logo
Apple inks $500m deal for rare earth magnets with US mining firm

Apple inks $500m deal for rare earth magnets with US mining firm

The Guardiana day ago
Apple has signed a $500m deal with a US firm for rare earth magnets, essential for manufacturing electronics, after China curbed exports of the scarce, vital materials.
The backing from one of the world's most valuable companies comes after MP Materials, which operates the only US rare earths mine, last week agreed to a multibillion-dollar deal with the US Department of Defense that will see the Pentagon become its largest shareholder. Both deals are aimed at mitigating supply chain risks after China limited the outgoing supply of rare earths earlier this year in response to Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs.
The deal, announced on Tuesday, guarantees Apple a steady flow of rare earth magnets free from China – by far the world's largest producer. For Apple, the cost to support US magnet production pales in comparison to the long-term risk that it could lose access entirely to the critical components, analysts said.
'We're in an era where executives are willing to pay a significant premium for a reliable supply chain. They don't want stoppage,' said Gracelin Baskaran, director of the critical minerals security program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Rare earths are a group of 17 metals used to make magnets that turn power into motion, including the devices that make cellphones vibrate. They are also used in weapons, electric vehicles and many other electronics.
China placed export restrictions on rare earths in April in response to Trump's tariffs. Though the US and China reached a deal in June that has resolved much of the rare earths dispute, broader trade tensions continue to underscore demand for a non-Chinese supply.
As part of the agreement, Apple will prepay MP $200m for a supply of magnets slated to begin in 2027. The companies did not disclose the length of the deal nor the volumes of magnets to be provided.
The agreement calls for magnets produced from recycled material, in keeping with Apple's longstanding goal of ending its reliance on the mining industry. They will be produced at MP's Fort Worth, Texas, facility using magnets recycled at MP's Mountain Pass, California, mining complex.
'Rare earth materials are essential for making advanced technology, and this partnership will help strengthen the supply of these vital materials here in the United States,' Apple's CEO, Tim Cook, said in a statement.
Las Vegas-based MP Materials' stock price has nearly doubled since the government deal was announced. It has had remarkable turnaround since last year, when it contemplated merging with an Australian rival as profits plunged in what its CEO, Jim Litinsky, called a 'very frustrating' pricing environment for rare earths.
Bob O'Donnell, president at market research firm TECHnalysis Research, said Tuesday's move 'makes complete sense' given that Apple requires significant amounts of rare earth magnets for its devices.
Sign up to TechScape
A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives
after newsletter promotion
'Plus, by focusing on a US-based supplier, it does help position Apple more positively in Washington,' he said.
Apple, which said the deal is part of its $500bn four-year investment commitment to the US, has faced threats from Trump over iPhones not made in the US. But many analysts have said making the iPhone in the US is not possible, given labor costs and the existing smartphone supply chain.
Apple did not disclose which devices in which it will use the magnets. MP said the deal will supply magnets for hundreds of millions of devices, which would constitute a significant share of any of Apple's product lines.
MP produces mined and processed rare earths and has said it expects to start commercial magnet production in its Texas facility by the end of this year.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Border Patrol hiring spree offers lessons as another immigration agency embarks on massive growth
Border Patrol hiring spree offers lessons as another immigration agency embarks on massive growth

The Independent

time10 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Border Patrol hiring spree offers lessons as another immigration agency embarks on massive growth

In 2006, top U.S. Border Patrol officials were asked how long it would take to hire 6,000 agents, a roughly 50% increase at the time. Michael Fisher, then deputy chief in San Diego, says the officials concluded they would need five years. 'You have 2 1/2 years,' Fisher recalls being told. With Immigration and Customs Enforcement now preparing to add 10,000 employees within five years to assist with President Donald Trump 's mass deportation efforts, the Border Patrol's torrid expansion in the early 2000s serves as a cautionary tale. Hiring and training standards were changed and arrests for employee misconduct rose. Pressure to turbo-charge growth can also lead to attrition. "If they don't uphold pretty rigorous standards and background checks, you can end up hiring the wrong people, and then you pay a huge price in how the public perceives them,' said Gil Kerlikowske, who was commissioner of Customs and Border Protection, the Border Patrol's parent agency, from 2014 to 2017. ICE, the main agency responsible for arresting and deporting people within the U.S., is set to get $76.5 billion, nearly 10 times its annual budget, under a bill Trump signed on July 4. Most of that money is for detention, but some is for hiring and other uses. The White House says ICE will grow from 20,000 employees to about 30,000. 'To do it today is an effort that needs to start years ago,' said Matthew Hudak, former Border Patrol deputy chief. 'The funding is there, but it is nearly impossible to bring in that many people that quickly because you hit challenges." Sponsoring a NASCAR race car and bull riding contests The Border Patrol nearly doubled its workforce from 11,264 agents in October 2005 to 21,444 agents six years later. To recruit officers, the agency sponsored a NASCAR race car and bull riding contests. It aired ads during Dallas Cowboys football games. It advertised at military bases. Billboards and job fairs hundreds of miles from the border promised fulfilling careers, resulting in thousands of applications a week. The agency also loosened some hiring guidelines and training requirements. The age limit for new hires was raised to 40 years old from 37. Spanish language training was cut by up to 30 days, some training was moved online and other instruction was shifted to the field to lessen time at a training academy that the agency opened in Artesia, New Mexico, during the hiring surge, according to a Government Accountability Office report. Arrests for illegal crossings fell to their lowest levels in decades — a sign for some that the strategy succeeded. But other measurements were more troubling. In 2008, the Border Patrol struggled to keep new agents, with about 20% failing to graduate from the academy and more leaving after returning to their stations. Arrests of CBP employees for misconduct increased to 336 in the 2012 fiscal year from 190 seven years earlier. The agency saw a spate of high-profile corruption cases, including agents accused of smuggling people across the border or working with drug cartels to bring illegal drugs into the U.S. The polygraph pass rate for new applicants tumbled to 33% in 2012 from 58% four years earlier. While the accuracy of the tests came under scrutiny, one applicant admitted that his brother-in-law, a known Mexican drug smuggler, asked him to use his employment to facilitate cocaine trafficking. Another admitted to using marijuana 9,000 times, including the night before the exam. A 2015 Homeland Security report found that the number of investigators assigned to internal wrongdoing was 'woefully inadequate' for the agency's growth. "Any time you have massive political pressure to beef up overnight, it never turns out well," said T.J. Bonner, the former president of the Border Patrol agents union who retired in 2011. "Too many corners have to be cut. Then when things go wrong. the fingers get pointed.' Stiff competition for qualified applicants ICE and Homeland Security did not respond to questions about lessons that the Border Patrol's hiring spree or detailed plans for hiring at ICE. 'The unprecedented funding for ICE will enable my hard-working officers and agents to continue making America safe again by identifying, arresting and removing criminal aliens from our communities,' Todd Lyons, the acting ICE director, said after Trump signed the bill. Critics say the administration's policy to target anyone in the country illegally, not just those with criminal records, could lead to abuses. Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff and lead architect of his immigration policies, had set an aggressive target of at least 3,000 arrests a day even before any additional hiring. 'When there are no priorities, everybody's a priority,' said Nayna Gupta, policy director of the American Immigration Council. 'You're very likely to see confusion, delay, wrongful arrest, more mistakes when law enforcement agencies, especially large ones, don't have clear direction and guidance for prioritization.' Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum, said competition for qualified law enforcement is tough, with departments now offering signing bonuses of $10,000 to $100,000. Border Patrol staffing has yet to return to its peaks of the early 2010s. Trump tried to increase staffing in his first term. A contract with consulting firm Accenture PLC cost $13.6 million to set up in 2018 and resulted in only two hires over 10 months. Trump's bill allocates about $170 billion for border and immigration enforcement, with $4.1 billion for CBP hiring that includes 3,000 more Border Patrol agents. It comes at a time of historically low crossings after they reached a record high in December 2023. ___ Spagat reported from San Diego.

Meta investors settle $8bn lawsuit with Zuckerberg over Facebook privacy
Meta investors settle $8bn lawsuit with Zuckerberg over Facebook privacy

BBC News

time11 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Meta investors settle $8bn lawsuit with Zuckerberg over Facebook privacy

Mark Zuckerberg and Meta have agreed to settle a multibillion dollar lawsuit with shareholders over how the top executives handled repeated privacy violations by Facebook, US media shareholders were seeking $8bn (£6bn) in damages. It is unclear how much they agreed to settle settlement was announced on Thursday by a lawyer for the shareholders, just before the trial was about to enter its second day in a Delaware court. Meta declined to comment on the settlement.A group of Meta shareholders had alleged that Mr Zuckerberg's actions led to the Cambridge Analytica scandal in which the data of millions of Facebook users was leaked and used by a political consulting firm. The shareholders had asked the judge to order the 11 defendants named in the case to reimburse Meta for more than $8bn in fines and legal costs, which they say Facebook has had to pay in order to resolve claims of users' privacy lawsuit was filed after it was revealed that data from millions of Facebook users was accessed by Cambridge Analytica, a political consulting firm that worked for President Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign. Among the defendants is Jeffrey Zients, who served as Meta director for two years starting in May 2018, and was also former President Joe Biden's White House chief of defendants include Peter Thiel, co-founder of Palantir Technologies, and Reed Hastings, co-founder of Netflix.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store