
1 No-Brainer S&P 500 Vanguard ETF to Buy Right Now for Less Than $1,000
The S&P 500 index is, without a doubt, the most closely watched stock market barometer on the planet. It contains some 500 large and profitable businesses listed on U.S. stock exchanges. Combined, they represent about 80% of the entire stock market capitalization.
Investors who want exposure to the index don't need to look far to find a compelling exchange-traded fund (ETF) to add to their portfolio. In fact, there's one that deserves some attention. Here's why the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO) is a no-brainer buy for someone who might have less than $1,000 of money to put to work in the stock market.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
Instant diversification for your portfolio
As mentioned, this ETF contains 500 stocks, so investors gain exposure to all sectors of the economy -- from information technology and financials to materials and real estate. This means there is a diverse range of businesses and industries included in the portfolio.
At the end of the day, this ETF can be viewed as a bet on the ongoing ingenuity of the American economy and some of the hottest trends -- and this includes artificial intelligence (AI). Some of the ETF's top positions are in companies like Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia, all of which are focused on AI-related initiatives to fortify their competitive positions.
The ETF's sponsor, Vanguard, is one of the most highly regarded asset management firms in the industry. It's been around since 1975. As of the end of last year, it had eclipsed $10 trillion in assets under management, which goes to show you the amount of trust that so many investors (and so much capital) have in the business.
The numbers are hard to ignore
Warren Buffett, who has an unbelievable track record handling capital allocation and running Berkshire Hathaway, suggests that a low-cost ETF like the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF is the best investment option for most people out there. It's hard to beat an expense ratio of just 0.03%.
That's pennies compared to the exorbitant fees you see active fund managers charge. A typical hedge fund charges its clients both a management fee and a performance fee. This can significantly eat away at returns over time. Even so, a good chunk of these so-called experts struggles to outperform the S&P 500 over long stretches of time.
Because the S&P 500 has put up better returns than its historical average of 10% per year, it's no wonder the professionals are having a hard time. Just in the past decade, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF has generated a total return of 232%, which would've turned a $1,000 initial investment into $3,300 today.
It's all about mindset
Even though the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF has produced such a great return, it doesn't necessarily mean that investors have achieved that same performance in their own portfolios. It's easy to fall victim to our emotions, with the goal of successfully trying to time the market, forcing us to trade too frequently, resulting in more damage being done.
This is why it's critical to fixate on the next decade and beyond with your investments instead of the next month or year. The stock market rewards those who are patient and disciplined, even in the face of extreme bouts of volatility, like what we experienced earlier in 2025.
It's impossible to say whether or not the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF will repeat its past decade's performance between now and 2035. However, I'm sure that long-term investors will end up with a very favorable result.
Should you invest $1,000 in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF right now?
Before you buy stock in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025
Neil Patel has positions in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
31 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Better Artificial Intelligence Stock: Nvidia vs. AMD
Even with new export controls cutting off a vital market in China, demand for advanced chips used to power artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure remains high. While there is a growing market for custom AI chips, the most commonly used chips for running AI workloads are graphics processing units (GPUs). This name stems from the fact that these chips were originally designed to speed up graphics rendering in video games. Due to their powerful processing speeds, GPUs are now used for a variety of high-power computing tasks, such as training large language models (LLMs) and running AI inference. The GPU market is basically a duopoly at this point, headed by Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ: AMD). The question many investors ask, though, is: Which stock is the better buy? Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » The leader versus the challenger The unquestioned leader in the GPU space is Nvidia, which commands an over 80% market share. Not only is Nvidia larger than AMD, but it's also been growing its data center revenue more quickly. Last quarter, Nvidia grew its data center revenue by 73% to $39.1 billion, while AMD's data center revenue jumped 57% to $3.7 billion. Nvidia's advantage comes from its software platform, CUDA. It launched the free software platform all the way back in 2006 as a way to let developers program its GPUs for different tasks in an effort to expand beyond the video game market. The company pushed the use of the software to universities and research labs, which made it the software program upon which developers were taught to program GPUs. While AMD made some half-hearted efforts with software, it didn't launch a true CUDA competitor until around 10 years later with ROCm. By that time, CUDA had already become the default software used to program GPUs, and ROCm was still behind with less hardware support, limited documentation, and more difficulty to install and use. Meanwhile, Nvidia has since expanded upon its software lead through a collection of AI-specific libraries and tools built on top of CUDA, called CUDA X, which helps bolster the performance of its chips for AI tasks. Ultimately, CUDA has given Nvidia a big network effect advantage. The more CUDA is used, the more tools and libraries are built for it, making Nvidia GPUs all the stickier. While ROCm continues to improve, it still trails CUDA, especially for use in LLM training. However, where AMD has been able to gain more traction is in AI inference. Training AI models is a much more difficult task, which is why Nvidia has dominated this market and where its CUDA advantage really shines through. Inference, on the other hand, is easier, and there is more of a focus on things such as latency, power consumption, and cost. Due to its competitive positioning, AMD's GPUs tend to be less expensive than those from Nvidia, and while its ROCm software trails CUDA, it is generally considered good enough for running most AI inference workloads. The good thing for AMD is that the inference market is eventually expected to become the much larger of the two markets. In fact, some pundits, including venture capitalist and former Facebook executive Chamath Palihapitiya, have said the inference market could be up to 100 times larger than the market for training AI models. But whether the inference market becomes 2 times bigger or 100 times than the training market, AMD could have an opportunity to gain some market share. Which stock is the better buy? When it comes to valuation, both stocks trade in a similar range. Nvidia has a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of just over 32 times this year's analyst estimates, while AMD is at 28 times. Nvidia, meanwhile, is growing its revenue more quickly. With their valuations similar, the key factor to which stock will outperform in the coming years will largely come down to growth. Nvidia is the clear leader in the GPU space and should continue to see strong growth as the AI infrastructure buildout continues. However, its AI data center revenue is now 10 times that of AMD. so the law of large numbers can come into play. As AI infrastructure begins to shift more toward inference, AMD should have a nice opportunity to take some market share. Nvidia still has the lead in inference, but the gap is narrower compared to training. AMD also doesn't need to take a lot a of share in what could be a rapidly growing market to really make a big difference off its much smaller AI data center revenue base. As such, there is a good possibility it could begin to grow more quickly than the much bigger Nvidia. If that happens, I think its stock will outperform. Ultimately, investors can own both stocks, which is probably a good idea. With AI infrastructure spending still appearing to be in its early days, both should be winners, although I do think AMD has more potential upside. The biggest risk, meanwhile, would be if AI spending unexpectedly starts to slow. Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Geoffrey Seiler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Globe and Mail
31 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
To prevent blackouts, Trump administration keeps another aging power plant online through summer
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — The U.S. Department of Energy has ordered another power plant, this time an oil and gas plant in Pennsylvania, to keep its turbines running through the hottest summer months as a precaution against electricity shortfalls in the 13-state mid-Atlantic grid. The department's order to the grid operator, PJM Interconnection, regarding the Eddystone power plant just south of Philadelphia on the Delaware River, is the department's second use of federal power under President Donald Trump to require a power plant to keep operating on the mainland United States. Constellation Energy had planned to shut down Eddystone's units 3 and 4 on Saturday, but Trump's Department of Energy ordered the company to continue operating the units until at least Aug. 28. The units can produce a combined 760 megawatts. The department, in its order, cited PJM's growing concerns about power shortfalls amid the shutdown of aging power plants and rising electricity demand. PJM has projected significant growth in electricity use to power America's fast-rising demand for artificial intelligence and cloud computing platforms. Demand for electricity has spiked for the first time in decades. In addition to artificial intelligence, crypto mining, the broader electrification of society and bipartisan political pressure to bring manufacturing back to the U.S. are fueling new electricity demand. PJM last year approved Constellation's request to shut down the units, but it welcomed the department's order to keep them operating, saying it's a 'prudent, term-limited step' that allows PJM, the department and Constellation to study the longer-term need and viability of Eddystone's units. In a statement Monday, Constellation said it is 'pleased' to work with the department and PJM and is taking emergency measures to meet the need for power 'at this critical time when America must win the AI race.' It also said it is trying to accelerate its restart of Three Mile Island 's Unit 1 to bring it online in 2027, instead of in 2028, as part of a deal to supply data centers run by tech giant Microsoft with carbon-free energy. PJM, based in Pennsylvania, earlier this year won federal approval to fast-track the construction of new power plants that critics said would favor natural gas plants over clean energy projects that don't emit planet-warming greenhouse gases. PJM has said a power shortage could affect the grid as early as 2026 as demand grows for electricity at the same time that aging coal-fired plants and nuclear plants are retiring. Clean energy advocates blame PJM for creating the existing reliability problem by taking an unduly long time to study proposed wind and solar energy projects in its project queue. Proposals awaiting PJM's approval are more than 97% solar, wind or battery storage, according to federal figures. Less than 3% are natural gas. The department took a similar step last week, ordering Consumers Energy to keep the J.H. Campbell coal-fired power plant open in Michigan past its Saturday retirement. The grid operator there, the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, said the order was unnecessary, that there was no energy emergency there and that there should be enough energy in the region through the summer. An environmental advocacy group, the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, criticized the move to keep Eddystone operating as an "environmental injustice." Shutting down the units would reduce hazardous pollution and carbon emissions from the decades-old facility and help the region meet federal clean air standards for smog, it said. ___

CTV News
32 minutes ago
- CTV News
Iranian official says U.S. nuclear proposal is ‘incoherent and disjointed,' as sources warn talks momentum is collapsing
A senior Iranian official told CNN the new nuclear deal proposal presented to Tehran in recent days is 'incoherent and disjointed,' as sources familiar with the progress of the talks said the momentum behind negotiations to secure a new deal appears to be collapsing. The private pessimism contrasts with U.S. President Donald Trump's public optimism last week that the administration was 'very close to a solution.' CNN has also learned that the US has shifted position on the issue of uranium enrichment in the new proposal, in comparison to what officials had said publicly. It suggests the US could invest in Iran's civilian nuclear power program and join a consortium that would oversee the enrichment of low-level uranium inside of Iran for an unspecified amount of time. That consortium is expected to include Middle Eastern nations and the UN's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. Previously, senior US officials have said no enrichment inside Iran could take place under a new deal, and top US officials demanded that Iran stop enrichment and only import the material – a suggestion Tehran firmly rejected. The prospect of allowing continued low-level enrichment in the country would likely enrage Iran hawks in the US and Israel and hearkens back to the 2015 nuclear deal, from which Trump withdrew. However later Monday, Trump said that the Iran deal will not allow uranium enrichment. 'Under our potential Agreement — WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM,' the president wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform. Iranian officials have repeatedly said that they are open to the idea of an enrichment consortium but have insisted Iran must be able to keep control of its own enrichment capabilities. The senior Iranian official on Monday denounced the new proposal, saying that at 'at first glance, is assessed as incoherent and disjointed, very unrealistic, and with excessive demands.' They argued that the primary barrier to progress was the US' inconsistency. 'The fact that the Americans constantly change their positions has so far been the main obstacle to the success of the talks and now makes the work more difficult than ever,' the official added. The official also alleged the latest text directly contradicts prior understandings. 'The text is clearly in conflict with the latest agreement reached during the fifth round of negotiations,' the official stated. They reaffirmed Tehran's uncompromising stance on a critical issue, saying, 'Iran's position on enrichment is firm and steadfast.' Iran and the United States concluded a fifth round of high-stakes nuclear talks in Rome on May 23 amid growing skepticism in Tehran about the chances of a deal. After that round of talks, the two sides 'agreed to meet again in the near future,' a US senior administration official said at the time. Now, however, the next round of talks is very uncertain and may not happen at all, the sources familiar said.