
I'm an American working at a retail store in Australia. A customer got offended when I greeted her - what did I do wrong?
An American woman working at a retail store in Queensland has sparked a fierce debate after a customer abruptly shut her down for using the word 'darling' in a routine greeting.
The employee, who works at a jewellery store in a busy shopping mall, said she was left stunned after addressing a female shopper with a friendly: 'Hey darling! How are you doing today?'
But instead of the warm reply she expected, the customer fired back: 'Please don't call me that.'
Confused, the worker asked the customer what she meant, only to be told: 'Just say, "Hi, how are you?" But don't call me "darling".'
'I've been at this job for almost a year and never had any issues with addressing another woman this way, which is why I was surprised,' she wrote on Reddit.
'I am always warm and friendly and aim to make my customers feel welcome and have a great experience. I will try to change how I address my customers from now on.'
The interaction left both the retail assistant and her colleague speechless.
'Needless to say, both the girl working with me and I stood there mostly stunned that she reacted like this,' the employee explained.
'Is this normal? Do most Aussies (particularly women) despise being called something like love, hun or sweetie... you get the drift... when stopping at a shop?'
The post sparked an avalanche of responses, with many Australians revealing they find terms like 'darling', 'love', 'hun' and 'sweetie' awkward or even patronising - especially when used by strangers.
'I wouldn't react that way, but I'd be internally thinking the exact same thing,' one person admitted.
'Unless you're an older woman in the country, I find it really off-putting. I've walked out of shops because of it,' said another.
However, many said they would be fine with being called 'darling' - as long as it came from an elderly woman.
'I would only be okay with "darling" from a sweet older lady. Anyone else and it's going to come across as condescending or creepy,' one said.
'Being called "darling" by a little old lady is totally different to being called that by a middle aged guy. Its also depends on the vibe you're giving off. In my experience of far too many years in customer service, 90 per cent of the time someone calls me darling it's uncomfortable or awkward,' another shared.
'As someone who worked in retail I think it's always safest to stick with "Hi, how are you?" or variations on it. I would expect darling or love from older women in rural areas, but apart from that... I would feel a bit weird being greeted like that,' one said.
'I always find it cringe as f*** when anyone who's not a 70-year-old (or older) lady calls me "darl",' another added.
Others shared their own horror stories, including one person who recalled a male customer demanding to be called 'sir' instead of 'mate'.
But some leapt to the defence of the worker, saying terms of endearment were simply a cultural norm - especially in more casual settings.
'I work in hospitality and I say "darling" all the time. It's just part of how we talk here,' one suggested.
The discussion touches on a broader issue currently dividing Australian shoppers and retail workers alike - the state of customer service.
Earlier this year, Melbourne woman Tasha Strachan went viral for lamenting the lack of basic courtesy in stores, after being completely ignored in three separate shops.
'Does no one care about customer service these days?' she asked in a video.
'Not one person asked, 'Can I help you with anything today?' Not one.'
Tasha previously told FEMAIL she wasn't expecting over-the-top attention - just a simple 'hello'.
'To me, that's customer service. Having worked in both retail and hospitality myself, I guess that's why I'm so shocked when I don't get what I would've given if I were still working in those roles,' she said.
But not everyone agreed.
One retail worker commented: 'I'm paid to do my job, not paid to care. If you don't look like you need help, I'm not going to offer it. I have a job to do.'
Others argued that customers often send mixed signals.
'I hate being asked if I need help - just leave me to shop in peace. But don't ignore me entirely,' one person wrote.
The result? A confusing etiquette minefield where even the most well-meaning 'darling' can be taken the wrong way.
Still, many agree that a basic greeting is the bare minimum - just without the pet names.
'Say hi, how are you?' That's all. It's not hard,' one shopper said.
As for the Queensland retail worker, she says she'll be more cautious with her greetings from now on.
'Lesson learned. But I still don't think I was being rude - just friendly,' she wrote.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
23 minutes ago
- Times
Cut parking for second cars to make room for e-bikes, says rental firm
Act now to keep your subscription We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.


Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Wes Streeting must transform Britain's crippled health services
Act now to keep your subscription We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Captain Cook's lost ship is FOUND after 250 years: Scientists discover the sunken remains of HMS Endeavour in Newport Harbor
The final resting place of Captain Cook's Endeavour, the legendary ship that first brought the British to Australia, has been identified after 250 years. Between 1768 and 1771, the Endeavour became the first European vessel to reach Eastern Australia and circumnavigate New Zealand 's main islands. Yet while James Cook was established as one of history's most famous explorers, his ship faded into obscurity, becoming a troop transport. She was then sold in 1775, renamed the Lord Sandwich, and finally scuttled off the US coast in 1778, during the American War of Independence. Now the sunken remains of the Endeavour have been found in Newport Harbor, Rhode Island, after experts formally identified her with a wreck called RI 2394. The verdict was announced by the Australian National Maritime Museum (ANMM) in a new report, bringing 25 years of study to a close with a 'definitive statement'. Museum director Daryl Karp said: 'This final report is the culmination of 25 years of detailed and meticulous archaeological study on this important vessel. 'It has involved underwater investigation in the US and extensive research in institutions across the globe. Between 1768 and 1771, the Endeavour became the first European vessel to reach Eastern Australia and circumnavigate New Zealand 's main islands 'This final report marks our definitive statement on the project.' Experts reached their conclusion after comparing the sunken ship with historical plans of the Endeavour. They discovered timbers whose placement corresponds exactly with the locations of Endeavour's main and fore masts. Measurements from the wreck also correlated with those taken during a 1768 survey of Cook's ship. Furthermore, analysis of the wood revealed it had European origins, consistent with records of the Endeavour being repaired in 1776, several years after the expedition. Collectively they represented a 'preponderance of evidence' that the Newport wreck was indeed the Endeavour. ANMM archaeologist, Kieran Hosty, said: 'The timbers are British timbers. 'The size of all the timber scantlings are almost identical to Endeavour, and I'm talking within millimetres – not inches, but millimetres. HMS Endeavour The HMS Endeavour was a British research vessel sailed by Captain James Cook. Cook left England in Endeavour in 1768 in search of Australia - the 'unknown Southern Land'. It was a small ship - less than 100ft long - and housed a crew of around 100 sailors. Before coming to Australia, Captain Cook reached New Zealand in 1769. He circumnavigated New Zealand's North and South Islands and drew the first complete chart of the country's coast. Endeavour was the first ship to reach the East Coast of Australia, landing in Botany Bay in 1770. The vessel returned to England in 1771 and was largely forgotten before it was sold in 1775 and renamed The Lord Sandwich. Source: Australian National Maritime Museum 'The stem scarf is identical, absolutely identical. This stem scarf is also a very unique feature – we've gone through a whole bunch of 18th-century ships plans, and we can't find anything else like it.' The findings could prove controversial however; when ANMM released a preliminary report in 2022 identifying RI 2394 as the Endeavour, their research partners at the Rhode Island Marine Archaeology Project (RIMAP) pushed back. In a statement, RIMAP asserted that they were the lead organisation for the study, and that the finding was both 'premature' and a 'breach of contract' – but ANMM experts have seen enough. Archaeologist James Hunter said: 'The Lord Sandwich was intentionally scuttled – it was sunk on purpose as a block ship. 'The chances of finding artifacts that would provide an immediate identification, such as a bell, were very unlikely. And that's because anything that was of value would have been stripped out of that ship before it was sunk. 'But what has been recovered up to this point is indicative of an 18th-century time frame.' Mr Hosty added: 'We'll never find anything on this site that screams Endeavour. You'll never find a sign saying 'Cook was here'. 'We will never see a ship's bell with Endeavour crossed out and Lord Sandwich inscribed on it. 'We've got a whole series of things pointing to RI 2394 as being HMB Endeavour. The Endeavour was a small ship - less than 100ft long - and housed a crew of around 100 sailors 'And so far we found lots of things that tick the box for it to be Endeavour and nothing on the site which says it's not.' Only around 15 per cent of the vessel remains with researchers now focused on what can be done to protect and preserve it. In a statement, ANMM acknowledged RIMAP's 'fine historical analysis and detailed artifact recording'. The statement continued: 'We acknowledge that RIMAP continues to accept that RI 2394 may be Endeavour, but they are not ruling out other candidate shipwreck sites.' Ms Karp also acknowledged the work of the ANMM archaeological team, of Dr Kathy Abass in Rhode Island, and of the Rhode Island authorities. RIMAP has been contacted for comment. How do we know that Endeavour has been found? Historical evidence tells us that five vessels were deliberately sunk by the British in 1778, just north of Goat Island in Newport Harbor. One of them was Lord Sandwich - previously known as James Cook's Endeavour. Four shipwreck sites have been found in this small area, including RI 2394. Therefore, one of these four wrecks is highly likely to be Endeavour. All five ships were deliberately sunk - 'scuttled' - by cutting holes in their hulls. There is clear archaeological evidence of scuttling holes in the surviving hull timbers of RI 2394. This confirms that it was one of the vessels sunk in 1778. We know from archival documents that Lord Sandwich (Endeavour) was the largest of the five ships sunk in this location. Archaeological evidence confirms that RI 2394 is much larger than any of the other eighteenth century shipwrecks in the area. Archaeologists have been able to measure the length of a large section of the shipwreck RI 2394. Its length almost perfectly matches the dimensions shown on historic Royal Navy plans for Endeavour. Many other details of the shipwreck RI 2394, right down to the size of specific pieces of timber used in its construction, closely match historic plans for Endeavour. Known as 'scantlings', these measurements also confirm that RI 2394 was the same size (tonnage) as Endeavour. Endeavour was originally built to carry coal. The shipbuilder used some techniques that were quite uncommon in the eighteenth century. One of these was a form of joint in the bow (front) of the vessel, known as a scarph. Archaeologists have found this very rare scarph joint in the bow of RI 2394. The overall shape and layout of the shipwreck RI 2394 also closely matches historic plans of Endeavour. This includes its very flat bottom and the places where the masts were located. These are important diagnostic clues in confirming the identity of the Endeavour wreck. Finally, while some of the ships sunk in Newport Harbor in 1778 were constructed in America, Endeavour was built in Britain. Timber samples taken with permission from RI 2394 have confirmed that it is made of British or European timbers.