logo
Pakistan says it's close to US trade deal, Washington gives no timeline

Pakistan says it's close to US trade deal, Washington gives no timeline

Straits Times6 days ago
WASHINGTON - Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said on Friday the United States and Pakistan were "very close" to a trade deal that could come within days, but comments from the U.S. after Dar met with Secretary of State Marco Rubio mentioned no timeline.
"I think we are very close to finalizing a deal with U.S. Our teams have been here in Washington, discussing, having virtual meetings and a committee has been tasked by the prime minister to fine-tune now," Dar said in a discussion at the Atlantic Council think tank in Washington.
"It's not going to be months, not even weeks, I would say (just) days," he said.
Under U.S. President Donald Trump, Washington has attempted to renegotiate trade agreements with many countries that he threatened with tariffs over what he calls unfair trade relations. Many economists dispute Trump's characterization.
The U.S. State Department and Pakistan's foreign ministry, in separate statements after Rubio's meeting with Dar, said the two stressed in their discussion the importance of expanding trade and ties in critical minerals and mining. A post by Rubio on X after the meeting and the State Department's statement mentioned no timeline for finalizing a trade deal.
The Pakistan foreign ministry also said Dar "appreciated the pivotal role" by Trump and Rubio "in de-escalating tensions between Pakistan and India by facilitating a ceasefire." The State Department statement did not mention India.
Trump has repeatedly taken credit for the India-Pakistan ceasefire he announced on social media on May 10 after Washington held talks with both sides. India disputes Trump's claims that the ceasefire resulted from his intervention and trade threats.
India's position is that New Delhi and Islamabad must resolve problems directly with no outside involvement.
An April 22 militant attack in India-administered Kashmir killed 26 men and sparked heavy fighting between the nuclear-armed Asian neighbors in the latest escalation of a decades-old rivalry. India struck Pakistan on May 7 and the two nations exchanged hostilities, killing dozens across three days. The ceasefire was declared on May 10.
New Delhi blamed the April attack on Pakistan, which denied responsibility and called for a neutral investigation. Washington condemned the attack but did not blame Islamabad. REUTERS
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pakistan jails more than 100 members of ex-PM Imran Khan's party for 2023 riots
Pakistan jails more than 100 members of ex-PM Imran Khan's party for 2023 riots

Straits Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Pakistan jails more than 100 members of ex-PM Imran Khan's party for 2023 riots

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Fifty-eight of the defendants, who included Parliamentarians and senior officials, were sentenced to 10 years in prison. LAHORE, Pakistan - A Pakistani anti-terrorism court on July 31 sentenced more than 100 members of jailed former Prime Minister Imran Khan's party to prison terms on charges related to riots that targeted military sites in 2023, a court order said. Fifty-eight of the defendants, who included Parliamentarians and senior officials, were sentenced to 10 years in prison and the rest were given sentences ranging from one to three years, the court said. The accused include Omar Ayub Khan and Shibli Faraz, the leaders of Khan's opposition Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party (PTI) in the lower and upper houses of Parliament respectively, the court order seen by Reuters read. 'The prosecution has proved its case against the accused without a shadow of doubt,' it said in announcing the sentences. Khan, who has been in prison since 2023 facing charges of corruption, land fraud and disclosure of official secrets, is being tried separately on similar charges related to the riot. The government accuses him and other leaders of inciting the May 9, 2023, protests, during which demonstrators attacked military and government buildings, including the army headquarters in Rawalpindi. He denies wrongdoing and says all the cases are politically motivated as part of a military-backed crackdown to dismantle his party. The military denies it. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 'For one last time, let's go home': Tears, laughs as last scheduled Jetstar Asia flight touches down Singapore Over half of job applications by retrenched Jetstar Asia staff led to offers or interviews: CEO Singapore No entry: ICA to bar high-risk, undesirable travellers from boarding S'pore-bound ships, flights Singapore 5 foreign women suspected of trafficking 27kg of cocaine nabbed in Changi Airport Singapore Fallen tree branch damages two Yishun flats, showering one home owner in shattered glass Singapore Man accused of raping woman who hired him to fix lights in her flat claims she made first move Singapore Jail for ex-employee of agency under MOH who corruptly obtained $18k trip from 2 men Singapore 'Switching careers just as I became a dad was risky, but I had to do it for my family' Khan's arrest had prompted the countrywide violent protests. The July 31 ruling does not directly affect the incitement case against him in which prosecution is still presenting witnesses. The PTI party said it will challenge the verdict. The ruling is the third such mass conviction this month; Khan's party says they have included at least 14 of its Parliamentarians. They will lose their seats in parliament under Pakistani laws, which will shred Khan's opposition party's strength. Another 77 were acquitted for lack of evidence in the latest verdict, which is linked to an attack on the office of an intelligence agency in eastern city of Faisalabad, the court said. The party plans new protests starting on August 5, the second anniversary of Khan's jailing, to demand his release. REUTERS

US appeals court hears arguments over Trump tariffs
US appeals court hears arguments over Trump tariffs

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

US appeals court hears arguments over Trump tariffs

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox U.S. President Donald Trump speaks after signing the VA Home Loan Program Reform Act at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 30, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein Oral arguments over President Donald Trump's power to impose tariffs kicked of on Thursday before a U.S. appeals court, after a lower court said he exceeded his authority with sweeping levies on imported goods. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., is considering the legality of "reciprocal" tariffs that Trump imposed on a broad range of U.S. trading partners in April, as well as tariffs imposed in February against China, Canada and Mexico. A panel of all of the court's active judges, eight appointed by Democratic presidents and three appointed by former Republican presidents, is hearing arguments in two cases brought by five small U.S. businesses and 12 Democratic-led U.S. states. "Tariffs are making America GREAT & RICH Again," Trump wrote in a social media post on Thursday morning. "To all of my great lawyers who have fought so hard to save our Country, good luck in America's big case today." Tariffs are starting to build into a significant revenue source for the federal government, with customs duties in June quadrupling to about $27 billion, a record, and through June have topped $100 billion for the current fiscal year. That income could be crucial to offset lost revenue from Trump's tax bill passed into law earlier this month. But economists say the duties threaten to raise prices for U.S. consumers and reduce corporate profits. Trump's on-again, off-again tariff threats have roiled financial markets and disrupted U.S. companies' ability to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The arguments - one day before Trump plans to increase tariff rates on imported goods from nearly all U.S. trading partners - mark the first test before a U.S. appeals court of the scope of his tariff authority. The president has made tariffs a central instrument of his foreign policy, wielding them aggressively in his second term as leverage in trade negotiations and to push back against what he has called unfair practices. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore No entry: ICA to bar high-risk, undesirable travellers from boarding S'pore-bound ships, flights Singapore 5 foreign women suspected of trafficking 27kg of cocaine nabbed in Changi Airport Singapore Over half of job applications by retrenched Jetstar Asia staff led to offers or interviews: CEO Singapore Fallen tree branch damages two Yishun flats, showering one home owner in shattered glass Singapore Man accused of raping woman who hired him to fix lights in her flat claims she made first move Singapore Jail for ex-employee of agency under MOH who corruptly obtained $18k trip from 2 men Singapore ICJ's climate ruling may spur scrutiny of S'pore carbon tax, firms' climate action plans Singapore 'Switching careers just as I became a dad was risky, but I had to do it for my family' The states and businesses challenging the tariffs argued that they are not permissible under emergency presidential powers that Trump cited to justify them. They say the U.S. Constitution grants Congress, and not the president, authority over tariffs and other taxes. Dan Rayfield, the attorney general of Oregon, one of the states challenging the levies, said that the tariffs were a "regressive tax" that is making household items more expensive. Trump claimed broad authority to set tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets. Trump is the first president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said the April tariffs were a response to persistent U.S. trade imbalances and declining U.S. manufacturing power. He said the tariffs against China, Canada and Mexico were appropriate because those countries were not doing enough to stop illegal fentanyl from crossing U.S. borders. The countries have denied that claim. On May 28, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade sided with the Democratic states and small businesses that challenged Trump. It said that the IEEPA, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies, did not authorize tariffs related to longstanding trade deficits. The Federal Circuit has allowed the tariffs to remain in place while it considers the administration's appeal. The timing of the court's decision is uncertain, and the losing side will likely appeal quickly to the U.S. Supreme Court. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS The case will have no impact on tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as duties on steel and aluminum imports. The president recently announced trade deals that set tariff rates on goods from the European Union and Japan, following smaller trade agreements with Britain, Indonesia and Vietnam. Trump's Department of Justice has argued that limiting the president's tariff authority could undermine ongoing trade negotiations, while other Trump officials have said that negotiations have continued with little change after the initial setback in court. Trump has set an August 1 date for higher tariffs on countries that don't negotiate new trade deals. There are at least seven other lawsuits challenging Trump's invocation of IEEPA, including cases brought by other small businesses and California. A federal judge in Washington, D.C., ruled against Trump in one of those cases, and no judge has yet backed Trump's claim of unlimited emergency tariff authority. REUTERS

S. Korea clinches US trade deal, but analysts remain cautious amid lack of details
S. Korea clinches US trade deal, but analysts remain cautious amid lack of details

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

S. Korea clinches US trade deal, but analysts remain cautious amid lack of details

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Under the agreement, the earlier-threatened tariff hike of 25 per cent was slashed to 15 per cent. – After weeks of haggling and even a cross-continental chase, South Korea finally sealed a trade deal with the United States, but analysts remain cautious on whether it can be seen as a win for the country. On July 31, a day before the Aug 1 tariff deadline, US President Donald Trump announced on his Truth Social account that a 'Full and Complete Trade Deal' has been reached with South Korea. Under the agreement, the earlier-threatened tariff hike of 25 per cent was slashed to 15 per cent, on a par with what Japan and the European Union managed to negotiate with the US just days earlier. Dr Lee Mun-seob, an economist at the University of California San Diego, told The Straits Times that even though the deal would come as a relief for South Korean companies 'at first glance', details of the deal would bear watching. 'Most of what we know right now is based on the US' interpretation. We have seen with the US-Japan agreement that the two governments framed the deal quite differently, and those nuances can be important,' Dr Lee noted. Indeed, while Mr Trump said in his post that South Korea had agreed to 'accept American products including Cars and Trucks, Agriculture, etc', the Blue House's presidential chief of staff for policy Kim Yong-beom told reporters on July 31 that Seoul did not agree to open its markets in the contentious rice and beef sectors despite the US' push. When asked about the discrepancy, Mr Kim said that the presidential office understood Mr Trump's words as a 'political statement' and that 'what matters are the talks held with the negotiating officials'. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore No entry: ICA to bar high-risk, undesirable travellers from boarding S'pore-bound ships, flights Singapore 5 foreign women suspected of trafficking 27kg of cocaine nabbed in Changi Airport Singapore Over half of job applications by retrenched Jetstar Asia staff led to offers or interviews: CEO Singapore Fallen tree branch damages two Yishun flats, showering one home owner in shattered glass Singapore Man accused of raping woman who hired him to fix lights in her flat claims she made first move Singapore Jail for ex-employee of agency under MOH who corruptly obtained $18k trip from 2 men Singapore ICJ's climate ruling may spur scrutiny of S'pore carbon tax, firms' climate action plans Singapore 'Switching careers just as I became a dad was risky, but I had to do it for my family' Details of the deal are to be hammered out in a first-ever summit between the presidents of both countries, which Mr Trump said he expects to happen within the next two weeks. At the point of the announcement on July 31, what is known was that part of the deal conditions included Seoul's pledge of US$350 billion (S$453 billion) in investment to be 'owned and controlled by the US, and selected by myself', said Mr Trump in his post without elaborating further. This is in addition to a promise on South Korea's part to purchase US$100 billion of liquefied natural gas and other energy products. Still, the deal has been lauded as a diplomatic coup by the newly elected Mr Lee in a Facebook post soon after Mr Trump's announcement. Mr Lee said that South Korea has managed to 'overcome a major hurdle', noting that negotiations are never easy, and that 'it is important not to seek one-sided gains but to produce mutually beneficial outcomes'. South Korea was late to the tariff negotiating game as it was in the throes of political chaos following the martial law crisis initiated by former president Yoon Suk Yeol. Even after Mr Lee was elected as president in snap elections held on June 3, his administration struggled to obtain the much-needed face time with Mr Trump and his team. Plans for Mr Lee to meet Mr Trump on the sidelines of the Group of Seven summit in Canada in mid-June did not materialise. South Korean trade officials due for final-stretch consultations in Washington with their US counterparts last week were left reeling from last-minute cancellations . Industry Minister Kim Jeong-kwan and Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo even pursued US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer all the way to Scotland where they were accompanying Mr Trump on an official visit to discuss trade deals with the UK and EU. It showed 'how much they really want to get a deal done', said Mr Lutnick in a Fox News interview on July 29. In comments to the media released after the announcement, former US deputy trade representative Wendy Cutler, who is now Senior Vice-President of the Asia Society Policy Institute, said South Korean negotiators 'had little choice but to work hard to conclude their own trade deal so as not to be disadvantaged in the US market', especially following the US deal with Japan on July 22. While details are still 'spotty', Ms Cutler said South Korea's deal appeared to 'check the same boxes' as the agreements that the US had cut with other countries recently. Apart from the reduced 15 per cent on reciprocal tariffs, South Korea also obtained a 15 per cent tariff for cars, down from 25 per cent. A key plank of the deal announced on July 31 was shipbuilding investment. Of the US$350 billion investment pledged by South Korea, US$150 billion was specifically designated for shipbuilding cooperation, Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol told reporters shortly after the tariff announcement by Mr Trump. As the world's second largest shipbuilding nation after China, South Korea's expertise is critical to the Trump administration's ambitions to 'Make American Shipbuilding Great Again', amid intensifying US-China rivalry. China's shipbuilding industry is said to be 230 times the shipbuilding capacity of the US. The shipbuilding cooperation between the US and South Korea will not only include building new American ships and cooperation on maintenance, repair and overhaul projects but also the construction of new shipyards and training of shipbuilding professionals, said Mr Koo. Non-resident fellow Troy Stangarone of the Carnegie Mellon Institute for Strategy and Technology told ST the shipbuilding proposal is in line with Mr Trump's key objective of restoring manufacturing in the US. 'Tariffs alone wouldn't achieve that, which is why the Trump administration has pushed Japan, the EU and now Korea to commit to investment in return for a reduction of the tariffs,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store