Winston the platypus was shipped to England. Has his mystery death at sea been solved?
In 1943, the UK's wartime prime minister, Winston Churchill, asked Australia for a platypus to add to his menagerie of exotic pets. He was advised by his closest friend, wartime minister for information Brendan Bracken, that the Australian government had suspended its 'much-cherished law about preventing platypus[es] from leaving the country'.
With a platypus set to arrive, Bracken urged Churchill to send his cat Nelson into exile. 'That pussy could (and probably would) slaughter the platypus in a few fell minutes,' Bracken wrote.
And so it was that in the midst of WWII on October 2, 1943, a young and healthy platypus, named Winston for his future owner, set sail in a custom-built platypussary for England.
Ewan Cowan, Holly Butler, Angela Liang and Zaki reveal that Winston's death was kept secret during the war, and document the fate of other platypuses sent abroad by sea.
As part of a cross-disciplinary course, a dozen students worked for 12 weeks at the Australian Museum with its head of archives, Dr Vanessa Finney, to digitise and explore a newly acquired collection, a bequest from the naturalist, zoo owner and educator David Fleay (1907-1993).
It included the ship's logbook and glass lantern slides made by Fleay, a fanatical photographer.
Finney said Fleay had been a serious scientist and showman with an eye for a great story. 'Behind that was a serious intent to promote and protect Australian wildlife,' she said.
Fleay had caught six puggles and chose Winston for his namesake. The young platypus was a 'little beauty' and possessed 'all the attributes of self-possession and good condition so essential to the trials ahead'.
Working with Finney, the students discovered who and what was really to blame for Winston's death at sea on November 4, 1943.
The students of history and philosophy of science reviewed the logbook kept by a midshipman entrusted with caring for Winston at sea. He recorded the temperature of the air, food and water several times a day, what he was fed and his condition.
Sometimes Winston was fed egg custard to supplement worms and grubs.
On Sunday, October 3, the log reports the animal was in good condition and eating all its food.
But two days short of reaching his destination, as the students report, 'Disaster Struck'. On Saturday, November 4, the midshipman notes, 'Platypus found dead in water'.
Writing to Australian prime minister John Curtin, Churchill said he 'was grieved to tell you that the platypus you kindly sent me has died. The loss is a great disappointment to me.'
He wrote that the Royal College of Surgeons was anxious to have Winston's remains stuffed because another platypus had been lost in the Blitz.
In correspondence between Australia and the UK, there was speculation that a depth charge by a German submarine could have killed Winston. 'With such a timid animal that only a little noise would be harmful, especially if his vitality had lowered by lessened food intake,' an official wrote.
Loading
By analysing the temperatures in the logbook, the students concluded that Winston was probably killed by heat stress, and exacerbated by a reduction in his food and the reverberations from an explosion.
Butler said platypuses eat a lot for their size. Winston's rations had been reduced from about 700 worms a day to 600 a day because the crew feared the 50,000 worms wouldn't last the trip otherwise.
Zaki said research on transporting platypuses said they shouldn't be exposed to constant temperatures above 27 degrees, yet for the week when they were crossing the equator, Winston was kept in conditions where the air and water were much higher.
Platypuses mostly live in environments where the temperature is 20 degrees and below. Above 25 degrees, they can't regulate their body temperature. Above 34 degrees can be fatal for the species.
'These temperatures don't seem extreme for us humans. They're very high for platypuses,' says their report.
In their online series, the students tell the full story of the story of platypus diplomacy.
Cowan said platypuses were seen as very exotic from the early days of colonial settlement. 'They were considered paradoxical. Because they have a bill of a duck, they look like an otter and had a tail like a beaver.' And they lay eggs.
Liang said they were so strange that scientists assumed the first specimens (taxidermied) sent overseas in the late 1790s were a hoax. 'Like a stitched-up artefact,' she said.
Finney said the platypuses caused a sensation wherever they were sent. The courtship of Penelope and Cecil, the 'only two duck-billed platypuses' alive in the United States, was reported like a Mills & Boon romance by newspapers from 1947 to 1957.
Loading
The Herald's correspondent Ross Campbell covered their New York debut. It was attended by the Australian ambassador and a gang of media, including 20 press photographers, journalists and TV crews. At one stage, it was reported that Penelope was faking a pregnancy to get more food.
The students report that Fleay said Penelope was 'shamefully maligned' – rather, she was 'always an ordinary, straightforward lady platypus'.
Penelope escaped from the Bronx Zoo in 1957. The New York Times reported that far from being lovesick, Penelope was sick of Cecil.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
a day ago
- The Age
Airlines begin checking fuel switches after Air India crash report
Conjecture about the pilot's mental health has been criticised by an Indian pilot's union, the Indian Pilots Guild, which said: 'The crew of Al171 deserves a thorough, fact-driven investigation.' The crash of Gatwick-bound Air India flight 171, which occurred seconds after take-off from Ahmedabad, India, on June 12, killed all but one of the 242 passengers and crew. It also killed 19 people on the ground. The safety of the fuel switches has come under scrutiny with the release of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) report on Friday. The bureau said the US Federal Aviation Administration issued an airworthiness bulletin in 2018 'regarding the potential disengagement of the fuel control switch locking feature'. But 'the airworthiness concern was not considered an unsafe condition that would warrant [an] airworthiness directive by the FAA'. Loading The throttle control module of the Air India 787 Dreamliner was replaced on the plane in 2019 and 2023, the AAIB notes. 'However, the reason for the replacement was not linked to the fuel control switch. There has been no defect reported pertaining to the fuel control switch since 2023', the AAIB reported. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority has been contacted for comment. An Australian source with direct knowledge of aviation maintenance including fuel control switches said it was possible a 'faulty locking feature of the fuel cut off switches' could be to blame. In this case, the problem would result from a switch design that 'had a history of wearing out where the two-action positive lock function is lost allowing the switches to be easily and inadvertently [flipped] back to the CUT-OFF to then shut its engine down'. A worn-out fuel control could be switched off either by the brushing of the hand or vibration by the plane, said the source with decades of domestic and international aviation engineering experience, although both would have to be switched. If the switches were the issue, the manufacturers and airlines had a duty to seek information on their performance for future air directives too, said the source. Honeywell, the maker of the switches, said: 'We do not comment on rumour or speculation. Any questions on the incident should be directed to the appropriate investigating agencies.' Boeing has been contacted for comment. Under the International Civil Aviation Organisation rules, the nation where the accident or incident happened has responsibility for conducting the investigation. To date, the Boeing Dreamliner has had a strong safety record. However, given the safety and production problems linked to the two Boeing 737s Max planes that crashed in 2018 and 2019, the findings of the Air India crash investigation are being closely watched. Dr Geoffrey Dell, head of aviation safety for the AMDA Foundation, said the accident could be the result of an issue with the switches. 'Anything is possible. The question is how probable is it.' The problem with the content of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau preliminary report was there was no data included. It was, Dell said, 'interpretation information'. Without any other facts, it's difficult to 'draw reasonable or even partial conclusions', he said. Dell, who is an aviation crash investigator, said it would be unlikely to be a problem with the switches alone because they aren't designed to be moved accidentally. A pilot would have to adjust them both by accident. Loading The AAIB report states that after the aircraft achieved the maximum recorded airspeed of 180 knots 'and immediately thereafter, the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUT-OFF position one after another with a time gap of 01 sec.' They were found in the on position after the crash. Swinburne University school of engineering department of aviation's Salim Hijazeen said: 'While the switch design and past FAA advisories carry weight, they are unlikely to be the sole cause of the incident. 'What appears more plausible is a convergence of factors – including human performance limitations under high stress, a potential aircraft system issue which required pilot input, and breakdowns in procedural discipline.' In most flight deck operations, especially those involving engine shutdown, 'a cross-check and verbal confirmation between pilots is required before any critical input is made,' said Hijazeen. 'The report indicates that the pilot monitoring may not have been aware that the shutdown had occurred, pointing to a significant lapse in crew resource management and situational awareness.' A high workload and pressure may have exacerbated this during the initial take-off roll, he said, 'a phase of flight that we still do not fully understand in terms of cockpit dynamics and decision-making'. Dell, the investigator, said that saying pilot error was the cause of the crash is 'like saying the accident was caused by gravity. It's true but not very bloody helpful.' Loading A better question, Dell said, is: 'How did the system allow an error to cause a catastrophic loss? 'Obviously, there's a design problem with the mechanics and the human systems built around it.' The Lifeline number for crisis support is 13 11 14.
Sydney Morning Herald
a day ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Airlines begin checking fuel switches after Air India crash report
Conjecture about the pilot's mental health has been criticised by an Indian pilot's union, the Indian Pilots Guild, which said: 'The crew of Al171 deserves a thorough, fact-driven investigation.' The crash of Gatwick-bound Air India flight 171, which occurred seconds after take-off from Ahmedabad, India, on June 12, killed all but one of the 242 passengers and crew. It also killed 19 people on the ground. The safety of the fuel switches has come under scrutiny with the release of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) report on Friday. The bureau said the US Federal Aviation Administration issued an airworthiness bulletin in 2018 'regarding the potential disengagement of the fuel control switch locking feature'. But 'the airworthiness concern was not considered an unsafe condition that would warrant [an] airworthiness directive by the FAA'. Loading The throttle control module of the Air India 787 Dreamliner was replaced on the plane in 2019 and 2023, the AAIB notes. 'However, the reason for the replacement was not linked to the fuel control switch. There has been no defect reported pertaining to the fuel control switch since 2023', the AAIB reported. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority has been contacted for comment. An Australian source with direct knowledge of aviation maintenance including fuel control switches said it was possible a 'faulty locking feature of the fuel cut off switches' could be to blame. In this case, the problem would result from a switch design that 'had a history of wearing out where the two-action positive lock function is lost allowing the switches to be easily and inadvertently [flipped] back to the CUT-OFF to then shut its engine down'. A worn-out fuel control could be switched off either by the brushing of the hand or vibration by the plane, said the source with decades of domestic and international aviation engineering experience, although both would have to be switched. If the switches were the issue, the manufacturers and airlines had a duty to seek information on their performance for future air directives too, said the source. Honeywell, the maker of the switches, said: 'We do not comment on rumour or speculation. Any questions on the incident should be directed to the appropriate investigating agencies.' Boeing has been contacted for comment. Under the International Civil Aviation Organisation rules, the nation where the accident or incident happened has responsibility for conducting the investigation. To date, the Boeing Dreamliner has had a strong safety record. However, given the safety and production problems linked to the two Boeing 737s Max planes that crashed in 2018 and 2019, the findings of the Air India crash investigation are being closely watched. Dr Geoffrey Dell, head of aviation safety for the AMDA Foundation, said the accident could be the result of an issue with the switches. 'Anything is possible. The question is how probable is it.' The problem with the content of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau preliminary report was there was no data included. It was, Dell said, 'interpretation information'. Without any other facts, it's difficult to 'draw reasonable or even partial conclusions', he said. Dell, who is an aviation crash investigator, said it would be unlikely to be a problem with the switches alone because they aren't designed to be moved accidentally. A pilot would have to adjust them both by accident. Loading The AAIB report states that after the aircraft achieved the maximum recorded airspeed of 180 knots 'and immediately thereafter, the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUT-OFF position one after another with a time gap of 01 sec.' They were found in the on position after the crash. Swinburne University school of engineering department of aviation's Salim Hijazeen said: 'While the switch design and past FAA advisories carry weight, they are unlikely to be the sole cause of the incident. 'What appears more plausible is a convergence of factors – including human performance limitations under high stress, a potential aircraft system issue which required pilot input, and breakdowns in procedural discipline.' In most flight deck operations, especially those involving engine shutdown, 'a cross-check and verbal confirmation between pilots is required before any critical input is made,' said Hijazeen. 'The report indicates that the pilot monitoring may not have been aware that the shutdown had occurred, pointing to a significant lapse in crew resource management and situational awareness.' A high workload and pressure may have exacerbated this during the initial take-off roll, he said, 'a phase of flight that we still do not fully understand in terms of cockpit dynamics and decision-making'. Dell, the investigator, said that saying pilot error was the cause of the crash is 'like saying the accident was caused by gravity. It's true but not very bloody helpful.' Loading A better question, Dell said, is: 'How did the system allow an error to cause a catastrophic loss? 'Obviously, there's a design problem with the mechanics and the human systems built around it.' The Lifeline number for crisis support is 13 11 14.
The Age
a day ago
- The Age
Winston the platypus was shipped to England. Has his mystery death at sea been solved?
First, Winston's backstory. In 1943, the UK's wartime prime minister, Winston Churchill, asked Australia for a platypus to add to his menagerie of exotic pets. He was advised by his closest friend, wartime minister for information Brendan Bracken, that the Australian government had suspended its 'much-cherished law about preventing platypus[es] from leaving the country'. With a platypus set to arrive, Bracken urged Churchill to send his cat Nelson into exile. 'That pussy could (and probably would) slaughter the platypus in a few fell minutes,' Bracken wrote. And so it was that in the midst of WWII on October 2, 1943, a young and healthy platypus, named Winston for his future owner, set sail in a custom-built platypussary for England. Ewan Cowan, Holly Butler, Angela Liang and Zaki reveal that Winston's death was kept secret during the war, and document the fate of other platypuses sent abroad by sea. As part of a cross-disciplinary course, a dozen students worked for 12 weeks at the Australian Museum with its head of archives, Dr Vanessa Finney, to digitise and explore a newly acquired collection, a bequest from the naturalist, zoo owner and educator David Fleay (1907-1993). It included the ship's logbook and glass lantern slides made by Fleay, a fanatical photographer. Finney said Fleay had been a serious scientist and showman with an eye for a great story. 'Behind that was a serious intent to promote and protect Australian wildlife,' she said. Fleay had caught six puggles and chose Winston for his namesake. The young platypus was a 'little beauty' and possessed 'all the attributes of self-possession and good condition so essential to the trials ahead'. Working with Finney, the students discovered who and what was really to blame for Winston's death at sea on November 4, 1943. The students of history and philosophy of science reviewed the logbook kept by a midshipman entrusted with caring for Winston at sea. He recorded the temperature of the air, food and water several times a day, what he was fed and his condition. Sometimes Winston was fed egg custard to supplement worms and grubs. On Sunday, October 3, the log reports the animal was in good condition and eating all its food. But two days short of reaching his destination, as the students report, 'Disaster Struck'. On Saturday, November 4, the midshipman notes, 'Platypus found dead in water'. Writing to Australian prime minister John Curtin, Churchill said he 'was grieved to tell you that the platypus you kindly sent me has died. The loss is a great disappointment to me.' He wrote that the Royal College of Surgeons was anxious to have Winston's remains stuffed because another platypus had been lost in the Blitz. In correspondence between Australia and the UK, there was speculation that a depth charge by a German submarine could have killed Winston. 'With such a timid animal that only a little noise would be harmful, especially if his vitality had lowered by lessened food intake,' an official wrote. Loading By analysing the temperatures in the logbook, the students concluded that Winston was probably killed by heat stress, and exacerbated by a reduction in his food and the reverberations from an explosion. Butler said platypuses eat a lot for their size. Winston's rations had been reduced from about 700 worms a day to 600 a day because the crew feared the 50,000 worms wouldn't last the trip otherwise. Zaki said research on transporting platypuses said they shouldn't be exposed to constant temperatures above 27 degrees, yet for the week when they were crossing the equator, Winston was kept in conditions where the air and water were much higher. Platypuses mostly live in environments where the temperature is 20 degrees and below. Above 25 degrees, they can't regulate their body temperature. Above 34 degrees can be fatal for the species. 'These temperatures don't seem extreme for us humans. They're very high for platypuses,' says their report. In their online series, the students tell the full story of the story of platypus diplomacy. Cowan said platypuses were seen as very exotic from the early days of colonial settlement. 'They were considered paradoxical. Because they have a bill of a duck, they look like an otter and had a tail like a beaver.' And they lay eggs. Liang said they were so strange that scientists assumed the first specimens (taxidermied) sent overseas in the late 1790s were a hoax. 'Like a stitched-up artefact,' she said. Finney said the platypuses caused a sensation wherever they were sent. The courtship of Penelope and Cecil, the 'only two duck-billed platypuses' alive in the United States, was reported like a Mills & Boon romance by newspapers from 1947 to 1957. Loading The Herald's correspondent Ross Campbell covered their New York debut. It was attended by the Australian ambassador and a gang of media, including 20 press photographers, journalists and TV crews. At one stage, it was reported that Penelope was faking a pregnancy to get more food. The students report that Fleay said Penelope was 'shamefully maligned' – rather, she was 'always an ordinary, straightforward lady platypus'. Penelope escaped from the Bronx Zoo in 1957. The New York Times reported that far from being lovesick, Penelope was sick of Cecil.
