Peter Dutton was the incredible shrinking man during Channel Nine's Great Debate
Anthony Albanese isn't the most inspiring political leader.
So much so that he was a lucky man to get one Scott Morrison in his lifetime.
He wasn't so much elected as he was thrown the keys to the Lodge by voters as the price of dragging ScoMo out by the collar of his Hawaiian shirt.
But against the odds, Albo has turned out to be lucky again.
Because even though he's profoundly disappointed voters in his first term, the Liberal Party has given him a beautiful gift.
That gift is Peter Dutton, a man who is personable, funny and likeable in the flesh but looks like an alien with a latex mask pulled over his skull on television.
Mr Albanese even got in a dig about it during last night's debate, suggesting he was 'batting above his average' with wife Kirrilee.
Good grief, couldn't the same be said about the Prime Minister?
Mr Dutton towers over Mr Albanese in real life. So why did he sometimes seem like the incredible shrinking man of Channel 9's Great Debate?
First up, he missed some big opportunities to skewer the Prime Minister on Medicare when asked to demolish Labor's biggest lies and instead went on a rambling, confusing rant about nuclear power.
Ninety-nine per cent of voters wouldn't know what he was talking about.
Then, he brought out the backyard brawler, savaging the Prime Minister as a big, fat, liar.
'Prime Minister, you couldn't lie straight in bed. Honestly, this is unbelievable,' Mr Dutton said as fired back at Labor's Medicare 'lies'.
As television biffo goes, it was entertaining enough for around 30 seconds.
Sure, it wasn't exactly the infamous 1991 Ron Casey And Normie Rowe Punch On At The Midday Show, but it was lively.
It was also bad politics. It allowed the Prime Minister to tick off the Opposition Leader as if he was a school kid getting into trouble with the principal.
'It's just the real abuse. That's a sign of desperation. Peter, frankly,' Mr Albanese purred.
It was also jarring, because Mr Dutton strikes most people as quite a calm person. Cautious. Polite. For heaven's sake, he meditates.
His sense of frustration with the Prime Minister getting away with fibs is understandable.
But it's not helping him. He just sounds like a sore loser and whinger.
If the Liberal Party wanted to win, somewhere at this stage of the election campaign, you might have thought they would turn down the relentless negativity and bring out some sunshine.
But they just don't seem to have it in them.
So it's no wonder that Mr Dutton is turning off women, the big movers who are deciding this election and carving him up over his work from home policies.
What a tragedy that Labor didn't have the ideas and the guts to get up a big reform at this election as John Howard bravely did with the GST in 1998.
What a tragedy the Liberal Party didn't have stronger, cut-through policies instead of temporary tax cuts.
Instead, we've got a bunch of spending on Medicare to lift bulk billing and some housing reforms that may well send the price of a first home going up.
There's every chance by the next election that those big promises will be political roadkill.
The promise to bring back bulk billing is likely to cause a riot when voters work out that it's not happening at every GP clinic when they flash the Medicare card.
But by then, despite the Prime Minister's claims he will serve a full term, the suspicion is that Mr Albanese, 62, will have Canberra in the rear view mirror as he pours himself a ginger beer at Copacabana.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
28 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Warning from Washington: Speak out about Chinese threat or risk AUKUS subs
Washington: Australia must speak more clearly about the threats posed by China, including how it would respond to a regional conflict, or risk the AUKUS submarine agreement, Indo-Pacific experts in the United States are warning. John Bolton, who served as Donald Trump's national security adviser in his first term, and held senior roles in other Republican administrations, said policymakers in Washington had noted the Albanese government was 'less vocal about what the problem is' compared with its predecessors. 'It is a little hard to get used to,' Bolton said in an interview. 'In the Cold War days, Labour governments in Great Britain were just as anti-communist as the Conservatives. When you see a leftist government that's not willing to talk as openly about what the real threat is, it does make some people nervous. 'I would be less than fully candid if I said it didn't make me a little nervous. Why the hell are we worried about talking about what the threat is? The struggle is on, and we ought to be candid about it.' Naval operations expert Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at the conservative Hudson Institute with close links to the administration, said the AUKUS review was about putting Australia on notice that the US expected Australia to use the submarines it bought. 'The Australians have been a little reticent to explicitly call out that they might use them against China,' he told this masthead. 'If you're not willing to say it in public, then you're not going to put the Chinese on notice. It has been privately conveyed in the past, but the US would like Australia to make it more public.' Clark noted – as have other prominent defence experts in Washington – that AUKUS represented a significant portion of the Australian defence budget, especially at the current level of defence spending. 'That's the concern in the US – that you're spending 10 to 20 per cent of your procurement budget on this one system, yet you're not talking about how you might use it,' he said.
Sydney Morning Herald
28 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Albanese is ignoring Trump's demands – it will change our place in the world
When the world changes, it's folly not to change with it. Finding itself in an external environment that is in many respects full of shocks, the Albanese government is staking out a more independent – or at the very least, a less America-dependent – security and diplomatic stance for Australia. As is its way, rather than galloping in this direction, the government is crab walking. Anthony Albanese goes out of his way not to make a big deal of it and never wants to look like he's undermining Donald Trump. He continues to send the hefty cheques to America to keep AUKUS alive and has said several times this week that Trump is an enduring 'advocate for peace in the Middle East', which is what the US president likes to hear. But the signs of the shift are mounting. The AUKUS agreement was conceived chiefly to thwart China's territorial and defence ambitions in our larger region. Knowing that the future of AUKUS is being reconsidered by the Trump administration and that Trump is capricious and often punitive in the way he applies tariffs against those who don't dance to his tune, Australia under Albanese is nevertheless steadfastly building on a more accommodating approach towards China. The prime minister's reasoning is simple: China underpins our economy and it pays not to overtly antagonise it. Meanwhile, America remains fixated on viewing China as its great economic competitor and geopolitical rival. Albanese's point-blank rejection of a series of direct and indirect demands from Trump's Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and US government factotums to almost double its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP is perhaps the boldest stance he has taken as PM. Albanese's continued dismissals are truly getting up the US administration's nose; various underlings are now regularly briefing reporters against Australia. And this week Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong foreshadowed the recognition of a Palestinian state, comprehensively at odds with the stance of the US, which is the Netanyahu government's chief military supplier and diplomatic enabler. These positions are not without risk, given how deeply enmeshed Australia has become in its alliance with America, and how long Australia has regarded Israel as a friend. But given the twin shocks of Trump's rapid transformation of the US government and Benjamin Netanyahu's military strategy in response to Hamas' diabolical attacks in 2023, which has failed to return all of the hostages, laid waste to Gaza, killed tens of thousands of civilians and led to widespread starvation, it's difficult to see how a prudent government could not have taken this course. Loading The adjustments taking place in our relationships are in line with broader public sentiment in Australia. Trump's Secretary of State Marco Rubio has dismissed Palestinian recognition by countries including Australia as meaningless and driven by domestic politics. In a sense, he is right. Recognition is a mostly symbolic tactic designed to impose diplomatic pressure on Israel. It might not work and probably won't while America continues to physically support Netanyahu's every action. But is Trump's foreign America First policy not also driven by his domestic political intentions? This week his vice president JD Vance said the US government would no longer send arms to Ukraine because Americans were 'sick' of their government doing so. Instead, the US will sell arms to European countries who can give them to Ukraine. Australia's strategic positions should not chop and change, but they should develop over time and reflect the general sympathies and inclinations of the bulk of its people. Because of our geographical isolation and colonial past, with a nation-state built on immigration, Australia is an outward-looking country. Most Australians see Trump for what he is: a great disruptor. Trump bases all his decisions on his own self-interest. And because he is the president and is dedicated to accruing as much personal power as possible, to the extent that he is now ignoring his own courts and militarising policing in cities that don't vote for him, those decisions and actions are expressed ultimately as being in America's own best interests.
Sydney Morning Herald
28 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
What's it like to have a son who does MMA? Ask our deputy PM
Richard Marles, 58, is the deputy prime minister and defence minister. His oldest son, Sam, 28, is a mixed martial arts fighter and trainer who had the biggest bout of his career on the night of this year's federal election. Sam: I idolised Dad when I was young. My parents were divorced, and I'd spend a few days with Mum [Lisa Neville, a former Labor minister in the Victorian government], then a couple of days with Dad. They both had very busy, high-pressure jobs, so there wasn't too much consistency in where I'd be. I had to go with the flow a little bit. I always looked forward to going to see Dad. He loves golf and I played with him a lot. It was one of the things that kept us close. I remember Dad's reaction when I got my first birdie. I was only about seven and I holed a putt from maybe 30 feet. Dad was jumping up and down. He ran over and gave me this big hug. As a son, you want to impress your dad; you want his validation. And golf gave me that. I'm sure he'd have loved me to become a professional golfer. It wasn't as if he pressured me to do that – he was never a pushy dad – but I stuck with golf a bit longer than I otherwise would have because I was searching for Dad's approval. When I made the transition to mixed martial arts, he was a bit concerned. I sat both my parents down and said, 'I'm going to pursue this.' At first, they didn't really understand it. They maybe didn't believe this was really a potential career path. They looked at me like I was crazy. But, over time, they started to get on board and actually became quite supportive. I think they can see it's been a positive influence on my life. 'I don't cry too often – he's more of a cryer – but there were definitely a few tears shed during that call.' Sam Marles I'm someone who needs to move. I'm very ADHD; I've been like that since I was a kid. Sitting at a desk like my parents do has never been something I'm good at. I like the description of mixed martial arts as high-level problem-solving with dire consequences. It's a very free form of combat sport. Boxing, jiu-jitsu, wrestling, kickboxing: it combines everything. I love it, and I really like the people I'm around in the gym. I probably didn't fit into the golf scene as well. Dad's a passionate person. The similarity between us is that we're both very driven. We're both obsessed with what we do, even if we've taken very different paths. At times in my life, I didn't have a lot of appreciation for the path he chose, and I'm sure that, at the beginning, the path I've chosen put a lot of stress on him. But we actually get along incredibly well. I can talk to Dad for hours; I love having conversations with him. After I won the fight on election night [on May 3], I called him straight away, but he must have been busy doing interviews. I went off and hung out with some people, then when I got back to the hotel room, I had about six missed calls from him. When we finally spoke on the phone, it was a pretty special moment. I don't cry too often – he's more of a cryer – but there were definitely a few tears shed during that call. It felt like everything had come together, and everything made sense.
