logo
Russia's Grip Weakens In The South Caucasus, Opening Doors To New Players

Russia's Grip Weakens In The South Caucasus, Opening Doors To New Players

This article was originally published by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and is reprinted with permission.
As Russia remains preoccupied with its war in Ukraine, its influence is weakening along its southern border, particularly in Armenia and Azerbaijan.
This power shift is opening the door for other players, including Turkey, the European Union, and the United States, to expand their presence in the region, analysts told RFE/RL.
On July 10, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev met in Abu Dhabi to discuss a potential peace deal, notably without any mediators — including Russia.
Although no breakthrough was reached, a joint statement reaffirmed both countries' commitment to bilateral negotiations and continuing 'confidence-building measures.'
Just five years ago, however, the dynamics were starkly different.
After a 44-day war between the two countries in 2020 over Nagorno-Karabakh — a mostly ethnic Armenian region internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan and long at the center of the two countries' mutual animosity — Russian President Vladimir Putin mediated a cease-fire, reinforcing Moscow's traditional role as the region's power broker.
But the truce has since contributed to what Rauf Mirgadirov, an analyst with the Ayna-Zerkalo newspaper in Baku, calls 'a historic shift.'
'The two countries — after more than 30 years of conflict over Karabakh — are now closer to one another and distancing themselves from Russia,' he told RFE/RL. 'Both want to be free from Russian influence, and this is their opportunity, as Russia is very busy with the war in Ukraine.'
Ruben Mehrabian, an analyst at the Armenian Institute of International Relations and Security, agrees that Yerevan views the current situation as a chance to loosen Moscow's hold on the country.
'Russia wanted Armenia to remain in eternal conflict so that it could continually rescue us to justify its indefinite presence,' he said. 'But Armenia wants to resolve these disputes and remove any Russian presence from our country. Now Russia doesn't like that.'
In the eyes of some analysts, Yerevan's ties with Moscow began to deteriorate in 2016 during a brief bout of hostilities between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh.
The conflict concluded with a Russian-brokered cease-fire and some territorial gains for Azerbaijan, fueling Armenian frustration over Moscow's limited support for its traditional ally.
According to Richard Giragosian, founding director of the Regional Studies Center in Yerevan, this moment marked 'the beginning of Armenian erosion and loss of confidence in Russia as a security partner.'
'Russia's position and policy beginning with the 2016 war began to shift to Azerbaijan,' he said.
Relations plunged further after the 2020 conflict, when Baku regained control over Nagorno-Karabakh and Russia again failed to back Yerevan.
Recent events have highlighted how strained the bond between the two countries has grown.
On June 17, Russian-Armenian billionaire Samvel Karapetian was arrested on charges of calling for the unlawful seizure of power.
In Giragosian's view, the arrest was 'a move by the Armenian government to preempt any Russian interference' in next year's parliamentary elections.
'But at the same time, it was more about pushing against Russian interest or influence within Armenia itself,' he added. 'This man is a product of Moscow; he is widely perceived as pro-Putin.'
Just days later, on June 25, Armenian authorities arrested Archbishop Bagrat Galstanian, a prominent cleric in the Armenian Apostolic Church, accusing him of plotting to overthrow the government.
Russia responded angrily, with Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov calling for an end to 'unjustified attacks' against the church, describing it as 'one of the key pillars of Armenian society.'
Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan fired back, accusing Moscow of meddling in Armenia's internal affairs.
The shifts aren't limited to Armenia.
Relations between Baku and Moscow have also deteriorated sharply this summer.
In late June, Aliyev suspended high-level meetings, barred Russian Deputy Prime Minister Aleksei Overchuk from visiting and canceled Russian cultural events in Baku.
These actions followed the deaths of two ethnic Azeris during a police raid in Yekaterinburg, Russia, amid allegations of torture.
Five years ago, Russia had other ambitions for maintaining influence in the region — specifically through a military presence.
The 2020 cease-fire agreement signed by Russia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan called for reopening economic and transportation routes. It also stipulated that Armenia would ensure secure transit between Azerbaijan proper and its Naxcivan exclave via the so-called Zangezur corridor, with Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) assigned to oversee it.
'Perhaps the Zangezur corridor is Russia's only viable option for maintaining a presence in the region,' Kirill Krivosheev, a Russian analyst at the Carnegie Foundation, told RFE/RL's Azerbaijani Service in 2023.
However, Armenia sees the corridor as a threat to its sovereignty.
While negotiations continue, it remains unclear whether Russian FSB oversight will be part of any final deal.
In March, Pashinian said there would be no foreign deployments along the Armenia-Azerbaijan border after a treaty is signed, and the idea is also not really attractive to the Azerbaijanis either, according to Vadim Dubnov, a correspondent for RFE/RL's Echo of the Caucasus.
'Deploying FSB forces may have made sense for Azerbaijan before the Karabakh conflict was resolved,' he said. 'But now, direct negotiations with Armenia — and not Russian involvement — are more beneficial to Baku.'
Control over Zangezur also ties into a larger geopolitical picture: the Middle Corridor, a route linking China to Europe and bypassing Russia.
'Zangezur is part of the Middle Corridor,' Mirgadirov explained. 'Russia doesn't just want to control Zangezur; it wants to dominate all land and air routes in the South Caucasus. But I think Turkey is well-positioned to lead regional security efforts.'
While analysts agree that Russia's influence is waning, they caution that deep economic and historical ties cannot be severed overnight.
However, since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, this economic dependence has also begun to shift, Russian analyst Krivosheev noted in his 2023 interview with RFE/RL's Azerbaijani Service.
'Turkey has become a key import partner for Russia. Many goods are transported via Turkey and Azerbaijan,' he said. 'The Istanbul straits are vital, and Azerbaijan is now a crucial hub for Russian gas. We sell oil and gas to Azerbaijan, which then sells it to Europe. This is legal and does not violate sanctions.'
Paul Goble, senior fellow at the Jamestown Foundation, highlighted Azerbaijan's rising importance.
'Aliyev has finally realized that Moscow needs Azerbaijan at least as much as Azerbaijan needs Russia,' he said. 'When you realize that the other side needs you more than you need it, that changes how you make calculations.'
Meanwhile, Yerevan is rebuilding ties with Istanbul while distancing itself from Moscow.
Long strained over the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict — in which Turkey supported Azerbaijan, closing its borders with Armenia in the 1990s — and historical grievances, relations between the two countries are cautiously improving.
In June, Pashinian visited Turkey and met President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan — the first political working visit aimed at bilateral negotiations.
'Armenia is economically dependent on Russia because most of our communication with external markets runs through Georgia to the Russian market,' said Mehrabian. 'Our border with Iran is open but limited in capacity. Opening the Turkish border would allow Armenia access to European markets.'
Yet Armenia is not putting all its hopes on Turkey. Mehrabian said Yerevan is also strengthening ties with the US and EU.
'We are working with the EU and the US to elevate cooperation,' he said. 'With the US, we have already signed a charter of strategic partnership. With the EU, we have passed legislation aligned with potential membership — even though we know it's a long road ahead.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU To Introduce ‘Punitive' External Funding Clause To Reduce Migration
EU To Introduce ‘Punitive' External Funding Clause To Reduce Migration

Forbes

time21 minutes ago

  • Forbes

EU To Introduce ‘Punitive' External Funding Clause To Reduce Migration

European Union flag in front of the European Commission. Amid a confusing roll-out of the latest long-term budget proposal, the European Commission has signaled it will move to a more 'punitive' approach in trying to get developing countries to take back more deportations of their citizens. The change, which will affect the way money is spent from the EU's $233bn external funding instrument, would see the bloc suspend or even cancel development assistance if countries don't co-operate with the EU's ambitions to reduce migration and increase deportations of failed asylum seekers. The Commission's proposal for the next budget period - which acts as a curtain-raiser for future negotiation and sets the likely tone for what will be the final budget - has already generated a lot of controversy and seen policy analysts scrambling to understand what's coming. The proposal reflects the dominant policy agenda of the Commission - namely defense, competitiveness and border security. To that end, various funding instruments have been grouped together to form mega-funds known as 'National and regional partnership plans.' These mega-funds will give a lot more discretion to member states to dole out money as they see fit, rather than being constrained by spending targets set by the EU. This, in practice, has some asylum and migration researchers and advocates concerned that member states will neglect funding for programs to better support people already seeking shelter in Europe, and spend it rather on building up their borders - something many member states have made it clear they want to do. While pointing out that a lot remains unclear when it comes to how the new budget will affect people on the move, 'what we know is that the proposal is to increase resources for funds that have sponsored violent border surveillance in the past,' says Chiara Catelli, Project Officer at the undocumented migrant charity PICUM. "The same goes for Frontex, an agency that's been accused of complicity in human rights violations at the borders multiple times.' Buried within the budget proposal is another clause that has set a lot of migration advocates on edge. Within the proposal text around the new external funding instrument - to be known as the Global Europe Instrument - it states that development funding for poor countries outside the EU could be suspended or even cut off, if those countries don't cooperate with the EU in accepting deportations of their citizens from the bloc. While the EU - and other major powers - have often used their economic might to convince poorer countries to follow their agenda, it is a new step to have enshrined in law such a 'punitive' approach, at least for the EU. It does, however, mirror broader policy developments in the EU and U.K., the latter of which is reportedly considering overall migration and visa policy as a lever to convince third countries to welcome back 'returns.' At the same time, the EU is believed to be exploring how it may use trade policy as a similar lever, an idea expressed by a Belgian politician in June.

Melania Trump Attacked in Russian State Media
Melania Trump Attacked in Russian State Media

Newsweek

time22 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Melania Trump Attacked in Russian State Media

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Russian newspaper has disparaged Melania Trump as Kremlin-backed media speculate about whether the first lady is behind President Donald Trump's Ukraine policy. Pro-Kremlin newspaper Vzglyad said "it would be better for him [Trump] to buy her shoes than to sell Patriots (missiles) to Kyiv" in an op-ed Monday that described the first lady as a "danger to Russia." Russian state TV has also taken aim at Melania Trump, saying she is responsible for the U.S. president's apparently tougher stance toward Putin which has seen him pledge more weapons for Kyiv and threaten more sanctions on Moscow. Newsweek has contacted the White House for comment via email outside of regular office hours. First lady Melania Trump departs the White House with U.S. President Donald Trump on July 11, 2025 in Washington, DC. First lady Melania Trump departs the White House with U.S. President Donald Trump on July 11, 2025 in Washington, It Matters After months of expressing how Trump can serve Moscow's interests, Kremlin propagandists have changed their tone, especially after the U.S. president pledged more weapons for Ukraine and threatened more sanctions on Moscow. A focus for Kremlin media in recent days has been Trump's comments about his unhappiness with Putin, as well as his references to remarks Melania Trump made about the Russia-Ukraine conflict. What To Know In an article on Monday headlined, "Melania Trumpenko's danger to Russia underestimated," Vzgylad referred to the moniker given to the first lady over her alleged "significant" role in her husband's policy with regards to Ukraine. The paper described how the U.S. president had told reporters how his wife would tell him another city in Ukraine had been shelled soon after he had spoken with Putin. Modified photos of the first lady with attached Ukrainian iconography on her clothing have formed social media memes in recent days. "It would be better for him to buy her shoes than to sell Patriots to Kyiv. It would be cheaper," the paper added referring to the missile system that President Trump said can be provided to Ukraine. Russian state TV has also taken a swipe at the first lady. In front of revealing years-old images of Melania Trump which Russian TV has used before to disparage her, anchor of 60 Minutes, Olga Skabeyeva, described the first lady as a "Ukrainian agent." Skabeyeva then outlined U.K. newspaper reports that she was behind her husband's tougher line on Putin, in the clip posted by Russia watcher Julia Davis. One of her guests, Moscow-based political scientist Malek Dudakov downplayed her role and said that the couple "has certain marital problems," and "doesn't even live with Trump." In May, the White House described claims by political biographer Michael Wolff that the couple was separated as "blatant lies and fabrications." What People Are Saying Russian newspaper Vzglyad: "Melania Trumpenko's danger to Russia is way or another, Melania is now a symbol of new hope for Ukrainians." Russian state TV anchor Olga Skabeyeva: "Melania Trump whom conspiracy theorists previously considered to be a Kremlin became a Ukrainian agent, Melania Trumpenko." Trump said during a meeting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office, per USA Today: "I go home, I tell the first lady, 'You know, I spoke to Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation.' And she said, 'Oh really? Another city was just hit,'" What Happens Next While Ukraine has welcomed Trump's pledge for weaponry and Patriot missile defense systems to Ukraine through NATO, Russia continues to bombard Ukrainian cities. Meanwhile, the prospect of peace talks, which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky suggested could take place this week, remain unlikely amid reports that Putin retains his maximalist demands in the war he started.

EU to Plan for Possible No-Deal Scenario With US
EU to Plan for Possible No-Deal Scenario With US

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

EU to Plan for Possible No-Deal Scenario With US

European Union envoys are set to meet as early as this week to come up with a plan for measures to respond to a possible a no-deal scenario with US President Donald Trump ahead of the August 1 deadline for tariff negotiations. The overwhelming preference is to keep negotiations with Washington on track in a bid for an outcome to the impasse ahead of next month's deadline. Bloomberg's Balazs Penz reports. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store