'It's him, it's him!' — Mother spots son deported from US in mega-prison footage
It had been 18 months since he had migrated to the US to begin a new life but he had told her that he was now being deported back to Caracas, Venezuela's capital, for being in the US illegally. They had spoken that morning, just before he was due to depart.
"I thought it was a good sign that he was being deported [to Caracas]," Myrelis Casique López recalled. She wanted him home.
But he never arrived. And while watching a television news report on Sunday, Ms Casique was shocked to see her son, not in the US or Venezuela but 1,430 miles (2,300km) away in El Salvador.
The footage showed 238 Venezuelans sent by US authorities to the Terrorism Confinement Centre, or Cecot, a notorious mega-jail. She saw men with shaved heads and shackles on their hands and feet, being forcefully escorted by heavily-armed security forces.
The Trump administration says all of the deportees are members of the Tren de Aragua gang, which has found itself in the White House's crosshairs. The powerful multi-national crime group, which Trump recently declared a foreign terrorist organization, has been accused of sex trafficking, drug smuggling and murders both at home and in major US cities.
Ms Casique told the BBC she was certain her son was among the detainees, even if no official list of names has been released.
"It's him. It's him," she said, gesturing at a picture in which a man is seated, with his head bowed, on a prison floor alongside a row of others, a tattoo visible on his arm. "I recognize his features."
She also maintains that he is innocent.
US immigration officials have said the detainees were "carefully vetted" and verified as gang members before being flown to El Salvador. They said they used evidence collected during surveillance, police encounters or testimonies from victims to vet them.
"Our job is to send the terrorists out before anyone else gets raped or murdered," Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said on Wednesday.
Many of the deportees do not have US criminal records, however, a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) official acknowledged in court documents. And they were deported under a law last invoked during wartime that doesn't require them to be charged with a crime.
Those who do have criminal records include migrants with arrests on charges ranging from murder, fentanyl trafficking and kidnapping to home invasion and operating a gang-run brothel, according to the Trump administration.
In García's case, his mother disputes that her son was involved in criminal activity. He left Venezuela in 2019, first to Peru, seeking new opportunities as overlapping economic, political and social crises engulfed the country, she said. He crossed illegally into the US in September 2023.
His mother has not seen him in person in six years.
"He doesn't belong to any criminal gang, either in the US or in Venezuela... he's not a criminal," Ms Casique said. "What he's been is a barber."
"Unfortunately, he has tattoos," she added, convinced that the roses and names of family members that adorn his body led to his detention and deportation. That is how she, and other family members, recognised him from pictures released of the deportees in El Salvador.
A young man with a shaved head and goatee kneels, while a soldier in khakis holds onto his shoulder
Image from the video released by President Nayib Bukele showing Mervin Yamarte in the Cecot mega-prison in El Salvador
Several other families have said they believe that deportees were mistakenly identified as Tren de Aragua gang members because of their tattoos.
"It's him," Ms Casique said tearfully in Maracay, referencing the image from the prison. "I wish it wasn't him... he didn't deserve to be transferred there."
The mother of Mervin Yamarte, 29, also identified her son in the video.
"I threw myself on the floor, saying that God couldn't do this to my son," she told the BBC from her home in the Los Pescadores neighbourhood of Maracaibo, Venezuela.
Like Ms Casique, she denies her son was involved with the brutal gang. He had left his hometown and travelled to the US through the Darién Gap, crossing illegally in 2023 with three of his friends: Edwar Herrera, 23; Andy Javier Perozo, 30; and Ringo Rincón, 39.
The BBC spoke with their families and friends, who said they had spotted the four men in the footage from the El Salvador jail.
Yamarte's mother said her son had worked in a tortilla factory, sometimes working 12-hour shifts. On Sundays, he played football with his friends, who all shared a home in Dallas, Texas.
"He's a good, noble young man. There's a mistake," she said.
'We're terrified'
President Trump invoked a centuries-old law, the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, to deport the men without due process in the US, saying they were Tren de Aragua gang members.
Despite the US government's assurances that the deportees were carefully vetted, the move has had a chilling effect on many Venezuelans and Venezuelan-Americans in the US, who fear that Trump's use of the law could lead to more Venezuelans being accused and swiftly deported without any charges or convictions.
"Of course we're afraid. We're terrified," said Adelys Ferro, the executive-director of the Venezuelan-American Caucus, an advocacy group. "We want every single member of TdA to pay for their crimes. But we don't know what the criteria is."
"They [Venezeulans] are living in uncertain times," she said. "They don't know what decisions to make — even people with documents and have been here for years."
Ms Ferro's concerns were echoed by Brian de la Vega, a prominent Florida-based, Venezuela-born immigration lawyer and military veteran.
Many of his clients are in the Miami area, including Doral — a suburb sometimes given the moniker "Doralzuela" for its large Venezuelan population.
"The majority of Venezuelans in the US are trying to do the right thing. They fear going back to their home country," de la Vega told the BBC. "The main concern, for me, is how they're identifying these members. The standard is very low."
Many Venezuelan expatriates in the US — particularly South Florida — have been broadly supportive of Trump, who has taken a tough stance on the left-wing government of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro which many of them fled.
But in February, the Trump administration terminated Temporary Protected Status — TPS — for Venezuelans, which had shielded many from deportation. The programme officially ends on 7 April and could impact nearly 350,000 Venezuelan nationals living in the US.
"Trump's speeches have always been strong about the Venezuelan regime, especially during the campaign," de la Vega said. "I don't think people expected all this."
Daniel Campo, a Venezuelan-born naturalized US citizen in Pennsylvania — and ardent Trump supporter — told the BBC that while he remains steadfast in his support of the president, he has some concerns about the deportations to El Salvador and the end of TPS.
"I certainly hope that when they are doing raids to deport Tren de Aragua, especially to the prison in El Salvador, they are being extra careful," he said.
Among those caught by surprise by the end of TPS and the recent deportations is a 25-year-old Venezuelan man who asked to be identified only as Yilber, who arrived in the US in 2022 after a long, dangerous journey through Central America and Mexico.
He's now in the US — but unsure about what comes next.
"I left Venezuela because of the repression, and the insecurity. My neighborhood in Caracas had gangs," he said. "Now I don't know what's going to happen here." — BBC
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
6 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Netanyahu rejects governing Gaza, Trump–Putin talks planned & UK migrant detentions
On W News Extra with Leigh-Ann Gerrans, we're joined by Freddy Gray from The Spectator and broadcaster and journalist Isabel Webster. We discuss Netanyahu's cabinet meeting to approve the full occupation of Gaza, President Trump considering the UAE for the upcoming meeting with Putin, and Trump's tariffs hitting over 90 countries.
Leaders
9 hours ago
- Leaders
Trump Tariffs Take Toll on Dozens of Countries
The 'reciprocal' tariffs announced by the US President, Donald Trump, on imports coming from over 90 countries worldwide have come into force. At 12:01 am Thursday in Washington, the sweeping tariffs took effect, minutes after Trump claimed on Truth Social that billions of dollars were now flowing into the US as a result of his import taxes. Trump first announced the duties in April, pausing many of which later to give countries a chance to strike deals with Washington as the tariffs announcement caused global economic turbulence. Since then, Trump adjusted the rates for several countries before setting a negotiating deadline of August 7, according to BBC. Both India and Brazil have taken the hardest blows, with 50% tariffs on each. India's duties, which will take effect on August 27, are tied to purchasing oil from Russia, while Brazil's levies are linked to the prosecution of former President, Jair Bolsonaro. Tariffs on other countries range from 10% to 41%, with negotiations under way to secure trade deals with Washington. War-torn Syria faces a 41% levy. South East Asian export-dependent economies are among the most affected, as Laos and Myanmar each face 40% tariffs. Switzerland also faces a 39% levy, one of the highest rates. Tariffs on Canada and China are 35% and 30%, respectively. Moreover, Trump warned he would impose a 100% tariff on foreign-made semiconductor chips, to press tech companies to increase investments in the US. Countries such as the UK, Japan and South Korea struck deals with the US to secure a reduced tariff rate. Similarly, the European Union (EU) reached a framework agreement, imposing a 15% tariff rate on European exports to the US. Meanwhile, China is holding talks with the US to extend its 90-day tariff pause due to expire on August 12, 2025. Short link : Post Views: 7
Arab News
12 hours ago
- Arab News
Harvard scientists say research could be set back years after funding freeze
CAMBRIDGE: Harvard University professor Alberto Ascherio's research is literally frozen. Collected from millions of US soldiers over two decades using millions of dollars from taxpayers, the epidemiology and nutrition scientist has blood samples stored in liquid nitrogen freezers within the university's T.H. Chan School of Public Health. The samples are key to his award-winning research, which seeks a cure to multiple sclerosis and other neurodegenerative diseases. But for months, Ascherio has been unable to work with the samples because he lost $7 million in federal research funding, a casualty of Harvard's fight with the Trump administration. 'It's like we have been creating a state-of-the-art telescope to explore the universe, and now we don't have money to launch it,' said Ascherio. 'We built everything and now we are ready to use it to make a new discovery that could impact millions of people in the world and then, 'Poof. You're being cut off.'' Researchers laid off and science shelved The loss of an estimated $2.6 billion in federal funding at Harvard has meant that some of the world's most prominent researchers are laying off young researchers. They are shelving years or even decades of research, into everything from opioid addiction to cancer. And despite Harvard's lawsuits against the administration, and settlement talks between the warring parties, researchers are confronting the fact that some of their work may never resume. The funding cuts are part of a monthslong battle that the Trump administration has waged against some the country's top universities including Columbia, Brown and Northwestern. The administration has taken a particularly aggressive stance against Harvard, freezing funding after the country's oldest university rejected a series of government demands issued by a federal antisemitism task force. The government had demanded sweeping changes at Harvard related to campus protests, academics and admissions — meant to address government accusations that the university had become a hotbed of liberalism and tolerated anti-Jewish harassment. Research jeopardized, even if court case prevails Harvard responded by filing a federal lawsuit, accusing the Trump administration of waging a retaliation campaign against the university. In the lawsuit, it laid out reforms it had taken to address antisemitism but also vowed not to 'surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights.' 'Make no mistake: Harvard rejects antisemitism and discrimination in all of its forms and is actively making structural reforms to eradicate antisemitism on campus,' the university said in its legal complaint. 'But rather than engage with Harvard regarding those ongoing efforts, the Government announced a sweeping freeze of funding for medical, scientific, technological, and other research that has nothing at all to do with antisemitism.' The Trump administration denies the cuts were made in retaliation, saying the grants were under review even before the demands were sent in April. It argues the government has wide discretion to cancel federal contracts for policy reasons. The funding cuts have left Harvard's research community in a state of shock, feeling as if they are being unfairly targeted in a fight has nothing to do with them. Some have been forced to shutter labs or scramble to find nongovernment funding to replace lost money. In May, Harvard announced that it would put up at least $250 million of its own money to continue research efforts, but university President Alan Garber warned of 'difficult decisions and sacrifices' ahead. Ascherio said the university was able to pull together funding to pay his researchers' salaries until next June. But he's still been left without resources needed to fund critical research tasks, like lab work. Even a year's delay can put his research back five years, he said. Knowledge lost in funding freeze 'It's really devastating,' agreed Rita Hamad, the director of the Social Policies for Health Equity Research Center at Harvard, who had three multiyear grants totaling $10 million canceled by the Trump administration. The grants funded research into the impact of school segregation on heart health, how pandemic-era policies in over 250 counties affected mental health, and the role of neighborhood factors in dementia. At the School of Public Health, where Hamad is based, 190 grants have been terminated, affecting roughly 130 scientists. 'Just thinking about all the knowledge that's not going to be gained or that is going to be actively lost,' Hamad said. She expects significant layoffs on her team if the funding freeze continues for a few more months. 'It's all just a mixture of frustration and anger and sadness all the time, every day.' John Quackenbush, a professor of computational biology and bioinformatics at the School of Public Health, has spent the past few months enduring cuts on multiple fronts. In April, a multimillion dollar grant was not renewed, jeopardizing a study into the role sex plays in disease. In May, he lost about $1.2 million in federal funding for in the coming year due to the Harvard freeze. Four departmental grants worth $24 million that funded training of doctoral students also were canceled as part of the fight with the Trump administration, Quackenbush said. 'I'm in a position where I have to really think about, 'Can I revive this research?'' he said. 'Can I restart these programs even if Harvard and the Trump administration reached some kind of settlement? If they do reach a settlement, how quickly can the funding be turned back on? Can it be turned back on?' The researchers all agreed that the funding cuts have little or nothing to do with the university's fight against antisemitism. Some, however, argue changes at Harvard were long overdue and pressure from the Trump administration was necessary. Bertha Madras, a Harvard psychobiologist who lost funding to create a free, parent-focused training to prevent teen opioid overdose and drug use, said she's happy to see the culling of what she called 'politically motivated social science studies.' White House pressure a good thing? Madras said pressure from the White House has catalyzed much-needed reform at the university, where several programs of study have 'really gone off the wall in terms of being shaped by orthodoxy that is not representative of the country as a whole.' But Madras, who served on the President's Commission on Opioids during Trump's first term, said holding scientists' research funding hostage as a bargaining chip doesn't make sense. 'I don't know if reform would have happened without the president of the United States pointing the bony finger at Harvard,' she said. 'But sacrificing science is problematic, and it's very worrisome because it is one of the major pillars of strength of the country.' Quackenbush and other Harvard researchers argue the cuts are part of a larger attack on science by the Trump administration that puts the country's reputation as the global research leader at risk. Support for students and post-doctoral fellows has been slashed, visas for foreign scholars threatened, and new guidelines and funding cuts at the NIH will make it much more difficult to get federal funding in the future, they said. It also will be difficult to replace federal funding with money from the private sector. 'We're all sort of moving toward this future in which this 80-year partnership between the government and the universities is going to be jeopardized,' Quackenbush said. 'We're going to face real challenges in continuing to lead the world in scientific excellence.'
