Illinois House passes bill to automatically seal criminal records of nonviolent offenders
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (WTVO) — The Illinois House has passed the Clean Slate Act, which would automatically seal criminal records of those convicted of nonviolent felonies.
The bill, which has been debated in the statehouse for years, would seal the records for offenders only if they served their punishment and were not convicted of another crime within the three years following their release.
Currently, convicted criminals are barred from many careers and certifications due to their felony convictions.
Assistant Majority Leader Jehan Gordon-Booth (D-92nd Dist), who authored the bill, said, 'After more than six years working on this legislation, I am thrilled to see the Clean Slate Act pass the House today. Too many Illinoisans who have served their time and paid their dues to society are still struggling to get access to the housing and employment opportunities that can set them on the pathway to success. By automatically sealing records for nonviolent offenders, we can help these individuals rebuild their lives, improve public safety, and address the workforce shortages facing businesses across our state.'
The bill now heads to the Senate.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate Environment and Public Works panel releases ‘big beautiful bill' text
The Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee released text for its portion of the Trump legislative agenda policy bill that Republicans are trying to get across the finish line, becoming the first Senate panel to do so. The EPW bill appears similar to provisions passed by the House. It's not one of the committees that deals with thorny issues like Medicaid or energy tax credits that is likely to undergo changes in the upper chamber. Like the House version of the bill, the text released by Senate Republicans on Wednesday repeals numerous green programs passed by the Democrats in 2022. This includes a $20 billion program that seeks to provide financing for climate-friendly projects and a $3 billion program that provides grants for underserved communities that want to fight air pollution and climate change. It also repeals other grant programs related to air pollution monitoring and reducing air pollution at schools – as well as a program that seeks to charge oil and gas companies for their excess methane emissions. Like the House version, the Senate bill also includes a provision criticized by Democrats as 'pay-for-play' that allows companies to pay for expedited reviews of energy or other infrastructure projects. And it seeks to repeal a Biden-era regulation that's expected to push the auto market toward selling more electric vehicles. The ultimate text could still change as the parliamentarian has to decide which programs can actually be passed through reconciliation – a process by which the Senate can pass legislation with a simple majority instead of the 60 votes it usually needs. However, since the green programs it seeks to repeal were passed in a similar manner in 2022, those are likely to make it into the final version. 'This legislative text puts in motion plans that Senate Republicans pledged to take, like stopping Democrats' natural gas tax and rescinding unobligated dollars from the so-called Inflation Reduction Act,' said EPW Chair Shelley Moore Capito ( in a written statement. 'I look forward to working with my colleagues to move our legislative package forward to enact President Trump's agenda, which the American people overwhelmingly support,' she added.


New York Post
18 minutes ago
- New York Post
Our ‘big, beautiful bill' will provide New Yorkers tax relief they desperately need
Whether it's a constituent contacting my office, shaking my hand along a parade route, coming up to me at Sunday mass or sitting next to me at the barbershop, the one issue I hear more than any other is how damn hard it is for people to make ends meet in the Hudson Valley. The affordability crisis is real, and it's severe. Well, here's some good news: The House just took a significant step toward doing something about it. The passage of HR 1, a k a 'the Big, Beautiful Bill,' quadrupled the SALT cap to $40,000 and is poised to deliver significant tax relief to nearly every home and business owner in the Hudson Valley (and beyond). It was a hard-fought victory for middle-class and working families, already drowning under the tax-and-spend policies in Albany that have made New York the highest-taxed state in the nation. Quadrupling the SALT cap will be a lifeline for the teachers, nurses, small-business owners and first responders who keep our communities strong, and for all of the working-class families and retirees on fixed incomes across the Hudson Valley. That's why I took on House leadership and members of my party to secure this win, and to block efforts to cut the federal share of Medicaid funding to the state. These changes would have resulted in a massive tax increase. For those who falsely claim lifting the SALT cap was only a tax cut for the rich, that's a bunch of bull. Over 93% of Hudson Valley home and business owners will see a tax cut if this bill is signed into law. Those are the facts. Better still, we achieved more than just increasing the SALT cap to help ease the affordability crisis for local families and seniors. The bill eliminates federal taxes on tips and taxes on overtime pay, directly helping restaurant workers, firefighters and other hourly employees who rely on these earnings. It prevents a looming middle-class tax hike by preserving key provisions from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, like the $2,500 Child Tax Credit for nearly 88,000 families in NY-17 and the Small Business Deduction for over 78,000 businesses in our district. Without this legislation, families earning our district's median income would have faced a tax increase of nearly $4,000 starting next year. We also made health care more affordable by preventing harmful cuts to safety-net hospitals, boosting physician reimbursements and cracking down on pharmacy benefit managers to lower prescription-drug costs. Sadly, instead of working with us to deliver much-needed tax relief for New Yorkers, hyperpartisan politicians like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries continue to sit on the sidelines and launch bogus, class-warfare attacks that have no basis in fact or truth. Frankly, to hear them criticizing an increase in the SALT cap is truly astonishing. When they had complete and total power to raise or scrap the cap, they sat on their hands and chose to let it stay in place, once again being held hostage by radical leftists like AOC and Bernie Sanders. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters And this bill doesn't stop at tax relief. We expanded Pell Grants to include workforce training and eased access to out-of-state pediatric care for kids on Medicaid and CHIP. Plus, despite the lies being told, we protected Medicaid for those who genuinely need it, like seniors, single parents and those with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The so-called 'cuts' you hear about were actually common-sense reforms that require able-bodied adults without dependent children to work, volunteer or go to school 20 hours a week. They were enhanced eligibility checks to cut waste, fraud and abuse, so people can no longer scam the system, including registering in two different states. And they were citizenship verifications that prevent illegal immigrants from siphoning benefits from this critical program. These are practical and popular solutions that reflect the values of the Hudson Valley. Anyone who tells you differently is lying. Plain and simple. As an independent voice in Washington, I've never been afraid to challenge my own party or work across the aisle to get results. This bill is a historic step forward — a tax cut that rewards hard work, supports families and levels the playing field. I'll always keep fighting for NY-17. Now let's just hope the Senate passes the bill soon. Mike Lawler represents New York's Hudson Valley area in the House of Representatives.

26 minutes ago
Cyber charter schools in Pennsylvania would see funding cut under bill passed by the state House
HARRISBURG, Pa. -- A Democratic-sponsored proposal to limit per-student payments to Pennsylvania's cyber charter schools and make other changes to how they operate narrowly passed the state House on Wednesday over Republican objections that it would imperil the online learning programs. The 104-98 vote, with only two Republicans in favor, sets down a marker on the perennially contentious issue of school funding as state lawmakers work to complete the coming year's state budget for the fiscal year that starts in July. The bill's $8,000 limit on how much public school districts would have to reimburse the cyber charters was the central piece of the sprawling legislation and would be a boost to the districts and the property tax payers who bear much of the cost of public education in Pennsylvania. There currently is no cap for the districts' payments to cyber charters, an amount now linked to how much districts spent on their own students in the prior year. Supporters said changes to the cyber charter rules are widely backed among the state's 500 school boards and that cyber school spending has been the subject of critical reviews, including recently by Republican Auditor General Tim DeFoor. But opponents defended the existing system as a critical lifeline to the students and families that for various reasons have sought alternatives to traditional schools. The bill would set annual tuition payments from school districts to cyber charters at $8,000 per student, with potential yearly increases. Special education funding would also see changes. Cyber charters would not be able to maintain cash balances above 12% of their spending and would not be able to provide payments or gifts to parents as incentives to enroll their children. The bill would bolster disclosure requirements regarding cyber charters' policies, instructional materials and budgets. It would bar the state Education Department from approving any additional cyber charter schools through the 2029-30 school year. A new Cyber Charter School Funding and Policy Council would be set up to make recommendations concerning enrollment, governance and funding. During floor debate Wednesday, Rep. Martina White, a Philadelphia Republican, said the measure will 'close real schools, displace real students, strip families of the very choices that they depend on to give their children a chance at success.' The moratorium would be highly damaging to cyber charters, said Rep. Craig Williams, a Delaware County Republican. 'You limit the number of cyber charters now in existence, you choke off its funding, and eventually you can kill cyber charter. Sixty-plus thousand students in our school system, finding another way to learn, and we're going to choke it off with this bill,' Williams said. The chair of the House Education Committee, Lehigh County Democratic Rep. Peter Schweyer, enumerated cyber charter spending issues raised in the auditor general's report, including staff bonuses, gift cards, vehicle payments and fuel stipends. 'Gift cards?' Schweyer asked his colleagues. 'We would all get in trouble if we were taking gift cards as part of our compensation.' Leaders of existing public cyber charter schools say the measure would cut their funding by about $450 million or more across the state, with a third of the total reductions targeting special education student reimbursements. A Democratic analysis put the figure at more than $600 million. About 65,000 Pennsylvania students currently attend the state's 14 public cyber charter schools, which are public, nonprofit corporations. They do not have to follow all of the requirements mandated of public schools under state law. Cyber charter school are considered independent public schools, approved to operate with a 'charter' issued by the Education Department. They use technology to provide much of the teaching. Students usually do not need to attend a physical location beyond certain events, such as standardized testing. The proposal was sent over to the Republican majority state Senate for its consideration. The bill becomes part of a wider negotiations to determine the budget before lawmakers recess for the summer.