Despite 0. 1% growth in Q1, the rand held firm below R18 to the dollar
As of lunchtime on Wednesday, it was trading at R17.83, remaining range bound in the tight R17.75 to R18.05 bracket, Andre Cilliers, Currency Strategist at TreasuryONE indicated. Bianca Botes, director at Citadel Global, noted earlier on Wednesday morning that the currency was at R17.85.
Image: Pixabay
Despite South Africa's economy growing at a measly 0.1% in the first quarter of this year, the local currency was unmoved and continues to trade at levels below R18 to the dollar.
As of lunchtime on Wednesday, it was trading at R17.83, remaining range bound in the tight R17.75 to R18.05 bracket, Andre Cilliers, Currency Strategist at TreasuryONE indicated. Bianca Botes, director at Citadel Global, noted earlier on Wednesday morning that the currency was at R17.85.
Cilliers said the dismal gross domestic product (GDP) data hasn't dented the local currency, with it taking its lead from a weaker dollar instead. Overall, Tuesday's print of GDP data was better than expected by several economists, most of which noted that this was due to the agricultural sector performing well.
Nolan Wapenaar, co-chief investment officer at Anchor Capital, explained that much of the production data and economic data that had already been had been pointing to a poor GDP print. 'In some ways, agriculture saved the day for the GDP numbers,' he said.
Maarten Ackerman, chief economist and advisory partner at Citadel, said that the 'latest GDP figure paints a familiar picture: a few resilient sectors keeping the economy afloat, while structural underperformance holds us back. Without meaningful and coordinated reform, the economy will continue to limp along, unable to meaningfully reduce unemployment or address pressing social challenges.'
Wapenaar added that the rand was not really impacted by numbers that were as expected.
Earlier this week, Investec chief economist, Annabel Bishop, noted that the rand 'is not expected to strengthen to its fair value of close to R16 until the fundamentals for economic growth improve in South Africa'.
The rand had been benefitting from a weaker dollar, which Bishop had previously said was a deliberate trade tactic by US President Donald Trump. His vacillatory position on tariffs has led to several knee-jerk market reactions.
Trump's latest move – which follows trade negations including with President Cyril Ramaphosa – was to double the tariffs on steel and aluminium from 25% to 50%. In a statement on the White House website, he said he was doing this 'so that such imports will not threaten to impair the national security'.
Wapenaar said the rand's relative strength was 'also a case of the markets being rather preoccupied with the White House' and what is happening there, which means that other data prints are less impactful than they might otherwise be'.
IOL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Poultry sector fears government concessions to US chicken imports threatens local industry
SAPA CEO Izaak Breitenbach said the US, under the African Growth and Opportunity Act agreements, along with Brazil, were amongst the major dumpers of poultry into the local market. Image: Pixabay The South African poultry industry has voiced concerns about the government's decision to facilitate the import of 72 000 metric tons of poultry from the United States as part of measures to boost trade and reduce the tariffs. The local poultry industry on Tuesday said it has been sacrificed to benefit the automotive sector and others focusing on profitable exports to the US. The South African Poultry Association (SAPA) told Business Report that the decision was a surprise. SAPA CEO Izaak Breitenbach said the industry had instead been hard at negotiations with the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (the dtic) to suspend the US imports prior to the tariff negotiations. Breitenbach said that the US, under the African Growth and Opportunity Act agreements, along with Brazil, were amongst the major dumpers of poultry into the local market. "We had a meeting with Minister [Parks] Tau on May 16th at which we asked, as we had heard the rumours already, that we be consulted if there were concessions to be made with poultry," Breitenbach said. "We had asked that the 72 000 tons from America be revoked. Our letters to his office have piled up without a response. This will have a very severe impact on the industry, which has been on a decline since 2009 due to the dumping." Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ In a joint statement of the dtic and the Department of Agriculture on the update to the negotiations with the US, the government said South Africa has already addressed sanitary and phytosanitary measures in compliance with the bio-security protocols affecting poultry, blueberries and pork. The government said South Africa granted the US market access under the conditional self-ban and self-lifting system. This will ensure that the US is able to leverage the Tariff Rate Quota of 72 000 tons already agreed in 2016. With blueberries, the country has granted market access for US states that are free of fruit fly and agreed to mitigation measures with those states with fruit fly. Similar agreements have been made on pork which is open subject to the bio-security requirements. "Consequently, the USA-Africa Trade Desk has informed us that it will be shipping containers of poultry and pork to South Africa in two weeks' time, which is testimony that these issues have been resolved," Tau said. "The shipments will come from the states of Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina, North Carolina and Alabama through the Ports of New Orleans in Louisiana, Savanna in Georgia, and Norfolk in Virginia." On the other hand, the Association of Meat Importers and Exporters (AMIE), which welcomed the announcement said for the beef export sector and South Africa's broader red meat industry, said this was an important opportunity to build long-term growth. AMIE highlighted the urgent need for the government to conclude standing regionalisation agreements, for both exports and imports, with its trade partners. It said these agreements limited trade restrictions to disease affected areas and safeguarded supply chain continuity when disease outbreaks occurred. "AMIE, with our deep sector expertise and established global network - including strong relationships with industry organisations in SA's key export markets - stands ready to support Government's trade objectives," said AMIE CEO, Imameleng Mothebe.
IOL News
5 days ago
- IOL News
Trump announces 100% chip tariff, pressuring Asian producers
Donald Trump has announced a 100% tariff on semiconductors from firms that do not invest in the United States. Image: Pete Linforth/Pixabay Donald Trump has announced a 100% tariff on semiconductors from firms that do not invest in the United States - sparking volatility in Asian chipmaker shares Thursday. The US president unveiled the levy at the White House on Wednesday ahead of the imposition of sweeping tariffs on goods from dozens of countries, with chips so far exempt. It comes with the United States and China locked in a high-stakes race to develop the high-end semiconductors used to power artificial intelligence systems. "We'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100 percent on chips and semiconductors, but if you're building in the United States... there's no charge," Trump said. He did not give a timetable for the new levy, which he has repeatedly threatened in the past, to be enacted. Arisa Liu, senior semiconductor researcher at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research, said it would impact the "strategic direction of global semiconductor companies". "Since the United States is the world's largest player in AI and related high-performance computing, this will have a relatively greater impact on companies involved in advanced processes," she said. "The highest-end semiconductors will be excluded," Alicia Garcia-Herrero, the chief economist for Asia Pacific at Natixis, told AFP. But "this kills producers of low-end chips", including those based in Malaysia or China, she warned. On Thursday, shares in Taiwan's TSMC - world's largest contract maker of chips, which counts Nvidia and Apple among its clients - soared nearly 5% after the government said the company would not be affected. Taiwan is a global powerhouse in semiconductor manufacturing, with more than half of the world's chips and nearly all of the high-end ones made there. 'Fight for Malaysia' Trump has previously accused Taiwan of having stolen the US chip industry, and earlier this year, TSMC unveiled a plan to invest an extra $100 billion in the United States. Samsung Electronics, which is pumping billions into the United States, rose more than 2% in Seoul, but a range of Japanese chip-making shares sank on the news. Apple is also investing an additional $100 billion in the United States, Trump and the US tech giant's CEO Tim Cook announced Wednesday, with Cook calling it "the largest investment Apple has made in America". Malaysian trade minister Zafrul Abdul Aziz told parliament on Thursday that the country, a key chip manufacturing hub, was seeking an explanation from the US side. "We will continue to fight for Malaysia to ensure that any policy changes or exemption criteria are communicated and negotiated in advance, and that Malaysia's position as a strategic partner is preserved," he said. Chiang Min-yen, a non-resident fellow at the Research Institute for Democracy, Society, and Emerging Technology, said the tariff would hit legacy chipmakers who don't have the deep pockets to invest in the United States. "Most of the legacy chip manufacturers in Taiwan, in the US, even in Japan... all face very serious, unfair market competition from Chinese competitors," he said.
Eyewitness News
6 days ago
- Eyewitness News
Losing grace: The human cost of AI efficiency
Jamil F. Khan 7 August 2025 | 15:19 Jamil F. Khan Artificial Intelligence (AI) Picture: Pixabay/geralt The proliferation of AI technology is proceeding at incredible speed, or at least it feels that way to those of us who have not acquiesced to its seductive wiles. Its uptake has been encouraged by the fundamental promise of ease. As a tool, AI offers to think for you, to try for you, to labour for you, to any extent you would choose. Though the ethics of its offering are widely debated, and people have used AI for dishonest ends, it is an assistant to many. The evolution of technology for the purposes of improving human life is a trend that has persisted since the beginning of social formation. AI displays this potential, to make life easier, but it comes in a time of reckless capitalist expansion coupled with an aversion to truth. Though it poses many threats, including to jobs, the value of creativity and intellectual property, my concern currently lies beyond these parameters. I am concerned for what AI will do to our already poor cultures of accountability, while also eradicating whatever measures of grace we have agreed to in our working relationships with each other. Institutions, however slowly, are creating policies to deal with the implications of using AI as an everyday tool to perform professional functions, but what happens when the standards of efficiency and quality are no longer determined by human beings? Are policies being created with this impact on human relations in mind? My concern stems from the idea that the professional standards set for people's outputs can soon be determined by the capabilities of machines, which can be programmed to eradicate human error – not withstanding that its design will still be prone to that same error. If a machine can do it in minutes with no need for meticulous checking, could human error in the delivery of work become unacceptable? While the rollout of AI is still subject to the accessibility of the basic resources that make it possible, such as internet connection, the supposed benefits it brings remain constrained by the very same inequalities developers are happy to overlook. When referring to cultures of accountability, I am aware that this is hardly a reality, however, when it comes to organisational structures there are processes that pursue accountability from people when things go wrong. The punitive element of this culture, which is not actually what accountability is about, is a site of much workplace abuse and intolerance, and for that reason most people would rather avoid accountability than adjust their behaviour. When offered a machine to which all responsibility can be deferred, an avoidance of responsibility seems like a great deal. The danger in this avoidance of responsibility is not only about one's responsibility to deliver good work, if that is of interest, but also the responsibility to our co-workers. We bear responsibility to each other because we understand that we need each other in order to perform our functions. This is what it means to live in a society, despite the aggressive 'individualist' messaging we receive under capitalism. Our co-workers can be a blessing or a nightmare, depending on the relationship we have with them. Individualism is of course not confined to the workplace, as it is reflected in society as well. Our potential overreliance on machines to do human work, though something that has happened throughout history, puts us in a position to risk forgetting what makes us human. Amongst many other things, it is our propensity for error. Within our humanness, in this relationship with error, we sustain our relationships through grace. We have come to expect mistakes of human beings, not as something that should be eradicated, but reminders of our fallibility. Having to sit in our mistakes and the impact they have on others, has offered us pathways into growth and the ability to practice connection and community. We give each other multiple chances to 'get it right' because the fact of our humanity cannot be denied as it rests on ability, as much as inability. What we learn about others and ourselves through the experiences of error and the disappointment it brings is invaluable in the creation of cultures that are accommodating of our differences. When seen for what it is, human error signals the shifting limits of human ability, which is entitled to grace. When we are intentional about it, we create cultures that recognise grace as a necessity in conducting human relationships. As AI advances, and its many uses are presented in more sophisticated ways, we risk losing sight of the responsibilities that come with being human. When humans behave badly or make mistakes, accountability has been an appeal to people's humanity that says 'you have a responsibility to your fellow humans to correct yourself if you want to enjoy a place in the collective of society'. When given the option to shield oneself from that responsibility, what might seem like a liberation is actually a death of the most social parts that define us. Though I do not reject AI completely, I am concerned for what it will do to our social cultures that already hang together by a very precarious thread. After centuries of ongoing systemic oppressions that have destroyed social relations and estranged people from their humanity, we can ill-afford a shift to cultures of even less grace and accountability. We think that our survival depends on constant technological solutions to daily problems. While this is useful, we must let our humanity shape our technology, and not the other way around. Technology should be a reflection of our collective investment in improving our methods of co-existence, not a way out of doing the work to improve those methods of co-existence. At the heart of human existence is sociality. This sociality has been threatened many times before, and when the most oppressive conditions have descended upon people, they survived through relying on other people. Through the long history of struggle for the right to be human, this fact has remained. Remembering this demands different choices from us, and while we marvel at the pace of innovation and think through ways to capitalise on it, we must remember that it will one day, again, come back to needing another human. Jamil F. Khan is an award-winning author, doctoral critical diversity scholar, and research fellow at the Johannesburg Institute for Advanced Study.
