India set to allow its private firms to mine and import uranium to help nuclear expansion
If it meets its expansion goal, nuclear will provide 5% of India's total power needs, according to government estimates.
Until now, the state has maintained control over the mining, import and processing of uranium fuel because of concerns over the possible misuse of nuclear material, radiation safety and strategic security.
It will retain its grip on reprocessing spent uranium fuel and managing plutonium waste, in line with global practice. But to help meet a surge in demand for nuclear fuel as it expands nuclear power production, the government plans to draw up a regulatory framework that would allow private Indian firms to mine, import and process uranium, the two government sources told Reuters.
They asked not to be named because the plans are not yet public.
The proposed policy, which the sources said was likely to be made public in the current fiscal year, will also permit private players to supply critical control system equipment for nuclear power plants, they said.
The Finance Ministry, Department of Atomic Energy and Prime Minister's Office did not respond to requests for comment.
Outside India, countries including Canada, South Africa and the United States allow private firms to mine and process uranium.
Domestic supply is not enough
India has an estimated 76,000 metric tons of uranium enough to fuel 10,000 megawatts of nuclear power for 30 years, according to government data.
But the sources said domestic resources would only be able to meet about 25% of the projected increase. The rest would have to be imported and India would need to increase its processing capacity.
In announcing its budget on February 1, the government made public its plans to open up the sector without giving details. Some of India's big conglomerates subsequently began drawing up investment plans.
But analysts said amending the legislation could be complex. "It's a major and bold initiative by the Indian Government which is critical for achieving the target," said Charudatta Palekar, independent power sector consultant.
"The challenge will be to define quickly the rules of engagement with private sector."
New Delhi will have to change five laws, including the ones regulating mining and electricity sectors and India's foreign direct investment policy to enable private participation in many identified activities, the sources said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
Trump says Xi told him he wouldn't invade Taiwan while U.S. leader is in office
U.S. President Donald Trump has claimed that Chinese leader Xi Jinping told him he would not invade democratic Taiwan as long as the American president remains in office. Trump made the comments Friday in an interview ahead of his highly anticipated summit in Alaska with Russian leader Vladimir Putin over Moscow's war in Ukraine. "I will tell you, you know, you have a very similar thing with President Xi of China and Taiwan, but I don't believe there's any way it's going to happen as long as I'm here. We'll see," Trump said in an interview with the Fox News program "Special Report" while aboard Air Force One. "He told me, 'I will never do it as long as you're president.' President Xi told me that, and I said, 'Well, I appreciate that,'' Trump said. But the U.S. president said Xi had also delivered an implicit warning about the future of self-ruled Taiwan — which China claims as its own and has vowed to bring back into the fold, by force if necessary. 'But he also said, 'But I am very patient, and China is very patient,'" Trump said, adding that he had told Xi: ''Well that's up to you, but it better not happen now.'' Asked in February whether it was his administration's policy to prevent China from using force to take control of Taiwan, Trump said he never comments on the issue. This position stands in stark contrast to that of his predecessor, Joe Biden, who repeatedly broke with decades of 'strategic ambiguity' on the issue, hinting multiple times that Washington would come to Taipei's aid in the event of a Chinese attack. Still, the Trump administration is believed to be urging partners and allies — including Japan — to make clear the role they would play in the event of a U.S.-China conflict over Taiwan. Taiwan enjoys de facto independence, with democratic elections, a government that controls defined territory and its own military, passport and currency — even if it is not formally recognized as a state by most countries. The United States switched diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing in 1979, but has maintained unofficial relations with Taiwan and is bound by law to supply the island with weapons to help it defend itself. The U.S. position of strategic ambiguity has for decades been intended to not only deter Beijing from using force against the island but also dissuade Taipei from seeking formal independence while giving Washington breathing room in its ties with both. In June, Trump and Xi held their first confirmed phone call of Trump's second stint in office. During those talks, Beijing said Xi had 'emphasized that the United States must handle the Taiwan question with prudence, so that the fringe separatists bent on 'Taiwan independence' will not be able to drag China and America into the dangerous terrain of confrontation and even conflict.' In recent months, as the U.S. president has angled for summit talks with Xi, he raised eyebrows in Taipei by reportedly urging Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te to cancel U.S. transit visits this month. A similar visit by then-Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen was greenlighted by Biden in 2023. Remarks made by Trump following Friday's talks with Putin were also expected to be closely analyzed by Taiwanese authorities. Asked about his advice for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a separate interview on Fox News' "Hannity" after the summit, Trump put the onus for resolving the conflict in Ukraine squarely on Kyiv as it strains to defend its territory from the Russian war machine. "Gotta make a deal,' Trump said. 'Yeah. Look, Russia is a very big power, and they're not.'


Japan Times
4 hours ago
- Japan Times
Taisho Democracy: A turbulent, tenuous era of conflicting ideals
Taisho is modern Japan's forgotten era. Postscript to modernizing Meiji (1868-1912), prologue to militarist and postwar Showa (1926-89), Taisho never came into its own as significant in its own right — which is unfair, because across its stage in 14 short years (1912-26) passed World War I (1914-18), nationwide rice riots (1918), 'Taisho Democracy,' the assassination (1921) of the prime minister who (however ambiguously) symbolized it, the birth of the Japan Communist Party (1922), the Great Kanto Earthquake (1923), the Universal Manhood Suffrage Law (March 1925) and, as though in alarmed recoil against that liberal measure, the decidedly anti-liberal Peace Preservation Law (April 1925). These are all definable, datable events. World War I speaks for itself. Japan, on the side of the Allies but fighting little, rode a war boom to prosperity and snatched German territory in China. Soaring postwar rice prices sparked rioting and coordinated strike action on a scale never before seen or even approached here. Was Japan, following Russia, going Bolshevik? Revolution simmered, authority braced. The Japan Communist Party, an incitement of the one, was anathema to the other. The earthquake was devastating. More than 105,000 perished in destruction that foreshadowed that of World War II. Yet the novelist Junichiro Tanizaki (1886-1965) could write of it, 'I felt a surge of happiness which I could not keep down. 'Tokyo will be the better for this!' I said to myself.' That's Taisho — gay, exuberant, crazy.


The Diplomat
9 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Why Narendra Modi's Upcoming Visit to Japan Is Strategically Significant
Amid the current complex security environment and the growing uncertainty in India-U.S. ties, Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to visit Japan for annual summit talks with his Japanese counterpart on August 30. Modi will also visit China for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) meeting scheduled from August 31-September 1. Modi's visit to Japan this year is both symbolic and strategically important, especially against the backdrop of rising trade tensions between India and the United States. With U.S. President Donald Trump having imposed steep tariffs on Indian goods, raising the rate to 50 percent as of August 27, India-U.S. relations face growing uncertainty. This situation casts a shadow on the future of the Quad, a strategic alliance that includes India, Japan, the U.S., and Australia. Modi's decision to visit Japan prior to his scheduled trip to China also signals India's strategic pivot toward East Asia and highlights the deepening ties between New Delhi and Tokyo. India and Japan share a long-standing bilateral relationship that has expanded from being diplomatic and strategic to also being focused on defense, trade, and investment. A major focus of the upcoming meeting will be on advancing the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet-train project. Japan has been planning to deliver the E10 series Shinkansen to India, which will mark the first time a next-generation train model will be launched simultaneously in both countries. The Japanese Shinkansen currently operates E5 trains and envisions the E10 as its next generation model. The E10, which has only recently entered service in Japan, is renowned for its advanced safety systems, energy efficiency, and cutting-edge engineering. A 508 km bullet-train route, with 352 km in Gujarat and 156 km in Maharashtra, is under construction and is largely funded by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). The Gujarat stretch of the project, spanning from Vapi to Sabarmati, is expected to be completed by December 2027, while the entire corridor is scheduled to be fully operational by December 2029. One of the fundamental objectives of Modi's visit is to finalize an agreement for India to acquire Japan's next-generation E10 Shinkansen bullet train technology. This also showcases Tokyo's commitment to exporting its most advanced rail-tech in support of India's infrastructure ambitions and a significant step forward in bilateral technological cooperation. Furthermore, this collaboration is also expected to include technology transfer agreements that could perhaps allow India to manufacture components domestically, boosting the Make in India initiative. Furthermore, the bullet train is expected to stimulate economic growth, reduce travel time drastically and promote regional connectivity, benefiting millions of commuters. Japan's E10 Shinkansen technology is a landmark collaboration that underscores trust, capacity-building and shared progress in modernizing critical infrastructure. India and Japan share a special strategic and global partnership that is entering its second decade, reinforcing a free and open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) vision. Both India and Japan are also members of the Quad grouping, with India set to host the next leaders summit by the end of the year. A key factor will be whether Trump participates in the summit, especially given ongoing trade tensions between the U.S. and India. Additionally, the outcomes of Modi's visit to China for the SCO summit are important, as there have been signs of thawing of tensions between India and China. In this complex geopolitical environment, strengthening India-Japan ties is crucial, as Japan provides India with a dependable partner that supports its broader Indo-Pacific strategy. Despite challenges, the Quad's strategic mission is expected to remain strong due to the shared security interests of its members. These developments reflect India's evolving multipolar diplomacy, where it carefully balances economic realities with its pursuit of long-term strategic partnerships. Modi's visit will not just be infrastructure-centered. It is a multilayered diplomatic move, reinforcing India's strategic autonomy through deepened collaboration with Japan and also reaffirming its engagement in regional multilateralism. Leaders of both India and Japan would also seek to bring in new dimensions to the India-Japan partnership, exploring cooperation on intelligence-sharing mechanisms, semiconductor supply chains, rare earth elements vital for electric vehicles, and broader economic-security cooperation, including coordination through the Quad framework. As the geopolitical landscape continues to shift, the India-Japan partnership will remain a vital anchor for regional stability, grounded in shared democratic values and a mutual commitment to upholding a stable and rules-based international order.