Elon Musk's career advice to young professionals in the age of AI is what you would least expect
In a recent
CNBC
interview, Musk reflected on how he advises his own children, some of whom are preparing to enter the workforce. He acknowledged the difficulty of giving
career advice
in such an unpredictable environment. Rather than pointing them toward safe or high-demand roles, he encourages them to pursue work they enjoy—something they find fulfilling and beneficial to society.
Facing AI's Impact Head-On
Musk's views carry added weight given his influence on the future of work. As the founder of Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, and xAI, he's not just a witness to technological change—he's helping drive it. From reusable rockets and electric vehicles to brain–machine interfaces and AI research, Musk's companies are reshaping how we live and work.
Yet he admits that even he questions the value of his relentless work. He shared how he sometimes wonders whether the sacrifices he makes—time lost with friends and family—are worth it if AI eventually does it all better. For him, staying motivated in this era means deliberately choosing not to overthink the long-term implications. He emphasized that people should focus on projects that excite them and make a positive difference, regardless of whether machines can replicate those efforts.
A Different Kind of Urgency
Musk's advice contrasts sharply with warnings from others in the industry. Zerodha co-founder Nikhil Kamath, for instance, believes adaptability is the most important trait going forward. Drawing on the World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs Report 2025, Kamath points out that 34% of all workplace tasks could be automated by 2030. He urges professionals to continuously upskill and shift away from traditional education models, which he believes are rapidly losing relevance.
— nikhilkamathcio (@nikhilkamathcio)
The WEF data predicts 92 million jobs could be displaced globally, while 170 million new roles may emerge. However, Kamath warns that only those who constantly learn and evolve will benefit from this transition.roles.
Where Kamath stresses survival through learning, Musk focuses on meaning. He raises deeper questions about purpose in a future where AI systems can do everything better, faster, and cheaper. In his view, the real challenge isn't just about career security—it's about staying emotionally and mentally engaged in a world where one's contributions might feel replaceable.
For Musk, fulfilment comes not from outperforming machines, but from doing work that aligns with personal interest and social good.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
India readies for US tariff impact, rules out retaliation over Russia ties
A day after US President Donald Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff, plus a penalty for oil and defence buys from Russia, on Indian exports from August 1, top government functionaries brainstormed on the way ahead. The broad consensus was to weather the storm while persisting with New Delhi's multi-track engagement with the White House. Top government sources conceded they were surprised at Trump's Wednesday evening (India time) announcement, especially since negotiations for a bilateral trade pact were still underway and a US team is scheduled to land in New Delhi on August 25 for the sixth round of talks. However, they ruled out the prospect of any retaliatory action being initiated by New Delhi, and asserted that India would neither succumb to the Americans on issues of national security, such as its defence ties with Russia, nor cede ground on its domestic interests in the agriculture and dairy sectors. The US insistence to secure greater market access in agriculture and dairy sectors has been a stress point in trade negotiations. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a CNBC interview on Thursday that the US trade team was frustrated with India, adding that the future of the trade deal between the two nations was now up to India. In a statement in both Houses of Parliament on Thursday evening, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said the government will take all necessary steps to safeguard and promote national interest. 'Let us wait and watch how the situation evolves. The ball is in the US court,' said a government source, adding that the government awaited clarity and the US executive order on the structure of the 25 per cent tariff and the quantum of penalty. The government has also kept a close watch on how some leaders, such as Brazil President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, whom Prime Minister Narendra Modi had met during the BRICS Summit and bilateral visit to that country in the first week of July, have opted to defy Trump's threats. Trump had threatened a 50 per cent tariff on Brazilian goods, which failed to cow down Lula with the result that the US has since issued a long list of exemptions to the levies on goods from Brazil. Hours after announcing the 25% levy plus penalty on Indian shipments, Trump had partially blamed India's BRICS membership for the move. Sources in the government also said that Trump's comment that India, along with Russia, were 'dead economies' shouldn't be given much heed as it was in response to some earlier comments of former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, who is currently the Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council. Trump and Medvedev have been sparring on social media for the last few weeks. Minister Goyal said the government is examining the implications of the US tariffs and is engaged with all stakeholders including exporters and industry for taking feedback of their assessment of the situation. 'The government attaches the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, workers, entrepreneurs, exporters, MSMEs and all sections of industry. We will take all necessary steps to secure and advance our national interest,' he said. Probably in response to Trump's description of India as a 'dead economy' along with that of Russia's, Goyal also said that in just over a decade, India has rapidly transformed from being one of the fragile five to the fastest growing major economy in the world and it is also widely expected that India will become the third largest economy in a few years. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh termed this a 'non-statement'. Along with other Opposition parties, Ramesh also took pot-shots at Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but a political skirmish did not take place on the issue, at least on Thursday. 'Prime Minister Modi had banked on his much-vaunted personal friendship with President Trump. This has proved to be completely hollow,' Ramesh said in a post on X. However, during the course of the day, INDIA bloc parties were keen to protest in Parliament and disrupt proceedings over the Election Commission's Special Intensive Review in Bihar, and unwilling to pin down the government on Trump's tariff pronouncement. Goyal said that in an increasingly protectionist world, India has done mutually beneficial trade agreements with the UAE, UK, Australia and EFTA countries, adding that India is committed to similar trade agreements with other countries. The government has broached these FTAs by drawing clear red lines to protect its farming sector. Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Trump had signalled the tariff and penalty that was set to take effect from August 1 may be delayed, adding that discussions with India are on over the matter. 'We are negotiating right now and it's also BRICS. BRICS, which is basically a group of countries that are anti the United States and India is a member of that... It is an attack on the dollar and we are not going to let anybody attack the dollar. So it's partially BRICS and it is partially had a tremendous deficit,' Trump said. 'They have one of the highest tariffs in the world. Now, they are willing to cut it very substantially. But we will see what happens. We are talking to India now. We will see what happens. It doesn't matter too much whether we have a deal or we charge them a certain tariff, you will know at the end of this week,' he said. Indian officials, on the other hand, had maintained that they had made their final offer earlier this month and that said that the ball is on the court of Trump to accept the offers made by India. Beyond the trade deal, what has peeved New Delhi is Trump's outreach to Pakistan. While announcing Washington's trade deal with Islamabad, Trump also said that the US will work together on developing Pakistan's 'massive oil reserves'. 'We are in the process of choosing the oil company that will lead this partnership,' the president said while half-jokingly adding: "Who knows, maybe they'll be selling oil to India some day.' 'We are a sovereign democracy with a global outlook, not a convenient scapegoat. If partnership is the goal, as it is, then respect can be the only foundation,' former foreign secretary Nirupama Menon Rao said. (With inputs from Shreya Nandi and Agencies)
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Trump and team ‘frustrated' with India over trade talks, says U.S. Treasury Secretary
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Thursday (July 31, 2025) said President Donald Trump and the whole trade negotiation team had been "frustrated" with India over the trade talks. His comments came a day after Mr. Trump announced the imposition of a 25% tariff on all goods coming from India starting August 1, plus an unspecified penalty for buying Russian crude oil and military equipment. Also read | Structural cracks emerge in the India-U.S. strategic partnership 'Well, I don't know what's going to happen. It will be up to India. India came to the table early. They've been slow rolling things. So I think that the President, the whole trade team, has been frustrated with them," Mr. Bessent said in an interview with CNBC. He also said India has been a large buyer of oil from Russia, which is facing sanctions, and reselling the crude as refined products. 'So, they [India] have not been a great global actor,' he added. Mr. Trump's surprise announcement on Wednesday is being seen as a pressure tactic to get New Delhi to agree to demands made by the U..S, which has, in recent days, got favourable trade deals with major partners such as Japan, the U.K. and the European Union. India has said it will take all necessary steps to safeguard and promote national interest and that the implications of the tariffs are being examined.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Nithin Kamath slams flawed comparison between India and US in candid post, says ‘Gambling runs deep in American culture'. Netizens applaud
'India is a drop in the ocean compared to US leverage' — Nithin0dha (@Nithin0dha) A $210 Million Bet on Zelensky's Outfit? The Indian Market: A Sleeping Giant? You Might Also Like: Comic nails Nikhil Kamath podcast spoof, leaves even the Zerodha billionaire in splits A Call for Patience and Perspective In a bold and unfiltered post that's making waves across financial circles, Zerodha co-founder Nithin Kamath has challenged what he calls a 'misguided narrative' comparing India's options trading volumes to those of the United States. And he isn't mincing words. Kamath took to social media this week, highlighting stark contrasts in market maturity , investor behavior, and cultural ethos—concluding with a punchline that's hard to ignore: 'Gambling runs deep in American culture.'The remarks, which appear in a now widely circulated LinkedIn post, reflect growing concerns over surface-level interpretations of trading data, especially as India's retail participation in stock markets continues to the heart of Kamath's argument is the assertion that Indian markets are not dangerously overleveraged, as some analysts and commentators suggest. He notes that most comparisons rely on the sheer number of options contracts traded, without factoring in premiums or actual capital value.'If anything, India is significantly less leveraged than the US, even taking into account the fact that our markets are 15–20 years behind theirs,' Kamath wrote in his drive home the scale of difference, Kamath pointed out that the margin funding market in the US recently crossed $1 trillion. In India? It's still under $10 billion—just 1% of that. Likewise, while shorting is a trillion-dollar mechanism in the US, India's stock lending and borrowing market remains in its most eyebrow-raising observation, however, came from outside the trading world—sort of. Referring to a bizarre $210 million wager on whether Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky would wear a suit to the NATO summit, Kamath underlined how deeply embedded gambling is in the American psyche.'From the stock market to sports, casinos, events, lotteries, prediction markets, and crypto, you can bet on anything,' he said. 'Calling the US a gambling society wouldn't be unfair.'Kamath's comments have ignited a spirited conversation online, with many users rallying behind his take. One user wrote, 'We actually cannot compare Indian markets with the US… the biggest companies in the US are still growing fast, but fractional investing will change the Indian market.'Another comment struck an optimistic tone: 'In the US, approximately 62% of the population has stock market investments, whereas in India, it's only 6%. India could be a sleeping giant waiting to awaken.'Other users praised Kamath for drawing attention to the importance of measuring real leverage over superficial contract counts. 'Comparing contract numbers without looking at actual value is like counting cars without checking if they're Ferraris or Fiat Puntos,' one broader point is that while India's markets are evolving rapidly, they are still in a formative phase—and that's no reason to ring alarm bells. He argued that overzealous comparisons with mature markets like the US not only lack nuance but risk misleading retail investors and policymakers alike.'We're still building basic infrastructure,' another netizen commented. 'Our regulators are right to be cautious given how new retail participation is. Better slow growth than 2008 crashes.'Whether one agrees or disagrees with Kamath's framing, one thing is clear: the story of India's financial markets cannot—and should not—be told through the lens of another nation's gambling habits.
