Senate Republicans hold hearing on Biden's mental fitness as Democrats boycott
WASHINGTON — Nearly six months after Joe Biden left the White House, Senate Republicans are still scrutinizing his presidency, kicking off the first in what's expected to be a series of congressional hearings this year on his mental fitness in office.
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee brought in three witnesses Wednesday — none of whom served in Biden's administration — to scrutinize his time in office, arguing that Biden, his staff and the media must be held accountable. Democrats boycotted the hearing and criticized Republicans for 'arm chair diagnosing' Biden when the committee could be looking into serious matters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
34 minutes ago
- Axios
Behind the Curtain: Trump's gut-check
President Trump's hard-line approach sometimes softens. Last week, he appeared to buckle — under pressure from farm interests, as conveyed to him by Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins — on his steadfast demand for the deportation of anyone who's in the U.S. illegally. He took to Truth Social to say some workers here illegally, working on farms or hotels, are actually "very good, long time workers." Those are the same undocumented workers ICE is rounding up, often in front of cameras, to lock up and ship away. But hard-ass Trump resurfaced this week, vowing to target those same "very good, long time workers" across America's biggest cities, run by Democrats. Why it matters: Trump, in private, is clearly wrestling with the political realities of long-time workers who paid taxes and committed no crimes (after coming here illegally) getting deported by the millions. His economic advisers are warning him of hotels, restaurants, landscaping, construction and meatpacking companies going belly up. Republican senators are warning about families getting torn apart and local businesses and services shuttering. Polls are showing broad support for locking up criminals and locking down borders — but much deeper division on going after people who played by U.S. rules after coming here illegally. As Axios reported last month, the hardest of the hard-liners — White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem — want all undocumented immigrants expelled, regardless of economic and political consequences. That's the current position. But don't be surprised if the position softens, because Trump himself softens. State of play: For now, the enforcement pendulum has swung back in favor of the very hard line of Miller and Noem — meaning raids at farms/hotels/restaurants. Within the White House, Rollins' move that initially led Trump to back off raids on farms, hotels and restaurants angered some top aides, notably Miller, the architect of Trump's immigration and deportation policies. The intrigue: Some Republican lawmakers and activists tell Axios they believe the debate over immigration enforcement is far from over. They note that Trump has already changed his mind twice, and that we haven't yet seen the true economic impact from waves of immigrant arrests. Steve Bannon — the powerful MAGA podcaster, and top aide in Trump's first term — believes the president once again could be swayed to go easy on such economically crucial industries. "There's constant pressure. There are constantly people coming to him," Bannon said Wednesday at a press breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor. "He's someone that takes the business community's interests in mind," Bannon added, referencing Trump's career in hotels and construction. Bannon also said that within the right-wing populist movement, Trump is actually a "moderate." Behind the scenes: Axios reporters are hearing about low morale within ICE. The agency is being stressed by the demands by Miller and Noem that agents arrest 3,000 immigrants a day nationwide — a quota that many within ICE don't believe is achievable. Some agents are stressed by the tactics some of their colleagues are using in making arrests. Others are disheartened by the response that masked, heavily armed agents have received in several communities. We've also heard that some ICE agents are afraid of being fired for not meeting arrest quotas — the agency still hasn't hit the 3,000-per-day goal. What we're watching: Senate Agriculture Committee chair John Boozman (R-Ark.) told Axios he plans to meet with Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins again soon to discuss the worksite raids issue. In the meantime, he's been fielding complaints from farmers across the country. "A lot of their workforce have questionable papers, and so they're concerned," Boozman said. "When you get mixed signals, it breeds uncertainty. So it's hard for businesses to plan," he added, echoing the concerns many businesses have expressed about Trump's tariff policies.
Bloomberg
38 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Fahmy: Need Forceful Diplomacy, Not Force
Bloomberg sources say Senior US officials are preparing for the possibility of a strike on Iran in coming days, as Israel and the Islamic Republic continue to exchange fire. Egypt's former Foreign Minister Nabil Fahmy told Bloomberg's Joumanna Bercetche that it could be very dangerous if the US gets involved, and now is the time for forceful diplomacy over force. (Source: Bloomberg)
New York Post
39 minutes ago
- New York Post
What Team Trump must do to get deportations right
When it comes to illegal-migrant deportations, President Donald Trump stressed last week, 'We're going to have to use a lot of common sense.' That principle must keep guiding his team's drive to expel the millions of 'asylum seekers' the last guy waved in. In particular, Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller's demand that ICE now aim for 3,000 arrests a day is asking for trouble. Advertisement First, that's impossible if Homeland Security boss Kristi Noem's people focus mainly on the resource-intensive work of going after the worst-of-the-worst — even though those are the deportations with the most overwhelming public support. Second, hitting the quota almost requires the kind of mass roundups that are the highest-risk, public-opinion-wise. Advertisement And which are also likely to capture pre-Biden (and even pre-Obama) illegal immigrants who've managed to put down some roots — and so prompt the kind of economic troubles that Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins warned of, such as 'severe disruptions to our food supply.' But the president can't, and won't, simply abandon one of his central campaign promises —nor should he. So far, that's meant a zig-zag: 'Changes are coming,' Trump vowed, and a top ICE official then ordered a 'hold on all work site enforcement investigations/operations on agriculture,' restaurants and hotels — only for top Homeland Security brass to order a resumption of such raids Advertisement Even it out, people: Common sense, remember. First, keep pushing self-deportation, which is cheaper than arresting and removing people. Nearly 1 million have already voluntarily left under Trump, per some estimate. The president is wise to offer migrants an incentive — $1,000, a one-way flight out of the country and no black mark on your record if you seek to immigrate legally — to self-deport. Second, balance goals and resources. The Big Beautiful Bill will fund 10,000 new ICE officers and 3,000 border agents (as well as more self-deport grants ) — but until that passes, Miller's quotas are going to force ICE to focus on lower-priority targets. Advertisement Third, make it clear — to both migrants and employers — that widespread reliance on illegal labor can't continue. Since 1986, the law has required businesses to verify workers' eligibility, but enforcement's been a joke. That must change — but a gradual transition is key to minimizing economic disruptions. Bottom line: Trump won election vowing to secure the border and to deport illegal migrants; he's done the first and will keep working on the second. But as he himself acknowledged, implementation sometimes requires a scalpel, not a hammer, to avoid needless harm — and major political pain.
