Russia in major advance in eastern Ukraine, residents told to leave
Analysis of battlefield data from the US-based Institute for the Study of War shows that Russian forces have made their biggest 24-hour advance in more than a year.
The head of the Donetsk region ordered civilians with children to evacuate from towns and villages under threat.
It comes as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky holds talks with European colleagues ahead of a meeting between the Russian and US presidents, Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, on Friday.
Mr Zelensky has not been invited to the encounter, fuelling fears that his country could be forced into painful concessions.
Ukrainian soldiers in Kramatorsk, an eastern city about 20km from the front line, said they had low expectations for the diplomatic efforts.
"There have already been so many negotiations between the heads of state, but nothing is changing," said 21-year-old Dmytro. "If something changes for the better, I will be only happy."
The analysis of Institute for the Study of War data shows that the Russian army took or claimed 110sq/km of land yesterday compared to the previous day - the most since late May 2024.
In recent months, Moscow has typically taken five or six days to progress at such a pace, although its advances have accelerated in recent weeks.
President Zelensky acknowledged that Russian troops had advanced by up to 10km near the eastern coal mining town of Dobropillia, but said that his forces would soon "destroy them".
"We see that the Russian army is not preparing to end the war. On the contrary, they are making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations," he added.
Russia - which has full or partial control over 19% of Ukrainian territory - said that it had taken two villages close to Dobropillia.
Donetsk governor Vadym Filashkin said the region was beginning the mandatory evacuation of families with children from the town of Bilozerske and a dozen other settlements.
The Russian military also fired at least 49 drones and two ballistic missiles at Ukraine during the night, the Ukrainian air force said.
At least three people were killed in Russian artillery and drone attacks on the southern Kherson region, according to regional officials.
Artem, a 30-year-old serviceman in Kramatorsk, said the war would likely continue for "a long time".
"(President Vladimir) Putin is massing an army, his army is growing, he is stockpiling weapons, he is pulling the wool over our eyes," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Starmer and Zelenskyy ‘agree strong resolve' for peace ahead of Trump-Putin talks
Keir Starmer and Volodymyr Zelenskyy have said there is 'strong resolve' for peace in Ukraine ahead of highly anticipated talks between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. The two leaders expressed cautious optimism about the prospect of a truce 'as long as Putin takes action to prove he is serious' about ending the war, as they met on Wednesday, a Downing Street statement said. In a separate statement, Mr Zelenskyy said there had been discussions about the security guarantees required to make any deal 'truly durable if the United States succeeds in pressing Russia to stop the killing'. Mr Starmer hosted the Ukrainian president for a private breakfast in No 10 on Thursday as Europe braces for the face-to-face meeting between the US president and his Russian counterpart in Alaska on Friday. European leaders are hopeful about the potential for a ceasefire after a joint call with Mr Trump on Wednesday, during which he reportedly told them his goal for the summit was to secure a ceasefire. But concerns linger over the prospect of Kyiv being excluded from negotiations over its own future, and pressured to cede territory, after the US leader suggested any agreement may need to involve 'swapping of land'. Ukraine has already rejected any proposal that would compromise its borders. In a readout of the morning meeting between Mr Starmer and Mr Zelenskyy, a Downing Street spokesman said: 'They had a private breakfast, where they discussed yesterday's meetings. 'They agreed there had been a powerful sense of unity and a strong resolve to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine.' Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky after their meeting at 10 Downing Street (Jordan Pettitt/PA) The Ukrainian president, who was warmly embraced by the Labour leader, with a red carpet rolled out for his arrival in Downing Street, said the meeting had been 'good' and 'productive'. But he urged the UK to join PURL- Nato's Prioritised Ukraine Requirements List initiative, to provide weapons to Kyiv. 'It is important that, within the framework of the coalition of the willing, we should all be able to achieve effective formats for security cooperation,' he said. 'We also discussed the continuation of support programs for our army and our defense industry. Under any scenario, Ukraine will maintain its strength. 'Keir and I also talked about such mechanisms for weapons supplies as the PURL programme, and I urged the UK to join.' It comes as The Times newspaper reported that Britain was planning to scale back its plans for a military peacekeeping force in Ukraine. British military chiefs are now said to be involving air reassurance over western Ukraine, training support to the Ukrainian military and the clearance of mines from the Black Sea. Further sanctions could be imposed on Russia should the Kremlin fail to engage and the UK is already working on its next package of measures targeting Moscow, he said. 'We're ready to support this, including from the plans we've already drawn up to deploy a reassurance force once hostilities have ceased,' Mr Starmer told allies on Wednesday. 'It is important to remind colleagues that we do stand ready also to increase pressure on Russia, particularly the economy, with sanctions and wider measures as may be necessary.'
The Irish Sun
2 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Putin's nuke button, ‘poo briefcase' & army of bodyguards… Giant security op that will go with Vlad for Trump showdown
AS one of the world's most powerful man on Earth, his security entourage will do anything to save his life from bloodthirsty would-be assassins. Vladimir Putin is expected to be surrounded by a high-profile security entourage as the despot with an international arrest warrant steps out of Russia. 10 Russian President Vladimir Putin, surrounded by his bodyguards, leaves the car Credit: Getty 10 Russia's President Vladimir Putin surrounded by bodyguards, as he leaves the Europe-Asia summit in 2014 Credit: Reuters 10 Russian nuclear briefcase was shown for the first time on state televison Credit: Wikipedia 10 The world's eyes will be on Alaska on Friday as leaders of the two superpowers sit down for a showdown that will decide Ukraine's fate. Trump and Vladimir Putin will sit down "one-on-one" at the Elmendorf-Richardson base in Alaska. The Kremlin confirmed key details of the crunch talks - with the showdown kicking off at 11.30am Alaskan time (8.30pm UK time). Putin, who has rarely set foot in a foreign country since begining his invasion of Ukraine in 2023, will be surrounded by his highly-trained bodyguards to ensure maximum protection. The former KGB agent, who has been ruling Russia for 25 years, is said to be obsessed with his security. A Russian official who attended the Victory Day parade on May 9 told The Moscow Times: "The Kremlin takes Vladimir Putin's security very seriously. He is protected by a whole army of visible and invisible guards." Members of ageing Putin's security team, who call themselves his "Musketeers", are said to be from a special unit within Russia's Federal Protective Service (FSO), according to The Economist. Among the many things they are expected to carry are a number of suitcases, but they are not ordinary luggage. Each one comes with a bulletproof protection that can be used as a shield in case shots are fired at Putin. One of them is said to be a "Poo suitcase", which is used to collect his stools and urine and deliver them back to Moscow. Inside remote Alaska ice base where Trump and Putin go head-to-head in CRUCIAL Ukraine war showdown French magazine Paris Match claimed that the bizarre practice was first noted in 2017 during a state visit to France. It is thought that Putin - who over the years has been at the centre of health rumours - does not want outsiders to know his physical condition, which could be studied using his faecal matter. In 2019, a strange video showed paranoid Vlad being accompanied to the bathroom by six male bodyguards during Ukraine peace talks at Paris' Elysee Palace. Putin also likes to carry his dreaded nuclear briefcase dubbed "Cheget". Developed during the 1980s for the Soviet KGB, earlier versions of these were said to have an explosive charge of one kiloton, equivalent to one thousand tons of TNT. That's enough to destroy everything within a half-mile radius. The current version is thought to act as a communication device, relaying orders to launch a nuclear attack. With just the press of a button, the General Staff in Moscow receives the signal and initiates the nuclear attack. 10 Russian President Vladimir Putin's bodyguard carrying special suitcases Credit: EPA 10 The despot is always pictured with suitcases close to him whenever he steps out in public Credit: EPA Meanwhile, Putin's bodyguards are said to be handpicked for qualities that include 'operational psychology,' physical stamina and the ability to withstand cold and not sweat in heat. They are equipped with an SR-1 Vektor pistol said which can fire armour-piercing bullets. Before Putin travels, advance teams scout out his destination months ahead of time, checking to see how the public will likely respond and even if the area could be affected by bad weather or natural disasters. Wherever he's going to stay gets inspected, jamming devices are installed to prevent remote detonation of bombs, and technicians conduct electronic surveillance of cellphones and other devices in the area. On the road, Putin rides amid a convoy of heavily armoured vans that carry military special operators armed with AK-47s, anti-tank grenade launchers and portable anti-aircraft missiles. The Friday summit is said to have a ring of steel security, made up of both Russian and American special agents. The base, near Anchorage, is bristling with troops from the US Air Force, Army, Navy and Marine Corps - as well as National Guardsmen and Reserves. 10 Elmendorf-Richardson base in Anchorage, Alaska, has been named as the setting for Trump's meeting with Putin Credit: DVIDS 10 Trump and Putin will touch down on the massive military runway on Friday Credit: DVIDS/USAF Airman First Class Mario Calabro 10 Trump and Putin will sit down for what the White House calls a 'listening exercise' Credit: Reuters In all, over 32,000 military personnel and their families live there - ten per cent of the population of Anchorage, Alaska's largest city - alongside grizzly bears, moose and wolves. It played a "particularly important" role in defending the US against the Soviet Union during the Cold War, according to the Library of Congress. The White House apparently wanted to avoid the sight of a Russian leader being welcomed into a US military setting - but concluded there was no other option. Elmendorf-Richardson is reportedly considered the only site in Alaska which could be locked down to the required level of security for the high-stakes meeting. Putin will fly the nine hours from Moscow and Trump the seven-and-a-half hours from Washington, with ample room on the runway for both their presidential aircraft.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
From pharma to food, the known unknowns of Trump's EU tariffs deal
The US/ EU tariff deal was meant to bring certainty for exporters. But almost three weeks later there is a lot that we don't know – and more that remains uncertain. A joint statement signed off by both sides had been expected shortly after the big summit in Scotland at the end of July , clarifying key parts of the deal and how it would be implemented. But this week, a European Commission spokesperson said, in best bureacrateese, that while further contacts with the US were expected on this, 'I don't believe at this stage we can put a timeline on these engagements.' 1. What is covered by the new tariffs? The deal had been hailed as bringing 'certainty' to Irish exporters. And it has done so, but only up to a point. A blanket 15 per cent tariff now applies on most categories or exports from Ireland to the US. READ MORE As ever with trade, there are tweaks. Some goods which had been subject to previous higher tariff charges (under the most favoured nation or MFN system) will still pay these. For Ireland, the main product affected here is butter – with Kerrygold now the second biggest seller on the US market. Before Trump came to office it had been levied at a rate based on weight – rather than the more usual percentage calculation. However, this worked out at somewhere over 16 per cent in practice. So this slightly higher rate will remain. Other sectors face tariffs for the first time, or higher charges. For example, the large medical products sector had previously been largely exempted, but is now being levied at 15 per cent. So are parts of the food sector and spirits. 2. What is not covered? US customs has published a list of goods that are excluded from the 15 per cent tariff and Carol Lynch, customs partner at BDO, says this is a good place for SMEs unsure if they are covered to check. A key point for Ireland is that pharma products, by far the State's biggest in value terms, are not currently subject to the 15 per cent tariff. This may change, as the Trump administration is undertaking a study of pharma supply into the US market and the national security issues that apply – the so-called section 232 investigation which refers back to a 1960s act of congress. This is the backdrop to Trump's talk of 150 per cent or 250 per cent tariffs on pharma in 18 months or two years' time, applying to companies that do not play ball and return production to the US market. The EU believes the US has signed up to a 15 per cent cap on pharma – and semiconductor – tariffs under the deal, but Trump's subsequent statements suggest otherwise. This is why the absence of a joint agreed statement between the EU and US is important. 3. What might change? Another frustration for the EU is that the outline agreement suggested that more areas would be excluded from the 15 per cent tariff net but, beyond aircraft and aircraft parts, none of these has yet been spelt out. These 'carveouts' were due to cover some areas of food of potential interest to Ireland, some generic drugs and chemicals and perhaps medical devices, a sector which typically has lower margins and fixed price contracts with US buyers. The EU had also been pushing for a 'zero for zero' tariff deal on wines and spirits, though the indications were the US was unlikely to concede this. So bar the list published by US Customs, we are no wiser on what other sectors may, in time, get a pass. 4. What can companies do? The practical steps, according to Lynch of BDO, are, first, to check whether goods were in transit before August 7th, in which case the old 10 per cent rate would apply rather than the new 15 per cent. Companies need to know the tariff codes being used by those importing their products and whether any of the exclusions they know about so far apply. And, she says, they need to examine whether they have any flexibility under the rules in terms of the value of goods declared for customs purposes. This is a complex area with detailed pricing rules applying but, particularly in high value sectors like pharma, companies may have options to readjust supply changes or pricing policies to cut their tariff bills. 5. Where next on pharma? The Trump administration has been promising the results of its section 232 investigation shortly, expected by way of a big report. Alongside this, Trump's team have been negotiating on prices with the big US pharma companies, demanding that they charge the same prices in the US as other countries. A 2022 study showed that US prices were, on average, three times higher than the OECD average. This – in Trump's view- means prices should fall in the US and rise in other countries, thus giving the US consumer a better deal while giving companies ongoing revenue to fund research. It is unclear what the outcome of this will be but the two areas are linked. Imposing tariffs on imports risks increasing prices on the US market, the opposite of the goal of the price negotiations. The US president is threatening tariffs which would gradually increase over time as a way of getting big pharma to relocate more production to the US of key drugs and ingredients. So will we see 15 per cent pharma tariffs when the result of the Section 232 probes are out? Or will the US president hold off for now while holding out the threat of tariffs if big pharma does not fall into line on prices and investment? 6. Ireland's pharma exposure: In a post on the pharma issue on LinkedIn, Ben McConkey, an Irish MSc student at the London School of Economics, underlines the extent of Ireland's 'pharma' exposure by pointing out that the US imported over $50 billion worth of Irish pharmaceutical products in 2004, making it the single largest category of goods imported from any EU country by a margin of $15 billion and representing 8.3 per cent of all US imports from the EU. While the noise around the trade talks was about German cars, Irish pharma exports have a higher value, though this is of course hugely inflated by the pricing practices of the firms involved, which have a financial incentive to declare as much profit as possible in low tax Ireland. McConkey also makes the interesting point that the bulk of Irish pharma and organic chemicals go to republican states such as Indiana – home of Eli Lilly – as well as Puerto Rico, North Carolina and Illinois. Many are not finished drugs but are high value ingredients in drugs then sold across the US. As tariffs will have an economic impact on these companies – and on US consumers – it remains to be seen what the president decides. But the stakes for Ireland in the Section 232 process are huge as it could influence both future manufacturing investment and the transfer pricing structures the companies employ which led to huge profits being declared in Ireland and a lot of corporate tax being paid here. 7. The uncertainty may just roll on: The EU's belief was that a joint statement would be agreed with the US on the basis of the political agreement between Trump and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland. This would then be followed by further detailed negotiations. It is unclear if the absence of even a basic, joint written understanding is just a result of August holidays or whether it is a sign of the way the US president tends to operate – in headlines and in a way which leaves him with maximum flexibility to change tack. The president and his team have been continuing to push the boat out in terms of tariffs and pressure on US businesses to bend to their will. There is a fair chance that the uncertainty will roll on – and on. And this in itself will have a cost on businesses, even if the 15 per cent deal will have left many feeling they have some more solid ground on which to plan. And, it must be remembered that the US president's right to impose the 15 per cent tariffs at all is being challenged in the courts – a process likely to go right to the US supreme court for an ultimate decision.
