1 killed in Shelby County armed standoff
According to the Shelby County Sheriff's Office, at around 4:30 a.m. deputies were called to the 1800 block of College Place in Harlan for a welfare check. When deputies arrived at the scene they were met with an armed male.
2 charged after dozens of animals found in 'poor conditions' at Des Moines motel
While deputies were negotiating with the male he made aggressive movements toward deputies, leading to a deputy firing at the suspect, the sheriff's office said. The suspect, identified as 36-year-old David Plagmann, was transported to a local hospital where he later died.
The sheriff's office said first responders also found an adult woman, identified as 31-year-old Alexis Martin, dead at the scene.
According to the sheriff's office, this is an isolated incident and there's no threat to the public.
The deputy involved in the shooting has been placed on administrative leave. An investigation into the incident is being conducted by the sheriff's office and the Iowa Department of Criminal Investigation.
Iowa News:
1 killed in Shelby County armed standoff
Iowa Republicans release bill that looks to overhaul property tax system
Snow piles up in Carroll with more snow on the way
WHO 13 Farm Report: Thursday, March 6th
Remains of Iowa WWII soldier killed on D-Day identified
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
24 minutes ago
- Politico
New York's Kathy Hochul faces a crime conundrum ahead of reelection
Hochul has successfully pressed fellow Democrats to change the law with provisions expanding the criminal charges in which a person can be held and giving more discretion to judges . This year, she won alterations to the state's discovery law that district attorneys wanted in order to reduce the number of dismissals in criminal cases. Hochul would also rather talk about an all-time low in New York City shootings and drop in felony crimes on subways — statistics she can tout as evidence her public safety approach is working. 'The Legislature has made three necessary fixes to bail since 2019, many crimes are at a historic low and Elise Stefanik is disconnected from reality,' said Democratic state Sen. James Skoufis, who also pointed to a recent New York Post frontpage trumpeting the sharp drop in shootings. (A Stefanik spokesperson called him 'clueless.') But New York Democrats are also warily watching the president's takeover of the Washington police department and move to deploy the National Guard to the streets of the nation's capital. Hochul this week also condemned the possibility that Trump, a Stefanik ally, would deploy the National Guard to New York City. 'If he crosses that bright line and decides that the 32,000 dedicated members of the NYPD are not doing their jobs — he's going to stand there and insult our law enforcement officers — I think people would be in outrage of that alone,' she said. The governor approved her own limited deployment of the New York National Guard to the city's subway system. The troops do not have arrest powers, but the move was meant to reinforce the perception of safety on mass transit. 'I've used them as a deterrent effect to stand there and just be a presence,' Hochul said. Democrats, though, are in something of a political cul-de-sac on crime, despite the steep drops in violent offenses. 'It's an issue that Democrats have failed to take any serious action on,' Erie County GOP Chair Michael Kracker said. 'The Republican Party has pledged to make the nation and the state safer. If Democrats fail to take action, Republicans will.' Citing crime statistics won't be enough for New Yorkers who don't feel safe in their own neighborhoods, he added. 'Ask your average New Yorker if they feel safer than they have over the last few years,' Kracker said. 'The answer is going to be a resounding no.' A version of this story first appeared in New York Playbook.
Fox News
4 hours ago
- Fox News
Schumer gives profanity-laced response to whether Dems will help extend DC police takeover
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer had harsh words Wednesday when asked whether Democrats planned to go along with President Donald Trump's request to extend his control over Washington, D.C.'s police force. Schumer made the comment during an appearance on "The Parnas Perspective" with host Aaron Parnas. The top Democrat made it very clear that his party would do everything in its power to prevent Trump's move from going beyond the current 30-day period. "No f‑‑‑ing way," Schumer told Parnas when asked about the extension. "We'll fight him tooth and nail. … He needs to get Congress to approve it, and not only are we not going to approve it, but there are some Republicans who don't like it either." "This is, again, just a distraction. He's afraid of Epstein," Schumer continued. "He's afraid of all that, and we are not going to give up on Epstein." Trump confirmed on Wednesday that he is asking Congress to extend his control over the Metropolitan Police Department beyond the 30 days afforded by the Home Rule Act. Trump nevertheless claims he can unilaterally extend the period by declaring a national emergency if Congress doesn't cooperate. "Well, if it's a national emergency, we can do it without Congress. But we expect to be before Congress very quickly. And again, we think the Democrats will not do anything to stop crime, but we think the Republicans will do it almost unanimously. So we're going to need a crime bill. That we're going to be putting in, and it's going to pertain initially to DC. We're going to use it as a very positive example," Trump told reporters at the Kennedy Center. "You can't have 30 days," he said. "We're going to do this very quickly, but we're going to want extensions. I don't want to call a national emergency, but if I have to I will." Trump announced his D.C. crime and homelessness crackdown last week, calling in the National Guard and federal law enforcement in addition to federalizing the MPD. Law enforcement has arrested more than 100 people since Aug. 7, which includes 43 who were arrested Tuesday, a White House official told Fox Digital on Wednesday. The arrests are part of Trump's March executive order, which established the Making DC Safe and Beautiful Task Force.
USA Today
8 hours ago
- USA Today
It's not just DC: Republicans seem happy to let Trump do whatever he wants
For a party that claims to care about federal overreach, GOP leaders certainly have been quiet about President Trump's invasion of an American city. I'm starting to wonder when our government's checks and balances will kick in – or if they will at all. On Monday, Aug. 11, President Donald Trump announced he would be deploying the National Guard in Washington, DC, and taking over the city's police force "to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.' The troops began showing up on Tuesday evening. According to Trump, violent crime is up in the nation's capital, and he's the only one who can rescue the city from societal collapse. It's a convenient narrative, one that feeds into MAGA's perception of him. For the rest of us, it's a terrifying move that shows he is willing to test the limits of presidential oversight. But while Trump's hostile takeover of DC public safety is concerning on its own, it's more alarming that Republicans in Congress are letting him do this with seemingly no regard for what is ethical. Even if this deployment is legal, there are certain lines that presidents should not cross. This is one of them. And I have to ask. Would Republicans be sitting on their hands if a Democratic president were doing everything that Trump is doing? I would hope not, but here we are. Of course, Trump is lying about crime in DC Trump seems to have called in the military after an assault on a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer on Aug. 3. While it's horrible that a government employee was attacked, Trump's declaration that Washington is crime-infested and dangerous doesn't align with reality. According to the Metropolitan Police Department, violent crime is down 26% compared with last year. In fact, 2024 marked a 30-year low for violent crime in Washington, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. Per a New York Times analysis, the homicide rate in 2023 was 40.4 per 100,000 people, the highest rate in 20 years. But that rate declined in 2024, down to 26.6 per 100,000 people. And homicides in the city continue to decline in 2025. While Trump is correct in saying this rate is higher than those of Mexico City and Bogotá, Colombia, it doesn't paint the full picture. A federal takeover is an extreme reaction. It doesn't matter, of course, that violent crime in the city is down overall this year. That wouldn't fit in with the Trumpian narrative, the one where he's the hero saving tourists and locals alike from violent crime. Are you worried about crime? Do you feel safe where you live? Tell us. | Opinion Forum Who even asked for this? It wasn't DC Mayor Muriel Bowser. All of this is happening to the dismay of Washington, DC, Mayor Muriel Bowser, who noted on the Aug. 12 edition of 'The Breakfast Club' that the militarization of the city will instill fear in its residents. '(Trump) wants to send the message to cities that if he can get away with this in Los Angeles, if he can get away with this in DC, he can get away with it in New York, or Baltimore or Chicago, or any other place where millions of people live, work and are doing everything the right way,' Bowser said on the radio show. Bowser is right, this is an escalation. It's Trump's way of showing everyone in Democratic parts of the country that he has the final say and that he isn't afraid to use the military to his advantage. Trump is a bully. He's using the National Guard to conquer DC as a test run. | Opinion Will Republicans hold Trump accountable for anything? For a party that claims to care about federal overreach, GOP leaders certainly have been quiet about Trump's invasion of an American city. In fact, it seems that many are supportive of the move. If a Democratic president were to try to do this, the Republican Party would decry authoritarianism's arrival in the United States. But because it's Trump, there has been zero pushback. Just like his tariff plan that's costing everyday Americans, the failed Elon Musk overhaul of the federal government, the deployment of soldiers against citizens in Los Angeles and his ruthless immigration agenda that includes trying to erase due process, the GOP is letting him get away with all of it. Republicans may even be happy about it. Imagine if Joe Biden did any of that? The Republican pearl-clutching would be generational. But this is fine because it's their king. Trump is considering extending the troop deployment beyond 30 days, something he will need congressional approval for. This seems entirely plausible, even likely, because of the Republican majorities in both chambers of Congress. I'm hesitant to throw the F-word – fascism – around, but if the Trump administration continues down this path, I worry that the rights we have as Americans will slip away. Who's stopping the president from deploying troops to other cities in the United States? It certainly isn't going to be Congress. There's some hope for the Supreme Court, but it has a 6-3 conservative majority. All of this is happening within the first year of Trump's return to the White House. There's no telling what the next three years will bring if this is how he's starting out. There should be firm lines that presidents do not cross – there are some things that are not appropriate or reasonable for a president to do. Yet that line keeps getting moved by Republicans, who don't seem to care as long as their conservative agenda is being implemented. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter: @sara__pequeno
