WIND AND SEA Reimagines Disney Icons in Bold New Capsule
Summary
WIND AND SEAis back with anotherDisneycollab, set to drop later this week. After the success of their varsity jackets fromlast year's collection, the two are expanding into a full wardrobe lineup including sweaters, shirts, and hats all laced with playful Disney touches.
One standout in the collaboration is the blue striped button-up, that appears to be simple and bold, featuring a sketch of Mickey in burgundy running down the button line which gives the clean design a fun contrast. A boxy, versatile and easy to dress up or down, alternative, the real star is the gingham button-up. Mickey and Pluto are featured on the chest pocket, while Donald and Goofy are embroidered near the hem, styled to interact with the pocket design. On the back, the full cast — Daisy, Chip, and Dale included — pull the whole piece together with the WIND AND SEA logo stamped with emphasis in bright blue, red, and yellow. It's playful, graphic-heavy, and made for Disney lovers and streetwear fans alike. The collection is available June 21st exclusively on WIND AND SEA'ssite.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geek Tyrant
an hour ago
- Geek Tyrant
James Gunn Says His SUPERMAN Was Shaped by His Marvel Firing: 'I Don't Think That I Would've Written the Superman That I Wrote' — GeekTyrant
James Gunn has talked a lot about what inspired his take on Superman like classic comics, giant monsters, emotional storytelling, but now he's added something more personal to the list, that time Disney and Marvel fired him. In a recent Rolling Stone interview, Gunn opened up about how his unexpected dismissal from Marvel in 2018 (over resurfaced tweets) changed more than just his career path. It also rewired the way he writes, and who he's writing for. 'There's no doubt that without that experience, I don't think that I would've written the Superman that I wrote. 'I definitely wouldn't be doing this job if I didn't get fired, but I don't know if I'd be doing this job even if it wasn't for that. I just don't think that a character that pure would've quite appealed to me.' Before the firing, Gunn admitted his storytelling had been shaped by a kind of people-pleasing instinct—pushing boundaries, going dark, throwing punches wrapped in humor. But that event forced a shift. 'I don't think that opened the door to me writing the pure Superman. That opened the door for me to stop creating so that people would like me. That's downplaying it – so people would love me. I think on some level, everything I had done came from a pleasing place.' DC had offered Gunn the Superman job years ago, but he turned it down. He wasn't ready. Not for the character, and not for the kind of storytelling Superman demands. 'I needed the right way in, and that required time to think through a few thousand options before I got to the way that I thought worked. But I do also think that my life, and career, has been a gradual softening of the edges. 'I still like black comedy. I still have edges. But I used to like provoking a lot. And today, although I still seem to do it, I don't really like doing that. In my heart, I'm pretty sentimental. I just believe in basic human values. I think Guardians of the Galaxy was a good starter kit for that.' When Marvel eventually reinstated Gunn for Guardians Vol. 3 , it marked the end of one era and the beginning of another. The trilogy's final chapter was also its most emotional, and in hindsight, a stepping stone toward the more idealistic tone of Superman . 'They [Guardians] have a lot of heart, but they do have their own weirdness and oddities and edginess, and Superman isn't that, even though he does from the outside have a lot of oddness. 'A flying dog in a cape is odd. Giant walking robots, and kaijus – that's all odd. But the very-good nature of him, this really strong belief in what's right, sometimes perhaps to a fault, is what makes Superman who he is." That kind of sincerity is something Gunn once might've undercut with a joke, but is now it's front and center in his vision for DC's next era. 'And that is not Star-Lord or Rocket. That's not a guy who's angry or covering up his emotions. He's pretty pure. And so getting to the place where I could write that character was a journey. 'In the past I would've done it through making fun of the character, and I don't think that's what I do here. I'm less afraid now than I used to be. I allow myself to be purely creative more than I used to. 'And I thought I was being purely creative, but a lot of times it was just anger releasing itself in another way. I'm less afraid of being goofy or sentimental, or boring or straight.' Superman isn't just a reboot for DC. It's a reset for Gunn himself, who is now an artist more comfortable with hope than sarcasm, and more interested in showing us what's good than mocking what is.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How The Abyss banned scene ended up on Disney+ as streaming service removes film
A classic James Cameron film has been removed from Disney+ over a banned scene of animal cruelty. The Abyss was originally released in 1989 and came under fire for a scene that showed a real rat being dunked into a vat of chemicals, which animal rights campaigners succeeded in having cut from theatrical screenings. But a "loophole" meant that the full version including the rat scene dropped on streaming service Disney+ in April. It has now been removed - here's how it made its way onto the streamer and what happened next. Cameron's 1989 film The Abyss starred Ed Harris in a sci-fi thriller about a diving team sent to recover a nuclear submarine, but stumble across aquatic aliens in the deep. The storyline was inspired by something the Titanic and Avatar filmmaker had read as a teen about humans being able to breathe through liquid, so some scenes include Harris' character appearing to breathe through a liquid-filled helmet. However, while Harris did not actually breathe in the fluid, a real rat used for filming actually was dunked into a vat of fluorocarbon liquid. Although it reportedly survived unharmed, animal rights campaigners were not impressed by the stunt and called for the scene to be removed from the film. Eventually, the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) agreed that the scene should be cut as it was in breach of the Cinematograph Films (Animals) Act 1937, which bans by law the "cruel infliction of pain or terror on any animal or the cruel goading of any animal to fury" in films. The rat scene was not allowed to be shown in UK cinemas. Despite clear rules that ban cinemas from showing scenes of animal cruelty under the Cinematograph Films (Animals) Act 1937, there is what the RSPCA has termed a "loophole" that meant the original film in its uncut form was able to stream on Disney+. At the time of protests about the rat's treatment, the BBFC also used the Video Recordings Act 1984 to stop the scene from being released on Blu-Ray and DVD, or from airing on linear UK TV channels. But how we watch TV and films has moved on in the years since, with many viewers now watching via streaming subscriptions that are sometimes not subject to the same rules. The RSPCA's David Bowles said at the time the film arrived on streaming: "The RSPCA is really concerned that a loophole currently exists allowing animal abuse scenes deemed unacceptable elsewhere to be streamed freely and legally into our homes. "The Abyss' controversial rat scene has long concerned the RSPCA, and has always been deemed unacceptable by BBFC — so it's hard to fathom out why Disney+ has decided to broadcast it. "We need to ensure people are not being exposed to content which promotes or showcases cruelty to animals. As the way millions of households consume entertainment changes, it's vital the legal framework is responsive to that and continues to consistently protect people and animals." Disney+ has now removed The Abyss from streaming, although it's not clear whether the film in its edited version for UK audiences may stream on the service in future. According to GamesRadar, Bowles at the RSPCA said: "This isn't about cancel culture – we'd welcome Disney+ reinstating the film to their platform, just with this troubling scene removed – as is already the case in cinemas, on TV, and on DVD. "This was instead about highlighting a loophole that currently exists allowing animal abuse scenes deemed unacceptable elsewhere to be streamed freely and legally into our homes - and protecting the public from having to see this animal abuse content."
Business Upturn
an hour ago
- Business Upturn
Is Only Murders in the Building season 5 coming in June 2025? Everything we know so far
By Aman Shukla Published on June 18, 2025, 19:00 IST Last updated June 18, 2025, 12:27 IST Fans of Only Murders in the Building are eagerly awaiting news about Season 5, especially with speculation about a potential June 2025 release. The Hulu comedy-mystery series, starring Steve Martin, Martin Short, and Selena Gomez, has captivated audiences with its witty storytelling and star-studded cast. But is Season 5 coming in June 2025? Here's everything we know about the upcomnig season. Is Only Murders in the Building Season 5 Releasing in June 2025? As of now, there's no official confirmation that Only Murders in the Building Season 5 will premiere in June 2025. However, based on the show's historical release patterns and recent updates, we can make an educated guess. The series has typically followed a consistent annual release schedule, with three of its four seasons premiering in August. Production for Season 5 began in March 2025 and wrapped in June 2025, aligning closely with the filming schedule of Season 4, which also ran from March to June and premiered in late August. Given this timeline, an August 2025 release is more likely than June 2025. Where to Watch Only Murders in the Building All four previous seasons are available to stream on Hulu in the U.S. and Disney+ (under the Star hub) internationally. Season 5 will follow the same distribution, with episodes likely dropping weekly. What to Expect from Only Murders in the Building Season 5 Season 5 will pick up after the shocking Season 4 finale, where the Arconia's beloved doorman, Lester (Teddy Coluca), is found dead in the courtyard fountain. The trio—Charles (Steve Martin), Oliver (Martin Short), and Mabel (Selena Gomez)—will dive into investigating Lester's murder, which showrunner John Hoffman has teased will explore themes of 'classic-meets-modern' New York, focusing on the rich history of doormen and their union. Additionally, a secondary storyline will involve Sofia Caccimelio (Téa Leoni), who appeared in the Season 4 finale, asking the trio to investigate her missing husband, Nicky 'The Neck' Caccimelio, a figure tied to the Caputo crime family. Hoffman has hinted that this disappearance may connect to Lester's death, promising a 'wildly funny world' for the trio to navigate. Ahmedabad Plane Crash Only Murders in the Building Aman Shukla is a post-graduate in mass communication . A media enthusiast who has a strong hold on communication ,content writing and copy writing. Aman is currently working as journalist at
