Ukrainian museum moves to 'decolonise' history
The quiet and echoing rooms of the museum in Poltava, dedicated to an 18th-century battle in central Ukraine, belie a struggle in the war-torn country on how far to go in recasting Russia's role in history.
The Russian invasion has seen Ukraine step up sweeping "de-colonisation" measures, including the removal of symbols of tsarist and Soviet domination.
Kyiv's efforts to remove Soviet monuments and symbols began in 2014, when Russian forces annexed the Crimean peninsula and backed armed separatists in the east of the country.
But new laws passed in the second year of Russia's full-scale invasion seek to go even further, forcing the Poltava museum to respond to claims it has not gone far enough to revise Kremlin-supported narratives.
The sleepy city, around 350 kilometres (220 miles) east of Kyiv, was the scene of a decisive June 1709 battle when the forces of Russian Tsar Peter the Great defeated the troops of Swedish King Charles XII in what is widely seen as the moment when Russia became a major European power.
"Over more than 300 years, a complex myth has been created around the Battle of Poltava," said Lyudmyla Shendryk, a guide who has worked at the museum for over 40 years.
In the years following the battle, the Russian empire captured more Swedish territory and Russia became the dominant power in eastern Europe.
- Hero or traitor -
Peter the Great spent vast sums to present the victory in Poltava as the result of a "genius" ruler selected by God, Shendryk said.
The Swedish king was allied with Ukrainian Cossack leader Ivan Mazepa, who had previously backed the tsar before going over to Sweden, and was presented by Russia as the ultimate traitor.
In 1828, in a famous poem, "Poltava," the Russian poet Alexander Pushkin depicted Mazepa as a pitiful and evil old man, reinforcing this negative legend in Russian culture.
Other Ukrainians were also fighting on the side of Peter the Great, Shendryk said, but under Soviet leader Josef Stalin the USSR embraced an "imperial narrative" in which the "brother peoples" of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians fought a "partisan war" against "Swedish interventionists" and Mazepa's "exploiters".
The museum presented this interpretation of history until Ukraine's independence from the USSR in 1991, after which it was transformed, she said.
Today, Mazepa, who was educated in Europe, spoke numerous languages and was a fervent patron of the arts, is presented in the museum as a national hero who wanted to preserve the independence of Ukrainian Cossacks against Russian expansionism.
In 2020, the museum created a display disproving "10 Russian myths" about Poltava, including the "treachery" of Mazepa.
"Mazepa wasn't a traitor to his own people," said Volodymyr, 25, a history teacher in Poltava.
But a decolonisation campaign can succeed only when it steps out of the archives and libraries and reaches young people via social media, he added.
- 'Act of genocide' -
Nor has the campaign gone far enough for some Ukrainians.
In 2024, one of the country's most widely read newspapers, Ukrainska Pravda, published an article accusing the museum in Poltava of continuing to glorify "Russian arms".
It accused the museum of not giving enough details of a massacre carried out by Russia in 1708 in the capital of Mazepa's realm, Baturyn, that led to thousands of deaths, calling it "an act of genocide".
A statue of Peter the Great in front of the museum was wrapped up in black plastic in June 2022 and then taken down in February.
The director of the museum, Nataliya Bilan, does not hide her dismay at such attacks, while acknowledging that decolonisation requires for her staff "a profound reinterpretation" of the facts.
Thousands of Ukrainian soldiers pass through Poltava trains to the front, and many stop by to visit the museum, Bilan said. In the vestibule, under a flag signed by fighters, a message thanks the museum for maintaining the "Сossack spirit".
Museum guide Shendryk said she sees her mission as analysing the causes of the "catastrophe" in Poltava, so it does not happen again.
"We need to be brave, not remain silent or close our eyes to the complex or disagreeable pages in our history," she said.
"And one of these disagreeable pages is, above all, our lack of unity."
rco-am/jbr/gv
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
IAEA warns of nuclear accident risk in Ukraine amid Russian attacks
The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on Tuesday warned of the ongoing risk of a nuclear accident in Ukraine following a recent surge in Russian airstrikes. "It is clear that the dangers to nuclear safety continue to be very real and ever-present. My teams report that this was the most intense day of air raid alarms they had experienced since late last year," IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said during his one-day visit to Kiev. He said the agency's presence at nuclear facilities remains essential to help prevent a nuclear incident. IAEA expert teams based at two of Ukraine's operating nuclear power plants had to take shelter up to three times during a day with an unusually high number of air raid warnings. Grossi also said it was critical to begin preparing for the future reconstruction of Ukraine's energy infrastructure, a process in which the IAEA could play an important role. The IAEA has played a central part in monitoring and safeguarding the condition and safety of Ukraine's nuclear power plants since the start of Russia's invasion. It regularly sends expert teams to the operating reactor sites in Rivne and Khmelnytskyi and has a permanent presence at the Zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant, which has been occupied by Russian troops since 2022 and was shut down for safety reasons. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on X that any Russian efforts to restart the Zaporizhzhya plant without Ukraine's involvement were "absurd and dangerous" and called for unhindered IAEA access to the site. Ukraine relies on nuclear power for more than half of its electricity needs. Russia has repeatedly targeted the country's power plants and energy infrastructure in an effort to disrupt supply.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Expanding missile threats and airspace closures are straining airlines
By Lisa Barrington, Shivansh Tiwary and Joanna Plucinska NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Proliferating conflict zones are an increasing burden on airline operations and profitability, executives say, as carriers grapple with missiles and drones, airspace closures, location spoofing and the shoot-down of another passenger flight. Airlines are racking up costs and losing market share from cancelled flights and expensive re-routings, often at short notice. The aviation industry, which prides itself on its safety performance, is investing more in data and security planning. "Flight planning in this kind of environment is extremely difficult … The airline industry thrives on predictability, and the absence of this will always drive greater cost," said Guy Murray, who leads aviation security at European carrier TUI Airline. With increasing airspace closures around Russia and Ukraine, throughout the Middle East, between India and Pakistan and in parts of Africa, airlines are left with fewer route options. "Compared to five years ago, more than half of the countries being overflown on a typical Europe-Asia flight would now need to be carefully reviewed before each flight," said Mark Zee, founder of OPSGROUP, a membership-based organisation that shares flight risk information. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the Middle East since October 2023 led to commercial aviation sharing the skies with short-notice barrages of drones and missiles across major flight paths – some of which were reportedly close enough to be seen by pilots and passengers. Russian airports, including in Moscow, are now regularly shut down for brief periods due to drone activity, while interference with navigation systems, known as GPS spoofing or jamming, is surging around political fault lines worldwide. When hostilities broke out between India and Pakistan last month, the neighbours blocked each other's aircraft from their respective airspace. "Airspace should not be used as a retaliatory tool, but it is," Nick Careen, International Air Transport Association (IATA) senior vice president for operations, safety and security, told reporters at the airline body's annual meeting in New Delhi on Tuesday. Isidre Porqueras, chief operating officer at Indian carrier IndiGo, said the recent diversions were undoing efforts to reduce emissions and increase airline efficiencies. WORST-CASE SCENARIO Finances aside, civil aviation's worst-case scenario is a plane being hit, accidentally or intentionally, by weaponry. In December, an Azerbaijan Airlines flight crashed in Kazakhstan, killing 38 people. The plane was accidentally shot down by Russian air defences, according to Azerbaijan's president and Reuters sources. In October, a cargo plane was shot down in Sudan, killing five people. Six commercial aircraft have been shot down, with three near-misses since 2001, according to aviation risk consultancy Osprey Flight Solutions. Governments need to share information more effectively to keep civil aviation secure as conflict zones proliferate, IATA Director General Willie Walsh said this week. Safety statistics used by the commercial aviation industry show a steady decline in accidents over the past two decades, but these do not include security-related incidents such as being hit by weaponry. IATA said in February that accidents and incidents related to conflict zones were a top concern for aviation safety requiring urgent global coordination. TOUGH CHOICES Each airline decides where to travel based on a patchwork of government notices, security advisers, and information-sharing between carriers and states, leading to divergent policies. The closure of Russian airspace to most Western carriers since the outbreak of war in Ukraine in 2022 put them at a cost disadvantage compared to airlines from places like China, India and the Middle East that continue to take shorter northern routes that need less fuel and fewer crew. Shifting risk calculations mean Singapore Airlines' flight SQ326 from Singapore to Amsterdam has used three different routes into Europe in just over a year, Flightradar24 tracking data shows. When reciprocal missile and drone attacks broke out between Iran and Israel in April 2024, it started crossing previously avoided Afghanistan instead of Iran. Last month, its route shifted again to avoid Pakistan's airspace as conflict escalated between India and Pakistan. Flight SQ326 now reaches Europe via the Persian Gulf and Iraq. Singapore Airlines did not respond immediately to a request for comment. Pilots and flight attendants are also worried about how the patchwork of shifting risk might impact their safety. "IATA says airlines should decide if it's safe to fly over conflict zones, not regulators. But history shows commercial pressures can cloud those decisions," said Paul Reuter, vice president of the European Cockpit Association, which represents pilots. Flight crew typically have the right to refuse a trip due to concerns about airspace, whether over weather or conflict zones, IATA security head Careen said. "Most airlines, in fact, I would say the vast majority of them, do not want crew on an aircraft if they don't feel comfortable flying," he said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Expanding missile threats and airspace closures are straining airlines
By Lisa Barrington, Shivansh Tiwary and Joanna Plucinska NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Proliferating conflict zones are an increasing burden on airline operations and profitability, executives say, as carriers grapple with missiles and drones, airspace closures, location spoofing and the shoot-down of another passenger flight. Airlines are racking up costs and losing market share from cancelled flights and expensive re-routings, often at short notice. The aviation industry, which prides itself on its safety performance, is investing more in data and security planning. "Flight planning in this kind of environment is extremely difficult … The airline industry thrives on predictability, and the absence of this will always drive greater cost," said Guy Murray, who leads aviation security at European carrier TUI Airline. With increasing airspace closures around Russia and Ukraine, throughout the Middle East, between India and Pakistan and in parts of Africa, airlines are left with fewer route options. "Compared to five years ago, more than half of the countries being overflown on a typical Europe-Asia flight would now need to be carefully reviewed before each flight," said Mark Zee, founder of OPSGROUP, a membership-based organisation that shares flight risk information. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the Middle East since October 2023 led to commercial aviation sharing the skies with short-notice barrages of drones and missiles across major flight paths – some of which were reportedly close enough to be seen by pilots and passengers. Russian airports, including in Moscow, are now regularly shut down for brief periods due to drone activity, while interference with navigation systems, known as GPS spoofing or jamming, is surging around political fault lines worldwide. When hostilities broke out between India and Pakistan last month, the neighbours blocked each other's aircraft from their respective airspace. "Airspace should not be used as a retaliatory tool, but it is," Nick Careen, International Air Transport Association (IATA) senior vice president for operations, safety and security, told reporters at the airline body's annual meeting in New Delhi on Tuesday. Isidre Porqueras, chief operating officer at Indian carrier IndiGo, said the recent diversions were undoing efforts to reduce emissions and increase airline efficiencies. WORST-CASE SCENARIO Finances aside, civil aviation's worst-case scenario is a plane being hit, accidentally or intentionally, by weaponry. In December, an Azerbaijan Airlines flight crashed in Kazakhstan, killing 38 people. The plane was accidentally shot down by Russian air defences, according to Azerbaijan's president and Reuters sources. In October, a cargo plane was shot down in Sudan, killing five people. Six commercial aircraft have been shot down, with three near-misses since 2001, according to aviation risk consultancy Osprey Flight Solutions. Governments need to share information more effectively to keep civil aviation secure as conflict zones proliferate, IATA Director General Willie Walsh said this week. Safety statistics used by the commercial aviation industry show a steady decline in accidents over the past two decades, but these do not include security-related incidents such as being hit by weaponry. IATA said in February that accidents and incidents related to conflict zones were a top concern for aviation safety requiring urgent global coordination. TOUGH CHOICES Each airline decides where to travel based on a patchwork of government notices, security advisers, and information-sharing between carriers and states, leading to divergent policies. The closure of Russian airspace to most Western carriers since the outbreak of war in Ukraine in 2022 put them at a cost disadvantage compared to airlines from places like China, India and the Middle East that continue to take shorter northern routes that need less fuel and fewer crew. Shifting risk calculations mean Singapore Airlines' flight SQ326 from Singapore to Amsterdam has used three different routes into Europe in just over a year, Flightradar24 tracking data shows. When reciprocal missile and drone attacks broke out between Iran and Israel in April 2024, it started crossing previously avoided Afghanistan instead of Iran. Last month, its route shifted again to avoid Pakistan's airspace as conflict escalated between India and Pakistan. Flight SQ326 now reaches Europe via the Persian Gulf and Iraq. Singapore Airlines did not respond immediately to a request for comment. Pilots and flight attendants are also worried about how the patchwork of shifting risk might impact their safety. "IATA says airlines should decide if it's safe to fly over conflict zones, not regulators. But history shows commercial pressures can cloud those decisions," said Paul Reuter, vice president of the European Cockpit Association, which represents pilots. Flight crew typically have the right to refuse a trip due to concerns about airspace, whether over weather or conflict zones, IATA security head Careen said. "Most airlines, in fact, I would say the vast majority of them, do not want crew on an aircraft if they don't feel comfortable flying," he said.
