
From deference to duty, let's reclaim our civic conscience
He wasn't joking. He wanted Kuala Lumpur City Hall to swing into action with the same urgency it showed in Bukit Tunku. The moment the king spoke, the city's machinery roared to life. Roads were swept, bushes trimmed, and the air itself seemed to freshen.
But here's the uncomfortable question: must we always wait for a royal walkabout or a ministerial convoy before the gears of local government start turning?
This isn't new. Since Merdeka, village elders and heads of residents' associations have learnt a peculiar trick: if you want a road resurfaced, engineer a visit from a VIP. Once the convoy is confirmed, the local authorities or the Public Works Department will spring into action.
By morning, the village or 'taman' proudly shows off its fresh coat of tar as if the asphalt itself was summoned by protocol. The message is painfully clear: without someone watching, little moves.
But must civic responsibility be an act of deference instead of a daily habit? Must we outsource our conscience to kings, prime ministers or politically connected local chiefs?
There's an old proverb worth remembering: "He who shirks his duty today will find it heavier tomorrow." And of course, Spiderman's Uncle Ben nailed it: "With great power comes great responsibility." Even Churchill knew the score: "The price of greatness is responsibility."
Dr Rahim Said, a self-described behaviourist and astute observer of our civic landscape, offers a deeper lens. He points to the Islamic concept of fardhu kifayah — the communal obligation that demands society collectively take responsibility for what must be done, lest the entire community be held accountable for neglect.
"It is a call to action," he says, "not just for public servants, but for ordinary citizens — to tend to their streets, their rivers, their neighbourhoods. Not in anticipation of a king's visit, but because it is only right."
In other words, we don't need another royal stroll to remind us of what we already know. We need a work ethic rooted in quality and a moral compass guided by a shared sense of duty.
The implications are profound. If we continue to outsource our conscience to rulers and politicians, we remain a nation of spectators — watching, waiting, hoping someone else will care enough to act.
And speaking of outsourcing, an accountant in his 80s who once ran several public-listed companies offered a sobering insight: the rot runs deeper. Many local councils have outsourced their basic responsibilities to external contractors. These recipients of government largesse have grown fat, while the actual work is handed over to cheap foreign labour whose worldview of cleanliness may differ vastly from ours.
It's a vicious cycle. Even if a well-meaning officer notices something amiss, they may stay silent. Why? Because their superior might be the "link" to the outsourcing company.
A former cabinet minister once lamented that it's nearly impossible to get some of his poorest-educated constituents hired for menial jobs in local councils. "They're earnest," he said. "They're willing to do the dirty work. But I'm always told — there are no vacancies."
So, many foreigners fly into KLIA, and the locals are left to hustle for something else, hopefully not crime.
Perhaps it's time for a deeper reckoning. We need to cultivate a culture where it's no longer necessary for a king or prime minister to see what we should never tolerate. The Madani government certainly has to start tweaking where it matters most and perhaps kill several birds with one stone.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Report on states' competency to enact Islamic laws presented to rulers
Religious affairs minister Na'im Mokhtar said the report was presented to the Conference of Rulers at their 269th meeting last week. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : The findings of a study on the competency of state assemblies to enact Islamic laws under state enactments has been presented to the rulers, says religious affairs minister Na'im Mokhtar. Na'im said the report prepared by a special committee had been presented to the National Council for Islamic Religious Affairs (MKI) chaired by Perak's Sultan Nazrin Shah on July 1. It was also presented to the Conference of Rulers when it held its 269th meeting on July 16, he said in a written parliamentary reply. The report followed studies, discussions and engagements with the various states' head of shariah courts, muftis, Islamic councils as well as representatives from Islamic institutions and other religions. Na'im said the recommendations outlined in the special committee's report will first be studied by the government before further action is taken, partly to look into the need for legal amendments to be tabled in Parliament. 'This is to ensure that every legal amendment enacted, especially those that touches on federal and state jurisdictions, are clear, organised and in line with the Federal Constitution, other laws that are in force, and shariah laws. 'This is to ensure that the amendments are legitimate and will not be questioned by any party once it comes to effect,' he said. The minister said recommendations involving matters under Putrajaya's jurisdiction will first be brought to the Cabinet. Recommendations involving matters under the purview of the respective states are subject to the agreement of the state governments, he added. In August 2023, then MKI chairman Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah of Selangor ordered for the special panel to conduct an in-depth study on the competency of state assemblies to enact Islamic laws under state enactments and the jurisdiction of the shariah courts. He said this was due to the number of cases under the jurisdiction of shariah courts being challenged in the Federal Court. In an 8-1 majority decision last year, the Federal Court struck down 16 provisions in the Kelantan Syariah Criminal Code (I) Enactment 2019 on the grounds of their unconstitutionality. Then chief justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat said the state assembly had no authority to pass the provisions as part of the enactment, as the offences in question were covered under federal law.


The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
Pengkalan Kubor ferry fees validation bill tabled in Dewan Rakyat
KUALA LUMPUR: The Fees (Pengkalan Kubor Ferry) (Validation) Bill 2025 was tabled for its first reading in the Dewan Rakyat today. The bill aims to validate the collection of ferry service fees between Pengkalan Kubor in Malaysia and Takbai in Thailand. Minister of Works Datuk Seri Alexander Nanta Linggi confirmed that the second and third readings will follow during the current parliamentary session. The bill covers fees collected by the Public Works Department from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2024, which were deposited into the Consolidated Fund. Additionally, the bill provides legal protection, stating that no legal action can be taken against the Malaysian government or its officers regarding the fees collected during the specified period. - Bernama


New Straits Times
8 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Beyond political theatre: Recognising the Auditor General's competence
LETTERS: It is both disappointing and ironic that, in a time when we should be celebrating the institutional strength of independent audit and accountability, the appointment of Auditor General Wan Suraya Wan Radzi has come under fire from some politicians, not for failing in her duties, but for excelling at them while refusing to play political cheerleader. To suggest that her appointment is "tainted" simply because she is a civil servant is both legally unfounded and ethically disingenuous. Article 105 of the Federal Constitution clearly provides for the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to appoint the Auditor General on the advice of the Prime Minister — after consultation with the Conference of Rulers. This process was duly followed. The idea that a civil servant, by default, lacks independence is an insult not only to her professionalism but to the integrity of the Malaysian Civil Service as a whole. In fact, the suggestion that only retirees are "independent" is laughable. Since when did age or retirement status become the gold standard for objectivity? Is independence defined by being out of service — or by having the strength to serve without fear or favour? Wan Suraya brings with her 29 years of administrative service, deep knowledge of government operations, and a track record unmarred by scandal. If anything, this positions her to understand — and scrutinise — government mechanisms with greater precision than someone parachuted in from outside with no institutional insight. As a communications professional, I must also highlight that this debate reflects a larger challenge — the erosion of ethics and integrity in public discourse. True communication isn't just about broadcasting opinions; it is about educating the public with context, accuracy, and respect for institutions. When we distort narratives for political mileage, we not only mislead the public but undermine trust in democratic processes. Ethical communication, especially in public service, must be upheld — not attacked — if we are to strengthen national confidence and civic understanding. And let's talk about this so-called "cheerleading" for Madani. If public servants attending a national event or sharing an official Facebook post constitutes propaganda, then we might as well shut down every government event since Merdeka. By that logic, any participation in public discourse becomes a conflict of interest. Perhaps next we'll be told that liking a post on workplace safety makes you unfit to investigate construction sites. Let us be clear: auditors are not monks, nor are they mute. Their duty is not to hide in a cave until summoned — it is to engage with governance, communicate transparently, and uphold public trust. Selective outrage over a social media post, or over a conflict of interest exemption that is both legitimate and previously exercised under certain contexts, reeks more of political theatre than constitutional concern. Instead of applauding the fact that the National Audit Department continues to produce thorough, timely reports, certain quarters would rather question the messenger — simply because the message is inconvenient. To the critics: if your goal is to discredit institutional integrity, do so with facts — not conjecture laced with sarcasm and double standards. And please, let's not pretend this is about transparency when it is clearly about politics. Malaysia doesn't need a silent Auditor General. It needs a courageous, competent, and constitutionally appointed one. And, fortunately, it has one.