SC asks for Centre's response, says states need designated courts to try special offences
New Delhi, Saying it was imperative on the Centre and states to establish courts for the speedy trial of cases under special laws, the Supreme Court has sought their stand in two weeks.
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh was acting on the bail plea of a Naxal sympathiser from Gadchiroli in Maharashtra. He was booked after 15 policemen of a quick response team were killed in a blast in the state.
"Additional solicitor general of India has referred to the affidavit filed by respondent 2 - National Investigation Agency. We are, however, of the view that when trials are to take place under special laws, it is imperative on the Union or States to establish specialised courts with adequate infrastructure for ensuring speedy trial, for achieving the legislative object of the statute," the bench said in its order of May 9.
ASG Rajkumar Bhaskar Thakre was, therefore, granted two weeks to obtain instructions on the matter as the bench posted the hearing on May 23.
The top court asked the Centre and Maharashtra government why couldn't they conduct a judicial impact assessment of the special statutes after enactment of the laws and said adequate judicial infrastructure was required for the speedy disposal of cases.
"We have been saying time and again that where are the judges and courts? How can you conduct an expeditious trial in serious cases if you burden the existing judges with additional cases under special statutes? I am very clear in my mind that if you want to prosecute under special laws, then first create adequate judicial infrastructure and appoint judges," Justice Kant said.
Thakre said a proposal on establishing special courts was sent to the government and was pending consideration but Justice Kant asked why was the state not providing a special court to decide sensitive cases such as the one at hand with significant ramifications.
Thakre then sought time to get back with instructions prompting the court to adjourn the matter.
The top court had previously noted due to delay in completion of trial, those accused in heinous offences took advantage of bail as trials couldn't go on indefinitely.
The top court was hearing a plea of one Kailash Ramchandani after the Bombay High Court rejected his bail plea on March 5, 2024.
He contended he had been in jail since 2019 and while charges hadn't been framed in the case so far, the co-accused had been granted bail.
The high court in its order recorded Ramchandani was booked under various sections of IPC, Arms Act, Maharashtra Police Act, MCOCA and UA in 2019 after 15 police personnel of the quick response team were killed in a blast at Kurkheda-Purada Road, Gadchiroli, while travelling in a vehicle on May 1, 2019.
The case was subsequently transferred to the National Investigation Agency which booked Ramchandani and others.
Ramchandani allegedly informed one of the co-accused about the police vehicle from one spot for the blast to be executed.
"It is evident that mere delay in the trial pertaining to grave offences, by itself cannot be a ground to enlarge an accused on bail, dehors the facts. We cannot be oblivious of the fact that 15 police personnel were killed in a mine blast, which took place on May 1, 2019," the high court ruled.
The order said the material placed by the prosecution on record prima facie indicated the complicity of the appellant in the conspiracy.
"The statements on record show that the appellant was in touch with the naxals. That he would visit the jungle and had informed the co-accused of the passing of the police vehicle on the fateful day. Thus, we find that the appellant had knowingly facilitated the commission of a terrorist act," it added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
MP HC commutes murder charge to culpable homicide, orders release of accused
Bhopal: A division bench of the Madhya Pradesh high court reduced the charge of murder against a woman accused of killing her husband to culpable homicide. The charge against her wife of father's elder brother (tai) was also reduced likewise, while her brother's wife was absolved of the charge. The accused, Rajkumari, and two other women from her parental family were found guilty of the murder of Rajkumari's husband by a sessions court at Sagar and sentenced to life. Since the wife was in jail for 10 years and her tai remained in jail for 9 years before being released on bail, the court stated that they already served the sentence for culpable homicide and should be released from jail forthwith. Rajkumari was charged with murder for throwing boiling water on her husband, causing his death during treatment. Her bhabhi, Rati, and tai, Ramsakhi, were co-accused in the case. In their criminal revision petition, Rajkumari and Ramsakhi argued that the deceased died after being discharged from the hospital following treatment. They contended that, at worst, they could be convicted for culpable homicide and not murder. On the other hand, Rajkumari's bhabhi, Rati, argued that the deceased did not name her in his dying declaration, so she should be absolved of the charge altogether. The bench of Justice Atul Sreedharan and Justice Anuradha Shukla found that Rajkumari's husband died 10 days after being discharged from the hospital due to septicemia, and Rati's name does not appear in the names taken by the deceased in his dying declaration. The court reduced the charges against Rajkumari and Ramsakhi to culpable homicide under section 304 of the IPC from section 302 and acquitted the third accused.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Tamil Nadu sees Blue Economy as a powerful tool to bring sustainable prosperity to coastal districts
Of late, there has been a growing buzz around the blue economy in Tamil Nadu power corridors. The phrase implies economic activities associated with the ocean, seas and coastal regions, which includes shipbuilding, processing and exporting of seafood, and coastal tourism. Tamil Nadu boasts of having the second longest coastline in India (after Gujarat). But the resource hasn't been tapped to a satisfactory extent. And that is something the TN govt is out to fix. "As TN charts its course towards our CM's (M K Stalin) ambition of a $1 trillion economy, the Blue Economy presents some of the most exciting opportunities. Despite having the second longest coastline in India, we believe our coast is still underutilized from an economic standpoint. This is something we are now addressing with urgency through a vision laid out by our CM," said T R B Rajaa, TN Minister for Industries. "We see the Blue Economy as a powerful tool to bring sustainable prosperity to our coastal districts, through investments that create large job opportunities for both skilled and semi-skilled talents," he added. The state's approach is strategic and focused on three key areas – shipbuilding, seafood processing and coastal tourism. Each of these has the potential to dramatically transform livelihoods and local economies. "The key strategy is maximizing the potential of TN's long coastline. Besides the focus areas, we could tap the state's port facilities spread across its coast. Shipbuilding is an area that has drawn the attention of the Centre as well. The Centre has ambitious plans to be part of the top five shipbuilding nations by 2047. In February, during the Union Budget 2025, a key maritime sector announcement was regarding the establishment of the ₹25,000 crore Maritime Development Fund (MDF) to support long-term investments in the sector. The other big ticket takeaway was the introduction of the revamped Shipbuilding Financial Assistance Policy (SBFAP 2.0) to encourage more participation in shipbuilding activities. With an improved outlay of ₹18,090 crore, this policy is aimed at strengthening domestic shipyards and enhancing their global competitiveness. Tamil Nadu is also working on a Marine Transport policy which could be out in a month, and this could generate a lot of economic opportunities," said Darez Ahamed, MD & CEO, Guidance Tamil Nadu. To understand the potential offered by shipbuilding - consider that just one anchor investor can unlock an entire value chain of MSMEs in welding, precision engineering, logistics and marine services. The state has already initiated talks with global players to set up shipbuilding facilities in TN. As per sources, the order books of these international operators are packed till 2032. On its part, the state must provide the infrastructure needed to help them to establish their units here. For every job created inside the shopfloor of a shipbuilding company, seven jobs will be created outside. That's the potential it offers, say stakeholders. In the seafood sector, TN is no longer content with being just a supplier of raw catch. The game plan now is to build end-to-end infrastructure for seafood processing, cold chains and export-quality packaging, ensuring that value addition happens right here in the state's fishing hamlets, creating better incomes and sustainable livelihoods for the coastal communities. Infrastructure, especially roads connecting the coastal belt, cold chains along the TN coast, availability of power for these cold chains, mapping the wasteland on the coast, utilizing it adequately for growth of marine food and processing industries, are some of the key areas TN should focus on, said a leading consultant for the marine food industry, on condition of anonymity. "We will be addressing all the issues that have been holding back the growth of the seafood industry in Tamil Nadu, vis-a-vis neighbouring states including Andhra Pradesh, which accounts for Rs 26,000 crore worth seafood exports as against TN's Rs 8,000 crore. We would soon match the best performing states in this sector," a TN govt official said. Coastal tourism is a major plus point. Tamil Nadu's coast is beautiful, diverse and rich in culture, but it remains largely unexplored. The state is developing a blueprint to unlock this through sustainable, community-led tourism, which will entail eco-friendly resorts, avenues for water-based recreational activities and support for local entrepreneurship. The aim is to make the coast a world-class destination; while keeping it rooted in tradition. "To ensure this transformation is inclusive, we plan to skill the youth in coastal regions through initiatives under the Naan Mudhalvan programme. We want our coastal communities to be more than beneficiaries. They must be the driving force behind this change. Tamil Nadu's Blue Economy strategy is also about building a just, green and resilient future for our coastal communities, and we are committed to making it a reality," Rajaa said. So, of the three segments that have got the special focus under the Blue Economy strategy, which one might get a head start? "We would like all three to take off big-time, since the opportunities are significant. But realistically, the first shipbuilding could take off in just about a year from now," says Guidance Tamil Nadu's Ahamed. That's just on the horizon.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Citing lack of evidence, Telangana high court acquits three in drugs case
Hyderabad: The Telangana high court quashed a drugs case registered in 2022 at Bolarum against three people, including a BPO employee and his friends. While hearing a petition filed by the trio, the high court observed that they could not be held responsible based solely on the confession of the other accused, especially in the absence of any corroborative evidence. Hence, the continuation of criminal proceedings against the trio is nothing but an abuse of the process of law, the court said while quashing the FIR. Delivering the judgment, Justice K Sujana noted that the police failed to collect any evidence linking the petitioners to the alleged crime apart from the confession of another accused. The police also did not send the seized mobile phones of the three petitioners to the FSL for analysis, nor were their blood samples sent for medical examination to prove that they consumed the alleged drugs, the judge remarked. 'In view of the observations based on the Supreme Court judgments, the trio cannot be held liable for the alleged crime,' said Justice Sujana. The prosecution contended that the accused were transporting hash oil from Visakhapatnam and supplying it to users in the city. The police caught two individuals, and six hash oil tins and Rs 1,500 cash were also seized from them. However, counsel for the petitioners argued that no drugs were found in possession of the petitioners, nor were they involved in sourcing any prohibited narcotic drugs. 'Falsely implicated' 'They were falsely implicated in the case solely based on the confession of one of the accused. Even according to the Supreme Court in the Tofan Singh vs State of Tamil Nadu case, this evidence is not admissible,' the counsel for the petitioner argued.
