
How Iran's internet serves as lifeline despite censorship – DW – 06/18/2025
Using the internet in Iran has long meant navigating government restrictions, fake news and propaganda. But now, as parts of the country are cut off after Israeli airstrikes, many still use it to help their neighbors.
As fighting with Israel continues, many parts of Iran have little to no internet access. Even direct calls, including both mobile phones and landlines, often fail to connect.
"We live in a situation similar to total war," documentary filmmaker and photographer Pouria Nouri told DW from the Iranian capital, Tehran.
"There are explosions ringing through the city night and day. Military bases and strategic infrastructure are getting bombed, and the civilian death toll keeps rising."
The Israeli army launched large-scale attacks on Iran last Friday, June 13, with the declared goal of destroying Iran's nuclear program. The attacks hit Tehran and other parts of the country, crippling Iran's telecommunications. Iran responded by firing missiles on multiple Israeli cities.
Internet still viewed as public enemy in Iran
While images of targeted sites in Israel are difficult to find online, Iranians are publishing plenty of self-made videos showing the impact of Israeli missiles. Many Iranians are simply ignoring the security guidance issued by their officials, saying that the state is incapable of protecting the people.
"In Iran, the internet is being suppressed by the security apparatus, who see it as an enemy and want to control it," cybersecurity expert Amir Rashidi told DW.
Tehran gridlocked as thousands try to flee Israeli strikes
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Rashidi said that the internet is portrayed in Iran as a Western espionage tool, noting that Iranians urgently need internet access — "first and foremost as means of communication, to keep in touch with one another and find out how other people are doing."
The cybersecurity expert said that while people need to stay informed during the escalating conflict, "officials are doing the exact opposite and keep limiting internet access."
Doctors, firefighters, everyday people use internet to help their neighbors
For many years, Rashidi has pushed for protecting digital rights and civil society in the digital world. He says that his efforts seem to be bearing fruit in Iran.
"We can see that some Iranian start-ups have started to offer their services free of charge — including finding apartments outside Tehran or sharing information on VPN access, so people can still read the news," he told DW.
There are also people offering ride sharing for those seeking to leave the Iranian capital.
Other internet users, like photographer and travel writer Peyman Yazdani, are attempting to help in other ways.
"If you live abroad and your parents are in Tehran, and need groceries or someone needs to check up on them, send us a direct message," he wrote on X, formerly Twitter. "We can take care of the shopping or visits."
Watch: Israeli strike interrupts Iran state TV broadcast
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
On Instagram, some doctors have published their phone numbers and offer medical consults, prescriptions and recommendations on Tehran pharmacies that still offer specific medications.
"There are still many elderly or disabled people remaining in the city," filmmaker Pouria told DW from Tehran. "In the poorer neighborhoods in the south there are still many people going to work."
Firefighters are posting photos of themselves on call, trying to reassure the public that they are not leaving the city. And despite the escalation and mounting death toll, no videos have surfaced showing looting or chaos on the streets.
Fake 'Starlink' apps used as bait
At the same time, Iranians are seeing a flood of false information online. Some claim that Israel is controlling apps such as WhatsApp or Instagram, others say that a simple app download is enough to use Starlink satellites for internet access.
"Those who want to use Starlink need a satellite dish to connect to the network," he told DW. "The apps spreading online now could be dangerous and used to spy on people."
There is also a lot of unverifiable information circulating among Iranians, including claims that the top religious and political leaders of the Islamic Republic have fled the country.
Regime challenged like never before
"The current situation in the digital space cannot be compared to the crises faced by security officials in the past, including the repeated nationwide protests," Hossein Kermani, the author of the 2025 book "Twitter activism in Iran," told DW.
In his scientific work, Kermani focuses on political communication in digital spaces and digitally-enforced propaganda under authoritative regimes.
"Unlike the protests, which sprung up inside the country, we are now seeing a transnational crisis," the researcher told DW. "It is no longer about controlling their own population, but about confronting an external opponent."
"While the regime can call upon years of experience in suppressing protests and pro-democracy movements, it does not have such experience in dealing with an external conflict. The security apparatus seems to be overwhelmed and still in shock."
Fear deepens in Tehran as Israel targets Iran's capital
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
At the same time, there are propaganda videos spreading among regime loyalists, trying to downplay attacks by the Israeli military.
Famous Islamist preacher and conspiracy theorist, Ali Akbar Raefipour, is playing a key role in those propaganda efforts.
"The target audience for those videos are members of the political system, whose morale apparently needs a boost," Kermani said.
"The regime is currently spreading targeted disinformation about its alleged strength, aiming to psychologically manipulate society, so that members of the regime don't turn their backs on it."
This article was originally published in German.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
2 hours ago
- DW
US Supreme Court backs Tennessee youth transgender care ban – DW – 06/18/2025
In a setback for transgender rights in the United States, the conservative-dominated court voted to uphold a ban on hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender transition surgery for minors. The United States Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors. The court, which is dominated by conservative justices, voted 6-3 in favor of the Republican-backed ban on hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender transition surgery for patients under the age of 18, ruling that it does not violate the US Constitution's 14th Amendment. What did the judges say? "Tennessee concluded that there is an ongoing debate among medical experts regarding the risks and benefits associated with administering puberty blockers and hormones to treat gender dysphoria, gender identity disorder and gender incongruence," wrote conservative Chief Justice John Roberts. "[The Tennessee] ban on such treatments responds directly to that uncertainty." The Supreme Court ruling comes after several plaintiffs, including three transgender minors, their parents and a Memphis-based doctor who provides such care, took legal action against the Tennessee law, which they argued discriminates based on sex and transgender status, thus violating the 14th Amendment. But Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the court largely deferred to the state legislature's policy choices in upholding the ban without conducting a "meaningful judicial review." Dissenting "in sadness," she said the court had "abandon[ed] transgender children and their families to political whims." Chase Strangio, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union, representing the plaintiffs, said that the Tennessee law has "taken away the only treatment that relieved years of suffering" for those concerned. The first openly transgender lawyer to argue before the court, Strangio added: "What they've done is impose a blunderbuss ban, overriding the very careful judgment of parents who love and care for their children and the doctors who have recommended the treatment." Trump declares US to only recognize two genders To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video A setback for transgender rights in the US The decision represents a setback for transgender rights, an issue at the heart of the culture debates that have become a dominant feature of American political life. While the Justice Department under Democratic former President Joe Biden had challenged the Tennessee law, his Republican successor Donald Trump has taken a hardline stance against transgender rights. "Across the country today, medical professionals are maiming and sterilizing a growing number of impressionable children," read a January 28 executive order signed by Trump, who had said in his inauguration speech that his government would only recognize two genders: male and female. "This dangerous trend will be a stain on our nation's history, and it must end," it added. According to the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law, a think tank that researches sexual orientation and gender identity demographics to inform public policy decisions, there are about 300,000 people between the ages of 13 and 17 in the United States who identify as transgender, plus around 1.3 million adults. Trans people in the US fear massive setbacks under Trump To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Edited by: Rana Taha


Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Iran-Israel War: A Lifeline For Netanyahu?
The Iran-Israel war has helped strengthen Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu domestically and overseas, just as his grip on power looked vulnerable. On the eve of launching strikes on Iran, his government looked to be on the verge of collapse, with a drive to conscript ultra-Orthodox Jews threatening to scupper his fragile coalition. Nearly two years on from Hamas's unprecedented attack in 2023, Netanyahu was under growing domestic criticism for his handling of the war in Gaza, where dozens of hostages remain unaccounted for. Internationally too, he was coming under pressure including from longstanding allies, who since the war with Iran began have gone back to expressing support. Just days ago, polls were predicting Netanyahu would lose his majority if new elections were held, but now, his fortunes appear to have reversed, and Israelis are seeing in "Bibi" the man of the moment. For decades, Netanyahu has warned of the risk of a nuclear attack on Israel by Iran -- a fear shared by most Israelis. Yonatan Freeman, a geopolitics expert at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, said Netanyahu's argument that the pre-emptive strike on Iran was necessary draws "a lot of public support" and that the prime minister has been "greatly strengthened". Even the opposition has rallied behind him. "Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is my political rival, but his decision to strike Iran at this moment in time is the right one," opposition leader Yair Lapid wrote in a Jerusalem Post op-ed. A poll published Saturday by a conservative Israeli channel showed that 54 percent of respondents expressed confidence in the prime minister. The public had had time to prepare for the possibility of an offensive against Iran, with Netanyahu repeatedly warning that Israel was fighting for its survival and had an opportunity to "reshape the Middle East." During tit-for-tat military exchanges last year, Israel launched air raids on targets in Iran in October that are thought to have severely damaged Iranian air defences. Israel's then-defence minister Yoav Gallant said the strikes had shifted "the balance of power" and had "weakened" Iran. "In fact, for the past 20 months, Israelis have been thinking about this (a war with Iran)," said Denis Charbit, a political scientist at Israel's Open University. Since Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, Netanyahu has ordered military action in Gaza, against the Iran-backed Hezbollah group in Lebanon and the Huthis in Yemen, as well as targets in Syria where long-time leader Bashar al-Assad fell in December last year. "Netanyahu always wants to dominate the agenda, to be the one who reshuffles the deck himself -- not the one who reacts -- and here he is clearly asserting his Churchillian side, which is, incidentally, his model," Charbit said. "But depending on the outcome and the duration (of the war), everything could change, and Israelis might turn against Bibi and demand answers." For now, however, people in Israel see the conflict with Iran as a "necessary war," according to Nitzan Perelman, a researcher specialised in Israel at the National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) in France. "Public opinion supports this war, just as it has supported previous ones," she added. "It's very useful for Netanyahu because it silences criticism, both inside the country and abroad." In the weeks ahead of the Iran strikes, international criticism of Netanyahu and Israel's military had reached unprecedented levels. After more than 55,000 deaths in Gaza, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory, and a blockade that has produced famine-like conditions there, Israel has faced growing isolation and the risk of sanctions, while Netanyahu himself is the subject of an international arrest warrant for alleged war crimes. But on Sunday, two days into the war with Iran, the Israeli leader received a phone call from European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, while Foreign Minister Gideon Saar has held talks with numerous counterparts. "There's more consensus in Europe in how they see Iran, which is more equal to how Israel sees Iran," explained Freeman from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Tuesday that Israel was doing "the dirty work... for all of us." The idea that a weakened Iran could lead to regional peace and the emergence of a new Middle East is appealing to the United States and some European countries, according to Freeman. But for Perelman, "Netanyahu is exploiting the Iranian threat, as he always has."


Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Gaza Humanitarian Foundation Initiative 'Outrageous': UN Probe Chief
The use of the US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to distribute food in the Palestinian territory is "outrageous", the head of a UN inquiry said Wednesday. Navi Pillay, who chairs the UN's Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Israel and the Palestinian territories, joined a growing chorus of criticism of the GHF's operations, and cited its US links. "In every war, the siege and starvation surely leads to death," the former UN rights chief told journalists. "But this initiative of what's called a foundation, a private foundation, to supply food, is what I see as outrageous, because it involves the United States itself, the government, and it turns out, as we watch daily, that people who go to those centres are being killed as they seek food." An officially private effort with opaque funding, GHF began operations on May 26 after Israel completely cut off supplies into Gaza for more than two months, sparking warnings of mass famine. The United Nations and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the foundation over concerns it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives. Dozens of Palestinians have been killed while trying to reach GHF distribution points. Pillay said the commission would "have to look into... the policy purpose and how it's being effected. "We have to spell out what is the motive of, right now, the killing of people who are coming for humanitarian aid from this so-called foundation -- and that lives are being lost just in trying to secure food for their children." Unprecedented in its open-ended scope, the three-person Commission of Inquiry was established by the UN Human Rights Council in May 2021 to investigate alleged violations of international humanitarian and human rights law in Israel and the Palestinian territories. South African former High Court judge Pillay, 83, served as a judge on the International Criminal Court and presided over the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. On Tuesday she presented the commission's latest report to the Human Rights Council. It said Israel had attacked Gaza's schools, religious and cultural sites as part of a "widespread and systematic" assault on the civilian population, in which Israeli forces have committed "war crimes" and "the crime against humanity of extermination". Israel does not cooperate with the investigation and has long accused it of "systematic anti-Israel discrimination". Navi Pillay served as a judge on the International Criminal Court AFP Dozens of Palestinians have been killed while trying to reach GHF distribution points AFP