Senate Waffle On Sara Duterte Impeachment Shows Deep Flaws In Philippine Democracy
'The Senate's return of impeachment articles of Vice President Sara Duterte to the Lower House is a blot on the democratic credentials of the Philippines,' said Peter Murphy, Chairperson of the International Coalition for Human Rights in the Philippines (ICHRP).
'The Senate delayed the trial from February and while it will proceed for now, there is the threat that somehow the House of Representatives could cancel it, or that incoming senators in July will tip the balance,' he said.
The grounds of impeachment – misuse of US$10.5 million in discretionary and intelligence funds, unexplained wealth, an alleged murder plot against the President and his family, and betrayal of public trust- are well-founded in fact. Leading institutions such as the Ateneo School of Government and the Makati Business Club have weighed in to the public debate, demanding that the trial go ahead. Public opinion surveys show 88 per cent support for the trial going ahead.
'ICHRP strongly supports the public rallies and cries of the people to press the Senate to do its constitutional duty. Clearly the political elite are failing to uphold the 1987 Constitution, and it is the people who have to make sure it is enforced and that the Vice-President is held accountable,' said Murphy. 'These rallies are democratic assemblies protected by the Constitution and must not be suppressed by the authorities.'
The international community, led by US policy, is either ignoring the unfolding fiasco or looking on with bemusement, while at the same time supplying weapons, training and political cover to the Marcos Jr. administration.
'It is long overdue that the international community itself upheld democratic standards and international law in its relations with the Philippines,' said Murphy. 'The Philippines is a rogue state where the rule of law is totally optional, where the state systematically murders and represses citizens who oppose its anti-people and anti-environment policies.
'ICHRP sponsored the International Observer Mission to the May 12 Mid-Term Elections, which we found to be deeply flawed, not meeting the international standards for a free and fair election,' said Murphy. 'But the international community again turned a blind eye.
'We repeat our longstanding call for an end to all military aid to this regime, and for the Marcos Jr government to immediately return to the peace talks with the National Democratic Front of the Philippines, a forum where the deep social and political problems of the Philippines can be addressed,' Murphy concluded.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
6 hours ago
- 1News
Trump once hailed mRNA vaccines as 'miracle', RFK now halting advancement
President Donald Trump hailed as a 'medical miracle' the mRNA vaccines developed to combat the deadly Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. Now, his health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is effectively halting the vaccine technology's advancement. Kennedy announced Wednesday that the federal government is cancelling US$500 million (NZ$843 million) worth of mRNA research development contracts, putting an end to US-backed hopes for the vaccine technology to prevent future pandemics, treat cancer or prevent flu infections. It's a sharp pivot from how Trump and top officials described the technology during his first term. Here's a look at what Trump and some of his closest advisers have said about mRNA vaccines that were credited with slowing the pandemic five years ago. Robert Redfield, Trump's director of the Centers for Disease Control ADVERTISEMENT 'A Covid-19 vaccine is the thing that will get Americans back to normal everyday life,' said Redfield, in a September 16, 2020, statement. Americans were still donning face masks as one of the few ways of protecting themselves from a virus that had killed nearly 200,000 in just over six months. Redfield promised that the new vaccines — developed for the first time using mRNA technology — would offer a return to normalcy. Trump wanted to make sure Biden didn't get credit 'Don't let Joe Biden take credit for the vaccines ... because the vaccines were me, and I pushed people harder than they've ever been pushed before. The vaccines are — there are those that say it's one of the greatest things. It's a medical miracle.' Trump said on November 26, 2020, during a news conference in the White House. Weeks earlier, Trump had lost the election in a bitter race against Democrat Joe Biden. As the Republican grappled with leaving Washington and continued to plan for the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccines, he reminded reporters that he oversaw the development of the new shots. 'They say it's somewhat of a miracle and I think that's true,' Trump said on December 8, 2020, during a speech at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. The event celebrated Operation Warp Speed, the government-funded project that accelerated vaccine development with pharmaceutical companies. Trump was promoting the shots as the government prepared to offer them to frontline health workers. ADVERTISEMENT Trump's first-term health secretary, Alex Azar 'It's clear that many Americans are learning these vaccines are safe and extraordinarily effective,' Azar said on December 16, 2020, at a news conference. The government was shipping out mRNA vaccines to states, preparing to distributed it to the masses. Azar noted that a vast majority of Americans — between 70% to 80%, according to polls — intended to get the new Covid-19 vaccine that would be available to the public in the coming months. Gen. Gusave Perna, Trump's chief operating officer for pandemic response 'It takes somewhere between five and 10 years to put a vaccine on the street. Look what we did. Now, that's because of the great work of the scientists who had done the research on mRNA vaccines and others because of industry working on this, they just didn't wake up one day and start working on it,' Perna said during a podcast interview that aired on May 9, 2023. Reflecting in an interview about his time overseeing Operation Warp Speed, Perna credited the mRNA technology with the government's ability to get shots in arms mere months after the pandemic started claiming lives in the US in 2020. Trump supporters boo his vaccine accomplishments ADVERTISEMENT 'Take credit because we saved tens of millions of lives. Take credit. Don't let them take that away from you,' Trump said on December 19, 2021 during a live interview with former Fox News host Bill O'Reilly. Daily Covid-19 deaths had ticked down to 1500 compared to 3000 from a year earlier after Americans began receiving their first doses of the mRNA vaccines. Trump revealed to O'Reilly and the audience that he had just gotten a Covid-19 booster. The crowd booed.
NZ Herald
7 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Trump and his team are bending the criminal justice system to the US President's agenda
Bruce Fein, who served in the Justice Department under Presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, and Ronald Reagan, said Trump is trying to make the department a political arm of the White House, sending lawyers into court to make implausible arguments on issues such as deportation. 'It's totally, completely unprecedented,' Fein said. 'The whole effort is to turn the department from being a professional organisation into one where you are told that unless you are an echo chamber of what Trump wants you to say, you will get fired.' Trump is not the first president to be accused of trying to inappropriately sway the Justice Department. John F. Kennedy appointed his brother Robert as the attorney-general. Nixon fired an attorney-general and his deputy when they refused to dismiss Watergate special prosecutor Archibald Cox. However, Trump's actions have been more far-reaching. The White House argues that it was Biden's Administration that politicised the Justice Department, going after Trump for matters that include allegedly seeking to overturn the 2020 election and taking classified files to Mar-a-Lago after he left the presidency. Trump is seeking to depoliticise the department and hold the wrongdoers from previous administrations accountable, White House officials said. 'President Trump is restoring integrity to the Department of Justice after four years of weaponisation, hoaxes, and attempts to imprison him,' said White House spokesman Harrison Fields. 'The DOJ is upholding Lady Justice and working to execute President Trump's Make America Safe Again agenda, which is lowering crime, holding criminals accountable, and empowering our law enforcement community.' The White House's influence over the Justice Department has been highlighted in recent days as Trump seeks to extricate himself from the furore over the Administration's handling of the files on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The department transferred Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell to a minimum-security prison camp - a move that many experts say is unusual for someone with a 20-year prison sentence for sex crimes. Deputy Attorney-General Todd Blanche, the Justice Department's second-highest official, interviewed Maxwell last month, giving rare attention to a single case from such a prominent official. Blanche was formerly Trump's personal lawyer. Administration officials say it is not uncommon to shift prisoners from one facility to another, and that it is natural for a prominent official like Blanche to get involved in a high-profile case. The Justice Department has always been a unique part of the federal government, answering to the president but often with an unusual measure of independence. Equality under the law is enshrined in the Constitution, and the department was designed to be free to investigate everyone impartially, including personal friends and foes of the president. President Trump with Deputy Attorney-General Todd Blanche and Attorney-General Pam Bondi during a press briefing at the White House on June 27. Photo / Demetrius Freeman, The Washington Post Trump signalled from the outset his contrasting view that the department's mission is to carry out his orders. Still, many lawyers and legal scholars have been startled by the extent and reach of the control he has imposed. Trump named two of his personal lawyers - Blanche and Emil Bove - to top Justice Department positions, and Bove has since been nominated and confirmed as a federal judge. The President pardoned virtually all of those convicted for offences related to the attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021. His Administration then fired dozens of career prosecutors, many of them apparently because their job was to prosecute January 6 defendants. Before Trump, career prosecutors were virtually never fired without cause. 'In the name of absolute executive authority, they are trying to turn US Attorney's offices, and the federal enforcement system generally, into a straightforward instrument of presidential power to be used for political or personal goals,' said Daniel Richman, a former federal prosecutor who teaches at Columbia Law School. 'That is antithetical to the notion of a Justice Department that stands for something other than what the President wants.' The President has also sought to extend his reach to the justice systems of other countries. He ordered tariffs of 50% on goods from Brazil because he was unhappy that the country was prosecuting former President Jair Bolsonaro, who like Trump was charged with seeking to overturn an election. Congressional Republicans have sought to bolster Trump's pursuit of his perceived adversaries, although since Congress is an inherently political body, its actions are arguably less of a break from precedent. Representative James Comer (Republican-Kentucky), chairman of the House Oversight Committee, has launched an investigation into whether Biden staffers improperly used an autopen to approve presidential documents due to what the congressman described as Biden's 'cognitive decline'. Trump has made that assertion and ordered a federal investigation. White House officials say it was clear that Biden was cognitively unfit at the end of his term, so it is appropriate to investigate whether actions were improperly taken in his name. There have been no credible assertions that Biden was unable to make decisions or understand issues, though some Democrats and Republicans have said he was clearly ageing and had occasional memory lapses. Yesterday, Comer issued subpoenas for communications between Biden and members of his Administration about Epstein. He also subpoenaed prominent officials from past Republican and Democratic administrations, including Bill and Hillary Clinton, on issues related to Epstein. Comer issued the subpoenas after one of his panel's subcommittees, with some GOP support, voted to compel the Justice Department to release the files. Under House rules, Comer was then obligated to issue the subpoenas. Congressional Republicans agreed with the White House assertion that Trump has been the victim, not the perpetrator, of the justice system's politicisation. 'History will show that the Obama and Biden administrations' law enforcement and intelligence agencies were weaponised against President Trump,' Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said recently. 'The new Trump Administration has a tremendous responsibility to the American people to fix the damage done and do so with maximum speed and transparency.' Grassley made his comments in announcing the release of additional material on the FBI's investigation of ties between the 2016 Trump campaign and Russia. The Administration has fired or investigated a string of individuals who were involved in building cases against Trump after the end of his first term. The White House contends that those investigations were political, but Trump's critics say he committed obvious offences and is now punishing those who sought to hold him accountable. The independent Office of Special Counsel said recently it is investigating Jack Smith, the former Justice Department special counsel named in 2022 by Attorney-General Merrick Garland to investigate Trump for allegedly seeking to overturn the 2020 election and for keeping classified files after his presidency. Federal prosecutors have also launched criminal probes into former FBI director James Comey and former CIA director John Brennan, two frequent Trump targets who were involved in the investigation of the 2016 Trump campaign's ties to Russia. Maurene Comey, Comey's daughter and a federal prosecutor who worked on the Epstein case, has also been fired, without a clear reason. 'The Justice Department has been captured by partisan politics,' said Barbara McQuade, a former US Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan. 'When I worked at the Justice Department through various administrations, Democratic and Republican, the people working as prosecutors were completely insulated from politics. We focused on facts and law, and nobody got in our way politically.' McQuade, who was appointed by President Barack Obama and now teaches law at the University of Michigan, said the decision to reopen a probe into the former president over a matter that has already been investigated was dismaying. 'It feels like exactly what President Trump promised - vengeance against his opponents,' McQuade said. 'Hardball politics is one thing, but using the justice system for political reasons is different.' Early in his term, Trump targeted major law firms that had done things like hiring lawyers the President considered hostile to him, threatening to end their federal contracts and bar them from government buildings. Several of his orders have been thrown out by the courts. Others have grown concerned about the Administration's regular attacks on judges. Trump has long made a habit of publicly criticising or mocking judges who have ruled against him, but in recent days the Justice Department raised the stakes by filing a misconduct complaint against US District Judge James Boasberg. Boasberg has overseen cases involving the Administration's efforts to deport alleged Venezuelan gang members. The complaint said he acted improperly by raising concerns at a recent judicial conference that the Administration would disregard court rulings. Legal experts said the ethics rule cited by the Justice Department was aimed at a judge's public comments - not private remarks at a closed-door judge's conference. Trump and his Administration have been accused of flouting numerous court orders in the more than 160 cases that have been filed against them. McQuade said the complaint against Boasberg appeared to be an effort to cow him. 'While he and other judges may say they will not be intimidated, it sends a message,' McQuade said. 'Even if the complaint goes nowhere, there will be those in the public who will send threats and harass him, just because he was attacked by the Trump Administration.' Some of the most scathing criticism came from US Circuit Judge Harvie Wilkinson, a conservative Reagan appointee who wrote an opinion in April on the Administration's efforts to deport Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Wilkinson warned that attacking the courts, as the Administration had been doing, could result in serious damage. 'The Judiciary will lose much from the constant intimations of its illegitimacy, to which by dint of custom and detachment we can only sparingly reply,' Wilkinson wrote. 'The Executive will lose much from a public perception of its lawlessness and all of its attendant contagions.' Fein, the former Republican Justice Department official, said Trump is trying to end the courts' ability to block presidential actions. 'He basically, in my judgment, is attempting to eliminate the judicial branch as a check on executive usurpation, over-reach and manipulation,' he said. 'The whole idea of equilibrium between the branches - it wasn't perfect before, but now it's at a new level.'
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Why is the Trump administration threatening to deport this Iranian man to Australia?
By Brad Ryan , ABC Reza Zavvar has been an active contributor to his local community for years, his loved ones say. Photo: Supplied The US government is threatening to deport an Iranian man to Australia - even though he has no connection to Australia and has lived in the US since 1985. Reza Zavvar, a 52-year-old recruiter from Maryland, has been targeted for deportation because of a marijuana possession conviction from the 1990s, his lawyer says. A court order means he cannot be returned to Iran because of the risk of persecution there. So immigration authorities say they are sending him to either Australia or Romania after arresting him in the street near his home in late June. "They got him while he was walking his dog in his quiet suburban neighbourhood," his lawyer, Ava Benach, told the ABC. "And they detained him and sent him to Texas to hold him, and they said: 'We're gonna deport you to Australia or Romania.' "How they picked those countries is a mystery to me." His family, friends and locals are fundraising for a legal fight. They say Mr Zavvar had been quietly contributing to his community for years, helping out his elderly neighbours and making sandwiches each week for those in need of food. He had adopted his dog from a local shelter and recently moved in with his mother to help care for his grandmother. "After 40 years of living in the US, Reza knows no other home," his sister, Maryam, wrote as part of an online petition. "He waits in a privately run detention centre, thousands of miles from anything familiar, while bureaucrats decide his future." Mr Zavvar's case has highlighted a controversial strategy increasingly used by the Trump administration as part of its mass deportation regime - sending migrants to countries they have no connection to, sometimes using historical low-level misdemeanours as justification. But immigration lawyers said they had not seen Australia listed as a destination before. "Most of us in the immigration bar have been hearing about cases being sent to Central and South America," said Mahsa Khanbabai, an elected director on the American Immigration Lawyers Association board. "Normally, what we've been seeing is that the Trump administration is targeting countries where they feel they have some leverage, that they feel they can push around and bully. "Australia is not a country that we would normally consider to be in such a position." A DHS Notice of Removal document, dated July 1, says ICE intends to deport Reza Zavvar to Australia. Photo: Supplied The Australian government said it had not been contacted by US authorities about the case. "There have been no new agreements made with the Trump administration on immigration," a government spokesperson said. Despite repeated requests for clarification, neither Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nor the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) explained why Australia had been selected. But in a statement, DHS assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin said: "ICE continues to try and find a country willing to accept this criminal illegal alien." Mr Zavvar's sister said her brother had "built his life in Maryland, surrounded by his loving family, including his parents, sister, and cousins". "He was a natural athlete, excelling in football during high school, where he was affectionately known as a 'gentle giant' - competitive on the field but kind and warm-hearted off." He had a green card, allowing him permanent residence in the US - but his lawyer says his past marijuana-related conviction was later used to jeopardise that status. In 2004, an airport agent noticed his conviction and started a process that could have led to deportation. Reza Zavvar was arrested by immigration agents while walking his dog. Photo: Supplied But three years later, a judge issued a "withholding of removal" order, preventing his return to Iran. DHS says his previous conviction - for attempted possession of a controlled substance - remains a reason to deport him. "Criminal illegal aliens are not welcome in the US," the department's Ms McLaughlin said. "Zavvar had almost 20 years to self-deport and leave the United States." The Trump administration has been pushing other countries to accept deportees who cannot return to their countries of origin: either because those countries will not take them back, or because of protection orders like Mr Zavvar's. The "withholding of removal" orders theoretically allow the US to deport the migrant to a different country, but that is historically rare. "We've never really seen people being sent to third countries in my 25 years of practice," Ms Khanbabai said. "When the UK started doing that a few years ago, I remember thinking, what a horrendous situation, thank God the United States doesn't do that. And now here we are seeing the US carry out these very same inhumane, what I would consider illegal, practices." The US government recently struck deals with several African countries, which have opened the door to more of these deportations. Small numbers of migrants - from countries including Vietnam, Cuba and Jamaica - have been sent to South Sudan and Eswatini. And on Wednesday, local time, Reuters reported that Rwanda had said it would accept up to 250 deportees, "in part because nearly every Rwandan family has experienced the hardships of displacement, and our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation". The Trump administration says it is delivering on an election promise to crack down on the millions of people in the US who don't have legal rights to live there, and especially those with criminal convictions. "Under President Trump … if you break the law, you will face the consequences," Ms McLaughlin said. "Criminal illegal aliens are not welcome in the US." But immigration lawyers and advocates say Mr Zavvar is among what appears to be a growing number of Iranians detained since the US air strikes on Iran in June. Green card and student visa holders, many of whom have clean records, are among them, Ms Khanbabai said. The Trump administration says it is delivering on an election promise. Photo: AFP The lawyer, who is Iranian American and has many Iranian clients, said the community felt it was being targeted. "The Trump administration claimed that they were going to be going after criminals, yet the vast majority of people, including the Iranians, don't have any serious criminal offences or any at all," she said. "And so we're trying to figure out, is there an uptick of this focus on Iranians … or is this just part of the massive targeting of and scapegoating of immigrants?" Mr Zavvar's lawyer hopes her client's arrest will prove to be a publicity stunt that doesn't lead to his deportation. "I honestly think that they wanted to make a show of arresting Iranians in the wake of our bombing of the Iranian nuclear facility," Ms Benach said. "What people are going to remember is that the administration was arresting Iranians when they were certain that the Iranians were going to retaliate … and then six months from now, they might have to release them under the law, but we'll have moved on to something else." - ABC
