Iwi Hosts Meeting With Multiple Crown Agencies For New Strategy
The inaugural hui was a formal discussion to begin to realise the opportunities of He Kawenata Hu, a commitment included in the iwis Treaty settlement legislation, Settlement Trust Chair Paora Ammunson says.
Ngāti Kahungunu ki Wairarapa Tāmaki-nui-a-Rua Settlement Trust has met with senior officials from 12 Crown agencies to begin the development of a new strategy to transform social and economic outcomes for whānau.
Crown representatives travelled to Masterton to meet with the iwi on Wednesday 9 July, including from: Health NZ; the Ministries of Education, Social Development, Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE), Justice, Housing and Urban Development; Oranga Tamariki; NZ Police; Department of Corrections; Te Puni Kōkiri; Social Investment Agency; and Ministry for Primary Industries.
Settlement Trust Chair, Paora Ammunson, said the inaugural hui was a formal discussion to begin to realise the opportunities of 'He Kawenata Hōu', a commitment included in the iwi's Treaty settlement legislation.
'Our settlement was signed back in 2021 and included a new covenant – He Kawenata Hōu – as the platform for us to build a new Tiriti relationship between Ngāti Kahungunu ki Wairarapa Tāmaki-nui-a-Rua and the Crown,' said Mr Ammunson.
'Having these senior government officials all come to us here in Masterton, signifies the unique and ongoing nature of He Kawenata Hōu.
'We are talking about a foundational strategy for the social and economic revitalisation of our iwi. Crucially, we must plan how to address the severe inequities that our whānau are facing.'
Mr Ammunson said that the development of the strategy was an important opportunity for the Crown and its responsible agencies to demonstrate their commitment to authentic Treaty Partnership.
'Our iwi is committed to making this mahi our priority focus, and as our Treaty partner, we expect the Crown to do the same.
'Discussions with these agencies so far have been positive and supportive of our hapū-led approach.'
Settlement Trust Group Chief Executive, Ray Hall, said yesterday's inaugural meeting in Masterton was a significant step for all parties.
'We are encouraged by the shared willingness to explore practical initiatives that will start to make a real difference for whānau who are facing serious deprivation in our communities,' Mr Hall said.
'Our goal is to enable our whānau to thrive in their daily lives, across all areas of hauora including health, education, employment, income, housing and cultural connection.'
Mr Hall said that the overarching strategy is expected to be developed over the coming months and finalised later this year.
Notes:
Ngāti Kahungunu ki Wairarapa Tāmaki-nui-a-Rua are mana whenua iwi of the Wairarapa and Tāmaki-nui-a-Rua (Dannevirke) regions. Their rohe (tribal area) extends from Turakirae in the south, to the headwaters of the Manawatū Awa in the Ruahine Ranges in the North, to Poroporo at Cape Turnagain on the eastern coast.
Ngāti Kahungunu ki Wairarapa Tāmaki-nui-a-Rua Settlement Trust is the Post-Settlement Governance Entity (PSGE) responsible for receiving and administering settlement assets on behalf of the iwi. www.kkwtnr.org.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Taranaki Regional Councillors Urged To Quit Election Over Treaty Principles Fiasco
Article – RNZ Councillors involved in quashing debate over the Treaty Principles Bill at the Taranaki Regional Council have received a dressing down at a fiery meeting. , Taranaki Whanganui regional correspondent Councillors involved in quashing debate over the Treaty Principles Bill at the Taranaki Regional Council have received a dressing down at a fiery meeting in Stratford. Council was considering a report which found councillors colluded not to make a submission on the bill and halt debate. New Plymouth District Councillor Dinnie Moeahu – whose deputation was shunted down the agenda in December – addressed council today in front of whanau and supporters. 'What unfolded that day was absolutely disgusting and shameful. I witnessed some elected members bully their way to getting what they wanted. 'And now your conduct has been extensively investigated, documented, reviewed and condemned and made public for the world to see.' He said what happened was not just a breach of process, but a breach of trust and the fundamental democratic and cultural responsibilities the TRC was obligated to uphold. Moeahu said a submission prepared by TRC which expressed concern about the Treaty Principles Bill was abruptly dismissed without discussion. 'Let's not mince words that was not governance, that was cowardice hiding behind collusion.' He said the offending councillors attempt to brush-off their actions as a miscommunication didn't wash with him. 'I was met with contempt, I was made to feel less.' Moeahu said the TRC had statuary obligations to take the Treaty of Waitangi into account and it had partnering with Māori explicitly enshrined as a strategic priority in its long-term plan. 'This isn't a training issue. It's an absolute failure in governance. When elected members treat Treaty matters as too political or not appropriate you betray your role.' He hoped the point of reckoning the report represented could be a turning point for the TRC. 'Leadership is a privilege you have been afforded… do better Taranaki Regional Council.' Dinnie Moeahu's father Peter – an iwi appointee to the council's Policy and Planning Committee – also made a deputation and took aim at councillors by name. 'People who spout democracy but connive behind closed doors to suppress it. 'People like councillor (Tom) Cloke, councillor Donald McIntrye and councillor (Neil) Walker who used their privilege position to bully the regional council chair and chief executive into submission at the December 10 meeting.' Peter Moeahu said whether the councillors adopted the report or not he would not trust them or forgive them for how they treated his son. He called on them to withdraw from the local government elections. 'Our community deserves better, our community deserves people who are open-minded, environmentally focussed … and willing to have a meaningful and open relationship with hapū, iwi and manuwhenua. 'My recommendation? Withdraw from the ballot.' At the closing of his deputation, the Moeahu whānau performed an impassioned haka. Council chief executive Steve Ruru then spoke briefly to the report which he authored. He reminded the council of its findings that the Treaty Principles Bill was relevant to TRC business and to make a submission and debate it appropriately. 'One of the big learnings coming out of this is that process issue again which is highlighted in there and obviously there are a range of recommendations made.' Taranaki Māori Constituency councillor Bonita Bingham believed council had underestimated 'the impact of the trampling of our mana' events of December had for Māori. 'I really thank Peter and Dinnie for their kōrero today because their words expressed what many of us are feeling. 'I would like all councillors to deeply reflect on the actions and collusion and predetermination that lead to the decision on December 10. 'This was no miscommunication this was a deliberate attempt to squash our voice.' After sitting in stoney silence Donald McIntyre was the only one of the three councillors directly under fire to speak during the meeting. 'Obviously I've upset some people with my actions and I'm sorry they feel aggrieved.' McIntyre acknowledge that it was correct the Treaty Principles Bill submission was on the December agenda. But he said if Dinnie Moeahu being shunted down the agenda was a problem someone should have raised it at the time. 'I have yet to see any reference of standing orders being breached and like I say if they were they weren't highlighted at the time.' McIntyre believed the procedures used on the day were appropriate and democratic because they were all voted on in an open meeting. 'Morally we may have been better to have discussed the item that is probably something we can reflect on in the future, but I still stand by the decision we made at the time.' McIntyre said iwi council relations had not been set back significantly 'there hasn't been a good relationship in the first instance'. That fired up councillor Susan Hughes. 'I find it extraordinary that you are sitting here today trying to justify what wasn't in fact and never could be justified. 'You set out to exclude myself and councillor Bingham from being involved in any of this. That was the plan and that was the plan that was executed. 'You undermined the integrity of this organisation by behaving as you did.' Council voted to adopt the report and all its recommendations with McIntyre voting against the motion. Following the meeting, Walker said he would not be withdrawing from the local government elections in October. 'I think we're done with this. We've done our thing and we'd like to draw a conclusion over it and put it aside.' He denied any collusion had ever occurred. 'As far as I'm concerned there was no meetings or any of those things. There was discussion at meetings like today but not meetings.' Walker was not inclined to apologise. 'What for?' Cloke declined to comment on whether he would pull out of the election race. McIntyre was not standing for re-election. He accepted councillors had colluded ahead of the December meeting. 'What's new about that? Of course we did, like I say, when we elect a chairman we collude before the meeting, is there something wrong with that.' McIntyre made an apology of sorts.
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Taranaki Regional Councillors Urged To Quit Election Over Treaty Principles Fiasco
Councillors involved in quashing debate over the Treaty Principles Bill at the Taranaki Regional Council have received a dressing down at a fiery meeting in Stratford. Council was considering a report which found councillors colluded not to make a submission on the bill and halt debate. New Plymouth District Councillor Dinnie Moeahu - whose deputation was shunted down the agenda in December - addressed council today in front of whanau and supporters. "What unfolded that day was absolutely disgusting and shameful. I witnessed some elected members bully their way to getting what they wanted. "And now your conduct has been extensively investigated, documented, reviewed and condemned and made public for the world to see." He said what happened was not just a breach of process, but a breach of trust and the fundamental democratic and cultural responsibilities the TRC was obligated to uphold. Moeahu said a submission prepared by TRC which expressed concern about the Treaty Principles Bill was abruptly dismissed without discussion. "Let's not mince words that was not governance, that was cowardice hiding behind collusion." He said the offending councillors attempt to brush-off their actions as a miscommunication didn't wash with him. "I was met with contempt, I was made to feel less." Moeahu said the TRC had statuary obligations to take the Treaty of Waitangi into account and it had partnering with Māori explicitly enshrined as a strategic priority in its long-term plan. "This isn't a training issue. It's an absolute failure in governance. When elected members treat Treaty matters as too political or not appropriate you betray your role." He hoped the point of reckoning the report represented could be a turning point for the TRC. "Leadership is a privilege you have been afforded... do better Taranaki Regional Council." Dinnie Moeahu's father Peter - an iwi appointee to the council's Policy and Planning Committee - also made a deputation and took aim at councillors by name. "People who spout democracy but connive behind closed doors to suppress it. "People like councillor (Tom) Cloke, councillor Donald McIntrye and councillor (Neil) Walker who used their privilege position to bully the regional council chair and chief executive into submission at the December 10 meeting." Peter Moeahu said whether the councillors adopted the report or not he would not trust them or forgive them for how they treated his son. He called on them to withdraw from the local government elections. "Our community deserves better, our community deserves people who are open-minded, environmentally focussed ... and willing to have a meaningful and open relationship with hapū, iwi and manuwhenua. "My recommendation? Withdraw from the ballot." At the closing of his deputation, the Moeahu whānau performed an impassioned haka. Council chief executive Steve Ruru then spoke briefly to the report which he authored. He reminded the council of its findings that the Treaty Principles Bill was relevant to TRC business and to make a submission and debate it appropriately. "One of the big learnings coming out of this is that process issue again which is highlighted in there and obviously there are a range of recommendations made." Taranaki Māori Constituency councillor Bonita Bingham believed council had underestimated "the impact of the trampling of our mana" events of December had for Māori. "I really thank Peter and Dinnie for their kōrero today because their words expressed what many of us are feeling. "I would like all councillors to deeply reflect on the actions and collusion and predetermination that lead to the decision on December 10. "This was no miscommunication this was a deliberate attempt to squash our voice." After sitting in stoney silence Donald McIntyre was the only one of the three councillors directly under fire to speak during the meeting. "Obviously I've upset some people with my actions and I'm sorry they feel aggrieved." McIntyre acknowledge that it was correct the Treaty Principles Bill submission was on the December agenda. But he said if Dinnie Moeahu being shunted down the agenda was a problem someone should have raised it at the time. "I have yet to see any reference of standing orders being breached and like I say if they were they weren't highlighted at the time." McIntyre believed the procedures used on the day were appropriate and democratic because they were all voted on in an open meeting. "Morally we may have been better to have discussed the item that is probably something we can reflect on in the future, but I still stand by the decision we made at the time." McIntyre said iwi council relations had not been set back significantly "there hasn't been a good relationship in the first instance". That fired up councillor Susan Hughes. "I find it extraordinary that you are sitting here today trying to justify what wasn't in fact and never could be justified. "You set out to exclude myself and councillor Bingham from being involved in any of this. That was the plan and that was the plan that was executed. "You undermined the integrity of this organisation by behaving as you did." Council voted to adopt the report and all its recommendations with McIntyre voting against the motion. Following the meeting, Walker said he would not be withdrawing from the local government elections in October. "I think we're done with this. We've done our thing and we'd like to draw a conclusion over it and put it aside." He denied any collusion had ever occurred. "As far as I'm concerned there was no meetings or any of those things. There was discussion at meetings like today but not meetings." Walker was not inclined to apologise. "What for?" Cloke declined to comment on whether he would pull out of the election race. McIntyre was not standing for re-election. He accepted councillors had colluded ahead of the December meeting. "What's new about that? Of course we did, like I say, when we elect a chairman we collude before the meeting, is there something wrong with that." McIntyre made an apology of sorts. "I apologise to Bonita (Bingham) and Susan (Hughes) for not discussing it (the submission) but I have not further grounds to apologise."
The Spinoff
2 days ago
- The Spinoff
NZOA has saved reality TV and soaps – what about all the shows left to die?
NZ on Air is confronting a very uncomfortable question: what to save, and what to leave behind. Funding announcements from NZ on Air are not typically newsworthy in and of themselves. The agency functions as a local version of the BBC, but instead of existing as a non-commercial umbrella brand, it funds a variety of media which runs across a wide range of largely commercial mediums and platforms. Funded work often consists of a mix of returning shows and new projects, which are either predictable (another season of Q+A, or a fresh David Lomas project) or largely unknown (another murder in rural New Zealand, cast tbc). The most recent round was strikingly different, making news in a way which reveals challenges to the agency's model, and shows just how bad the choices are for NZ on Air now. Three very familiar shows collectively received more than $5m in funding. They are Shortland Street, Celebrity Treasure Island and The Traitors NZ. All are broad in their appeal and comparatively popular. Yet none would have been considered good candidates for funding until very recently. That's because NZ on Air was set up to address a market failure. Due to our small population, some forms of 'programming reflecting New Zealand identity and culture' (according to its legislation) are not commercially viable. The legislation makes specific reference to 'drama and documentary', with everything else somewhat in the eye of the beholder. For decades that meant scripted shows (such as comedy and drama) were NZ on Air's core business, while most other formats (from current affairs to breakfast TV) were commercially funded, due to TV networks being able to sell enough ads to make them on their own terms. That didn't mean it lacked value, just that it didn't need the support. News is the canonical example of a commercially funded genre – TVNZ's 6pm bulletin remains among the highest-rated shows on television, despite costing a bomb to make. Reality TV wasn't even a genre when NZ on Air was founded, and the agency has tended to be fairly circumspect in its funding of it over the years, only getting involved when, as with Match Fit, or Popstars, it fulfilled another worthy goal. Shortland Street, our only true soap, was briefly funded as a kind of TV startup, but cranked along under its own steam for decades afterwards. This was helpful because reality TV and soaps are considered less intellectually nutritious by the kind of people who care about the culture we fund. The end of that era This has not been an uncontested idea. Critics, including those at The Spinoff, and the makers of reality TV have long felt that NZ on Air was too prescriptive in its definition of 'reflecting New Zealand identity and culture'. They believe that reality TV and soaps are popular, show a diverse range of New Zealanders and bring voices, vernacular and perspectives to our screens, just as scripted comedy and drama do. This past week, they won the argument. Shortland Street has returned for a second funded season, after last year accessing two different strands of public funding to stay on air. More striking was the return of The Traitors NZ and Celebrity Treasure Island, two shows which had previously been commercially funded. Celebrity Treasure Island is a revival of an '00s-era format, and has drawn praise for its use of Te Reo Māori and addressing 'complex issues like ageism, sexism and queer politics, all on primetime mainstream television', according to my colleague Tara Ward. The Traitors NZ is a hit local version of a smash international format, with a diverse cast and a strong strain of New Zealand-specific humour. In addition to the cultural arguments, there's also a broader systems-level case for their funding. The shows have consistently rated strongly, particularly with the kind of middle-aged audiences which have abandoned linear television over the past decade. The thinking goes that by keeping these tentpole shows on our screens, you also help keep our networks and production companies viable. The path not taken Despite the solid arguments in favour, there remains a case against, too. To contemplate it, you only need to cast your mind back to a little over a year ago. It was a bonfire of the journalists. We lost longform current affairs stalwart Sunday, the venerable consumer rights show Fair Go, the magazine-style 7pm staple The Project and, most wrenchingly, the whole Newshub operation, all in the space of a few harrowing months. The death of those shows was attributed to the awful financial equation facing TV networks. That despite all rating very strongly, at least by comparison to the rest of the schedule, none could justify the investment required to keep them running. It was a shocking, visceral event, one which made New Zealand a cautionary tale across the Tasman – the country you need to look hard at to figure out how to avoid its fate. Now, a year on, and NZ on Air has been persuaded by the arguments of TVNZ and Three, that these reality TV and soap formats are too important to be allowed to die. To be clear, none of Shortland Street, Celebrity Treasure Island or The Traitors NZ is fully funded. The budgets aren't public, but production industry sources suggest the agency's investment would cover no more than 50% of the associated costs, and perhaps considerably less. Still, the risk of moral hazard is clear. The networks and production companies have established that no show is beyond help, and as audiences decline, there is a manifest case for continually topping up the public funding component of budgets. The implication is that paradoxically, as they get less popular and ad revenue declines, they should receive more help. None of which is to say these decisions are wrong in isolation. But looking at the slate of what we publicly fund now, we seem a long way from home. Pulpy true crime documentaries, reality TV shows with large chunks devoted to selling McDonalds, regularly re-named shows built around the interests of a single comedian. Still, what else can we do? Linear TV audience decline is a global phenomenon, and no public or private broadcaster has successfully ported their audiences across to digital at the same scale as they once had, let alone been able to defend the same advertising revenues. NZ on Air faces bad choices everywhere as it seeks to fulfil its mission and defend its model. It may not have even been given the chance to save the news. But as we slip gently into a new era, where everything which can be argued can be funded, it's important to remember the shows we didn't save too. And ask whether the foundational mission of NZ on Air is better served by what we kept, or what we threw away.
