13,000 South Dakotans would lose Medicaid if ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' passes, research group says
(Getty Images)
If Republicans in the U.S. Senate pass the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' as written, 13,000 South Dakotans would lose Medicaid and the state would lose $931 million in federal funding for the program by 2034, according to a new analysis.
Medicaid is a federal-state health insurance program for low-income people. The budget reconciliation bill, which passed the U.S. House, aims to reduce federal Medicaid spending through various policy changes by about $793 billion. The biggest changes include setting a work requirement for some enrollees and mandating more frequent eligibility checks. The work requirement would take effect in January 2027.
Republicans, including South Dakota's delegates, say the policies would reduce waste, fraud and abuse in the program. Democrats say they would increase barriers, resulting in eligible people losing health insurance.
South Dakota Medicaid enrollments would decline by about 10%, or around 13,000 people, by 2034, according to an updated analysis from health policy organization KFF. The projections use Congressional Budget Office estimates to unpack the potential state-by-state impacts. Nationwide, 10.3 million fewer people would be enrolled in Medicaid by 2034, according to the CBO.
Combined with the expected expiration of the Obama-era Affordable Care Act's enhanced premium tax credits at the end of this year, the projected number of uninsured South Dakotans rises to about 20,000.
Medicaid cuts would 'force states to make tough choices,' KFF reported: 'maintain current spending on Medicaid by raising taxes or reducing spending on other programs; or cut Medicaid spending by covering fewer people, offering fewer benefits, or paying providers less.'
The majority of the cuts, according to KFF, would come from three sources:
Work requirements mandating that adults who are eligible for Medicaid expansion must meet work and reporting requirements (estimated to save $344 billion as people become ineligible).
Repealing a Biden administration rule simplifying eligibility and renewal processes (estimated to save $167 billion).
Setting a moratorium on new or increased provider taxes (estimated to save $89 billion).
The cost estimates can be uncertain because states might choose to implement a work requirement with easier or harder reporting requirements than other states. South Dakota is exploring implementing its own work requirements, which are more relaxed than the federal proposal.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
La. legislative session nears end, here's a recap
BATON ROUGE, La. (Louisiana First) — The Louisiana legislative session is nearing the have tackled insurance reform, election security, and even the state's $45 billion spending budget. While some bills have been signed into law by the governor, a lot of bills are still making their way through the legislature. Governor Jeff Landry has signed into law six bills from his Tort and insurance reform effort, which he says will lower insurance rates. One of the laws requires people who claim they have been hurt in a car accident to prove their injuries were caused by it. 'This points to a cultural problem of frivolous litigation, driven by lawyer advertising,' said Governor Landry during a news conference and bill signing. Even before the session, Landry called for major reform with what he calls a balanced approach, addressing both trial lawyers and the insurance companies. State elections were also a priority in this session. A package of bills pushed by Louisiana's Secretary of State, Nancy Landry, promises election security in the state. Out of the six election bills presented, a few are hung up in committees, one has been sent to the governor, and another has been signed by the governor. As for the bills Louisiana First News has followed: The abortion exceptions bill never made it out of committee last week. It would have allowed victims of rape under the age of 17 to get an abortion. The bill failed 3-9, with two Democrats siding with Republicans. A bill that promised to address homelessness also failed in committee. HB 619 would have allowed local governments to designate certain areas as homeless encampments if beds at homeless shelters are not available. That bill was narrowly defeated by one vote in the Committee on Appropriations. And finally, the bill that funds the government, House Bill 1 by Representative Jack McFarland, has been on a fast track to the governor's desk with lots of bipartisan support. McFarland says the 45 billion dollar budget does more with less, adds no new taxes, and still funds the legislature's priorities, like education, teacher pay raises, and crucial government services. 'I have an open dialogue with every member. If you will remember when the session started, I told every member publicly I'm going to fund the priorities of the legislature,' said McFarland after his bill passed out of the Committee on Appropriations. Since that time, HB 1 has also passed out of the House, and on Monday it passed out of the Senate with no opposition. Out of the hundreds of bills filed, 83 have passed, with a lot more being considered. The Governor has only vetoed one bill so far. The session must end by Thursday. 81 Years After D-Day: Honoring the courage that changed history Date, game time announced for LSU Baseball in 2025 NCAA Men's College World Series Trump hails $1K-per-child 'Trump Accounts' during White House roundtable La. legislative session nears end, here's a recap Inmate accused of attacking Assumption Parish corrections officer facing additional charges Collins calls Kennedy's firing of vaccine experts 'excessive' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Debate within the debate: Should Pennsylvania's tipped minimum wage rise too?
HARRISBURG, Pa. (WHTM) — The overall debate is not new. Neither are the arguments: All surrounding states — even West Virginia, supporters of raising Pennsylvania's base pay from $7.25 are always sure to note — have higher minimum wages than Pennsylvania. But raising it could cause consumer prices to rise and cost jobs, opponents always say. But within that familiar debate — this time over House Bill 1549, which would raise minimum wage to $15 (and eventually beyond) for most Pennsylvanians at different rates depend on which counties they call home — is the question of whether if that happens, employers of tipped workers (like restaurants who employ servers) should have to pay more than the $2.83 per hour, before tips, they're currently required to pay. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now What's already true, and wouldn't change under any plan, is: For tipped workers who don't earn much, employers have to make up the difference between tipped minimum wage and full minimum wage. But under the proposed bill, tipped minimum wage would rise to 60 percent of regular minimum wage — or, for example, $9.00 when minimum wage in a given county rises to $15. The problem with that, according to restaurant industry leaders? 'What this tripling of the base wage would mean, is restaurants would need to recoup those additional expenses somehow,' said Joe Massaro of the Pennsylvania Restaurant & Lodging Association (PRLA). New Rite Aid locations listed for closure in Pennsylvania: court docs Massaro cited the experience of Washington, D.C., where years ago, the city's Democratic mayor and city council previously overturned a law — backed by other Democrats and approved by voter referendum — that would have required restaurants to pay employees full minimum wage before tips. Now leaders there have paused a minimum wage hike, under a subsequently passed referendum, due to go into effect July 1. D.C. restaurants recouped the higher wages 'mostly by adding service charges to the bill,' Massaro said. 'And when that service charge is added, then consumers customers pay less in tips, so servers were reporting making less money after the change.' Massaro said the average tipped Pennsylvania employee earns $27 per hour. PRLA backs a proposed amendment by State Rep. Robert Leadbeter (R-Columbia) to House Bill 1549, which would exclude employers of tipped workers from the proposed minimum wage hike. The overall legislation enjoys strong support by Democrats, who narrowly control the commonwealth's House of Representatives, but faces tougher odds in the Republican-controlled Senate, which would need to pass the bill before it could go to Governor Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, who supports raising Pennsylvania's minimum wage. Including Pennsylvania, 20 states have minimum wages equal to the federal minimum of $7.25 per hour. But most are in the south or mountain west; New Hampshire is the only northeastern state aside from Pennsylvania with a $7.25 hourly minimum wage. Minimum wages among states bordering Pennsylvania range from $8.75 in West Virginia to $15.50 in New York. Among all states and territories, Washington, D.C.'s $17.50 hourly minimum is highest, followed by California's $16.50. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democratic lawmaker looks forward to Elon Musk 'turning his fire against MAGA Republicans' in 2026 midterms
Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., was optimistic on Friday that former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) leader Elon Musk would be targeting Republicans instead of Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections after his feud with President Donald Trump. In an interview with Semafor, Khanna said that he spoke to some of the Tesla CEO's "senior confidants" about whether Musk would be interested in supporting Democratic candidates in 2026. Based on Musk's recent attacks against the Trump administration and his history of supporting Democrats, Khanna believed a change could be possible. "Having Elon speak out against the irrational tariff policy, against the deficit-exploding Trump bill, and the anti-science and anti-immigrant agenda can help check Trump's unconstitutional administration," Khanna said. "I look forward to Elon turning his fire against MAGA Republicans instead of Democrats in 2026." Booker Won't Accept Money From Elon Musk For Campaign, But Urges Him To 'Sound The Alarm' On Trump-backed Bill Khanna made similar comments to Politico on Wednesday where he implored the party to start trying to embrace Musk after he broke ranks with Trump. "We should ultimately be trying to convince him that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with," Khanna said. "A commitment to science funding, a commitment to clean technology, a commitment to seeing international students like him." Read On The Fox News App Fox News Digital reached out to a Musk spokesperson for a comment. While Democrats have largely framed Musk as a political enemy because of his support for Trump, Khanna has been a notable exception, calling for "bipartisan cooperation" with DOGE's efforts to cut federal spending prior to Trump taking office for the second time.. Not every progressive has encouraged reaching out to Musk ahead of the midterms. On CNN Sunday, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., told "State of the Union" host Dana Bash that he didn't believe Democrats should work with the "right-wing extremist." Elon Musk Biographer Believes Billionaire Is 'Frustrated' As He Exits Doge "Musk has evolved over the years. My understanding is he actually voted for Obama in 2008. But over the years, he has developed into a right-wing extremist," Sanders said. While Musk and Trump traded harsh barbs last week over Trump's massive tax and spending package, Musk has since shown signs of reconciling with the Trump administration on social media. On Sunday, Musk shared a Truth Social post from Trump regarding the Los Angeles riots that broke out on Friday. He also re-posted one of Vice President JD Vance's posts on X about the riots, signaling approval of the administration's handling of the article source: Democratic lawmaker looks forward to Elon Musk 'turning his fire against MAGA Republicans' in 2026 midterms