
Trump's Plan To Shut Harvard's Doors To Foreign Students Hit By US Judge
Boston:
A federal judge on Monday blocked President Donald Trump's administration from implementing his plan to bar foreign nationals from entering the United States to study at Harvard University.
US District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston issued an injunction barring Trump's administration from carrying out its latest bid to curtail Harvard's ability to host international students amid an escalating fight pitting the Republican president against the prestigious Ivy League school.
The preliminary injunction extends a temporary order the judge issued on June 5 that prevented the administration from enforcing a proclamation Trump signed a day earlier that cited national security concerns to justify why Harvard could no longer be trusted to host international students.
She ruled after Trump's Friday announcement that his administration could announce a deal with Harvard "over the next week or so" to resolve the White House's campaign against the university, which has waged a legal battle against the administration's various actions against the school.
Trump signed the proclamation after his administration had already frozen billions of dollars in funding to the oldest and wealthiest US university, threatened Harvard's tax-exempt status and launched several investigations into the school.
The proclamation prohibited foreign nationals from entering the US to study at Harvard or participate in exchange visitor programs for an initial period of six months, and directed Secretary of State Marco Rubio to consider whether to revoke visas of international students already enrolled at Harvard.
But Burroughs said Trump's administration was likely violating Harvard's free speech rights under the US Constitution's First Amendment by retaliating against it for refusing to meet its demands to cede control over the school's curriculum and admissions and by targeting it based on what officials viewed as the university's left-leaning orientation.
The judge said that "at its root, this case is about core constitutional rights that must be safeguarded: freedom of thought, freedom of expression, and freedom of speech, each of which is a pillar of a functioning democracy and an essential hedge against authoritarianism."
"Here, the government's misplaced efforts to control a reputable academic institution and squelch diverse viewpoints seemingly because they are, in some instances, opposed to this Administration's own views, threaten these rights," she wrote.
Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Harvard said the ruling will allow it to continue hosting international students and scholars while this case moves forward. It added it will continue to defend the rights of the school, its students and scholars.
The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The university has filed two separate lawsuits before Burroughs, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, seeking to unfreeze around $2.5 billion in funding and to prevent the administration from blocking the ability of international students to attend the university.
The latter lawsuit was filed after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on May 22 announced that her department was immediately revoking Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification, which allows it to enroll foreign students.
Almost 6,800 international students attended Harvard in its most recent school year, making up about 27% of its student population.
Noem, without providing evidence, accused the university of "fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party."
Her action was temporarily blocked by Burroughs almost immediately. While the Department of Homeland Security has since shifted to challenging Harvard's certification through a lengthier administrative process, Burroughs at a May 29 hearing said she planned to issue an injunction to maintain the status quo, which she did officially on Friday.
A week after the hearing, Trump signed his proclamation, which cited concerns about Harvard's acceptance of foreign money including from China and what it said was an inadequate response by the school to his administration's demand for information on foreign students.
His administration has accused Harvard of creating an unsafe environment for Jewish students and allowing antisemitism to fester on its campus. Protests over US ally Israel's treatment of Palestinians during its war in Gaza have roiled numerous universities' campuses, including Harvard's.
Rights advocates have noted rising antisemitism and Islamophobia in the US due to the war. The Trump administration has thus far announced no action over anti-Arab and anti-Muslim hate. Harvard's own antisemitism and Islamophobia task forces found widespread fear and bigotry at the university in reports released in late April.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ceasefire in Words, Missiles in Air: Rising tensions between Israel and Iran threaten India's billion-dollar Middle East trade
Despite US President Donald Trump's announcement of a ceasefire deal between Israel and Iran, the two warring sides continue to trade deadly missiles targeting each other's cities. This has put the Indian trading community in a state of uncertainty regarding the fate of their shipments into the region, which is a market for the country. Traders say that with Iran now launching rockets—most recently the attack on the Al Udeid base in Qatar—the situation remains volatile and uncertain for them. 'Freight costs are going up—now by 20-25% for all major trading destinations. For the Gulf (Jebel Ali port of Dubai), a 40-ft container shipment, which was previously $50, now costs $550. And it's not just Dubai; this holds true for all neighbouring ports,' says Ghaziabad-based home textile exporter Ananat Srivastava , describing the acute toll on his Middle East-bound shipments in the wake of the widening Iran-Israel conflict. Even before the US bombed key Iranian nuclear sites, Srivastava, who is also Director of the Home Textile Exporters Association, says Indian traders were already facing disruptions. 'Lots of apparel and home textile products go to Israel. Transit time has increased by 30%, and freight rates are up by 50%. Vessel planning for containers has gone haywire. When the vessel will arrive, nobody knows. This applies to all routes, including Europe and the US, and holds particularly true in the case of the Middle East. Whatever schedule I get from the forwarder or vessel, it's now showing a delay of 2-3 weeks.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ödeme? Dieses simple Haushaltsmittel reduziert Flüssigkeit Venen Kompass Weiterlesen Undo According to Srivastava, Israel-bound shipments are facing highly erratic port scheduling. He notes that shipping lines are no longer able to provide reliable schedules. Another key point he highlights is that while freight costs have increased, insurance costs remain unchanged. The reason: war and war-related damages are not covered under any policy. Rajat Mehra, Co-convenor of the CII UP MSME Panel and Director at Rajat Chemicals Industry, affirms the increase in costs, noting that in addition to sky-high freight charges, he is also witnessing significant delays. 'A consignment that the importer had assured would be shipped to us last week is now reportedly delayed by another week as of this morning,' he says. Live Events The escalation of the war is already impacting shipping freight rates and insurance coverage for shipments, according to Sumit Jain, Managing Director of New Delhi-based Kanin Originals, an MSME manufacturing cotton garments. As things escalate further, the burden of increased supply chain costs will have to be borne by traders and end consumers, he cautions. 'A lot of India's exports move via Dubai's free zones, which serve as warehousing hubs for the Middle East, Africa, and GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) nations. Traders catering to Gulf-bound markets are bound to suffer a blow due to this disruption. Any potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz will also cripple energy supply lines, particularly oil, used by Indian firms,' Jain adds. India's strategic trade ties with the region India's bilateral trade with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, Iran, and Israel accounts for a significant share of its global trade . In FY 2024-25, India-GCC bilateral trade reached $178.56 billion, accounting for 15.4% of India's total global trade. The UAE is India's top GCC trading partner, followed by Saudi Arabia, with both countries contributing the bulk of this trade through energy imports, gems and jewellery, machinery, electronics, and food products. The GCC, as a bloc, is also a major source of foreign direct investment into India. Trade with Iran, though diminished by sanctions, remains important. India was the third-largest importer of Iranian goods in 2023, with exports to Iran, mainly basmati rice, bananas, soya meal, Bengal gram, and tea, totalling $1.24 billion in FY 2025. Imports from Iran have sharply declined since 2019 due to US sanctions, but Iran remains a strategic partner, especially for agricultural exports and as a transit hub through the Chabahar Port. With Israel, India's trade has grown steadily, reaching $6.53 billion in FY 2024 (excluding defence), with India exporting $4.53 billion worth of goods (including chemicals, machinery, and agricultural products) and importing $2 billion in high-tech, electronics, and defence-related items. India is now Israel's second-largest trading partner in Asia and seventh globally. Shipping companies forecast cost increases With Iran's parliament approving the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a new worry point has emerged for the Indian trading community. This is one of the world's most critical maritime chokepoints for global trade, especially for energy supplies. Approximately 20 million barrels of oil—about 20% of global petroleum liquids consumption—pass through the Strait every day, making it the single most important route for seaborne oil exports. About 60-65% of India's crude oil imports transit through Hormuz, making energy security the most vulnerable sector. Disruptions would drive up oil and LNG prices, increase shipping and insurance costs, and trigger inflation across the Indian economy. Sectors heavily reliant on Middle Eastern energy—refining, chemicals, fertilisers, and transport—would be directly hit. Additionally, agricultural exports to Iran (notably basmati rice, bananas, and tea) are already being affected, with large consignments stranded at ports due to payment and shipping disruptions. Overall, any escalation would cascade through India's trade with the entire West Asian region, impacting both energy and non-energy sectors. Hector Patel, Chief Operating Officer–Sea, at Jeena and Company, is of the view that oil shipments may need to be re-routed, and international shipping lanes could be severely disrupted if tensions rise. 'While only 2-3% of global container volumes pass through the Strait of Hormuz waterway, a direct container market impact would primarily affect the Middle East. This will affect the redirection of transshipment volumes, particularly impacting Dubai's Port of Jebel Ali, the busiest hub in the Gulf. This could cause congestion in alternative South Asian ports and elevate freight rates.' Jitendra Srivastava, CEO of Triton Logistics & Maritime, is of the view that the escalating Israel-Iran tensions are driving a sharp surge in marine insurance premiums and disrupting lifeline shipping routes, especially through the Strait of Hormuz. 'It can double insurance rates for a Rs 50 crore bulk cargo shipment from Rs 1.5 lakh to Rs 6.5 lakh when war risk cover is needed to transit through risk-prone zones such as the Red Sea. Regular marine premiums are 0.3% of cargo value, of which war risk is 0.1%. This rise in insurance costs, combined with greater security risk, is compelling freight rates to jump by 30–50% as shipping lines transfer costs to customers.' According to Srivastava, countries such as India, with extensive trade links with West Asia, are facing higher logistics costs and supply chain disruption risks. 'Exporters are now using alternative, longer routes to avoid risk zones, adding once more to transit time and cost.' Notably, ratings agency Crisil has cautioned that a prolonged or escalating conflict, especially if it disrupts energy supplies, could aggravate risks, raise inflation, and pressure margins in oil-dependent sectors. Energy-intensive sectors and those with exposure to global shipping and insurance costs should be monitored closely for any escalation or supply chain disruptions, it stated in its latest report.


India Gazette
23 minutes ago
- India Gazette
Oil prices likely to stabilize near USD 65 as Trump announces Iran-Israel ceasefire: SBI Report
New Delhi [India], June 24 (ANI): Crude oil prices are now expected to remain around USD 65 per barrel after US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, bringing relief to global markets. According to a recent report by SBI, the price of oil depends heavily on Iran's response to the recent tensions in the Middle East. The report laid out three possible scenarios, each with a different price impact. Now, with the ceasefire announced, the third scenario of 'ceasefire with Israel' has come into effect, and crude oil prices are likely to stabilise around USD 65. The report stated, 'Different scenarios being built along the Iran-Israel conflict seem a little far-fetched, especially a worst-case scenario, on oil's trajectory, given that any sharp increase in prices may not be a long-term phenomenon.' As per the report, if Iran had chosen a path of substantial retaliation against the US and the conflict had widened regionally, oil prices could have jumped sharply, reaching as high as USD 130 to 140 per barrel. This would have created a major shock for oil-importing countries. The second scenario considered symbolic retaliation by Iran and continued conflict with Israel, which would have kept crude oil prices steady around USD 80 to 90 per barrel. Now, with a ceasefire officially declared by President Trump, the report suggested that the market is likely to follow the third and most optimistic path, with oil prices falling to around USD 65 per barrel in the coming weeks. During the recent Israel-Iran-US conflict, crude oil prices had surged as high as USD 79 per barrel on Monday, reflecting market fears of further escalation. However, the SBI report also pointed out that some of the extreme projections for oil prices, especially in the worst-case scenario, appear far-fetched. The report further stated that the only event that could have led to sustained prices above the crude price of USD 130 would be the use of weapons of mass destruction by either side, a situation so severe that its cost cannot be measured through normal economic models. United States President Donald Trump announced on Monday (local time) what he described as a 'complete and total' ceasefire between Israel and Iran, stating that it would take effect in approximately six hours. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said the ceasefire has been jointly agreed upon by both nations and would mark a significant de-escalation in hostilities that have gripped the region. With tensions now easing, global oil markets may return to stability, which is a major positive for oil-importing countries like India. Lower oil prices will help reduce the current account deficit and support economic growth. (ANI)


Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Intelligence leaders are set to brief Congress on Trump's Iran strikes
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Members of Congress will hear directly from President Donald Trump 's intelligence leaders Tuesday, receiving classified briefings just three days after Trump directed strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and a day after Iran struck a US base in briefings also come the day after Trump proclaimed on social media that Israel and Iran had agreed that there will be an "Official END" of their in Congress, along with some Republicans, have questions about Trump's unilateral decision to launch military action, arguing he should have come to Congress for approval - or at least provided more justification for the attacks."We expect them to explain to the American people what were the results in terms of actually thwarting Iran's capacity to become a nuclear power and what are the Trump administration's plans to avoid another potentially disastrous war in the Middle East, where thousands of American lives are potentially at risk," said House Democratic Leader Hakeem separate briefings for the House and Senate will be led by CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, along with Gen. Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and deputy secretaries of state Christopher Landau and Steve meetings could turn contentious as many lawmakers feel they have been left in the dark on what led to the strikes and amid escalating tensions between the White House and Congress over the role of the United States internationally - disagreements that don't always fall along party have been generally suspicious of Trump's strategy, and his motives abroad, but some believe the U.S. could have a role in supporting Israel against Iran. Others strongly believe the U.S. should stay out of of Trump's strongest Republican supporters agree with the Democrats, echoing his earlier arguments against "forever wars." But many others in the party enthusiastically backed the strikes, saying he should have the power to act on his own."President Trump deserves all the credit," said House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., after Trump said there would be a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. "This is what peace through strength looks like."Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, suggested in a post on X that Trump should be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., posted: "Historic! The President of Peace!"Democrats said they would be looking for more information about the ceasefire that Trump claimed on social media. Israel and Iran did not immediately acknowledge any Iran's retaliation on the U.S. base in Qatar on Monday, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said he wanted an additional classified briefing "laying out the full threat picture, the intelligence behind Iran's retaliation, and the details, scope, and timeline of any US. response."Senate Democrats are also forcing a vote as soon as this week on a resolution by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., requiring congressional approval for specific military action in Iran."You have a debate like this so that the entire American public, whose sons and daughters are in the military and whose lives will be at risk in war, get to see the debate and reach their own conclusion together with the elected officials about whether the mission is worth it or not," Kaine said between the White House and Congress about Iran has been limited for most members. Trump sent congressional leaders a short letter Monday serving as his official notice of the strikes, two days after the bombs said the attacks were "limited in scope and purpose" and "designed to minimize casualties, deter future attacks and limit the risk of escalation."Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat, said he wants to ask the intelligence officials what they know about the damage done by the bombings, and how successful they were."There's a reason why the Constitution requires the Congress to be informed and the president to seek approval in beginning a war, which is the founders thought that the people should have a say, that the president shouldn't act alone," Blumenthal said.