
Fire chief took own life amid probe into claims he lied on his CV, inquest hears
Mr Brown, the UK's first black fire chief, had been under pressure because of a 'barrage' of harassment and complaints about his character in the form of emails, Freedom of Information requests and letters to his workplace as well as social media posts making allegations about him, and had left a note for police saying the last 18 months of his life had been 'absolutely awful' and 'I can't do this anymore'.
Mr Brown's partner, Nicola White, told the inquest on Monday that national media attention in relation to claims he had lied on his CV and his LinkedIn page about having an MBA postgraduate business qualification – which was a requirement for chief fire officers – was the 'final straw'.
The court was told that on January 16 last year, days before he took his own life, colleagues at the fire service had been copied into an email saying that Mr Brown did not have the MBA qualification from London South Bank University he claimed to, which sparked an internal investigation.
Satinder Sahota, monitoring officer for WMFS, said after questioning him about the claims, Mr Brown admitted he had started an MBA but had not finished it and apologised for putting it on his CV.
Ms White said her partner was clearly 'low' about the ongoing investigation, but felt the 'final straw' for him was when a national news outlet ran a story about him the night before he took his own life.
She said: 'He just couldn't take it anymore. I said 'Wayne, you need to speak to someone', but he didn't like to show his weaknesses.
'He was the first person to support others and tell them to seek help, but he felt he needed to be strong for everyone else.
'On the Tuesday… I did think to ask him, 'you're not going to do anything silly are you?' but I put that thought immediately out of my head because I thought he would never do that.'
Ms White said her partner did say he felt supported by the fire service, although Mr Sahota said Mr Brown was a 'private and stoic' man who did not seek the support from occupational health colleagues that he was urged to take during their meetings.
On one occasion days before he died, the fire chief, who took up the role permanently in April 2023, did tell Mr Sahota that he was feeling under pressure, was exhausted, struggling to sleep and had 'racing thoughts'.
Mr Sahota told the inquest: 'My view at the time was that he was saying he was okay. I urged him to reach out to occupational health.
'I had to be careful with Wayne… I didn't want to annoy him, it was quite clear he was private and he was the most senior person in the organisation and I didn't want to be disrespectful of that because it would affect my relationship with him going forward.'
Deputy chief fire officer Joanne Bowcock said in a statement read out at the inquest that she recognised Mr Brown was under pressure due to the alleged harassment and the media interest, but that she never considered he would take his own life.
She said he appeared to be coping well but when speaking to him on January 18 after the email about the MBA had been received, told her he had 'the worst two weeks of his life' and feared he would be suspended.
Detective Chief Inspector Jonathan Kiteley, who was the West Midlands Police officer investigating the alleged harassment, said a man was charged with harassing the fire chief in July 2023 and while there had been some early court appearances, Mr Brown had expressed 'frustration' to DCI Kiteley that a court date had been pushed back.
He said: 'I had no idea he would go on to take his own life but I could tell the constant barrage of contact was getting to him.
'I appreciated it was difficult for him to go on with his day job because of other pressures.'
The charges against the man accused of harassment were dropped by the Crown Prosecution Service after Mr Brown's death.
Senior coroner Louise Hunt, who presided over the inquest, said Mr Brown had died as a result of suicide and indicated she would be writing a Prevention of Future Deaths report to WMFS to raise concerns.
She said the fire service did not undertake any investigation following Mr Brown's death so lessons could be learned and was concerned that there was no policy requiring them to do so.
Mrs Hunt was also concerned that there appeared to be no mechanism for recording concerns raised about the welfare of staff during a fact-finding or formal investigation, and that there was no provision in the service's health and wellbeing or mental health policy for employees as senior as Mr Brown was.
In a tribute, Mr Brown's son Kai said he was 'loved and respected', had many friends and was their 'shining star'.
He said: 'We will be forever proud of him and he leaves a void in our lives which will never be filled.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


ITV News
3 days ago
- ITV News
Cowboy builder victim 'let down' by Trading Standards warns cuts leave door open to rogue traders
It's good news if you are a cowboy builder, or if you are selling illegal cigarettes, maybe some illicit vapes beacuse there are now fewer people working to stop you. New research suggests our defences against rogue traders have fallen so low that they have become 'not fit for purpose' with a reduction on criminal prosecutions and shop raids for suspected illegal goods. Claire Dickenson says "I was let down by my builder - and then by Trading Standards" as she now lives in a house that shows all the signs of the struggles she's been through fighting a builder for more than a year. Her builder walked out after disagreements over payments 13 months ago, and now she and her family have been left living in a half-finished building site without a kitchen. She says the contractor has left her out of pocket and out of options. But she says the trader is not the only one to have let her down - she had expected far more help from Trading Standards who did not prosecute. "It's been a really stressful experience for the whole family," Ms Dickenson said. "We didn't think when we started this project that we would have no recourse if things were to go wrong. "We had a contract, we staged payments we thought we were doing the right thing but when it actually came down to it, its very much a civil issue that's difficult to support people on. "In any other industry or issue with a product or service there is a backstop with the consumer, with building work there is seemingly nothing to protect the consumer and that quite frightening." Ms Dickenson says she is "panicked" at the thought of paying to install a new kitchen and said she feels "alone, upset and quite angry that there is nothing to support consumers". She said Trading Standards do not have the resources to help her get the money back she has lost and believes this leaves an open door for any trader that wants to abuse customers. Trading Standards officers work for local councils enforcing consumer rules. But there are fears that cutbacks have left some departments ineffective. Freedom of Information disclosures to Which? show 36 councils made no criminal prosecutions in a whole year while 25 made only one prosecution of rogue traders. Consumer expert Lisa Webb from Which? said: "Fewer than one in five of the Trading Standards teams we spoke to have not bought any form of criminal investigation or prosecution in their area at all this year. "That means that criminals effectively know that they can get away with breaking the law." Trading Standards has been cut by around 50% in the last 15 years according to the sectors professional body, Chartered Trading Standards Institute. We asked Ms Dickenson's local Trading Standards for comment who told ITV News they understand her distress but that they did not have a legal basis to take formal action. Meanwhile, it's not just the criminals who benefit from the problems. Traders that work hard to stick to the rules face unfair competition from rivals who have no such scruples. There has often been a phrase to explain police resourcing as 'the thin blue line', for Trading Standards that line seems to be even more thin.


New Statesman
3 days ago
- New Statesman
How the web became a wasteland
Illustration by Marie Montocchio / Ikon Images When I first got a smartphone, I remember thinking: 'I'll never be bored again.' How wrong that was. The internet now leaves me cold. My daily browsing has shrunk to a few websites – the Atlantic, Reddit, BBC News – and I have replaced social media with newsletters, including the New Statesman's excellent Saturday Read. The open web has been degrading for years and is now a wasteland of ugly adverts, intrusive marketing, hallucinated sources and plausible deepfakes. This is tragic. I'm old enough to remember a time when Google results were useful. Then they were gamed by SEO wizards, who found tricks to juice their website's rankings at the expense of useful information. Next, Google pumped the first page full of adverts: never try searching for a named hotel, all you'll see are its competitors. And now, the top link slot has been usurped by AI summaries. These can be badly wrong – in one famous example, Google recommended putting glue on pizza instead of cheese – but they are nevertheless destroying web traffic to newspapers and magazines. And at that point, what will be left for Google's AI to summarise? The big Epstein stink The decline of the internet has had one positive result, however, as I've turned back to an older technology: books. When the Jeffrey Epstein case became news again earlier this summer, I bought a copy of Julie Brown's Perversion of Justice. Brown, a reporter at the Miami Herald, tells the story of Epstein's offending, which was relentless and repetitive. A teenage girl would hear from a schoolfriend that she could make a few hundred dollars by 'giving an older guy a massage'. She would be taken to Epstein's house, where the massage would culminate in her sexual assault. Full of shame, she wouldn't tell her parents but would instead be groomed by Epstein, with money and gifts and other support, to recruit more girls. Like many sex offenders, Epstein was obsessive: he liked white, blonde 14-year-olds, and would sometimes have three different girls visit him in a single day. In the late 2000s, the local Florida cops were sure they had enough evidence to prosecute Epstein for rape, but the prosecutors offered him an extremely lenient plea deal instead, with minimal jail time. Brown makes a good case that Epstein even had teenagers visit him at his office when he was on 'work release' from prison. He hired private investigators to intimidate both his victims and anyone who represented them. The passport details of guests flown to his private island are held by the US government (Donald Trump said on 28 July that he never had the 'privilege' of visiting Little Saint James), but have never been released. The whole thing stinks. The price of a scoop Brown is also admirably honest about how her type of investigative journalism – which led to Epstein's re-arrest in 2019 – is a dying art. At one point, she takes a 15 per cent pay cut to stay at the Miami Herald. She sometimes paid her own expenses when travelling to interview victims. She had to work hard to convince her reluctant editors to take on the story in the first place, and then to spend the newsroom's money on getting important court documents unsealed. Her reward is to have the story turned into a cash cow by Maga influencers like 'DC Draino', who arrived at the White House in the spring to receive 'the Epstein files', which turned out to be ring binders of heavily redacted information. I'd like to support Brown by buying more copies of her book, but it's not exactly the kind of thing you can give someone for Christmas. Reading by ear Talking of books, I published my second one, The Genius Myth, this summer – just as everyone was declaring that no one reads any more. The prime suspect in this crisis, it will not shock you to discover, is social media. You might be tempted to dismiss this as yet another moral panic – medieval scholars once fretted that literacy would corrode our memories. But I have a compelling data point: when my friends have told me they liked the book, most of them have said they've been 'listening to it'. And these are people who, largely, work in print journalism. My theory is that phones can replace reading time, but it's hard to scroll while doing chores, walking the dog or driving a car. (OK, the last one is actively illegal.) And so phones might beat hardbacks, but audiobooks are still better than the terrible possibility of being alone with your thoughts for 20 minutes. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Helen Lewis is a staff writer at the Atlantic and the author of 'The Genius Myth' (Vintage) [See also: It's time for angry left populism] Related


Spectator
4 days ago
- Spectator
The depressing spectacle of ‘Mind the Grab'
When I moved to London two years ago, my friends who already lived in the capital shared various warnings. From the cost of housing to the oppressive heat of the Central Line in summer – they tempered my excitement at moving to the big city with sober, sensible advice. But more than anything, the one message I heard time and again was striking: don't get your phone out on the street. I'd read numerous articles about London's growing phone-theft epidemic, but it wasn't until I moved here that I realised quite how prevalent it had become. My brother-in-law's phone was stolen within moments of him stepping out of his gym on the Strand. A friend's was wrestled from her hands in Soho. And sure enough, it wasn't long before it happened to me. I'd stepped out of Oval tube station, in broad daylight, and was about to turn into my road when… snatch. My iPhone was lifted straight out of my hand by a teenager on a bike. Rightly or wrongly, I blamed myself. I'd had enough warnings, after all. Yet it also felt like a perverse rite of passage. An initiation ceremony for life in Sadiq Khan's London. Mine was now among the more than 70,000 phones stolen in the capital in 2024. It is hard to overstate the scale of the problem. Freedom of Information data shows that a phone was stolen every 15 minutes in Westminster alone last year – 94 a day and over 34,000 in total. Londoners have been forced to adapt – I almost never get my phone out in public now, and if I do, I stand with my back to a wall and clutch it as close to my person as possible. But tourists are just as likely to fall victim. Sadly, many now return home with their smartphone replaced by a scare-story about the state of the UK. One might expect the Mayor of London to adopt the issue as one of his immediate priorities. Instead, it has now been left to high-street retailers to raise awareness. Currys has now launched a campaign called 'Mind the Grab' – with a bold purple line and signage added to the pavement outside its store on Oxford Street. The retailer is also piloting a new training scheme for staff to support victims – from contacting loved ones and the police, to cancelling cards and getting them home safely. It is noble of Currys to launch such a campaign, but it is utterly depressing that a high street retailer feels compelled to tackle an issue that is so squarely the responsibility of the police and the Mayor's office. The Met is supporting 'Mind the Grab' and claims to have increased patrols in hotspots. Yet when my phone was stolen within sight of several CCTV cameras last November, my case was still closed within 48 hours. Meanwhile, on TikTok, a viral post contrasts the difference approaches taken by Singapore and London when it comes to sexual assault on public transport. In Singapore, train carriages are adorned with warning posters that state, 'If you molest, we will arrest'. In London, tubes now carry posters that advise victims simply to 'distract' their attacker 'with a question'. From phone theft to sexual assault, retailers, influencers and campaign groups are filling the void that should have been filled by the authorities long ago. 'Mind the Grab' is welcome, but it should never have been needed in the first place.