Albanese is ignoring Trump's demands – it will change our place in the world
Finding itself in an external environment that is in many respects full of shocks, the Albanese government is staking out a more independent – or at the very least, a less America-dependent – security and diplomatic stance for Australia.
As is its way, rather than galloping in this direction, the government is crab walking. Anthony Albanese goes out of his way not to make a big deal of it and never wants to look like he's undermining Donald Trump. He continues to send the hefty cheques to America to keep AUKUS alive and has said several times this week that Trump is an enduring 'advocate for peace in the Middle East', which is what the US president likes to hear. But the signs of the shift are mounting.
The AUKUS agreement was conceived chiefly to thwart China's territorial and defence ambitions in our larger region. Knowing that the future of AUKUS is being reconsidered by the Trump administration and that Trump is capricious and often punitive in the way he applies tariffs against those who don't dance to his tune, Australia under Albanese is nevertheless steadfastly building on a more accommodating approach towards China. The prime minister's reasoning is simple: China underpins our economy and it pays not to overtly antagonise it. Meanwhile, America remains fixated on viewing China as its great economic competitor and geopolitical rival.
Albanese's point-blank rejection of a series of direct and indirect demands from Trump's Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and US government factotums to almost double its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP is perhaps the boldest stance he has taken as PM. Albanese's continued dismissals are truly getting up the US administration's nose; various underlings are now regularly briefing reporters against Australia. And this week Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong foreshadowed the recognition of a Palestinian state, comprehensively at odds with the stance of the US, which is the Netanyahu government's chief military supplier and diplomatic enabler.
These positions are not without risk, given how deeply enmeshed Australia has become in its alliance with America, and how long Australia has regarded Israel as a friend. But given the twin shocks of Trump's rapid transformation of the US government and Benjamin Netanyahu's military strategy in response to Hamas' diabolical attacks in 2023, which has failed to return all of the hostages, laid waste to Gaza, killed tens of thousands of civilians and led to widespread starvation, it's difficult to see how a prudent government could not have taken this course.
Loading
The adjustments taking place in our relationships are in line with broader public sentiment in Australia. Trump's Secretary of State Marco Rubio has dismissed Palestinian recognition by countries including Australia as meaningless and driven by domestic politics. In a sense, he is right. Recognition is a mostly symbolic tactic designed to impose diplomatic pressure on Israel. It might not work and probably won't while America continues to physically support Netanyahu's every action. But is Trump's foreign America First policy not also driven by his domestic political intentions? This week his vice president JD Vance said the US government would no longer send arms to Ukraine because Americans were 'sick' of their government doing so. Instead, the US will sell arms to European countries who can give them to Ukraine.
Australia's strategic positions should not chop and change, but they should develop over time and reflect the general sympathies and inclinations of the bulk of its people. Because of our geographical isolation and colonial past, with a nation-state built on immigration, Australia is an outward-looking country. Most Australians see Trump for what he is: a great disruptor. Trump bases all his decisions on his own self-interest. And because he is the president and is dedicated to accruing as much personal power as possible, to the extent that he is now ignoring his own courts and militarising policing in cities that don't vote for him, those decisions and actions are expressed ultimately as being in America's own best interests.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
17 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
Israel's Smotrich seeks to ‘bury' idea of Palestinian state
Maale Adumim, West Bank/Tel Aviv | Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich announced work would start on a long-delayed settlement that would divide the West Bank and cut it off from East Jerusalem, a move his office said would 'bury' the idea of a Palestinian state. The Palestinian government, allies and campaign groups condemned the scheme, calling it illegal and saying the fragmentation of territory would rip up peace plans for the region. Reuters
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Trump says he thinks Putin ready to make a Ukraine deal
US President Donald Trump says he believes Russian President Vladimir Putin will make a deal, and that the threat of sanctions against Russia likely played a role in the Kremlin seeking a meeting. Trump is scheduled to meet with Putin in Alaska on Friday. The US president said he is unsure whether an immediate ceasefire can be achieved but expressed interest in brokering a peace agreement. "He really, I believe now, he's convinced that he's going to make a deal, he's going to make a deal. I think he's going to, and we're going to find out," Trump said in an interview on Fox News Radio. Earlier in the day, Putin said that the United States was making "sincere efforts" to end the war in Ukraine and suggested that Russia and the US could agree on a nuclear arms deal as part of a broader push to strengthen peace. Trump also mentioned during the Fox interview that he has three locations in mind for a follow-up meeting with Putin and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, although he noted that a second meeting is not guaranteed. He said staying in Alaska for a three-way summit would be the easiest scenario. "Depending on what happens with my meeting, I'm going to be calling up President Zelensky, and let's get him over to wherever we're going to meet," Trump said. He said a second meeting, featuring Trump, Putin and Zelenskiy, would likely dig deeper into boundary issues. Zelenskiy has been adamant about not ceding territory that Russian forces occupy. Trump said it would be up to Putin and Zelenskiy to strike an agreement. "I'm not going to negotiate their deal. I'm going to let them negotiate their deal," he said. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Trump will go into the talks hoping to achieve a halt to the fighting in Ukraine but that a comprehensive solution to the war will take longer. "To achieve a peace, I think we all recognise that there'll have to be some conversation about security guarantees. There'll have to be some conversation about ... territorial disputes and claims, and what they're fighting over," Rubio told reporters at the State Department on Thursday. "All these things will be part of a comprehensive thing. But I think the president's hope is to achieve some stoppage of fighting so that those conversations can happen." Rubio said that the longer wars go on, the harder they are to end. "And even as I speak ... there are changes happening in the battlefield which have an impact on what one side views as leverage or the other. So that's the reality of ongoing fighting, which is why a ceasefire is so critical," he said. "But we'll see what's possible tomorrow. Let's see how the talks go. And we're hopeful. We want there to be a peace. We're going to do everything we can to achieve one but ultimately it'll be up to Ukraine and Russia to agree to one." Rubio said preparations for the meeting were going "very fast" as it had been put together very quickly. He said he believed Trump had spoken by phone to Putin four times and "felt it was important to now speak to him in person and look him in the eye and figure out what was possible and what isn't". "He sees an opportunity to talk about achieving peace. He's going to pursue it, and we'll know tomorrow at some point, as the president said, probably very early in that meeting, whether something is possible or not. We hope it is."
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Trump says he thinks Putin ready to make a Ukraine deal
US President Donald Trump says he believes Russian President Vladimir Putin will make a deal, and that the threat of sanctions against Russia likely played a role in the Kremlin seeking a meeting. Trump is scheduled to meet with Putin in Alaska on Friday. The US president said he is unsure whether an immediate ceasefire can be achieved but expressed interest in brokering a peace agreement. "He really, I believe now, he's convinced that he's going to make a deal, he's going to make a deal. I think he's going to, and we're going to find out," Trump said in an interview on Fox News Radio. Earlier in the day, Putin said that the United States was making "sincere efforts" to end the war in Ukraine and suggested that Russia and the US could agree on a nuclear arms deal as part of a broader push to strengthen peace. Trump also mentioned during the Fox interview that he has three locations in mind for a follow-up meeting with Putin and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, although he noted that a second meeting is not guaranteed. He said staying in Alaska for a three-way summit would be the easiest scenario. "Depending on what happens with my meeting, I'm going to be calling up President Zelensky, and let's get him over to wherever we're going to meet," Trump said. He said a second meeting, featuring Trump, Putin and Zelenskiy, would likely dig deeper into boundary issues. Zelenskiy has been adamant about not ceding territory that Russian forces occupy. Trump said it would be up to Putin and Zelenskiy to strike an agreement. "I'm not going to negotiate their deal. I'm going to let them negotiate their deal," he said. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Trump will go into the talks hoping to achieve a halt to the fighting in Ukraine but that a comprehensive solution to the war will take longer. "To achieve a peace, I think we all recognise that there'll have to be some conversation about security guarantees. There'll have to be some conversation about ... territorial disputes and claims, and what they're fighting over," Rubio told reporters at the State Department on Thursday. "All these things will be part of a comprehensive thing. But I think the president's hope is to achieve some stoppage of fighting so that those conversations can happen." Rubio said that the longer wars go on, the harder they are to end. "And even as I speak ... there are changes happening in the battlefield which have an impact on what one side views as leverage or the other. So that's the reality of ongoing fighting, which is why a ceasefire is so critical," he said. "But we'll see what's possible tomorrow. Let's see how the talks go. And we're hopeful. We want there to be a peace. We're going to do everything we can to achieve one but ultimately it'll be up to Ukraine and Russia to agree to one." Rubio said preparations for the meeting were going "very fast" as it had been put together very quickly. He said he believed Trump had spoken by phone to Putin four times and "felt it was important to now speak to him in person and look him in the eye and figure out what was possible and what isn't". "He sees an opportunity to talk about achieving peace. He's going to pursue it, and we'll know tomorrow at some point, as the president said, probably very early in that meeting, whether something is possible or not. We hope it is."
