logo
Jimmy Swaggart, the controversial and longest-serving televangelist in America, has passed away at 90

Jimmy Swaggart, the controversial and longest-serving televangelist in America, has passed away at 90

Time of India01-07-2025
Jimmy Swaggart, America's longest-serving televangelist, has passed away at the age of 90. The news, which was broken by his family on Tuesday, July 1, closes the book on one of the most remarkable pastors to ever appear on American television.
Jimmy Swaggart recounted his early life in his autobiography To Cross a River, where he claimed to have started from humble beginnings as an impoverished preacher in rural Louisiana. Unable to afford a home, Jimmy and his family resided in church basements, motels, and the homes of other pastors.
Jimmy's fortunes would change after he began his career as a televised preacher in the 1970s and 1980s, eventually gaining a massive following and influence.
Jimmy Swaggart's career was dogged with controversy
Televangelist Rev. Jimmy Swaggart dead at 90 — weeks after suffering a heart attack https://t.co/lenoeQzd8E pic.twitter.com/4Ru6qY3P4g
With his increasing prominence came increased controversy, however, as after founding Jimmy Swaggart Ministries, the televangelist threw his support behind the Mozambican National Resistance during the Mozambique Civil War.
The Mozambican National Resistance, or RENAMO, was dogged with allegations of war crimes, and Jimmy's own reputation was tarnished after allegations emerged of Swaggart Ministries providing direct material support to the militant group.
Jimmy would later face scandals of a more personal nature, with him being accused of soliciting prostitutes on multiple occasions. The first public scandal was the culmination of a longstanding feud Swaggart had with rival minister Martin Gorman. Retaliating to Swaggart's accusations of impropriety, Martin began his own investigation, resulting in him uncovering Swaggart's affair with local prostitute Debra Murphree at the Travel Inn in New Orleans.
Swaggart's response to these allegations was a public, tearful speech that he gave on February 1988, where he said:
"I have sinned against You, my Lord, and I would ask that Your Precious Blood ... would wash and cleanse every stain until it is in the seas of God's forgetfulness never to be remembered against me anymore."
Jimmy Swaggart's legacy continues with his son
While Jimmy Swaggart's reputation would never fully recover from these scandals, he maintained a dedicated following, and Jimmy Swaggart Ministries would remain active throughout the remainder of his life.
Jimmy's son, Donnie Swaggart, and his grandson, Gabriel Swaggart, are also preachers, and seem set to carry on Jimmy's legacy after his passing.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AI-171 crash victims family seeks US legal action, demands transparent probe
AI-171 crash victims family seeks US legal action, demands transparent probe

News18

time3 hours ago

  • News18

AI-171 crash victims family seeks US legal action, demands transparent probe

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) [India], August 12 (ANI): Trupti Soni, sister of Swapnil Soni, who died in the Air India AI-171 plane crash, had called for a transparent investigation into the tragedy and announced plans to pursue legal action in the United States. She also accused the Indian government of releasing selective data without any to ANI, Trupti Soni revealed that she is exploring the possibility of filing a product liability case in America.'We are filing a case in America because this could be a product liability case. American laws are stringent about product liability. Before that, we need information about why this accident happened. We are considering filing a petition here to obtain raw data from the flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder. However, we have received no support from the Indian government till now," she stressed that government backing is essential to ensure accountability. 'But we need the support of the Indian government so that it can be seen that the investigation that is taking place is very transparent and in the truest sense fair and free."Soni criticised the limited disclosure of findings so far. 'So far, the data that has been released is very selective without any context. It seems to me that the data and report that have come out raise a lot of questions instead of providing answers."Expressing the family's need for closure, she added, 'So, as a victim's family, we hope that this investigation ends as soon as possible and the correct root causes are placed before the people."The family is holding out hope for justice through the American legal system. 'We are still hoping for justice in the US court…we hope that if a case of production liability is made, the US court will take it seriously and give justice," she June 12, Air India flight AI171, a Boeing 787-8 aircraft, crashed soon after it took off from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport, killing 260 people, including 229 passengers, 12 crew members, and 19 people on the ground. (ANI)

Trial begins for US fugitive who faked death to dodge rape charges
Trial begins for US fugitive who faked death to dodge rape charges

Hindustan Times

time3 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trial begins for US fugitive who faked death to dodge rape charges

A man accused of faking his death and fleeing the country to avoid rape charges faced an alleged victim in court Monday as a jury trial in Utah began. Prosecutors say they have identified at least a dozen aliases Nicholas Rossi used over the years to evade capture.(X) The man known in the US as Nicholas Rossi, whose legal name is Nicholas Alahverdian, is accused of sexually assaulting two women in Utah in 2008. Prosecutors are trying the cases separately, with the first set in Salt Lake County. Rossi, 38, was arrested in Scotland in 2021 — a year after he was reported dead — when he was recognised at a Glasgow hospital while receiving treatment for COVID-19. He lost an extradition appeal after claiming he was an Irish orphan named Arthur Knight who had never set foot on American soil and was being framed. Prosecutors say they have identified at least a dozen aliases Rossi used over the years to evade capture. Rossi appeared in court in a wheelchair, wearing a suit and tie and using an oxygen tank. The woman identified him from the witness stand, saying he's 'a little bit heavier, a little bit older' but mostly looks the same. District Judge Barry Lawrence helped clarify for the jury some of the twists and turns of the case, explaining that different people may refer to Rossi by different names. The defense and prosecution agreed it's factual that Rossi was in Utah in 2008 and had a relationship with the alleged victim that year. Prosecutors painted a picture of an intelligent man who used his charm to take advantage of a vulnerable young woman. He raped her when she pushed back against his attempts to control her, said Deputy Salt Lake County District Attorney Brandon Simmons. The woman, whose identity the judge asked not to be identified publicly, described a whirlwind relationship with Rossi that began in November 2008 while she was recovering from a traumatic brain injury. The two began dating after she responded to a personal ad Rossi posted on Craigslist, and were engaged within about two weeks. The woman described being asked to pay for their dates, cover Rossi's rent so he wouldn't be evicted from his apartment and take on debt to buy their engagement rings. Then, the relationship spiralled quickly, with Rossi 'becoming controlling and saying mean things to me,' she testified. The couple got into a fight in which Rossi pounded on her car and used his body to block her from pulling out of the parking garage. She finally let him inside and drove him home but said she had no plans of continuing a relationship. She agreed to go into his house to talk, but he instead pushed her onto his bed, held her down and 'forced me to have sex with him,' she testified. The woman described lying still, paralysed with fear. 'I was a little bit more of a timid person back then, and so it was harder for me to stand up for myself,' she said. Dismissive comments from her parents convinced her not to go to the police at the time, she said. She did, however, try to bring Rossi to small claims court over the engagement rings but dropped the case. Rossi's lawyers sought to convince the jury that the alleged victim built up years of resentment after Rossi made her foot the bill for everything in their monthlong relationship, and accused him of rape to get back at him a decade later when she saw him in the news. Rossi will also stand trial in September over another rape charge in Utah County. Rossi grew up in foster homes in Rhode Island and had returned to the state before allegedly faking his death. An obituary published online claimed he died on Feb. 29, 2020, of late-stage non-Hodgkin lymphoma. State police, along with Rossi's former lawyer and a former foster family, cast doubt on whether he was dead. A year later, hospital staff in Scotland recognised his tattoos from an Interpol notice and alerted authorities. He was extradited to Utah in January 2024. 'This case is like an old puzzle from the thrift store," said MacKenzie Potter, one of Rossi's attorneys. "It's 13 years old, not all the pieces are there, and some pieces are from a different puzzle. And when you start going through everything, you're not going to get a complete picture.' Prosecutors pushed back, saying that if any 'puzzle pieces' are missing, it's because Rossi's attorneys fought to have some evidence dismissed.

Landmark trial kicks off over Trumps use of US military in LA policing role
Landmark trial kicks off over Trumps use of US military in LA policing role

Mint

time6 hours ago

  • Mint

Landmark trial kicks off over Trumps use of US military in LA policing role

By Dietrich Knauth and Jack Queen -A landmark trial kicked off on Monday over the use by Donald Trump's administration of National Guard forces to support its deportation efforts and quell protests in Los Angeles, in a legal challenge to the U.S. president's break from long-standing norms against deploying troops on American streets. The three-day non-jury trial before San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer will determine if the government violated a 19th century law that bars the military from civil law enforcement when Trump deployed the troops in June, as the state of California claims in its legal challenge. "The factual question which the court must address is whether the military was used to enforce domestic law, and if so, whether there continues to be a threat that it could be done again," Breyer said at the start of Monday's court hearing. Los Angeles experienced days of unrest and protests sparked by mass immigration raids at places where people gather to find work, like Home Depot stores, a garment factory and a warehouse. The administration denies that troops were used in civil law enforcement and plans to show that they were protecting federal property and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. Many of the troops have been withdrawn, but California's Attorney General Rob Bonta said on Monday that 300 National Guard members are still going on immigration raids and restricting civilian movements in the state. The Trump administration last week extended the activation of troops in the Los Angeles area through November 6, according to a court filing by Gavin Newsom, the state's Democratic governor. "The federal government deployed military troops to the streets of Los Angeles for the purposes of political theater and public intimidation," Bonta said in a statement. "This dangerous move has no precedent in American history." California and Newsom have asked Breyer to prohibit the troops from directly participating in domestic law enforcement activities. They say the National Guard is accompanying ICE agents on raids and assisting in arrests, in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 and other laws that forbid the U.S. military from taking part in civilian law enforcement. The Republican president ordered 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles in June against Newsom's wishes. California's lawsuit ultimately seeks a ruling that would return its National Guard troops to state control and a declaration that Trump's action was illegal. The trial before Breyer will have limited impact, however, on Trump's plan to deploy hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington as part of a crackdown on violent crime in the U.S. capital city despite statistics showing that violent crime there hit a 30-year low in 2024. "I'm deploying the National Guard to help reestablish law, order and public safety in Washington, D.C.," Trump said on Monday. "And they're going to be allowed to do their job properly." Unlike in California and other states, where the governor typically decides when to activate Guard troops, the president directly controls the National Guard in Washington. A ruling against the administration could restrict the actions of those troops and constrain Trump if he deploys such forces to police other American cities. Trump said his efforts to fight crime will go beyond Washington and he has mentioned Chicago, Los Angeles, New York and Baltimore. Trump's decision to send troops into Los Angeles prompted a national debate about the use of the military on U.S. soil and inflamed political tensions in the second-most-populous U.S. city. A U.S. appeals court has allowed Trump to retain control of California's National Guard during the legal challenge.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store