every tactic to stay in power, regardless of the outcome of an election,' Bassin said. He noted that in 2020, Trump was checked by elected Republicans in Congress and statehouses who refused to bend the rules, along with members of his own administration and even military leaders who distanced themselves from the defeated incumbent. In his second term, the president has locked down near-total loyalty from the GOP and stacked the administration with loyalists. The incumbent president's party normally loses seats in Congress during midterm elections. That's what happened to Trump in 2018, when Democrats won enough seats to take back the House of Representatives, stymieing the president's agenda and eventually leading to his two impeachments. Trump has said he doesn't want a repeat. He also has argued that his actions are actually attempts to preserve democracy. Repeating baseless allegations of fraud, he said Monday during a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that 'you can never have a real democracy with mail-in ballots.' Earlier this month, Trump said that, because he handily won Texas in the 2024 presidential election, 'we are entitled to five more seats.' An attempt to engineer GOP control of the US House Republicans currently have a three-seat margin in the House of Representatives. Trump pushed Texas Republicans to redraw their congressional map to create up to five new winnable GOP seats and is lobbying other red states, including Indiana and Missouri, to take similar steps to pad the margin even more. The Texas Legislature is likely to vote on its map on Wednesday. There's no guarantee that Trump's gambit will work, but also no legal prohibition against fiddling with maps in those states for partisan advantage. In response, California Democrats are moving forward with their own redistricting effort as a way to counter Republicans in Texas. Mid-decade map adjustments have happened before, though usually in response to court orders rather than presidents openly hoping to manufacture more seats for their party. Larry Diamond, a political scientist at Stanford University, said there's a chance the redrawing of House districts won't succeed as Trump anticipates — but could end up motivating Democratic voters. Still, Diamond said he's concerned. 'It's the overall pattern that's alarming and that the reason to do this is for pure partisan advantage,' he said of Trump's tactic. Diamond noted that in 2019 he wrote a book about a '12-step' process to turn a democracy into an autocracy, and 'the last step in the process is to rig the electoral process.' The Justice Department acts on Trump's priorities Trump has required loyalty from all levels of his administration and demanded that the Department of Justice follow his directives. One of those was to probe ActBlue, an online portal that raised hundreds of millions of dollars in small-dollar donations for Democratic candidates over two decades. The site was so successful that Republicans launched a similar venture, called WinRed. Trump, notably, did not order a federal probe into WinRed. Trump's appointees at the Department of Justice also have demanded voting data from at least 19 states, as Trump continues to insist he actually won the 2020 election and proposed a special prosecutor to investigate that year's vote tally. Much as he did before winning the 2024 election, Trump has baselessly implied that Democrats may rig upcoming vote counts against him. In at least two of those states, California and Minnesota, the DOJ followed up with election officials last week, threatening legal action if they didn't hand over their voter registration lists by this Thursday, according to letters shared with The Associated Press. Neither state — both controlled by Democrats — has responded publicly. Attempts to interfere with voting and elections Trump's threat this week to end mail voting and do away with voting machines is just his latest attempt to sway how elections are run. An executive order he signed earlier this year sought documented proof of citizenship to register to vote, among other changes, though much of it has been blocked by courts. In the days leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol to reverse his 2020 loss, Trump's allies proposed having the military seize voting machines to investigate purported fraud, even though Trump's own attorney general said there was no evidence of significant wrongdoing. The Constitution says states and Congress, rather than the president, set the rules for elections, so it's unclear what Trump could do to make his promises a reality. But election officials saw them as an obvious sign of his 2026 interests. 'Let's see this for what it really is: An attempt to change voting going into the midterms because he's afraid the Republicans will lose,' wrote Ann Jacobs, the Democratic chair of the Wisconsin Elections Commission, on X. The president has very few levers to influence an election Derek Muller, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, said the idea of seizing voting machines in 2020 was a sign of how few levers the president has to influence an election, not of his power. Under the U.S. Constitution, elections are run by states and only Congress can 'alter' the procedures — and, even then, for federal races alone. 'It's a deeply decentralized system,' Muller said. There are fewer legal constraints on presidential powers, such as criminal investigations and deployment of law enforcement and military resources, Muller noted. But, he added, people usually err in forecasting election catastrophes. He noted that in 2022 and 2024, a wide range of experts braced for violence, disruption and attempts to overturn losses by Trump allies, and no serious threats materialized. 'One lesson I've learned in decades of doing this is people are often preparing for the last election rather than what actually happens in the new ones,' Muller said. ___

Russia launches largest strike on Ukraine in weeks following Trump's call with Putin — as war's civilian death toll nears 13,000
Russia launches largest strike on Ukraine in weeks following Trump's call with Putin — as war's civilian death toll nears 13,000

New York Post

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Russia launches largest strike on Ukraine in weeks following Trump's call with Putin — as war's civilian death toll nears 13,000

WASHINGTON — Russian dictator Vladimir Putin ordered the largest drone strike on Ukraine in a month on Monday night — just as he hung up the phone with President Trump in a call discussing next steps for peace. As Trump celebrated his significant progress toward ending Russia's war on Ukraine in White House meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders on Monday, Moscow launched 270 drones and 10 missiles into the war-torn neighbor's territory. It came after at least 14 civilians were killed and more than 50 others were injured in a similar Russian strike ahead of the Monday meeting. Advertisement Among the dead was an entire family, including two children — ages one and 15 — their parents and grandmother, according to the Ukrainian government. They were at home in Kharkiv — roughly 15 miles from the Russian border — in the middle of the night when the fatal blast happened. 'An ordinary apartment block … families with small children, a children's playground, a residential compound,' neighbor Olena Yakusheva told Reuters on Monday while fighting back tears. 3 Ukrainian firefighters search for survivors in a damaged building after a Russian airstrike on Aug. 18, 2025. Anadolu via Getty Images Advertisement That assault added to the war's already horrifying death toll of nearly 13,000 civilians — including 569 children — since Russia invaded in February 2022, according to the Ukrainian Prosecutor General's Office data shared with The Post. Put in perspective, that's more than four times the civilian toll of the Sept. 11, 2011 attacks. 'Several children were killed,' Zelensky's top advisor Andriy Yermak told The Post on Monday. 'How is that possible if [Putin] sat and committed to Trump: 'Yes, I am ready for peace.'' 3 An elderly woman stands with her dog near a damaged brick wall in Kostiantynivka, Ukraine, after a Russian airstrike Monday night. Anadolu via Getty Images Advertisement '[Putin] is a liar — a professional liar,' he added. Trump has previously expressed frustration over Putin launching aerial attacks hours after promising the US president of his desire for peace, but he had not spoken out about the latest attack as of Tuesday afternoon. 'I go home, I tell the first lady, 'You know, I spoke to Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation.' She said, 'Oh, really? Another city was just hit,'' he said in July, recounting a call earlier this summer. 'We get a lot of bulls–t thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth,' he said another time. Advertisement Last month was the deadliest since Putin launched his full-scale war on Ukraine three and a half years ago. In July alone, 286 civilians were killed and another 1,388, according to official data. 3 Ukrainian firefighters search for survivors after a Russian air strike on a residential building after a Russian airstrike in Kostiantynivka, Ukraine on Aug. 19. 2025. Anadolu via Getty Images It was the second month in a row that Russia had reached an all-time high in the number of civilians killed during the course of its full-scale war. Also in July, Russia set a new record of 728 drones launched in a single night, blasting past its prior record of 337 set in March. While roughly 60% of the civilian deaths have occurred in communities near the front lines, the remaining 40% have happened far from the war's center, including in the capital city of Kyiv, according to a Monday United Nations report.

Tulsi Gabbard revokes security clearances of 37 former intelligence officials
Tulsi Gabbard revokes security clearances of 37 former intelligence officials

USA Today

time21 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Tulsi Gabbard revokes security clearances of 37 former intelligence officials

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced on Aug. 19 that President Donald Trump had directed her office to revoke security clearances from 37 former intelligence officials for 'politicizing and manipulating intelligence.' 'Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right. Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold,' she wrote in an X post that contained a memo her office had sent out. 'In doing so, they undermine our national security, the safety and security of the American people and the foundational principles of our democratic republic.' The former officials who are all accused of 'leaking classified intelligence without authorization,' include Biden administration officials Emily Horne, a spokesperson for the National Security Council, and Dilpreet Sidhu, who served as a deputy chief of staff at the National Security Council. Last month, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released a report that claimed to demonstrate how the former President Barack Obama and his national security Cabinet had 'manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup' against Trump after he had defeated Hillary Clinton in 2016. Obama's office dismissed the claims as another example of the constant "nonsense and misinformation" that emanates out of the White House. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes," Obama's office said in a statement on July 22. 'These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio.' Rubio now serves as Trump's secretary of state. On his first day in office, Trump revoked the security clearance of his former national security adviser John Bolton as well as his Secret Service protection.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store