Rupee hits highest level in August on fading US tariff risks, tax cut boost
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The Indian rupee climbed to its highest level so far this month, supported by lower risks of additional U.S. tariffs on domestic goods and optimism that planned tax cuts will bolster growth.The rupee rose as much as 87.2050 per U.S. dollar on Tuesday, compared with 87.35 in the previous session. It was last at 87.2250.The currency is being supported by the Trump-Putin meeting and subsequent talks between the U.S. and Ukrainian presidents, raising hopes a peace deal. This, Nomura said in a note, "appears to reduce the likelihood of additional tariffs/sanctions on India in relation to the purchase of Russia oil".Nomura further highlighted that Trump, after his meeting with Putin, said the tariff/sanction path will be delayed.An escalation in U.S. tariffs on India could have driven the USD/INR to break past key levels on the upside.Indian Prime Minister Modi's planned cuts on goods and services tax (GST) is expected to support consumption and has also lifted sentiment in the rupee. Economists said the measures could provide a near-term boost to growth momentum and help offset the drag from weak external conditions.The rupee's Asian peers were mostly lower on Tuesday, pegged back by a rise in U.S. yields. The 10-year U.S. yield hit the highest in two weeks on Monday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
a few seconds ago
- Economic Times
Trump hails 'total victory' as US court quashes $464 mn civil penalty
Agencies US President Donald Trump A US court threw out Thursday a $464 million civil penalty against President Donald Trump imposed by a judge who found he fraudulently inflated his personal worth, calling the sum "excessive" but upholding the judgment against Arthur Engoron ruled against Trump in February 2024 at the height of his campaign to retake the White House, which coincided with several active criminal prosecutions that the Republican slammed as "lawfare.""It was a Political Witch Hunt, in a business sense, the likes of which no one has ever seen before," Trump said on his Truth Social platform Thursday, adding that "everything I did was absolutely CORRECT and, even, PERFECT."When Engoron originally ruled against Trump, he ordered the mogul-turned-politician to pay $464 million, including interest, while his sons Eric and Don Jr. were told to hand over more than $4 million judge found that Trump and his company had unlawfully inflated his wealth and manipulated the value of properties to obtain favorable bank loans or insurance terms. Alongside the financial hit to Trump, the judge also banned him from running businesses for three years, which the president repeatedly referred to as a "corporate death penalty."On Thursday, five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court upheld the verdict, but ruled that the size of the fine was "excessive" and that it "violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution."The Eighth Amendment prohibits excessive or cruel punishments and penalties.- 'Massive win! - State Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the initial case, vowed to take Thursday's ruling to the state's highest court, the New York Court of Appeals. Thursday's appeals court ruling "affirmed the well-supported finding of the trial court: Donald Trump, his company, and two of his children are liable for fraud," James added. Following the initial verdict, Trump subsequently sought to challenge the civil ruling as well as the scale and terms of the penalty, which has continued to accrue interest while he repeatedly condemned the case and the penalty as politically son Don Jr. termed the appellate court ruling a "massive win!!!" "New York Appeals Court has just THROWN OUT President Trump's $500+ Million civil fraud penalty! It was always a witch hunt, election interference, and a total miscarriage of justice... and even a left leaning NY appeals court agrees! NO MORE LAWFARE!" he wrote on X. During hearings, conducted without a jury under state law, Trump accused then-president Joe Biden of driving the case, calling it "weaponization against a political opponent who's up a lot in the polls."As the case was civil, not criminal, there was no threat of economic advisor Peter Navarro said at the White House Thursday that "James is another one that belongs in jail," referring to the New York attorney general."The Democrats really overplayed their hand on this because they thought they could take Donald Trump out," he said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India's GDP growth likely at 6.3% in FY26, below RBI estimates: SBI report
A New York appeals court struck down a $464 million fraud fine against President Donald Trump and his company, handing him a victory over the state's attorney general. In a decision issued Thursday, the Manhattan appellate court still found that Trump broke the law by inflating the valuation of assets like Mar-a-Lago and his Trump Tower penthouse, but it said the massive penalty was unconstitutionally 'excessive.' The long-awaited ruling by an intermediate state appeals court wipes out one of Trump's biggest financial liabilities. It also puts fresh pressure on New York Attorney General Letitia James, who has become the focus of a federal probe into whether her lawsuit violated Trump's legal rights. The politically charged decision resulted in the five-judge panel issuing three separate opinions. The majority ultimately concluded that Trump violated the law by inflating his assets, but nevertheless threw out the massive fine. Most of Trump's legal woes melted away after his election victory. The Justice Department dropped two federal criminal cases against Trump, citing a longstanding policy against prosecuting a sitting president. While Trump was convicted in his hush money case in Manhattan, a judge sentenced him to no jail time at a hearing 10 days before his inauguration — following a US Supreme Court ruling that gave the president broad immunity. James filed the case against Trump and his sprawling real estate company in September 2022, more than two years before his successful bid to retake the White House. She won the case after an 11-week trial. The development raises questions about whether James, a Democrat and staunch critic of Trump, will seek to reinstate the penalty by appealing the decision to the state's highest court in Albany. Trump argued that his method of valuing his real estate was typical of the industry and that disclaimers on his financial statements advised banks they should do their own valuations anyway. One of his biggest defense arguments was that no banks lost money on his loans, and the state didn't dispute that. On Aug. 8, people familiar with the federal probe into James' civil lawsuit against Trump said Justice Department officials had convened a grand jury and sent subpoenas to James's office. The subpoena also seeks information on James's case against the National Rifle Association, said one of the people. The probe is being run out of Albany, New York. Abbe Lowell, a lawyer for James, said at the time that the investigation is a 'blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign.' Trump has long criticized James as well as Justice Arthur Engoron, who oversaw the non-jury trial, calling both of them biased against him because he's a Republican. Trump has also appealed his conviction in the hush money case, seeking to erase his criminal record. He has also appealed two civil jury verdicts against him in lawsuits brought by E. Jean Carroll, who sued him for sex abuse and defamation and won nearly $90 million in total damages. Trump has maintained innocence throughout.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 minutes ago
- Business Standard
True test of independent directors lies in their integrity, not box-ticking
Despite India's robust regulatory framework -strengthened by the 2013 Companies Act and Sebi's listing regulations - the chairman identified a troubling gap between structure and spirit Amit Tandon Listen to This Article At the recent Annual Directors' Conclave, Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey delivered his assessment of Indian boards, urging them to swap ceremonial formality for intellectual grit. His central metaphor was that companies are ships with CEOs at the helm, but who watches the compass for 'ethical fog' and 'regulatory icebergs'? Governance, in his view, is less about ticking boxes and more about steering a corporate 'ship' through geopolitical squalls, technological disruption, and fickle public opinion. Despite India's robust regulatory framework —strengthened by the 2013 Companies Act and Sebi's listing regulations — the chairman identified
