logo
‘Mind boggles': Big call to bring back old tax

‘Mind boggles': Big call to bring back old tax

Yahoo6 days ago
Former Treasury boss Ken Henry has renewed calls for a carbon tax, lashing former governments for dropping the tax.
He said 'it still boggles the mind that we had the world's best carbon policy' and questioned: 'Why the hell did we ever drop it?'
The carbon pricing scheme was introduced by Labor in 2012 and placed on about 500 of Australia's largest polluters.
Under the policy, companies had to purchase credits to offset the amount of carbon produced, with the funds generated form the levy returned through tax cuts and increases to welfare payments.
The measure was later repealed by the Abbott government in July 2014 and replaced with an offset scheme to incentivise companies to avoid emitting CO2 by earning carbon credits.
Speaking at the National Press Club on Wednesday, Mr Henry, who was the Treasury secretary from 2001 to 2011, criticised the scrapping of the tax.
'It still boggles the mind that we had the world's best carbon policy and then, for
purely political reasons, decided that we can afford to do without it,' he said, speaking as the chair of not-for-profit Australian Climate and Biodiversity Foundation.
'A country that's capable of creating the best and then decides that it doesn't need anything at all – well, my God, of course we need a carbon tax.'
Mr Henry urged the government to not 'give up' and fix Australia's 'broken' environmental laws, taking aim at the 'not fit for purpose' and outdated Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC).
'Report after report tells the same story. The environment is not being protected. Biodiversity is not being conserved. Nature is in systemic decline,' he said.
'Of particular concern, they are incapable of supporting an economy in transition to net zero, and they are undermining productivity.'
He noted that the government's pledge to erect 1.2 million homes by 2030 would require more land and transport, meaning more interaction with EPBC assessments.
In strong criticism, he said there was 'no point in building a faster highway to hell', and while approvals needed to be granted faster, the environment needed to be protected.
'These projects, be they wind farms, solar farms, transmission lines, new housing developments, land-based carbon sequestration projects, new and enhanced transport corridors or critical minerals extraction and processing plants, must be delivered quickly and efficiently,' he said.
Speaking more broadly about government spending, Dr Henry, who authored the Henry Tax Review in 2010 to guide tax reforms over the next 10 to 20 years, said there needed to be more 'spending discipline'.
'If the budget is to meet these growing spending pressures, then we've got two options. We either increase taxes, as a share of GDP, or we grow the economy faster,' he said, noting productivity growth had slumped from an average of 2.31 per cent in the '90s to 0.98 per cent in the last 25 years.
'That's a pretty fundamental difference.
'If we continue on that trajectory, as we said in 2002, we will have no option but to raise taxes, and quite significantly, by several percentage points of GDP … or cut spending.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Maximus to Continue Providing Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment Support in West Virginia
Maximus to Continue Providing Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment Support in West Virginia

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Maximus to Continue Providing Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment Support in West Virginia

Renewed partnership focuses on streamlining access and enhancing customer experience TYSONS, Va., July 21, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Maximus, a leading employer and provider of government services, today announced it has been selected by the West Virginia Department of Human Services (DoHS) to continue serving as the state's enrollment broker for Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). Since 2015, Maximus has delivered a wide range of enrollment and eligibility services to West Virginia residents. During that time, the company supported the state's efforts to expand the number of programs and populations the enrollment broker project served including the expansion of Medicaid in 2015, the expansion of CHIP in 2017, and the addition of Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits in 2017. Maximus has partnered with the state to improve the delivery of eligibility and enrollment services for more than 400,000 West Virginia residents. The majority of Medicaid enrollment in West Virginia is handled through the customer contact center operated by Maximus, offering residents the choice to engage by phone, web, online chat, and mail. The company conducts caller surveys to monitor customer experience, earning a 98% average customer satisfaction score in 2024. Maximus also provides in-person outreach and education at local community events. "We've developed a deep understanding of residents' needs over the last decade and are pleased to continue providing West Virginians a high-quality, person-centered customer experience," said Robin LaFrance, Executive Managing Director of U.S. Services East, Maximus. "As the leading provider of Medicaid enrollment broker services to states across the nation, we prioritize delivering accurate program information and streamlined enrollment services, ensuring residents are promptly connected with the right benefits." In 2018, Maximus partnered with West Virginia to help implement a successful Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) pilot project across two large counties. The company leveraged its enrollment broker infrastructure, developed a full SDOH survey, and added the survey delivery to the Medicaid enrollment process. The surveys, with completion rates of nearly 70 percent, revealed an average of 2.5 unmet SDOH needs per resident. The pilot project's results will be used by the state to better identify the needs of at-risk people, coordinate services, and ultimately improve health outcomes. Learn more about Maximus's eligibility and enrollment services for government programs. About Maximus As a leading strategic partner to government, Maximus helps improve the delivery of public services amid complex technology, health, economic, environmental, and social challenges. With a deep understanding of program service delivery, acute insights that achieve operational excellence, and an extensive awareness of the needs of the people being served, our employees advance the critical missions of our partners. Maximus delivers innovative business process management, impactful consulting services, and technology solutions that provide improved outcomes for the public and higher levels of productivity and efficiency of government-sponsored programs. For more information, visit View source version on Contacts Media & Public RelationsEileen Cassidy Rivera, media@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Orlando Health expands footprint with Florida land purchase
Orlando Health expands footprint with Florida land purchase

Business Journals

time9 minutes ago

  • Business Journals

Orlando Health expands footprint with Florida land purchase

If you are a resident of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Virginia, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Utah, Oregon, Tennessee, Texas, Minnesota and Montana, you have the right to opt-out of Targeted Advertising, including our 'sale' and/or 'sharing' of your Personal Information ('Opt-Out'). We and our third-party business partners use Personal Information in accordance with our Privacy Policy to serve advertising believed to be of interest to you ('Targeted Advertising'). If you are a California resident, you also have the right to limit the use and disclosure of your Sensitive Personal information in particular circumstances. Please note that you may need to Opt-Out on each website, mobile app, browser, and device you use, and if you clear your browser cookies, you may need to repeat this process. However, if you have created an account to log in across several of our websites and/or mobile apps, we will make reasonable efforts to apply your Opt-Out request to each of those websites and apps. Please follow the steps below: To Opt-Out of Targeted Advertising: Move the 'Allow Targeted Advertising On This Site or App' toggle below to the left and press 'Confirm my Choices.' Move the 'Allow Targeted Advertising On This Site or App' toggle below to the left and press 'Confirm my Choices.' To Opt-Out of other 'sales', including for list rentals and data co-ops: Please provide information on the Webform below and press 'submit.' You can also submit this request by calling 1-800-833-7323. This information will not be used or disclosed for any purpose other than for processing this request. Please provide information on the Webform below and press 'submit.' You can also submit this request by calling 1-800-833-7323. This information will not be used or disclosed for any purpose other than for processing this request. To Opt-Out of both Targeted Advertising and other 'sales', including for lists and data co-ops: Move the 'Allow Targeted Advertising On This Site or App' toggle below to the left and press 'Confirm my Choices.' Please provide information on the Webform below and press 'submit.' You can also submit this request by calling 1-800-833-7323. This information will not be used or disclosed for any purpose other than for processing this request. Move the 'Allow Targeted Advertising On This Site or App' toggle below to the left and press 'Confirm my Choices.' Please provide information on the Webform below and press 'submit.' You can also submit this request by calling 1-800-833-7323. This information will not be used or disclosed for any purpose other than for processing this request. To limit the use and disclosure of your Sensitive Personal Information: Please provide information on the Webform below and press 'submit.' You can also submit this request by calling 1-800-833-7323. This information will not be used or disclosed for any purpose other than for processing this request.

Dish weighs in on Verizon's FCC petition to extend phone locking, and I agree
Dish weighs in on Verizon's FCC petition to extend phone locking, and I agree

Android Authority

time9 minutes ago

  • Android Authority

Dish weighs in on Verizon's FCC petition to extend phone locking, and I agree

Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority TL;DR Verizon is seeking FCC approval to end its 60-day phone unlocking rule and set its own policy, sparking industry debate. Dish (Boost Mobile's parent) supports a single national unlocking standard, while seven state attorneys general say Verizon should decide its own policy. A change could reduce the number of unlocked devices in the resale market and affect all carriers, not just Verizon users. Verizon is one of the only major carriers that unlocks mobile phones after 60 days, which means it not only makes it easier to switch to another carrier but also leaves you the option of using your phone's eSIM to add a secondary service with another provider. To little surprise, it doesn't do this out of the goodness of its heart. In fact, it may soon extend this unlock period to whatever it sees fit. Back in May, the carrier petitioned the FCC asking for it to waive the 60-day unlocking requirements and let it set its own policies similar to other carriers. As is required, the FCC opened up the request for comments initially, though that window has since closed. Curious how other carriers feel about Verizon's request? As first reported by Chris Price via Reddit, it seems there was a wide range of responses. While T-Mobile and AT&T have kept quiet, Dish was the one national carrier that officially submitted a comment to the FCC. In short, the parent behind Boost Mobile said it isn't against replacing the current Verizon policy, but that there should be one national unlock policy that uniformly applies to all carriers with no exceptions. On the flipside, seven state attorney generals reportedly commented, saying Verizon should have the power to control how long your phone is kept locked. I have to say, I mostly agree with Dish. While I'd love to see Verizon keep its current policy, the current administration's FCC tends to vote in favor of big business, and so change is likely coming no matter what. Though the carrier didn't specify how long the new policy should be, the idea of it applying uniformly means that no carrier is unfairly disadvantaged here. For what it's worth, Dish currently has a one-year locking policy on most of its prepaid devices, and so it's throwing out an idea that could potentially negatively impact it as well. After all, it's very possible the new locked period could be sooner than its current policy. Wondering why Verizon had a 60-day policy enforced on it in the first place? Years ago, the FCC and Verizon came to the current 60-day unlocking policy agreement when Verizon acquired 700MHz spectrum in 2007, and the deal was reaffirmed during the acquisition of Tracfone in 2021. Why does the lock policy matter? Ryan Haines / Android Authority As much as I don't personally feel sorry for any major corporation if I'm truly honest, I can see why Verizon would feel that its 60-day unlock policy feels unfair in the current market. When it first agreed to these FCC stipulations, it was a player on the rise and a clear leader in the mobile space. These days, T-Mobile has taken some of its thunder, and so it probably feels it needs all the help it can get in retaining customers. I personally feel like an extended period of 3 to 6 months is perfectly reasonable. That said, the wording of this petition seems to have very little in the way of protections when it comes to how long Verizon would be able to lock its devices. While Verizon likely wouldn't risk locking its phones indefinitely, the carrier recently reported its second quarter 2025 results, and it has bled another 51,000 customers. These kinds of actions could certainly make it more likely to extend its policy for as long as it can get away with it without major backlash, as it would ensure customers stay for longer. Even if you're not on Verizon, this change could affect you as it could have major impacts on the unlocked market, possibly resulting in fewer unlocked options in the second-hand market and driving up prices for unlocked phones as demand rises for those who don't want a phone locked to just one carrier. This is especially true if there's no firm limit in place. Should the FCC change Verizon's unlocking policy? 0 votes Yes, but only if it's uniform across all carriers. NaN % Yes, it's a private company and they can do what they want. NaN % Yes, but with clear limitations and guidelines. NaN % No and in fact all the carriers should be forced to 60-day unlocks. NaN % No, it should stay the same. NaN % Other (Tell us in comments) NaN % The FCC is set to vote on the issue on July 24, but in light of the flurry of comments it received, the FCC is reportedly giving folks a chance to respond to the latest comments around the petition. While the petition is typically aimed more at businesses and others, it's open to anyone. To submit your own thoughts, you'll need to go to the ECFS Express Comment System and in the Proceedings/docket number field add 24-186 and 21-112. From there, you can give a response to how you feel about these groups that have commented and where you stand. You can find more details on how to submit via Reddit. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store