Leicester City Council's adult social care 'requires improvement'
The council's responsibilities include promoting the wellbeing and independence of working age disabled adults, older people, and their unpaid carers to reduce their need for formal support where appropriate.In 2023-24, the council spent £172.5m on adult social care - 22.89% of the total budget - which was £15.3m less than estimated.
'Not easily accessible'
The report said some people found there was a lack of face-to-face support with some assessments having been conducted entirely over the telephone, and navigating the council's system was described as "challenging".People experienced language barriers, "which prevented people's access to care and support", the report said.It said online information in non-English languages was "not easily accessible", which posed a challenge for the portion of Leicester's residents whose main language was not English.Data regarding waits for reviews for people in the city receiving long-term care was also significantly worse than the England average, according to the report.For example, at the time of the assessment, the CQC found there were 903 people waiting for an occupational therapy assessment, with a median wait time of 220 days and the longest reported waiting time being 815 days.James Bullion, the CQC's chief inspector of adult social care and integrated care, said: "The authority acted promptly when needed, including providing responses within two hours, for same day care, and reviewing care after changes."But people still faced long waits for assessments and regular reviews. Their communication during these waiting periods was limited."The assessment team found the authority failed to properly support unpaid carers to make choices during their assessment.However, the regulator said it found people did not have to wait long for residential, nursing or homecare support, and the authority "worked closely with people with lived experience to shape services".
'Under-funded system'
Laurence Mackie-Jones, the city council's strategic director of social care, said: "We don't think this assessment fully reflects the challenges we face in Leicester, or the strengths that exist despite these challenges."We're pleased it recognises the work we do to help people to live independent lives, as that is a key priority for us."Helping people to stay in their homes, taking advantage of the technology that can help them, and accessing direct payments for the support they need is vital in a hugely under-funded care system."We're also very proud of the fact that 85-90% of people agree or strongly agree that the support we provide helps them to live their life, as noted in the CQC report."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
K18's new heat protectant may be pricey, but its longevity is unmatched
K18 is fast becoming my go-to brand for effective hair repair formulas, so I jumped at the chance to try its new heatbounce heat protection spray (£48, As the eighth product in its roster, the brand now has an all encompassing collection that covers all your needs, including cleansing, conditioning, smoothing, volumising, repairing and protecting. First, the molecular repair leave-in conditioner (£30, convinced loyal Olaplex users to make the switch to K18. Then came the airwash dry shampoo ( which had even sceptical TikTokers defending its £48 price tag. And now, I'm left wondering – could the brand's latest release really be worth yet another £48? As a beauty writer who tests haircare products day on the daily, I'm not an easy test subject to win over, but even I can't deny heatbounce's unique appeal: that its protection lasts through multiple styling sessions. Scroll on for my honest verdict after trialling with a variety of heat tools. How I tested Testing over the course of three weeks (with early access to the product), I used K18's heatbounce conditioning heat protection spray on my hair in three different settings: before using my hair dryer, before using hair straighteners and before using a hair curler. I applied enough spray to adequately coat my fine-medium thickness hair (around 10 pumps), before brushing and styling as usual. During use, I paid attention to the following criteria: Scent: I considered whether the formula had a scent and, if so, whether it was pleasant or had staying power post-styling Ease of use: With such a high price tag, I wanted a small amount of the formula to go a long way, so I noted how moveable the liquid was once on the hair itself, plus the surface coverage of the mister (was it a fine, widespread mist or more of a powerful stream?) Conditioning benefits: The product mentions conditioning in its name, so I assessed whether or not my hair felt moisturised or dry after use. Protection effectiveness: When my hair suffers heat damage, it leaves a bitter odor in the damage's wake, which was convenient when testing a heat protector. In addition to this unpleasant scent, I inspected my hair post-drying, curling and straightening for any signs of brittleness and notable split ends. However, the latter was more difficult to associate with this particular product, rather than any prior heat damage. Why you can trust IndyBest reviews Lucy Smith has been reviewing haircare products for IndyBest since July 2024 and is well-versed on the best products for all hair types and conditions, be they straight, curly or dyed. Specifically, she's headed up The Independent 's guides to the best hair brushes, the best leave-in conditioners and the best shampoos and conditioners, not to mention speaking with expert hairdressers and trichologists. As someone who curls her hair two to three times a week, she was well placed to test K18's latest heat protectant and had a number of tools at her disposal to do so.
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Secret lovers of man unite to keep him alive after brain bleed
A man in a 'vegetative state' will be kept alive after his secret lovers united to oppose a hospital's bid to remove his life support. Referred to as YD in court documents, the 60-year-old man entered what is called a prolonged disorder of consciousness after suffering from a bleed to the brain in October 2024. In August, the Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust asked the Court of Protection for permission to remove his clinically assisted nutrition and hydration, which he needed to stay alive. Though YD has been breathing independently since March 2025, he received all of his nutrition and medications through a feeding tube. Without this life support, a doctor concluded he would die within one to three weeks. However, his two partners, both of whom he has known for over 20 years, have successfully stopped the hospital from doing so after telling a judge about his strong belief in the power of spiritual healing. The pair, referred to as JG and MB, told Mrs Justice Theis that YD would not have wanted his support to be withdrawn despite his doctors assessing he was in a 'vegetative state'. Despite not having known each other before YD fell ill, Mrs Justice Theis said: 'They were each able to independently confirm many common features about YD's wishes and beliefs. In particular, regarding the depth of his interest in the spiritual world and his limitless curiosity about such matters that he held strong beliefs about.' Mrs Justice Theis said these beliefs 'are likely to be relevant factors that would inform his decision if he had capacity and would be likely to be a factor in him wishing and feeling that he wanted to continue to be provided with clinically assisted nutrition and hydration'. In the court documents, YD is described by JG - who he has known for 20 years - as 'easy to get on with, humorous, determined and unique'. In her statement, she said she believed YD had not given up on life and 'would absolutely want to continue living, with any chance to improve (however small), until he passes away in a natural and unforced way.' Both she and MB visit YD for six hours each day, with the court documents describing the pair as providing emotional and physical care for him at his bedside. MB has known YD for 24 years, with the pair having gotten engaged seven years ago and lived with each other for four years. She described improvements she had observed and considered he was 'healing himself', noting he has been able to squeeze with his hand and lift his wrist. She said he opens his eyes when she gives him a kiss on arrival and that he can track her with his eyes. Refusing the trust's application, Mrs Justice Theis said: 'Whilst it is recognised that any awareness on the part of YD, if present, is extremely limited and there may be little or no further improvement and a trajectory of general deterioration it is far from clear that in the circumstances YD is in he would regard his continued existence as a burden. 'There is a strong presumption in favour of preserving life which, in my judgment, having carefully evaluated the evidence in this unusual case, the Trust has not discharged.'
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Inquiry into rogue surgeon to hold preliminary hearing next month
A public inquiry set up to investigate disgraced surgeon Sam Eljamel will hold a preliminary hearing next month. The Eljamel Inquiry will investigate the activities and oversight of Mr Eljamel, who was appointed by NHS Tayside as a consultant neurosurgeon at Ninewells Hospital in Dundee in 1995 and went on to become head of neurosurgery at the site. In 2013, Mr Eljamel was placed under supervision and later suspended following concerns about the standard of clinical care he was providing to patients. He resigned from NHS Tayside in 2014. Patients of the former neurosurgeon have claimed he harmed as many as 200 people, with some suffering life-changing injuries. The Eljamel Inquiry will determine, among other things, whether patients were let down by failures in clinical governance, risk management, and complaints procedures, and the adequacy of previous reviews. It will also examine to what extent Mr Eljamel's private practice, research, and workload impacted on care received by his patients, and whether, and if so to what extent, Mr Eljamel and NHS Tayside tried to conceal evidence of sub-standard care. The independent public inquiry, chaired by Lord Weir, will hold a preliminary hearing in Edinburgh on September 10 to set out its progress and intentions. Scotland's Health Secretary Neil Gray formally set up the inquiry on April 3, empowering it to begin the process of gathering evidence. To date, Lord Weir has designated applicants including NHS Tayside, 133 former patients of Mr Eljamel and 19 personal representatives of former patients. This group is represented by the legal firm Levy & McRae. The Scottish Government and the University of Dundee are also designated as core participants, as are the Royal College of Surgeons (Edinburgh), Healthcare Improvement Scotland, and NHS Education for Scotland. Members of the public, including former patients, can apply to attend the preliminary hearing in person. Proceedings will also be broadcast live on the inquiry's YouTube channel, and will be available to view later on its website. The preliminary hearing will take place at Waverley Gate in central Edinburgh.
