
In Meta's AI future, your friends are bots
Mark Zuckerberg and Meta are pitching a vision of AI chatbots as an extension of your friend network and a potential solution to the " loneliness epidemic."
Why it matters: Meta's approach to AI raises the broader question of just whose interest chatbots are serving — especially when the bot has access to the details of your life and the company's business depends on constantly boosting the time you spend with it.
Driving the news: Facebook's parent company on Tuesday debuted a new mobile app that transforms the Meta AI chatbot into a more social experience, including the ability to share AI-generated creations with friends and family. But Zuckerberg also sees the AI bot itself as your next friend.
"The average American has, I think, it's fewer than three friends," Zuckerberg said during a podcast interview Monday. "And the average person has demand for meaningfully more."
In a media blitz that included several podcast appearances this week timed for Meta's Llamacon event, Zuckerberg mapped out an AI future built on a foundation of augmented-reality glasses and wrist-band controllers.
With those devices plugged into Meta's AI models, he predicted the emergence, within four or five years, of a new platform for human interaction with bots. It would, he said, be the next logical step on the internet's evolution from text to audio and video.
What they're saying:"Today, most of the time spent on Facebook and Instagram is on video, but do you think in five years we're just going to be sitting in our feed and consuming media that's just video?" Zuckerberg asked podcaster Dwarkesh Patel.
"No," he answered himself. "It's going to be interactive. You'll be scrolling through your feed, and there will be content that maybe looks like a Reel to start, but you can talk to it, or interact with it, and it talks back, or it changes what it's doing. Or you can jump into it like a game and interact with it. That's all going to be AI."
Yes, but: Where Zuckerberg sees opportunity, critics see alarm bells, especially given Meta's history and business model.
"The more time you spend chatting with an AI 'friend,' the more of your personal information you're giving away," Robbie Torney, Common Sense Media's senior director of AI programs, told Axios. "It's about who owns and controls and can use your intimate thoughts and expressions after you share them."
Under Meta's privacy policy, its AI chatbot can use what the company knows about you in its interactions.
Meta can also use your conversations — and any media you upload — for training its models.
You can choose to have Meta AI not remember specific details, but there is no way for U.S. users to opt out more broadly.
The intrigue: Zuckerberg's bot-friendship vision is arriving at a moment when AI companions face criticism and controversy, particularly as younger users encounter them.
The Wall Street Journal reported last week that its testing showed earlier versions of Meta's chatbots — including those based on celebrity personas — are willing to engage in sexual banter, even with users who identified themselves as teens. (Meta said it has since implemented controls to prevent his from happening.)
The big picture: It's not just Meta that is being forced to navigate the social maze of chatbot-human interaction.
Most chatbots typically serve up information users request, but as models grow in size and complexity, their makers are finding it hard to tune the bots' traits properly.
ChatGPT maker OpenAI was forced to roll back an update after users found that its latest model was behaving with an overload of flattery — it had become, as Engadget put it, "an ass-kissing weirdo."
Between the lines: Critics' concerns range from the sensitivity of the data users are sharing to the potential for addiction to the risk of bots dispensing potentially dangerous advice.
"These companies are optimizing for data collection first and user engagement first, with well-being as a secondary consideration, if it's a consideration at all," Torney said.
Common Sense Media issued a report Wednesday declaring the entire category of AI companions — including those from Character.AI, Nomi, and Replika — poses an unacceptable safety risk for minors. Torney said they can be problematic for vulnerable adults as well.
"People are increasingly using AIs as a source of practical help, support, entertainment and fun — and our goal is to make them even easier to use. We provide transparency, and people can manage their experience to make sure it's right for them," a Meta spokesperson said in a statement.
What's next: The more social AI becomes, the more likely it is that AI companies will replicate the aspects of social media that have gradually soured so many users on the platforms — which still command billions of people's attention.
Camille Carlton, policy director at the Center for Humane Technology, sees dangers in this "transition towards engagement," as well as in companies' push to grab as much data as they can to personalize their AI services.
Carlton noted that companies like Anthropic and OpenAI are generating revenue from business customers who pay for access — but those, like Meta, which focus on consumers will keep looking for ways to make their large investments in AI models pay off.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Micron to invest $200 billion in US memory facilities
Memory chip maker Micron (MU) announced on Thursday that it will invest an additional $30 billion in the US, as it looks to build out its manufacturing and research and development facilities in Idaho and New York. The move brings Micron's total US manufacturing and R&D investments up to roughly $200 billion which will create some 90,000 direct and indirect jobs, the company said. Micron is receiving about $6.5 billion in funding from the US CHIPS Act. The plans call for Micron to build a second memory manufacturing plant at its Boise, Idaho, facility and a massive chip fabrication complex in New York. The company is also updating and expanding its Virginia plant. Micron also said it expects the second Idaho plant to help it bring its advanced high-bandwidth memory (HBM) manufacturing to the US. HBM is a key component in AI data centers. 'Micron's investment in advanced memory manufacturing and HBM capabilities in the U.S., with support from the Trump Administration, is an important step forward for the AI ecosystem,' Nvidia (NVDA) CEO Jensen Huang said in a statement. 'Micron's leadership in high-performance memory is invaluable to enabling the next generation of AI breakthroughs that NVIDIA is driving. We're excited to collaborate with Micron as we push the boundaries of what's possible in AI and high-performance computing,' Huang added. All totaled, Micron says the investments will allow the company to produce 40% of its DRAM memory in the US. Its initial Idaho plant is expected to begin pumping out the hardware in 2027. Micron also says it is set to begin preparing the ground for its New York facilities later this year. 'This approximately $200 billion investment will reinforce America's technological leadership, create tens of thousands of American jobs across the semiconductor ecosystem and secure a domestic supply of semiconductors—critical to economic and national security,' Micron CEO Sanjay Mehrotra said in a statement. 'We are grateful for the support from President Trump, Secretary Lutnick and our federal, state, and local partners who have been instrumental in advancing domestic semiconductor manufacturing.' Micron isn't the only company bringing HBM production to the US, though. South Korea's SK Hynix is also building a new HBM plant in Indiana as part of a $3.8 billion construction project. The Trump administration, and the Biden administration before it, has made onshoring semiconductor manufacturing a key component of its domestic agenda, as it seeks to wean itself off of the country's dependence on foreign-made chips. Companies ranging from Intel (INTC) and TSMC (TSM) to Samsung and GlobalFounderies (GFS) and others have recently announced plans to build or upgrade their facility throughout the country, thanks in part to billions of dollars in funding through the CHIPS Act. Email Daniel Howley at dhowley@ Follow him on X/Twitter at @DanielHowley. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


San Francisco Chronicle
14 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
AI chatbots need more books to learn from. These libraries are opening their stacks
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (AP) — Everything ever said on the internet was just the start of teaching artificial intelligence about humanity. Tech companies are now tapping into an older repository of knowledge: the library stacks. Nearly one million books published as early as the 15th century — and in 254 languages — are part of a Harvard University collection being released to AI researchers Thursday. Also coming soon are troves of old newspapers and government documents held by Boston's public library. Cracking open the vaults to centuries-old tomes could be a data bonanza for tech companies battling lawsuits from living novelists, visual artistsand others whose creative works have been scooped up without their consent to train AI chatbots. 'It is a prudent decision to start with public domain data because that's less controversial right now than content that's still under copyright,' said Burton Davis, a deputy general counsel at Microsoft. Davis said libraries also hold 'significant amounts of interesting cultural, historical and language data' that's missing from the past few decades of online commentary that AI chatbots have mostly learned from. Supported by 'unrestricted gifts' from Microsoft and ChatGPT maker OpenAI, the Harvard-based Institutional Data Initiative is working with libraries around the world on how to make their historic collections AI-ready in a way that also benefits libraries and the communities they serve. 'We're trying to move some of the power from this current AI moment back to these institutions,' said Aristana Scourtas, who manages research at Harvard Law School's Library Innovation Lab. 'Librarians have always been the stewards of data and the stewards of information.' Harvard's newly released dataset, Institutional Books 1.0, contains more than 394 million scanned pages of paper. One of the earlier works is from the 1400s — a Korean painter's handwritten thoughts about cultivating flowers and trees. The largest concentration of works is from the 19th century, on subjects such as literature, philosophy, law and agriculture, all of it meticulously preserved and organized by generations of librarians. It promises to be a boon for AI developers trying to improve the accuracy and reliability of their systems. 'A lot of the data that's been used in AI training has not come from original sources,' said the data initiative's executive director, Greg Leppert, who is also chief technologist at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society. This book collection goes "all the way back to the physical copy that was scanned by the institutions that actually collected those items,' he said. Before ChatGPT sparked a commercial AI frenzy, most AI researchers didn't think much about the provenance of the passages of text they pulled from Wikipedia, from social media forums like Reddit and sometimes from deep repositories of pirated books. They just needed lots of what computer scientists call tokens — units of data, each of which can represent a piece of a word. Harvard's new AI training collection has an estimated 242 billion tokens, an amount that's hard for humans to fathom but it's still just a drop of what's being fed into the most advanced AI systems. Facebook parent company Meta, for instance, has said the latest version of its AI large language model was trained on more than 30 trillion tokens pulled from text, images and videos. Meta is also battling a lawsuit from comedian Sarah Silverman and other published authors who accuse the company of stealing their books from 'shadow libraries' of pirated works. Now, with some reservations, the real libraries are standing up. OpenAI, which is also fighting a string of copyright lawsuits, donated $50 million this year to a group of research institutions including Oxford University's 400-year-old Bodleian Library, which is digitizing rare texts and using AI to help transcribe them. When the company first reached out to the Boston Public Library, one of the biggest in the U.S., the library made clear that any information it digitized would be for everyone, said Jessica Chapel, its chief of digital and online services. 'OpenAI had this interest in massive amounts of training data. We have an interest in massive amounts of digital objects. So this is kind of just a case that things are aligning,' Chapel said. Digitization is expensive. It's been painstaking work, for instance, for Boston's library to scan and curate dozens of New England's French-language newspapers that were widely read in the late 19th and early 20th century by Canadian immigrant communities from Quebec. Now that such text is of use as training data, it helps bankroll projects that librarians want to do anyway. 'We've been very clear that, 'Hey, we're a public library,'" Chapel said. 'Our collections are held for public use, and anything we digitized as part of this project will be made public.' Harvard's collection was already digitized starting in 2006 for another tech giant, Google, in its controversial project to create a searchable online library of more than 20 million books. Google spent years beating back legal challenges from authors to its online book library, which included many newer and copyrighted works. It was finally settled in 2016 when the U.S. Supreme Court let stand lower court rulings that rejected copyright infringement claims. Now, for the first time, Google has worked with Harvard to retrieve public domain volumes from Google Books and clear the way for their release to AI developers. Copyright protections in the U.S. typically last for 95 years, and longer for sound recordings. How useful all of this will be for the next generation of AI tools remains to be seen as the data gets shared Thursday on the Hugging Face platform, which hosts datasets and open-source AI models that anyone can download. The book collection is more linguistically diverse than typical AI data sources. Fewer than half the volumes are in English, though European languages still dominate, particularly German, French, Italian, Spanish and Latin. A book collection steeped in 19th century thought could also be 'immensely critical' for the tech industry's efforts to build AI agents that can plan and reason as well as humans, Leppert said. 'At a university, you have a lot of pedagogy around what it means to reason,' Leppert said. 'You have a lot of scientific information about how to run processes and how to run analyses.' At the same time, there's also plenty of outdated data, from debunked scientific and medical theories to racist narratives. 'When you're dealing with such a large data set, there are some tricky issues around harmful content and language," said Kristi Mukk, a coordinator at Harvard's Library Innovation Lab who said the initiative is trying to provide guidance about mitigating the risks of using the data, to 'help them make their own informed decisions and use AI responsibly.'
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BioNTech to Acquire CureVac in Stock Deal Valued Around $1.25 Billion
BioNTech will acquire all shares of CureVac after the two sides reached an agreement in a deal valued around $1.25 billion. Each share of CureVac, a clinical-stage biotech company, will be exchanged for about $5.46 in BioNTech American depositary shares. Upon the deal's closing, CureVac shareholders are expected to own between 4% and 6% of the German developer of RNA vaccines and immunotherapies. ICE Raids Have Sent Latino Shoppers Into Hiding and Big Brands Are Hurting The Secret to Retaining the Best Employees: Ask Them These Four Questions Here's How Much Money the U.S. Is Earning From Tariffs, in Charts How Home Depot Became Ground Zero in Trump's Deportation Push Supply Chains Become New Battleground in the Global Trade War BioNTech Chief Executive Ugur Sahin said the plan is to bring complementary capabilities between the two companies together to develop transformative cancer treatments. CureVac's operating subsidiary will become a wholly owned subsidiary of BioNTech following the close of the transaction. As part of this plan, BioNTech will integrate CureVac's research and manufacturing site in Tübingen, Germany. The deal was unanimously approved by both companies' management and supervisory boards. It is expected to close in 2025. Shares of CureVac surged 29% to $5.25 in premarket trading. Write to Denny Jacob at Pulls Outlook as Sales Fall Bojangles Is Exploring a Sale While the Fried-Chicken Market Is Hot Why Bosses Should Give Feedback in the Morning The Audacious Reboot of America's Nuclear Energy Program Muted May Inflation Defies Tariff Fears Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data